Talk:Kelli Ward

Reverted extensive deletion of material from article

I did not agree with the basis of the 548 character deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Apparently, it is the only edit that the anonymous user has ever made. The user's Internet Protocol address indicates that it was made from Glendale, AZ. The user has no entries on his or her TALK page. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. Activist (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I did not agree with the basis of the deletion by this user. The material removed seems legitimate, well sourced, and pertinent to the subject of the article. Before any further deletions are made, they should be discussed on the article's talk page and a consensus should be collectively achieved. Activist (talk) 02:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Seems this is a recurring problem only now with Calibrador (talk). This senator has made many comments that support noted racists Cliven Bundy & Donald Sterling. Even if she is not a racist herself, as an elected official, its certainly notable to see where she stands on the issue if it isn't condoning the comments. Therefore its very much pertinent and relevant. Thank you 100.14.57.197 (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

The Sterling comments are not relevant other than a source existing. Not everything where a source is available is required to be included in the article. Calibrador (talk) 18:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for finally responding here, rather than simply reverting me without saying anything. I reverted your previous revert of me, because your edit explanation stated "Undid revision 693461170 by 100.14.57.197 (talk) do not remove updated information" - which is false explanation. I did not remove any information, whereas you keep removing info. I'm not saying you're wrong for removing information (although in this case you are) but you are wrong for removing it and telling me to stop removing information. Moving on, if you search for Dr. Ward on google, this is the first news article that comes up. Unfortunately, that article is not an exception - most articles about her refer to her in that same negative light. We would be doing great disservice to the readers of this site to not provide them with the general public perception of her. The information on her support of Cliven Bundy and remarks on Donald Sterling, while not a tacit indication that she herself is a racist, are highly controversial and deserve inclusion. In the future, do not remove information under false edit summaries. Its also clear you remove the information then try to hide it under six or seven additional edits - not a good practice here. Also there's a rule about reverting something three times, so one more revert puts you close to a block. Please discuss before changing. Thanks