User talk:Accesscrawl

Archives

2017 in Indian television moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2017 in Indian television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunal Kamra has been accepted

Kunal Kamra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 01:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow yoga deletion

I see you recently deleted the page on Shadow Yoga, which I wrote years ago with some hope that others would fill in details I didn't have time to add back then. I appreciate you need to pull out weeds and keep the garden here neat and tidy, so to speak, but I'm a bit confused why something like Chair Yoga is kept but Shadow Yoga is not. I'd be happy to keep working on the page if you are able to bring it back. Wspr81 (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wspr81: please check Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Yoga you'll find more details about deletion. Connect with the closing admin in case you want to apply for WP:REFUND. As this article already passes it.Accesscrawl (talk) 04:52, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jasleen Matharu

Hello, Accesscrawl,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jasleen Matharu, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.

scope_creep^Talk 23:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What Ivan really needed to say is that he proposed a sanction against you. Please go to the thread and comment before this sanction is placed without hearing your side of the story. Jehochman ^Talk 18:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kunal Kamra) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kunal Kamra.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm honestly really surprised that this was deleted at AfD last time it was in the new page queue.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

edits to Battefield Archaeology

Hello you removed my eduts to battlefield archaeology. I'm actually part of the Ministry of Cultures team working on improving our digital outreach at Grand Sites Archaeologiques. I may not have added the citation to the text but it is taken from our website which is a report of battefield archaeology from WWI, would you please be able to replace the text you removed and i will add the citation. Thank you

Archeonationale (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC) ---- Anastasia from GrandSitesArcheologiques[reply]

@Archeonationale: See WP:CITE. Sources are necessary to add. If you are closely associated with the subject then you would also like to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks yes I had read the COI article which is why i removed the discussion of website, however the rest of the paragraph merely dicussing the first world war battlefield archaeology of france and its relevance which is why I think it should stay.