User talk:Weweremarshall

Weweremarshall, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Weweremarshall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Weweremarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored. I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats. I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered. It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed. People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

September 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Weweremarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored. I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats. I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered. It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed. People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored.  I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats.  I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered.  It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed.  People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}