Jump to content

User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:4490:d660::b07 (talk) at 02:58, 23 July 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "The Hindu#Controversy". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 16:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kunchacko Boban filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sneha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piravom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindu Controversy

Dear JK There were references cited along with the changes made. So please refer to them before deleting the editing. FurtherThe editor of The Hindu, N.Ram was executive member of communist students union (SIFA). And if you read The Hindu, you will come to know about the leaning. Please do not remove editing as I am citing references to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4490:D660:0:0:0:0:B07 (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Sunday Indian" is a promotional website and hence a questionable source. The article by Kuldip Nayyar doesn't mention anything about left-leaning. Even if he has mentioned it, it is just his personal opinion and not a fact. Wikipedia should only contain facts. The only fact that can be inferred from that article is that Kuldeep Nayyar has criticised the editor-in-chief of the newspaper for imposing his agenda and ideology on the organisation.JK (talk) 12:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 "Bloomberg" is an international financial news site. The Sunday Indian is magazine of politics, economics and current affairs and not a promotional website. More references are now cited from other sources. Ideology of a newspaper is of prime importance in order to publish neutral news. Its a well known fact and don't trivialise it by mentioning "some online portals", which are infact websites of established news  magazines/agencies.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100&oldid=565420084"