Jump to content

Talk:AT 2017gfo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 104.153.72.218 (talk) at 10:25, 4 November 2017 (→‎Merge request: Don't think anyone disagrees.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects Redirect‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
WikiProject iconPhysics Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Merge request

I will second the suggestion to merge this page with GW170817 and GRB 170817A, under GW170817. These are all different identifiers for the same event. I choose GW170817 for reasons of priority (that was the first observation), dependency (the kilonova would not have been observed without the GW observations), and the overall importance of gravitational waves to science. EMS | Talk 19:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EMS: I don't think anyone seriously disagrees with the merge. It's just a matter of someone volunteering to do the actual work. And who can be arsed to do a half-decent job of it. (Three {{Merge}} templates without a |discuss= parameter to direct discussion to a common place is not encouraging. But notice I'm not fixing it either; I'm busy with other things ATM and just overspent my Wikipedia time budget on Permuted congruential generator.) 104.153.72.218 (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]