Jump to content

User talk:StarTrekker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 198.151.8.4 (talk) at 23:45, 16 August 2020 (Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sexual orientation and gender identity in the United States military

You undid what I thought were improvements, citing some mystery source. Could you point that source out to me please? Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You added a bunch of Transgender mentions to placed where it shouldn't be. The Pride celebration was at a time where only LGB people were allowed, so there is no reason to pretend like it was a celebration for trans people too. The page is pretty clear about the fact that Trans people are still fighting for their right to be in military right now.★Trekker (talk) 13:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Transgender personnel in the United States military says it’s a mixed situation with thousands grandfathered in. That is a reason to fix what I did removing Just the transgender part, or better explain the difference, not revert the entire effort. Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of the Pride celebration Trans people were very much not allowed to be open. I don't think it would be disingenuous claim it was a true LGBT pride celebration with Trans people too when they were still forced to be closeted (if they were present at all).★Trekker (talk) 13:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That remains a reason to fix, not erase. Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't do it the way you would. Feel free to add back the parts you think are still ok.★Trekker (talk) 13:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MCU Phases

Hi. I'm sorry but I do not see how the MCU Phases are more projects than film franchises, and how the information in the Infobox project could be more useful and important than the information in the Infobox film. The uses of Infobox project I've seen are in articles about programmes by governments or organisations. These articles are proposed splits from the List of MCU films, which uses the Infobox film given that it is a franchise of films. The Phases are a part of that, and as such they should use the Infobox film as well. El Millo (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Millo, I think that while they are part of a film franchise they themselves do not have much of a story or "in universe" element in my opinion, it's not an "artistic work" so to say like a film would be but an out of universe real world practical tool for the makers. The Phases are pretty much just Feige and Marvel Studios way of organizing their planing and workload in the comming years. That's why I think a film navbox is not appropriate, maybe there is a better alternative to either of them.★Trekker (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For now, let's stick with the infobox with more useful information. El Millo (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pilate

At what point does Siebert's continued arguing and ignoring of scholarly consensus at Pontius Pilate become disruptive?--Ermenrich (talk) 14:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soon I'd say, she shows no sign of stopping so far. He really needs to just accept that his view simply is not the accepted one.★Trekker (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He was over here too: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Is PhD thesis in Theology a reliable source for the claim about authenticity of Tacitus fragment?. He really just doesn't get it.--Ermenrich (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh boy. The irony is he doesn't get that he's being exactly the type of unreasonable person whom I bet he thinks all Christians are.★Trekker (talk) 15:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess if he starts inserting his POV into all the Jesus articles he'll get blocked.--Ermenrich (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
R. Well now it's an ANI.★Trekker (talk) 19:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At least he says he's not going to discuss it anymore now, lol [1]. Although I guess I shouldn't count on it.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm more suprised that he thinks it's come to a "logical end", I mean what does that even mean???★Trekker (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well that didn't take long, he's back announcing he'll stop again.--Ermenrich (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Guess it was not the end after all!★Trekker (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE

To this. Nothing will happen. This is just a poor performance. My advice: stop commenting on ANI or any other administrative noticeboards, at least for a couple of weeks and see what happens. My very best wishes (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm sure some things will happen at least.★Trekker (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is he allowed to threaten everyone who voted for a topic ban like that?--Ermenrich (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doubt it.★Trekker (talk) 19:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jesus (lol), every time he says he's leaving he just reappears!--Ermenrich (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Feels like the 4th time now.★Trekker (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if he's going to try to pin another editor undoing his edit at Richard Carrier on me if he really does take it to ANI.--Ermenrich (talk) 00:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was tempted to undo it myself honestly, who does he think he is threatening people with reports when he has no consensus behind him?★Trekker (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he got TBAN'd for Pontius Pilate. He's still pushing for the Christ myth theory and claiming unnamed "secular" scholars believe Christ never existed though, while "theologians" assert he did...--Ermenrich (talk) 00:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uuuuuuuurg.★Trekker (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JamesBay

Hey, just updating my username. JamesBay (talk) 22:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Just so you know tho, there really isn't any need to do that, your old username redirects to your current one i would assume.★Trekker (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe specific characters

A tag has been placed on Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe specific characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look, the speedy deletion wasn't my intention at all, AGF please. Since Bruce Banner (Marvel Cinematic Universe) was included in that category, I assumed it referred to MCU versions of characters as well, and since there already was another category for that with a more concise name, I just changed all articles to the category I though was the right one. I still think the existence of this category is mostly unwarranted, since they could all be in the category for category for Marvel Cinematic Universe characters and it would be practically the same. Some of those characters, like J.A.R.V.I.S., are not actually specific to the MCU, given that they were introduced to the comics after being created for the films. El Millo (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. Thanks for taking the time to reply.★Trekker (talk) 03:10, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Meltzer

