Jump to content

Talk:Three-state solution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Knightmare72589 (talk | contribs) at 19:21, 26 November 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPalestine Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIsrael Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Official Response?

Can anyone find anything near an official statement from either Jordan or Egypt regarding these suggestions? Or at the very less from politicians, academics, whatever from either? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.180.3 (talk) 02:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old peace proposal that has recurred recently. It seemed wrong for Wikipedia to have articles on the Two state solution and the One state solution but not on this widely discussed option. That said, the article needs a lot of work. I may not have much time for the next few days, I do hope that others will add material.Historicist (talk) 00:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Color-coded Map Problem

On the map, is the "Green" the light green color and Emerald the darker green? If so, perhaps "Green" should be changed to "Light Green" for clarification.69.3.223.122 (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas Coup?

There is no such thing as Hamas coup. Hamas took control of Gaza by the will of its people, through democratic elections that the US and Israel wanted. This should be clarified in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.237.207.245 (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's indeed the case. It might be a crappy government for everyone involved, but they were still elected. They didn't seize power in a coup d'etat. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie, AKA TheArchaeologist Say Herro 06:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually not that simple. Hamas won the Palestinian Authority elections and was supposed to assume power in both Gaza and the West Bank. Fatah was strongly pressured by the US and Israel to question the results of the elections and keep Hamas out. Fatah refused to give up power and Hamas launched a takeover. Fatah won in the West Bank and Hamas won in Gaza. It is is accurate to say, "Hamas was elected" but inaccurate to deny that a coup occurred and that bloody fighting accompanied the Gaza takeover. In order to be strictly accurate and properly balanced, language should reflect both the election and the coup. Omission of the election and the circumstances of the coup presents an inaccurate picture that fails to show the political skullduggery on the part of the US, Israelis, and Fatah. Omission of the facts of the coup itself and only reference the elections ignores the fact that Hamas did take over Gaza by violent uprising against Fatah forces and killed or expelled a lot of political opponents, thus greatly radicalizing the region. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.5.151.90 (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proponents?

the proponents section of this article includes persons who would seem to be opponents. should there be separate sections, or perhaps an alternative title for the section? It escapes me what the appropriate title would be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.234.242 (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan over 50% Palestinian?

This seems highly dubious at best, there's nothing to indicate such on the 'Jordan' page, it says a bit more than 1m of it's 5m population are palestinian refugees. The source itself seems to be quite badly written and doesn't cite its own sources, according to it's wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arutz_Sheva it identifies as Religious Zionist, which may compromise it's neutrality. Either way, would it still be called 'Mainstream Media'? - 86.42.248.251 (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was definitely true from 1949-1967. Not sure about after 1967... AnonMoos (talk) 09:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2014

Please replace the template call

{{Israel-Palestinian peace process}}

at the start of the article with

{{Israel-Palestinian peace process |Proposals}}

which should ensure the relevant part of the template is shown when the article appears.

Thank you, 213.246.85.251 (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks! LittleMountain5 01:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not technically a three state solution, so I don't know if this should be added

Egypt announced that they would be willing to send troops to a future Palestinian state to help stabilize it. Knightmare72589 (talk) 19:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]