User talk:Malkinann

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by .

This is Malkinann's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 100 days

Talkback

Hello, Malkinann. You have new messages at Jinnai's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Malkinann. You have new messages at Allen4names's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legends of Vampire Hunter

I noticed that your CSE search query was '"The Legends of Vampire Hunter" -download -scanlations -"read online" -scans -scanlator'. It's not supposed to be necessary to search for anything other than "The Legends of Vampire Hunter".

If you run into queries where the CSE falls all over itself, I'd like to know so I can clean the results. (Sites tend to offend for multiple queries.) Alternately, if you're using it regularly, I could give you access to the whitelist/blacklist - I think I can trust you to ban bad sites and leave alone marginal ones like evageeks.org. --Gwern (contribs) 16:56 28 September 2010 (GMT)

Misato = Sailor Moon?

Ping. --Gwern (contribs) 20:14 28 April 2011 (GMT)

Ping. --Gwern (contribs) 00:35 24 June 2011 (GMT)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Malkinann! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

OR

Article is filled with areas big areas without sources. And there are areas. Providing proof of or to specific areas? There are too many for you not to see them. So if its to vague for you, its probably because it asks for further analysis.Lucia Black (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, Malkinann. You have new messages at Jinnai's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Sailor Moon (English adaptation)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 December 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 17:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, Malkinann. You have new messages at Lucia Black's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request for mediation accepted

The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Sailor Moon (English adaptation), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.

As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 21:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

"Case talk page"

Just to let you know, you completely fubared your link to the talk page of Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation). It should have been to Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation) where I have moved it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also eliminated the various redirects that will be broken because Talk:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation) should have been deleted.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, there's still a link to the deleted page in the "Parties' agreement to mediation" section of the mediation page. I have no idea what all the #IF code is for (and I am not involved in the mediation) so haven't touched it. Shiroi Hane (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to notify

You seem to have been making actions to defend the articles or somewhat change tags that are on the verge of WP:OWN. Anyways....the revert over the name was over clarity when the current isn't anymore clear and made you no attempt to add any assurance of the article's creation for the disambiguation. Overall seems lack of knowledge of naming conventions occurs. (USA) isn't an appropriate form of disambiguation considering the notes say one was originally from canada.Lucia Black (talk) 12:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its very simple...also I been reviewing the article even more carefully and some of the claims don't fit with what the article is saying and some I question their reliability.Lucia Black (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Sailor Moon formal mediation

Hello—Sunray and I will be your mediators. We will be sharing the job of mediation, so anything shared with one of us should be expected to be shared with the other, unless specifically requested otherwise. As you may or may not also know, discussions during formal mediation are privileged, meaning that they cannot be used against you later; for example, if the case is referred to arbitration. This allows participants to speak freely and candidly about the issues.

To start off the case, we've decided to invite participants to share, privately, their perspectives with the mediators, Feezo and Sunray. We'd like to hear your thoughts on what the major issues are, what the ideal result of mediation would be, and what alternatives might be acceptable. Other relevant thoughts are of course welcome. Send these by email with the form at Special:EmailUser/Feezo.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

resource request

Hi Malkinann,

I've got the manga article you requested at the resource exchange. You can find a link to the article on that page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sailor Moon mediation

The issues have recently been updated here. I believe this reflects the issue you wished to add. If you agree, please sign as agreeing. I note that the other participants have all done so. Sunray (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you back from the holidays? If so, would you now be able to signify your agreement (or lack thereof) with the issues? Sunray (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning discussion

We've initiated the discussion for the Sailor Moon mediation here. Sunray (talk) 02:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Katie Holmes

I have nominated Katie Holmes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Brad (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to add the following to the discussion on the featured article review, or even if I'm supposed to, but I'd like to. I know next to nothing about Katie Holmes and am reading this article to find out more about her and her work. And now I still know next to nothing about Katie Holmes.

The article reads like an imitation of People magazine or a film fanzine, filled with genuinely trivial details, for example about her wedding in Italy, or maybe it was a non-wedding, if the Mayor is right (what Mayor and who cares?). I read the article with increasing amazement: nothing about her acting except gossipy quotes and more than a few non-quotes; no critical discussion of her place (if any) in US or world film; nothing about the people who directed her work and how they obtained different performances from her (if they did); nothing about the kinds of scripts she has played and with what skills (or lack thereof); and so on for a long list of other stuff that isn't there. In brief, trivia spun into paragraphs.

If that's a featured article, we're all in trouble. The fact that no one, or hardly no one (present company excepted), has done anything on the article since ca. 2006 is an index of just how unimportant this article is. If I were teaching a film course, I'd give this article a D- and tell the student who wrote it to learn something about film.

Sorry for being a curmudgeon, but we need some kind of critical standard lest we grant or maintain FA status for every piece of trivial gossip that comes up on the screen.

Timothy Perper (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moto Hagio in Paris

Hi,

just to inform you that Moto Hagio will be in Paris. I will have 2 opportunities to see her in real flesh.

That said not sure that i will be able to have her sign my copie "A Drunken Dream and Other Stories".

--KrebMarkt (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]