Before crying foul and misuing the POV policy, take a listen to the WON podcast or WOL. Dave has said time and time again that the title is irrelivant and is more critical of the WON as a historical piece and as the "original dirt sheet". Learn your wrestling history if youre going to call yourself a fan.174.16.184.125 (talk) 00:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tryong to discredit someone else fandom does nothing but make you look like a fool.★Trekker (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Being a tabloid writer is not discrediting Dave. Nowhere is there language that implies direct inferiority. Like I told you on all the other pages, provide distinct sources that demonstarte why journalist over tabloid writer is appropriate. You waited between August 2 and August 9 to engage in this, and have failed to properly communicate.174.16.184.125 (talk) 00:53, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have done far more comunication than you. As for the wait-time, some people have lives outside of specific articles.★Trekker (talk) 00:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Link it, cos the only form of communication I have seen is you make passive agressive edit summaries and hand out barn stars. You edited between the dates, so that "people have lives" is bull.174.16.184.125 (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"outside of specific article" Reading is your friend.
As for comunication, see your own talkpage and the ProWrestlingProject talkpage.★Trekker (talk) 01:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again with the passive agressive edits. I stopped when others chimed in. In the future, maybe you should try clear and consistent communication. 174.16.184.125 (talk) 01:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is not true. Please stop wasting mine and everyone elses time now.★Trekker (talk) 01:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Woah there bud! That's blatant POV, don't turn into the kettle calling the pot black. 174.16.184.125 (talk) 01:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's really not. And please go away already.★Trekker (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at you defending your boyfriend Dave Meltzer again. You should not be a Wikipedia editor.

A Barnstar For You!

Short Description Barnstar
For your work on WWE related pages. --Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chucky (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your effort but please add references for the article "Holiday horror"

I appreciate your additions to categories and lists, but you incorrectly added the category Category:Mother's Day to Mother's Day (1980 film) and Mother's Day (2010 film) and also listed them as films occurring on Mother's Day in the list of holiday horror films. These films do not take place on Mother's Day, which is why I did not include them in the list of films set around Mother's Day when I originally made it. They are not holiday horror films at all. Just because a leprechaun is in a film does not automatically make it a St. Patrick's Day film either. That is why I did not include the Leprechaun films (apart from Leprechaun 2) on the list of films set around St. Patrick's Day when I originally made it.
There is a column for references for every film entry in the article "Holiday horror" but you did not provide any references and many of your additions are incorrect. Many of the films you added are not even horror films and some of the ones that are horror films do not actually occur on the holiday specified. I have attempted to remove some of the most obvious errors but ultimately it is really your responsibility to provide references for each of your entries. I don't want to just "Undo" your work because I don't want you to feel unappreciated for your effort so I would rather provide you with the opportunity to fix the problems yourself. I implore you to go back and look up information about each of the films you listed in the article "Holiday horror" and either provide a reference or remove the entry from the list. --Nicholas0 (talk) 19:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Inside the Montreal Screw Job: Who Really Got Screwed in the WWE?" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inside the Montreal Screw Job: Who Really Got Screwed in the WWE?. Since you had some involvement with the Inside the Montreal Screw Job: Who Really Got Screwed in the WWE? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sempronia (mother of Decimus Brutus)

Hello *Treker,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sempronia (mother of Decimus Brutus) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece

I'm sorry about my wrong edits. --Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 11:23, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok man, it's not a major problem. Easy to fix.★Trekker (talk) 11:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of One Piece episodes page

Hi, Is piping with double redirect really needed in Lists of One Piece episodes, because right after you added redirects, the original pages average views decreased like half and the redirect pages seems to have other half of the views, so I was wondering if its affecting readers navigation. Panda619 (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's good because it links directly to the episode section.★Trekker (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Dear *Treker, thank you so much for the barnstar, much appreciated! Cheers! --A.S. Brown (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling halls of fame

You welcome for the edits to the wrestling hall of fame article. I would really like to see a real WWE hall of fame building. I think that it's creation is long overdue. Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree 100%.★Trekker (talk) 13:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you feel that way. Do you think it's creation is going to happen at any point? Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it will. But when, I'm unsure.★Trekker (talk) 12:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tertulla (wife of Crassus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tertia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The Montreal Screwjob (Dark Side of the Ring)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Montreal Screwjob (Dark Side of the Ring). Since you had some involvement with the The Montreal Screwjob (Dark Side of the Ring) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential). Since you had some involvement with the Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart: WWE's Greatest Rivalries" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart: WWE's Greatest Rivalries. Since you had some involvement with the Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart: WWE's Greatest Rivalries redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

A thanks for the thanks. Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 01:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh how sweet! :).★Trekker (talk) 01:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me with editing?

Can you please help me with editing? I need some entries added to the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. I would do it myself, but can only do so much editing at a time. Also every entry that can be added is useful. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to help Davidgoodheart, but this is not a topic I'm very familiar with, where would I find examples to add?::★Trekker (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I can give you a few entries. Here's one Liu Sung-pan who became a missing fugitive in February 2007. Please add him to the "Fugitives who are no longer sought" section of List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. Reason he belongs in that section is because he was convicted and sentenced to jail while out of the country, never acknowledged an offer to receive medical treatment while serving his sentence, was made a fugitive from justice, and died years later while still a fugitive and is no longer sought due to his death. If you click on the link it will go right to that section, as I have linked it. Thank you very much. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've added him to the list. Hope I did it all correctly.★Trekker (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You did it correctly, well done! Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please add Jakrapob Penkair (39 years old when he disappeared) to the 2000s section. He disappeared in 2009. I have recently fixed the links on his article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please add Andrew Luster to "Fugitives who are no longer sought" section. In 2000, Luster was arrested when a student at a local college told police that she had been raped at Luster's home, and later disappeared in January 2003. Upon investigation, police charged Luster with drugging three women with the date-rape drug GHB, sexually assaulting them, and video-taping the assaults, having found videotapes of the assaults when they searched his home.[1] After paying $1 million bail, Luster failed to appear in court to defend himself against the charges in January 2003.[1] Luster was convicted in absentia and sentenced to 124 years in prison, which was later to 50 years—48 years.[2] In June 2003, after he was captured by American bounty hunter Duane "Dog" Chapman in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


References

  1. ^ a b Leduff, Charlie (8 January 2003). "Cosmetics Heir Is Missing As His Rape Trial Proceeds". The New York Times.
  2. ^ "Max Factor heir to pay damages". the Guardian. Retrieved 28 July 2015.

