Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. K. Krishna Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P. K. Krishna Das

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL A politician who has never won any election and no major work done. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete First of all the three sources present here are not enough for passing WP:GNG as first one his published and last two are about his candidancy. The second point is taking part in Lok Sabha election is not enough for passing WP:NPOL. And last point is we do not think party's state presidents pass WP:NPOL.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has not held any role that confers an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just because he existed, but the article is not referenced even remotely close to well enough to claim that he would pass WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:I disagree with saying that he failed WP:GNG on the basis of WP:SIGCOV. But this article is not perfect.In my opinion it should be expanded instead of deleted -- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 12:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 20:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. He's a member of a national commission, but I don't think that makes him automatically notable. If somebody can find better sources, I'd go along with keeping this one. Bearian (talk) 17:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:He is a one of the most famous politician from Bharatiya Janata Party kerala.and also he is the head of Passenger Amenities Committee (under the Government of India)

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nashik/pac-pushes-for-extension-of-platform-at-rly-station/articleshow/73562367.cms

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/cleaning-during-inspection-takes-railway-board-team-by-surprise-865979

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/kfc-elbows-out-jan-aahar-rail-passengers-suffer/articleshow/71929136.cms

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/Krishnadas-calls-for-all-party-meet-on-price-rise/article16894808.ece

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2017/sep/12/not-airing-speech-unconstitutional-krishnadas-1655701.html

https://www.asianet.in/trivandrum-news/krishnadas-made-bjp-secretary.html

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2019/jan/21/hunger-strike-ends-not-a-success-but-mileage-made-feels-sangh-1927816.html

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2010/jan/07/v-muraleedharan-is-bjp-state-president-119545.html

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2019/jul/28/uninspiring-leadership-fails-to-curb-rampant-factionalism-in-kerala-bjp-2010476.html

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/bjp-gears-up-for-organisational-polls/article7693992.ece

All these reliable sources mention him deeply and he clearly pass WP:GNG so this article should be kept on its basis of WP:BASIC WP:NPOL and WP:POLOUTCOMES -- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 09:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments on these sources below.

[1][2] Both are covering an official visit by team of Railway officers.

[3] article about allocation of store in a city station.

[4] article about a political meeting and covering the statements of Das

[5] news about PM's speech

[6] news about Das's appointment as secretary.

[7] article on Entry of women to Sabarimala

[8] Doesn't even mention the subject in article.

[9] article on political infighting in the party.

[10] article about preparation of the party for polls.

None of these links suggested above are giving a significant coverage to Das by making him the subject of the article. DBig Xrayᗙ 11:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.