Black people in ancient Roman history
 | This article or section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. (May 2018) |
 | It has been suggested that this article should be split into articles titled Aethiopes, Kingdom of Kush and Romans in Sub-Saharan Africa. (discuss) (May 2018) |
Roman writers described people with physical characteristics of sub-Saharan Africans as "Aethiopes", but the term carried no social implications.[1] There was no such thing as a black community; immigrants from south of the Sahara were few and from disparate ethnic communities. The immigrants would have been separated from each other in households of white people, and if they had descendants these would have blended within very few generations into the local population.[1] While slavery was a deeply-stigmatized social status, the great majority of slaves were from European and Mediterranean populations; inherited physical characteristics were not relevant to slave status.[1] Black people were generally not excluded from any profession, and there was usually no stigma or bias against mixed race relationships in Antiquity.[2]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Thompson, Lloyd (Sep 1993). "Roman Perceptions of Blacks". Electronic Antiquity: Communicating the Classics. 1 (4): 1. Retrieved 9 May 2017.
- ^ Snowden, Frank M. (Winter 1997). "Misconceptions about African Blacks in the Ancient Mediterranean World: Specialists and Afrocentrists". Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics. 4 (3): 28–50. Retrieved 9 May 2017.
Sources
- Benjamin, Isaac (Mar 2006). "Proto-Racism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity". World Archaeology. 38 (1): 32–47. doi:10.1080/00438240500509819. Retrieved 9 May 2017.
- Snowden, Frank M. (Winter 1997). "Misconceptions about African Blacks in the Ancient Mediterranean World: Specialists and Afrocentrists". Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics. 4 (3): 28–50. Retrieved 9 May 2017.