Invites for a new WikiProject (or Taskforce)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes Updates

Could you look into this discussion and provide a suggestion please.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_considered_the_best#/talk/6 Ashokkumar47 (talk) 03:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe).

User:Kudpung while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please address the sources issues in red

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง I just made the redirect. Other people keep turning it into articles.★Trekker (talk) 11:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Collaboration

As I'm going through hive4media.com I need your help with something. Can you reassess all the film articles I've been adding home media section's too? Thanks! Timur9008 (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In what way do you want me to reassess them?★Trekker (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help improve the article. Thanks you very much. Duylop (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to do? I'm not very familiar with this person's work so it will be hard for me to just jump in.★Trekker (talk) 03:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I've been having a lot of trouble with working on some articles, if it's not apparently noticeable. But you have helped out a lot (especially with my The Lost Boys articles). I'd just like to thank you for the work you're putting in and I hope to learn more from you as I'm still getting used to working on here. I hope you can help out more with my The Lost Boys articles, cheers! SeanTheYeti452 (talk) 09:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much SeanTheYeti452!★Trekker (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It’s absolutely no trouble at all. In fact I was wondering if you could help me with some drafts if you want. It’s entirely up to you but I’m currently trying to work on a draft based on the character Chop Top from Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2. If you could potentially help me out with making sure the page is considered good enough to stay on Wikipedia, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanTheYeti452 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@SeanTheYeti452: I love Chop Top! I've been thinking of doing an article for him for a long while! I've just been bussy with my Billy Loomis and Stu Macher sandboxes recently.★Trekker (talk) 02:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great idea doing Billy and Stu. I was surprised that they didn’t already have pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanTheYeti452 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@SeanTheYeti452: Thanks. I'm working pretty hard on them. By the way, you can also use sandboxes instead of drafs if you want to.★Trekker (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Servilia (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Servilia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Stainless Steel Stalinism (talk) 10:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to talk page

You are invited to the talk page on WP:FILM to discuss the issues with the format of 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raptor (DC comics)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Raptor (DC comics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gazamp (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Grudge (franchise) films

A tag has been placed on Category:The Grudge (franchise) films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Grudge (franchise)

A tag has been placed on Category:The Grudge (franchise) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This has been resolved thankfully.★Trekker (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All Dead Mormons Are Now Gay

Do you know where it is based? Rathfelder (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathfelder: Not sure actually.★Trekker (talk) 23:10, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clear cell acanthoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collarette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Category:Recipients of aid from Lewis Tappan

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Recipients of aid from Lewis Tappan. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. deisenbe (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi *Treker! You created a thread called Archive location at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Fylindfotberserk:. . You're lovely.★Trekker (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and welcome again sir. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Cornette

Hello, Treker. How are you? I saw your thanks in my LM2000 message about Jim Cornette. Would you like to help me with the section? I can find sources, but since English isn't my first languaje, it's difficult to create an entire section on my own. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@HHH Pedrigree: I'd like to help, but it's a delicate topic, BLP will apply, I think maybe we should bring it up on the wrestling project.★Trekker (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I made a very small section with most common topics, like complains about comedy wrestlers, ECW and several rants. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good start. I'll take look at it tomorrow, I'm pretty exhausted today.★Trekker (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really suck at Wikipedia

Hey man. So I've had a rough time battling to keep an article alive. The AfD resulted in Redirect. Of course after this I came across a load of sources, so I've moved the article to a draft. Is it possible to get the draft back to the article stage after an AfD discussion? Or if I put it back up, even with all the new information I've found, will it still get redirected as per the AfD. I'm just a little confused and I've tried looking for an answer but can't seem to find one. I turned to you because you've been the most helpful so far on my Wikipedia journey. Cheers. -- SeanTheYeti452

This is the article in case you were wondering. I’m trying to get it back up considering they’re the main character of the novel and the only 2 articles left from that novel are supporting characters, which doesn’t really make sense but oh well. —SeanTheYeti452
@SeanTheYeti452: Yes SeanTheYeti452 it's possible for something to be deleted via AFD then become an article again. One advice I would have for you is to never post an article you have working on before you're super sure you've used every source you can find to it's fullest. Like for example with Bill Denbrough, after the AFD you now found far more sources and the draft is in better shape. Another advice would be to use sandboxes instead of drafts sometimes, sandboxes have a lot more room for experimenting and privacy. I prefer to use some of my sandboxes over drafts most of the time.★Trekker (talk) 06:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@*Treker: Thanks for the advice, I've started using the sandbox on some articles now. Just out of curiosity, how long do you reckon I should wait until I could put the article back up? Do you think there's anything else I could add to the article? Or do you reckon that as soon as I put it back up, despite all the new upgrades, One1 is just gonna redirect it again?
@SeanTheYeti452: I would say you should wait at least a couple of months and make sure you've made them as good as possible. For example, I've been working on my Billy Loomis sandbox now for months, and I'm nowhere near done with all the sources I've collected.★Trekker (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@*Treker: Yeah, I took a look through the Billy and Stu articles, I have to congratulate you on all that hard work finding sources. I can't wait to see it when it's finished, it looks amazing already! Bravo!
@SeanTheYeti452: Thanks. It will take a while, but it will be great when its done.★Trekker (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, *Treker

