Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizan
Towns Hill
- Towns Hill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
12 February 2017
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Oye You There (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Same POV pushing in Bangladesh war related articles.
- Evidence
- Oye You There account was created two days after Towns Hill was blocked for one month. His very first edits show that Oye You There is knowledgeable about Wikipedia editing.
- This brand new account added same content which Towns Hill had added: "
Indian soldiers as well as as Bengali millitiamen
" raped women in the Bangladesh war. 1 2- "500,000 Biharis were killed/massacred" (Towns Hill, Oye You There)
- Both Towns Hill (1, 2) and Oye You There (1, 2) sometimes forgets to sign their comments on the talk page.
- Often opens new sections with the title "My edits": (1, 2)
- Other behavioral similarities include use of visual editor([1],[2],[3]) and similar edit-summaries:
- More
added another case of genocidal rape from Journal of Genocide Research
[4]added from indian expresses..
[5]you are tampering with the article structure..
[6]undone tampering
[7]- Interest in Bangladesh war and religion-related topics — a hallmark of the master.
- Forgets to space after default undo message in edit-summaries:
- Both posted books.google.com.au links: (1, 2, 3, 4) which indicates geographical location in Australia.
Looks like a duck to me —MBlaze Lightning T 14:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hi, I am User:Oye You There. I would like to give my statement. MBlaze Lightning's accusations are false, i am not a duplicate/sockpuppet of Towns Hill. He revered me here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jana_Gana_Mana&diff=764876749&oldid=764738553) without any explanation, even-though the content was properly/reliably sourced. I reverted him back and added further relevant information along with another reliable reference. After i reverted his edit on "Jana Gana Mana" the first time he revered another edit of mine, on another page here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Honour_killing_in_Pakistan&diff=764884813&oldid=763149721). I guess his revert on "Honour killing in Pakistan" was a ploy of sucking me into an edit war and then try and create trouble for me. Then he reverted the properly sourced content on the "Jana Gana Mana" page, the second time, again without giving any explanation. I have been going through wikipedia policies so i do not want to engage in an edit war with this user. MBlaze Lightning seems to be an experience user who has been granted certain "rights/privileges" on wiki. But this user indulged in disruptive/unconstructive behaviour. I request the administrators to take a serious note of MBlaze Lightning and his behaviour. Regards Oye You There (talk) 15:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
I just found out that "MBlaze Lightning" has revered my reliably sourced edits on two more pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rape_during_the_Bangladesh_Liberation_War&diff=765075911&oldid=763451427, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persecution_of_Biharis_in_Bangladesh&diff=765076022&oldid=764706278). MBlaze is on a spree of disruptive editing, revering reliably sourced information. This user is apparently hooked onto my edit history and is trying to find out anything he can revert. I would expect a more professional behaviour from an experienced user, but is has been very otherwise. Request admins to see this and take a serious note. Regards Oye You There (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)