Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohema Miah
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – bradv🍁 21:48, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rohema Miah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, sourcing is weak and founding nothing after a courtesy search for sources. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - the claims to notability are somewhat nebulous. Noe of the sourcing in the article are reliable sources. My own search turns up only passing mentions. -- Whpq (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.