Thank you for creating Servilia's pearl.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice article, #Trekker. I read between 80 and 200 new articles a day, and this is one of the finer ones.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 23:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thank you Onel, it makes me very happy that you like it. ★Trekker (talk) 04:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dracula in film has been nominated for discussion

Category:Dracula in film, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 11:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of unsolved murders

Hi, could you add some entries to the List of unsolved murders who aren't on the list already? If so I will give you the countries of the people who need adding to the list. The article is not a table and it is much easier to add too. Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Boo!

Happy Halloween!

Hello *Treker:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Boo! Happy Halloween!

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Halloween on the behalf of WikiProject Holidays and WikiProject Horror.

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Holidays and its related projects.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

You are welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar (Marvel Comics)

This might be of interest of you. I welcome your opinion. Jhenderson 777 15:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Mysteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolf Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update to Template:Dragon Ball anime

Hi

I saw you reverted my good faith edit, but I'm hoping you'll undo the reversion as Template:Dragon Ball films was recently merged into Template:Dragon Ball anime such that the TV series and films are in one, combined template, following consensus to do so.

Happy editing! : )

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C 18:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your good faith reversion. Is the reason because the template is named Template:Dragon Ball anime? If that's the case, you might propose at WP:TFD, renaming the template Template:Dragon Ball anime and films. Doug Mehus T·C 18:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmehus: I was unaware that a discussion had been made to merge the two templates, sorry for the confusion. Also, since there was a merger wouldn't an admin be able to merge them both to Template:Dragon Ball anime and films?★Trekker (talk) 18:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Treker, No worries at all. Unfortunately, the Template for Discussions space of Wikipedia is low attended, both editors and administrators, so "consensus" is often formed by several editors. I would support a renaming to Dragon Ball anime and films, if you wanted to propose that in a subsequent discussion. Do you have Twinkle installed? You just go to Template:Dragon Ball anime and then use the XfD tool to propose what you are wanting to do. Doug Mehus T·C 18:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Alternatively, I will ask Trialpears what other alternative there might be. Trialpears, when transcluding the merged Template:Dragon Ball anime template, is there a title parameter that can be used to set a custom title? If not, would this be something you could easily add? Doug Mehus T·C 18:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmehus: As long as the template makes sense I'm fine with anything.★Trekker (talk) 08:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That could be done in seconds, but might not be a good idea, since the content of the template isn't changing on a case-by-case basis. Its scope at present seems to be "Dragonball anime and films" (with the first word covering all entries except the live-action films), so that seems to be the ideal title. And renaming a template is a WP:RM thing, not TfD. In this case, though, I would just manually move it to Template:Dragonball anime and films, and clean up the redirects, since it's not likely to be a controversial move.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  20:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SMcCandlish, True, yeah, I suspect they wouldn't oppose that. At the end of the day, everyone, including
  • Treker, was on board with the merge, it's just that for the film-related articles, the name of the merged template wasn't really discussed at TfD. I'll look into potentially renaming this later and then proposing a bulk deletion at RfD of the unnecessary left behind redirects. Doug Mehus T·C 21:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects are generally fine. They won't be deleted if they have history, nor if they might actually be useful (if I guess at {{Dragonball films}} that should probably actually work, so we likely need some additional redirects).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Male Roman emperors

Why did you create this category? Alll Roman emperors were male. Consorts were sometimes called Augustus. Female Augusti regnant would in English be called Empresses. There is no such thing as a female Roman emperor. Please delete the associated trail of categories. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Laurel Lodged: There is no category by the name of Category:Male Roman emperors nor has there ever been, so I have no idea what you're talking about.★Trekker (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Haven't had my coffee yet. Saw monarch and read as emperor. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Laurel Lodged: It's cool. Everyone misreads from time to time.★Trekker (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - November 2019

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter
The September 2024 Issue / November 2019
Project news
  • Sharing the joy of the revival of newsletter after a break.
Newly nominated content
Task force and related news
  • Please participate in the revival of WikiProject.
  • Feel free to improve the articles come under the project.
Collaboration of the Month
Announcements and open tasks
Open tasks logo WikiProject Horror
Announcements and open tasks

→ Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages!

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (StarTrekker) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.
Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Horror. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unwanted categories

Hello. If you make a category by mistake, such as Category:Cultural depictions of Byzantinian men, then just tag it with {{db-self}} rather than blanking it. And just as a personal opinion, I'm not a big fan of those cultural depictions categories, for me they tend towards WP:OVERCATEGORIZATION but I know others disagree. 3-5 categories are generally enough for any one article. Le Deluge (talk) 14:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Deluge:I was under the impression that blanking and putting {{db-self}} were the same thing. Apologies if that's not the case.★Trekker (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{db-self}} puts it directly in the queue for deletion, whereas blanking adds an extra layer of work via it showing up in eg WP:Database reports/Uncategorized categories where people like me end up adding the db-self tag. You might as well cut out the middle man <g> Le Deluge (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Le Deluge: Ok, thanks for letting me know.★Trekker (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second Opinion

