User talk:Iamthemuffinman
July 2012
If you continue to revert, you will likely receive a block. Acalamari 19:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Iamthemuffinman, it ceased being a legitimate debate when the insults and personal attacks started, which was from the first post onwards. Start a new section if you want a civil discussion on the matter. Zazaban (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- What's the point? It's clear you don't wish to discuss it, it's clear that you were ridiculing the IP and it is absolutely clear that you don't give a stuff about the matter, why waste my time? What a joke. You, and every editor responsible for removing that debate should be ashamed. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- The IP was hardly being ridiculed, and people were actually being incredibly patient with them. It was explained to 2.99.69.69 several times about why the Norway shootings were left out this year, why the Colorado shootings will be left out next year, and it was explained to the IP why their tone and language were inappropriate. If 2.99.69.69 had started the discussion without assuming some sort of wrongdoing on the behalf of others I suspect the thread would still be continuing. Acalamari 19:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- What's the point? It's clear you don't wish to discuss it, it's clear that you were ridiculing the IP and it is absolutely clear that you don't give a stuff about the matter, why waste my time? What a joke. You, and every editor responsible for removing that debate should be ashamed. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
- I sincerely do encourage you to start another discussion if you're willing to take a more civil tone than the last one had, although I disagree that there is bias. 9/11 was missing two years in a row, and not a peep was heard, and I find that the main page is just as likely to have a large proportion of British content. There is generally an Anglosphere bias, of which the United States is over 60% of. Zazaban (talk) 19:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- The topic is finished and I am not prepared to discuss it further on my talkpage. Use the Ani thread if further discussion is required. As for 60% of the Anglosphere, I do not consider the US to have a connection to the Anglosphere after the revolution, you didn't want us, you shouldn't be a part of our legacy. But that is soapboxing and another matter altogether. Please stop using my talkpage for this matter. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Anglosphere as in english-speaking world, English being the language this wikipedia is based on, hence the bias towards it. Also, I am Canadian. Zazaban (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- The topic is finished and I am not prepared to discuss it further on my talkpage. Use the Ani thread if further discussion is required. As for 60% of the Anglosphere, I do not consider the US to have a connection to the Anglosphere after the revolution, you didn't want us, you shouldn't be a part of our legacy. But that is soapboxing and another matter altogether. Please stop using my talkpage for this matter. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)