Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchess Elisabeth of Württemberg (b. 1933)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duchess Elisabeth of Württemberg (b. 1933)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She got one fanciful title from her father and another from her husband. There is no indication that she uses either. It is impossible to verify whether she and her family use the titles accorded to them by Wikipedia and genealogical publications; impossible, because reliable sources other than these genealogical publications do not cover them. And if the sole notability of this woman is her place in a family tree, the article should not exist. See WP:NOTGENEALOGY and WP:NOTINHERITED. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Again more cruft about someone whose supposed titles come from states which ceased to exist before she was even born, and who married after the abolition of nobility in Italy. PatGallacher (talk) 14:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the other comment above. Smeat75 (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a geneological database for any royal houses, let alone for members of royal houses that have been out of power for over a century.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yet another article that defines a woman's notability based on who her family and husband are. And all two sources are SPS, one deprecated. JoelleJay (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my standards. I can't find any hint of scandal, nor any charity work, that she was involved in. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.