Hey Man! How's everything going? How are the Billy and Stu articles? Hey I was wondering if I could get a second opinion on a sandbox article I'm working on? I'm currently writing an article about Jack Napier from Tim Burton's Batman film. I've done a lot of work on it but I'm just looking for a progress update and some feedback. What all I should add? What all I should fix/improve. Because it's a bit of a daunting task writing an article for a character as big as, well, The Joker. Just looking for a second opinion is all. Thanks man! - SeanTheYeti452

  • @SeanTheYeti452: Hi man, nice to hear from you again. Sorry it took a while to reply, I've been a little tired recently so havn't been on the site much. The Billy and Stu articles are ok, havn't worked a lot on them since I've been busy with other suff but they're moving forward. As for the Napier page, it looks very good (great even), only things I'd note is that you should make sure to cite the Biography section, I don't see any refs in there right now, and to not use capitalization in the headers when not needed (for example "Fictional Character Biography" should be "Fictional character biography").★Trekker (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @*Treker: Wow, thanks. That's really helpful. I'll make sure I find some more references for the biography section. I still don't know if it's ready for the big move into the article space (especially when compared to Joker (The Dark Knight)). But I'm going to keep working on it. Thanks for the help! Also, dude, it's all good that it took a while for the reply, Wikipedia's not a job. If you need to take some time off do it, you deserve it. - SeanTheYeti452
    • @SeanTheYeti452: Thanks Sean, you're very sweet. ★Trekker (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • @*Treker: Aw thanks man! I'm also working on a page for the Michael Keaton Batman as well. It's pretty similar to the Napier page but again, feedback is good! - SeanTheYeti452
        • @SeanTheYeti452: It's looking really good too. Things that I'd note is that instead of "Bruce Wayne A.K.A. Batman" I would write "Bruce Wayne, better known by his superhero alias Batman", because Wikipedia doesn't usually use contractions, and you should also make sure to use italics on the film titles even when they're in the section headers, like this.
        • I've also noticed that you havn't added images to some of the character articles you've made yet, would it be ok if I helped with that? ★Trekker (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • @*Treker: Absolutely, please do. That helps a lot! - SeanTheYeti452
          • @*Treker: Ok, I've got a question. Say I want to use a pre-existing photo file in an article (In this case the file File:Batman (Michael Keaton).jpg in the aforementioned Batman article). How would I go about doing that? Would I have to ask permission of the person who uploaded the file?
            • @SeanTheYeti452:No that would not be needed. What you need to do is to go to the image's own page and add a second "free use rationale" to it where you explain that it's needed on the article page to give context and illustrate a point (in this case show the character). The more times a non-free file is used in helpful ways the better it is for Wikipedia.★Trekker (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I’m alright. Just kinda dealing with the whole Holiday season thing. It’s not a very easy time of year for my family, but we’re getting by. I haven’t been active as often on Wikipedia this past week due to family commitments. But other than that I’m doing ok. How are you? SeanTheYeti452 (talk) 10:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft categories

FYI, the annoyoyance of the Draft categories getting the colon trick mistakenly applied might be an ongoing nuisance from bots. Not sure if the bot runner figured out what the bug is, but its been a while now... See User_talk:DannyS712_bot#Task_27_disabling_draft_categories_as_well?. Just letting you know since they may unfortunately pop in again in an annoying uphill battle. -2pou (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry

This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.

No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well *T. MarnetteD|Talk 19:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - December 2019

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter
The September 2024 Issue / December 2019
Happy holidays!

Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2020. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. We give thanks for your works to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia.

Project news
Newly nominated content
Recent DYKs
Recent RMs
Task force and related news
  • Please participate in the revival of WikiProject.
  • Feel free to improve the articles come under this project.
  • Feel free to contribute to newsletter.
  • Feel free to participate in the deletion discussions regarding this group.
Quotes
I think that true horror is accomplished by slowly getting into your brain. The old way is much more scary.
Sergio Aragonés – Spanish/Mexican cartoonist and writer.
Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Horror. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Collaboration of the Month
Announcements and open tasks
Open tasks logo WikiProject Horror
Announcements and open tasks

→ Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages!

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (StarTrekker) from the Delivery list.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Hello *Treker: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Cheers

Merry Christmas, StarTrekker!
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!

Hello, *Treker! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

God Jul och Gott Nytt År!

User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång is wishing you the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas,
Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus,
or the Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.

Please enjoy these messages from our readers! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 15:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Merry!

  • Right back at you!
    Right back at you!

Vjmlhds (talk) 17:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --A.S. Brown (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år!

Dear *Treker, thank you so much! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It was a great pleasure to meet you this year and I hope you having a wonderful time. Cheers!--A.S. Brown (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas

Merry Christmas and a happy new year 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this Christmas. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Fanoflionking 19:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A returned happy holidays

T, thanks for the kind WikiLove. Best wishes to you and a great holiday season. Cheers! Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 22:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 23:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas StarTrekker

Hi StarTrekker, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 00:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 02:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you too! :)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
BattleshipMan (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Jhenderson 777 06:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Season's Greetings

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ho ho

A stub-class Christmas tree dreams of the day it will reach featured status. Happy holidays! Clarityfiend (talk) 07:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
El Millo (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas!

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :) BOZ (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.


Betty Logan (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Starforce13 04:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A Joyous Yuletide to you!

