User talk:Akrabbim

Archives

/Archive 1 September 2005—July 2006
/Archive 2 September 2006—November 2009
/Archive 3 December 2009—March 2010

Wikipedia:AWB/Tasks

Hi, can you take care of the tasks over there? --JokerXtreme (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look and see what I can do with the time that I have. I'm surprised that there is a backlog filling - a few weeks ago I had to see the change on my watchlist within a few hours if I didn't want someone else to snatch it up! —Akrabbim^talk 11:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, maybe it's a slow period for Wikipedia. --JokerXtreme (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Another one for you. Could you please change [[Wild Horses (song)|Wild Horses]] to [[Wild Horses (Rolling Stones song)|Wild Horses]]? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Akrabbim^talk 00:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denez Prigent

Do you intend to edit the article again ? No problem if you don't, I'd just like to know. Oyp (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do, though I have been very busy lately and haven't been able to edit much of Wikipedia at all. I have another two or three weeks left in this semester, and after that I should be able to get on here more. It is on my list for when I do pick up my editing again. —Akrabbim^talk 19:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC courtesy notice - succession boxesAs someone who has taken part in previous discussions regarding the use of succession boxes in articles for songs and albums, I'd like to notify you of a request for comment that is taking place at WT:CHARTS#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes. It would be nice to finally come to a resolution on this. If you have already participated in this RFC or do not wish to participate, then please disregard this notice. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]NiceI like it. Much better than my version was. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 18:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]Glad to be of service! —Akrabbim^talk 18:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]Album ratings default stateGreetings, Akrabbim. At Template talk:Album ratings#Width, there is a discussion about several of the default values for the {{Album ratings}} template. Of the several editors who have commented about the "state" parameter, there seems to be agreement that the best default value would be "plain", so that by default the hide and show options are not there. I'm not too familiar with template syntax and parsing. Would you be willing to change the default to "state=plain"? Thanks in advance. — Mudwater^(Talk) 00:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]I've started a separate discussion thread just about this, at Template talk:Album ratings#The best default would be "state=plain". — Mudwater^(Talk) 03:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] After a quick discussion at Template talk:Album ratings#The best default would be "state=plain", I've removed the "state" parameter from the template. Feel free to comment there. And by the way, thanks for your work on the template. — Mudwater^(Talk) 13:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]Nomination for deletion of Template:Album ratings proseTemplate:Album ratings prose has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Muhandes (talk) 21:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]Peter LehmannWhy are you requesting deletion of Peter Lehmann? (I just changed it from a redirect to a disambig with 2 entries though formatting could be improved.) RJFJR (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]I am deleting it so Peter Lehmann (disambiguation) could be moved to its place. This was because I created the disambig page before I moved Peter Lehmann (winemaker) from Peter Lehmann. Same result, different path. Sorry for the confusion. —Akrabbim^talk 15:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] Deleted and moved. RJFJR (talk) 16:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] Ah, you're an admin, nice. Thanks. —Akrabbim^talk 16:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] (ec)I've removed the redirect from Talk:Peter Lehmann to Talk:Peter Lehmann (winemaker), now that Peter Lehmann no longer redirects to Peter Lehmann (winemaker). I'll leave someone else to decide whether Peter Lehmann (author) has appropriate references to secondary sources. At the very least I did feel that Peter Lehmann (winemaker) probably qualified as primary topic. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] I was mostly just responding to the question at WP:HD#There are 2 "Peter Lehmann", but only 1 to find with the search button, and since neither article seemed obviously more popular to me at first glance (I know next to nothing about psychiatry or wine), I guessed that the db page should be at Peter Lehmann. It won't bother me what ends up where in the end; I will also leave that up to someone else to decide :) —Akrabbim^talk 16:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]Talk page/DiscussionThat was not a talk page. The link that you gave me does not apply there. Quest09 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Conversation continued at User talk:Quest09#Reference desk comments. —Akrabbim^talk 21:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]Message for Akrabbimhttp://tehcake.com/video/Withoutatrace/3x12.html That's the website address which shows Without A Trace Season 3 Episode 12 called Penitence. Is it okay for you to watch the Episode called Penitence? YES OR NO.(99.88.78.94 (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]NO, sorry. I'm not really interested in watching this show. Maybe you could look around to see if you can find any fan or general movie/TV forums where you can discuss these shows and movies with other people who have seen them. Wikipedia isn't really the best place to have these conversations. —Akrabbim^talk 23:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]MESSAGECan you please watch Penitence when you get a chance? During the Prison Yard Fight in the Episode called Penitence, I actually believed that MacAvoy broke out of prison but 2 of the guards were bribed to take MacAvoy to the church inside the prison. MacAvoy got murdered by his friend inside the Church.(99.88.78.94 (talk) 07:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]