Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilga Ziegler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ilga Ziegler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a mix of unsourced biography and promotion for a business that does not seem to be notable. Does not pass WP:CREATIVE. Mccapra (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC);[reply]

Delete largely unsourced, one wonders where the information comes from. Not from independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 12:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. Article is deemed promotional, non notable flora designer. Found nothing after WP:BEFORE to support meeting WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a site to prmote a business. The high number of photos of flower arrangements alone shout out that this is what the article is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - her work with Hollywood stars does not rub off on her. There's very little coverage about her. We are a charity, not a free web host for for-profit businesses. Bearian (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.