Christmas card by Louis Prang, showing a group of anthropomorphized frogs parading with banner and band.
Carole of the Bells by Pentatonix


Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing, 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:39, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPは*Trekerたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 03:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ho dee ho ho ho

Merry Christmas to your and yours, and give Santa his due (reindeer food!). Enjoy the holiday week, Randy Kryn (talk) 04:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Have a great rest of your holiday season! If you do not, then you should know that I have acquired a very particular set of skills on my time on Wikipedia. Skills that make me a nightmare for people who do not enjoy themselves. If you do not have a great time this year, I will find you... And I will block you.

But seriously, happy holidays. DarkKnight2149 21:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
adamstom97 (talk) 05:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year! :)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello *Treker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
HalfOfDwarf (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year *Treker!

Happy New Year!
Hello *Treker:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, DonIago (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Auld Lang Syne

  • Back at you, Treker!
    Back at you, Treker!

Vjmlhds (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year *Treker!

Happy New Year!
Hello *Treker:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, BattleshipMan (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, Treker!

Happy New Year!
Hello Treker:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheer! --A.S. Brown (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Dear Treker, thank so much for the card! Much appreciated! It was great with working this year and I hope to work with you again next year! Thank you so and wishing you the best for the new year! --A.S. Brown (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!
Hello *Treker:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year, *Treker!

Happy New Year!

*Treker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

:)

Happy New Year!

Hello *Treker: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, HalfOfDwarf (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, *Treker!

Happy New Year!

*Treker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 00:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

slasher characters

why you have deleted my work ?--77.207.75.83 (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because its fancruft and many of the characters you added are not from slasher films.★Trekker (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

which one ?--77.207.75.83 (talk) 15:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC) i don't understand what you say, every character on this list are slasher character !--77.207.75.83 (talk) 15:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So The Shining is a slasher film in your mind?★Trekker (talk) 17:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could really use some more help

Hi, I could use some more help adding entries to the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. If you can I will give you some entries to add. I have been adding entries mostly by myself and any help will be much appreciated. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Davidgoodheart:, sorry I havn't replied right away, I've been very busy with uploading images. I can help out a little if you want me to.★Trekker (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Great, please add these people to the "Fugitives no longer sought section": John List fugitive disappeared 1971, now captured, Benjamin Hoskins Paddock disappeared December 30, 1968, captured September 1978, Frederick Grant Dunn, fugitive disappeared 1958, found dead 1959. Thank you so much for helping me with this as I have been trying hard to get some help! Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Helen Lyle

Hello, *Treker

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Helen Lyle, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Lyle.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

100,000th edit!

100,000th edit award
Hello *T. Let me be the first to congratulate you on your 100,000th edit! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your bling page! or you could choose to display the {{User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thanks for all your work at the 'pedia! Cheers, — MarnetteD|Talk 05:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :) ★Trekker (talk) 08:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Character redirects

Hey, I noticed you were tagging redirects with categories. If you're already doing that, it would be helpful if you place {{Fictional character redirect|series_name=<series article name>}}. --Gonnym (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to make sure to do that. Thanks.★Trekker (talk) 18:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I appreciate you standing up for me - I really do. That being said, I think we can all move on from TurokSwe at this point; he's banned for two different violations and if he edits, it will show here. Though I don't perceive me calling him out for his sockpuppetry as gravedancing like Guy Macon did, I agree that the conflict has concluded with his ban and he can let off steam all he wants, as he won't be welcomed back. If you do engage with TurokSwe, I'd suggest you leave it strictly to undoing vandalism by his sock IPs and alert administrators, so they may re-implement the range block. DÅRTHBØTTØ (T•C) 16:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:One-shot (comics) has been nominated for renaming

Category:One-shot (comics), which you created, has been nominated for possible renaming, to Category:One-shot comics and manga. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween character page

Why was the page moved to "Halloween (franchise)"? There isn't any other "Halloween character list" page that I can find, so you wouldn't disambiguate a page that doesn't require it.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my motivation in the edit summary. If you don't agree with it you can make a move request.★Trekker (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transgender rights by region has been nominated for discussion

Category:Transgender rights by region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks. that IP is likely going to revert war it seems.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi *Treker

@*Treker:

Always nice to see your user talkpage pop up in my watchlist. I noticed this edit re: a Twinkle notification for a redirect you created, and I didn't realize you created that redirect. Not sure if you saw or not, but I did notify you via a ping (as the most recent editor, not as the creator as I didn't know that yet) in the RfD wondering your thoughts on my proposed, arguably better, target as an alternative to deletion. Not sure if you wanted to weigh in there or not.

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C (talk page stalker) 19:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dmehus: Hi Dmehus! Thank you for wanting my input. Yes I created that redirect a while ago, I was planning on expanding a section on intersex persons in the Cisgender article but I never got around to it. Redirecting it to Cary Gabriel Costello seems like a great idea!★Trekker (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category scope

Category:Cultural depictions of stunt performers does not specify that the stunt performers must be actual people. In fact, the subcategory Category:Films about stunt performers includes a couple of Ghost Rider films and a whole lot of other films about fictional people, e.g. The Stunt Man, The Great Waldo Pepper, etc. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not how the "Cultural depictions of foo" categories function. That's now what they're for. Category should be removed from pages it does no belong in.★Trekker (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this restriction specified? Clarityfiend (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know who came up with the "cultural depictions of foo" it's just how its always done. The category "Cultural depictions of American people" doesn't show up in every single film with American characters in it for example. If you want specifics you should ask someone more familiar with the history of the category.★Trekker (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked over a bunch of the categories, and the situation is as you stated. I've therefore removed The Soup Nazi from a couple of them. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death of a famous Mexican wrestler

