Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snwazna Adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ 09:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snwazna Adams

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I put this up for proposed deletion because it is clearly not even close to any level of notability. The fact that such got overturned is just one more part of the unbalanced situation at Wikipedia where it is several times easier to create an article than to get rid of one. This has 1 source that is a PR release, one source that is facebook, which is totally and completely not secondary, independent nor reliable, and one source that is just a photo on the website of the organization that Adams won a competition with. None of these things come even remotely close to at all meeting GNG, which in turn requires multiple reliable sources that meet its requirement. This is a biography of a living person that has absolutely no reliable sourcing at all, which is what we are supposed to be proposed deletion because under our rules we can say nothing about the subject. John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: winning an obscure pageant is not an indicator of notability. Does not meet WP:MODEL / WP:BASIC. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 11:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - she was a contestant at the highest levels of modeling, such as Miss Universe. Bearian (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails NMODEL, and no evidence she meets the GNG. I'm mildly surprised there aren't any SNGs conferring presumptive notability on Miss Universe contestants, but the fact is there aren't. Ravenswing 01:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.