Jump to content

User talk:Cathry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cathry (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 1 October 2017 (→‎October 2017). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thanks for your evidence-based edits, clean-ups and general busting of anti-social knowledge destroying cabals. :-) You deserve Admin rights. 120.17.210.246 (talk) 14:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words. Cathry (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring--Ymblanter (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You must provide links to my "edit warring" edits. Ремарка для русскоговорящих - я так понимаю скайпочаты не дремлют? Cathry (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong on both counts. Btw the next block may be of indefinite duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Мне особенно нравится, что вы считаете наличие раздела про Украину в статье неонацизм "маргинальной теорией". Это вполне согласуется с тем, что ваши русскоязычные коллеги считают "мэйнстримом" называние Украины "приёмником" и правки статьи о лидере неонацистской организации его же соратниками. Cathry (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I am wrong. All you wrote at Noticeboard it is repeating of accusations in Russian wikipedia, where you were administrator and where conversation outside wikipedia among admins are common and well-known. I didn't see you in mentioned at Noticeboard articles, so it is strange you so quikly decided where "fringe theories" are. Cathry (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the English Wikipedia, please respond in English. I do not edit the Russian Wikipedia and have no "Russian-speaking colleagues there". I never discuss blocks off-wiki unless explicitly authorized by the community. I just happened to have your talk page on my watchlist. However, I understand that a conspiracy theory adept, you will have difficulties believing me. You are welcome to request an unblock as detailed above in the template.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I know pretty well, you know Russian, as you was admin at Russian wikipedia. It is interesting you "happened to have my talk page on your watchlist", but there are no records you posted some at this talk page. What was the occasion? Cathry (talk) 15:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I do not remember why I added you on my watchlist. It was quite some time ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So this is your sincere personally formed opinion that I do edit-warring and "adding fringe theories and original research all over the place". As far as I understant "edit warring" in my case is any first and single revert of my opponents edit. But what and where "fringe theories and original research"? Cathry (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For a starter. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
it is impossible to understand what do you mean. Cathry (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Cathry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about "fringe theories and original research". Cathry (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=803276322&oldid=803276009 fringe theories and original research]". [[User:Cathry|Cathry]] ([[User talk:Cathry#top|talk]]) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=803276322&oldid=803276009 fringe theories and original research]". [[User:Cathry|Cathry]] ([[User talk:Cathry#top|talk]]) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=803276322&oldid=803276009 fringe theories and original research]". [[User:Cathry|Cathry]] ([[User talk:Cathry#top|talk]]) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cathry&oldid=803288329"