Hi, did you know about this famous Mexican wrestler's death? https://globalnews.ca/news/6404334/mexican-wrestler-la-parka-dead/ His death is sad, but I am glad that he doesn't have to live paralyzed the rest of his life, and that he only had to live like that for under 3 months as well. The article says he hit his head on the floor, if there was no padding on the floor then there should have been, it's MUCH safer that way, and hopefully they will make sure that the concrete floor is padded with crash mats. Davidgoodheart (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Man I feel like there have been a lot of accidental lucha deaths in the last couple of years. Terrible.★Trekker (talk) 17:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, speaking of deaths did you know about Howard Finkel's death? This is indeed sad and tragic, but not as bad as La Parka II's death, since he was older and died in a lot less worse way than La Parka II did. He had suffered from a stroke in February 2019 and was ill, so I am glad he is not in that pain anymore. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is yet another recent wrestler's death, and the cause of his death was Corona, cripes! https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/11417345/wrestling-death-black-demon-coronavirus/ Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart: This sucks.★Trekker (talk) 00:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know, how tragic, I feel bad about it as well. Lets hope that this won't continue. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi *Treker! You created a thread called Wikidata at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


"WhatCulture" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WhatCulture. Since you had some involvement with the WhatCulture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DC film categories

Hello *Treker, I saw that you already marked a lot of the DC film categories to be deleted cause they have only a few entries. What about the following categories not yet marked for possible delition: Aquaman films, Green Lantern films, Robin films, Animated Robin films, Wonder Woman films, Justice League films, Teen Titans films, Watchmen (film), Suicide Squad (film series), Batman Unlimited Film Series, Fan films based on Batman, Fan films based on Superman? I guess a lot of these also should be deleted, but I am not so used to with all the official procedure and honestly I am to lazy for announcing them myself. (Just thought you might want to know.) ...same accounts to a bunch of Marvel Comics film catagories. - Weapon X (talk, contribs) 21:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2019 Cure Award
In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Thank you!★Trekker (talk) 18:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Middle-earth peoples and animals

Template:Middle-earth peoples and animals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Vanity project" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vanity project. Since you had some involvement with the Vanity project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Billy (Black Christmas)

@BlueMoonset: Hi, I've been thinking that since I kinda screwed up there maybe I'm not the one best for the job. I would love to see it approved but maybe someone else would do a better job.★Trekker (talk) 09:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. I've called for a new reviewer there. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mission: Impossible moves

I hate to say it, but I think you got this one backwards. The discussion last July was pretty explicit in the consensus that the franchise article should be at the base name, not the disambiguation page. I think that's the right course of action as the franchise article does provide the links to the individual franchise entries more than sufficiently, and provides more context than a disambiguation page is allowed to have. oknazevad (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that discussion. My bad. I tried to avoid any issues with the Wikidata links so I made a brand new page.★Trekker (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, being that you are now aware of the discussion, can you please undo your moves? oknazevad (talk) 13:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I can do that. I'm not an admin. If I try to move a page to a space that alreay exists it just tells me that I can't do that.★Trekker (talk) 13:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to request a technical move at WP:RM then. oknazevad (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Oknazevad: I've made a move request at the talkpage now.★Trekker (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus scare

Hi, just wondering how are adjusting and handling issues? This has me worried and I REALLY hope that this will get better as soon as possible, take care. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Oh I'm fine myself. It's not a huge problem where I live, as of now at least, there is no real issues with food markets or hospitals here in Stockholm. Most people are just staying at home and such, a few schools are closed, but not all. My family are all doing well, but my little brother is Peru just now, and his flight home got cancelled, but hopefully that will clear up soon. Thank you for caring! I'm sad to hear that you are very worried, is everything ok with you?★Trekker (talk) 04:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is soso, as I am having both my ups and downs. I am glad that things are okay with you. I will continue this discussion later as there is much that I need to take care of right now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart: No hurry my friend.★Trekker (talk) 03:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this might offer some hope: https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canadian-scientists-make-covid-19-research-breakthrough-isolating-virus-1.4851641. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart: Any news regarding a vaccine or cure seems to be good so far. Hopefully this will all come to a close sooner than later.★Trekker (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, here is some new news regarding a corona vaccine: https://ca.yahoo.com/news/big-tobacco-joins-fight-against-132300262.html. And I agree with you about any success with this a good thing. Davidgoodheart (talk) 09:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart: My brother just came home today, so it's all good news for me today.★Trekker (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good to hear that, take care. Davidgoodheart (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart: Thank you. You too.★Trekker (talk) 09:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to give to new information regarding Corona: some stores have reopened after being shut down for months and people can now sit together on the bus and come in through the front of the bus rather than the back as they were asking people to do before. How is the situation where you live right now? Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edits to Publius Clodius Pulcher

Just thought I'd drop you a note since I reverted your edits to the "background" section of Publius Clodius Pulcher. Most of the reasons are given in the edit summary, if briefly. But I can explain in greater detail here. I wasn't aware of a Claudia Prima or a Claudia Secunda—they weren't in the previous version of the article, and I didn't see them mentioned in any of the sources I checked—although I didn't do a thorough search, so there might be one—if you had cited to something for them, I would have had something to go on.

