User talk:O.Koslowski

Welcome!

Hello, O.Koslowski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Acalamari 09:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi O.Koslowski, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 08:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perspectives

Still waiting on your cite re: Mark Weber. I'm not holding my breath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.49.183 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am reporting you for editorial misconduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.49.183 (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Pharmacist was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Conny (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For constantly reverting vandalism. A520 \| Talk me away!/sign it! 17:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The amount of vandalism in this particular Wikimedia project is staggering, but I try to help. o.O O.Koslowski (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Your recent editing history at State-sponsored terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. lTopGunl (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, right. An IP doesn't react to anything on the talk page, makes a claim that does not fall into WP:BLUE and I get warned for being in an edit war? o.O O.Koslowski (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no excuse for edit war even when you are discussing or right. Crossing 3RR gets you a quick block .I've replied on my talkpage and the article. Feel free to continue the discussion at article talk. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Underworld (film series) - Just a heads up

Scott Speedman did NOT return for the fourth film in the underworld series.

The character "Michael" was in fact played by a random lookalike and wasn't even credited (to my knowledge) in the film.

Checkout IMDB if you think I am making this up, but Scott Speedman did NOT return for the fourth film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.220.30 (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to change it to "unknown actor" if you want, or whatever else you like. But it certainly was not Scott Speedman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.220.30 (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	That's some quality Twinkling! Keep up the good work. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can I write correctly to correct information

Dear O.Koslowski,

I try to correct some information that incorrect on the page but I got warning at all time that I write it as advertising which I only try to correct the data; Do you have any suggestion?

Best Regards,

New User — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.47.114.141 (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, O.Koslowski. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 05:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hey Bud!

Then remove the other sites as well and not just mine.