Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Anthony Jonas

The research article is not an MA thesis. And so this presumption is false. The research is notable as it speak about the democratization of knowledge in developing nations and the technological divide and free access to scholarship via the Internet.

The source is notable and referenced in a refereed journal on the page.

The independent references are also on the page, for example, The Swedish and German libraires, the actual publishers, the journal itself and more.

Please see the references.

Regarding the quantity published, I do not see this as an issue. An author is an author.

If the page comes across as an advertisement or resume, that is my fault. This is the first time I have ever written up anything on Wikepedia and my inexperience is showing here.

I used an accepted page that has been online for many years. It is similar in content to mine.

This artist has even less sources and it is an accepted page and format. As such I used it as an example of what is OK - The page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Mavreas

I hope that the new references added in respect to the feedback give are now clear. Libraires, universities and publishers are the makeup of most of them.

Regarding the format and content, I used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Mavreas as a guide and it is accpeted.

Thanks for the feedback.

Randall Anthony Jonas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A text book writer and painter. He wrote three text books and one research article as a Masters student. Presumably, it is his thesis. Unable to find any reliable, independent references about him. Only mentions on social media. Name is common. Prod was removed for unknown reasons Bgwhite (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - comes across as a resumé and/or an advertisement. The subject also lacks notability. DJAMP4444 (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of being notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]