User talk:M4gnum0n

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|M4gnum0n}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, M4gnum0n, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yacht no 1 (hydrogen)

reason given. Cheers Mion (talk) 12:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a question for you on Talk:Yacht no 1 (hydrogen), i can't follow the placing of the template. Mion (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deadlinked citations

I reverted your changes to DCV Balder. Citations that are deadlinked should be preserved, as the citation is still valid, it's just the link that isn't. See WP:DEADREF. Thanks!

69.214.14.62

Regarding the question at User talk:Mentifisto:
I believe most Blocked Users/IP's can edit their own talk page (Because they may want to request a unblock using the template).
Limideen 10:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lurking

Navigated to your page, decided to help get you a centijimbo. :) Cheers! Durova³²⁰ 04:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kenji Nagai

I'm not at all clear why you removed the update template from the talk page and from the article. As far as I can tell the article has still not been updated in a year. I'm curious why you wrote in the edit summary, "I think there is nothing more to update now". The template and tag was added because the work has not yet been done. Viriditas (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My fault then, I just thought it was an old template dangling: go on and replace it please. --M4gnum0n (talk) 01:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since you have an interest in the article, perhaps you would like to do some of the work. Because of Nagai's killing, Japan canceled a planned human resources center that was going to be built in Yangon. This is not mentioned in the article. Several sources can be found in the search indexes supporting this statement, including Southeast Asian Affairs (2008:20. ISBN 9812307907) which relies upon the source "Japan decides to cancel grants for Myanmar human resources centre." Kyodo World Service. 16 October 2007. That is only one item that needs to be added. Viriditas (talk) 01:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The story is already told in 2007_Burmese_anti-government_protests#October_16, but the link to the article does not work anymore. You could source it again with the item you cited, linking to Kenji Nagai if the connection is mentioned there.--M4gnum0n (talk) 01:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revisit?

I was wondering if you can revisit your comments here. The FL is seriously lacking in a review. ResMar 13:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't understand what exactly means "revisit your comments". --M4gnum0n (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at it again, see if all the stuff is adressed, look at the article itself again, and either give more comments, or close it as Resolved comments and/or a Support or Oppose. ResMar 21:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously the issue is addressed now, I just didn't know I had to close resolved comments. I have found the right template and have done it now. Cheers, M4gnum0n (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Someone added precious references to VRML and X3D, but was deliberately reverted, which is against WP:VER. Please reinstate these precious references, especially because these precious references are valuable to us:

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.30.142.59 (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--M4gnum0n (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M4gnum0n. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PIIGS/ Image

I’m at loss for words to describe the clearly unconstructive (to use a polite word!) behaviour of DinDraithou: first he kept on vandalizing (“bye bye yet another time”) the paragraph on “Corrective Policies” without which the article would be meaningless….; and now he’s making up faux copyright issues (User Yion has established picture is under 3.0 CC) to justify his erasing a pertinent picture- perfectly illustrative of the content of the article in general & of the paragraph in question... => I’m not an expert with WP protocols: is he allowed to erase the picture definitively after a week, even though there’s no copyright infringement here? Moorehaus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The image is being deleted on a copyright issue and I don't know the relevant "WP protocols" either. His behaviour is, as you note, unconstructive, but tolerable as long as he doesn't breach policy.--M4gnum0n (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback --Moorehaus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

hi

hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi Yddam (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sticky prods

Hi M4gnum0n'! You participated earlier in the sticky prod workshop. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few points of contention.
There are now a few proposals on the table to conclude the process. I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. --Maurreen (talk) 06:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

I am sorry.Will certainly look into the core policy and I assure you that the changes were done in good faith.Thank you