However, I guessed that you, or your source, was probably inferring their existence from the names of the other daughters—Tertia, or Tertulla, Quadrantaria (seems to be a nickname, not a surname, and in any case means "squarish", rather than "Quarta", which is the praenomen/cognomen for a fourth daughter), and Quinta. On its face that seems logical, but without evidence of other, elder daughters it's too speculative, in my opinion. They could have been called "Tertia" and "Quinta" because they were the third and fifth children, not the third and fifth daughters. And even then there's no certainty; these names could be used without reference to their literal meaning. Of course, it's possible that there were two elder sisters who perhaps died in childhood or never married, and played no role in history—but if that's not known for certain, do they need to be mentioned in this paragraph?

One of my goals in rewriting this article was to clear away some of the excess verbiage and make it more readable. So I'm trying to use an economy of words—not austerity for its own sake, of course, there's room for style—and I want to avoid parentheticals whenever possible, since in my experience they tend to distract from the flow of text. So wherever possible, I've been splitting long sentences, and changing parentheticals into distinct clauses that fit better into their sentences. The more details go in a sentence, the more clauses there are, and the more attention is required to understand it in one reading; so I'm trying to avoid intrusive clauses that break the flow of the language.

I removed the new links to two of the wives and one of the husbands; the two wives don't have articles of their own, and may never have; the links simply redirect to their husbands, who are already linked in the same sentence, with the exception of Celer. And he's linked, with his full name, earlier in the same paragraph, so there's no need to repeat his full name or link to him a second time.

Of course I fully expect that this article will be heavily edited once I'm done with it—in fact I want it to be, because there are some things that I found awkward and which need to be refactored or moved, although I'm not sure how. For example, the "sex and politics in ancient Rome" section seems quite large, at least in edit mode, due to the huge links to individual book pages on Google Books—I think I might trim those; direct links make it hard to read and edit article text even when they're not massive, like these are. And I'm not sure of the extent to which the views expressed by the scholars cited reflect mainstream views, or novel hypotheses. Attempting to get a sense of how to revise them this afternoon, I struggled a bit to find a logical structure to this section, and decided to leave it for later, apart from moving it to the end of the main text—it seemed intrusive coming in the middle of the article.

And while I agree that the commented-out sentence about rumours of incest with Clodius' sisters should be mentioned in the article (there are a few allusions to these already, but not an independent mention), I'm not sure where to put it so as not to give it undue weight; the easiest place to put it would be the lead, but that would also give it the greatest importance, and I doubt the rumours deserve that much weight.

I'm aware that there are several sections that could use more citations, one of which I wrote myself this afternoon—not controversial, I think, but I didn't have any sources in front of me; I've been relying mainly on the existing citations, as my goal was to trim fat and improve flow. I'm sure I could use your help with this! I should have the main stuff done by tomorrow or Monday. Thanks again for your hard work in the project. I didn't want you to think I didn't value it, simply because I reverted this edit. P Aculeius (talk) 03:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Syme's Roman Papers

Hi, you can find all of Ronald Syme's Roman Papers here. You should also request JSTOR access through the Wikipedia Library. T8612 (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been able to download them? If so, I can remove them from the filehost. T8612 (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@T8612: No I havn't taken the time to do it yet. I've been quite bussy uploading pictures to Commons this week.★Trekker (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Punisher

It continues: [2] 2601:249:8B80:4050:813:5AA8:F505:67FE (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected it would, thankfully Davey came in now.★Trekker (talk) 12:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrading article

Hi, do you think you could try and see if you could upgrade this article Ivan Belov (captain) by adding more sources and information to it. If it can be upgraded I can then add it to the List of unsolved murders. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: I've added it to my watchlist, I'm a bit busy right now at Wikidata, but I'll take care of Belov as soon as I can.★Trekker (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, take care and keep safe. Also thanks for your quick response as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

WWE article

Hey *Treker. A little while back I removed the "As of 2019" text from the WWE WP article's lead before the statement "It is the largest wrestling promotion in the world, holding over 500 events a year...". So it previously read "As of 2019, it is the largest wrestling promotion in the world, holding over 500 events a year...".

The explanation I gave was "Don't need "as of 2019". Its been the largest for a long time and no indications that it won't continue to be." But I've since began to second guess if that text should've have been removed, especially considering the arrival of AEW and the continued success of companies like NJPW. What's your opinion on this? It's in the lead of the WWE article so I do think that it's important. -TrynaMakeADollar (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TrynaMakeADollar: I don't think there was anything wrong with your edit. WWE is still very much the biggest wrestling company and has been for a long time, even if AEW and New Japan have grown pretty big recently.★Trekker (talk) 07:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alright thanks. -TrynaMakeADollar (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vipsania

Hi Treker, I have edited Vipsania according to disambiguation page guidelines, particularly with respect to red links (MOS:DABRED). The only insect that I could find a mention of was Vipsania unicolora, so I commented out the rest until they are included in an article. Leschnei (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category dispute

IMO, the question of whether something belongs in Category:Films based on actual events or Category:Films based on real people revolves around what confers the notability. Someone like Alexander the Great overshadows all events in his life, but the 47 Ronin are only notable because of the assassination. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clarityfiend: Well it shouldn't have both categories at least. I personally think the "real people" category is better since while they are know for the one event, they're still the ones who are known and named in both the category and article. The event is not called "The assassination of Kira Yoshinaka".★Trekker (talk) 23:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated Category:Films based on real people for deletion here because two other categories between them make this one redundant. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for all the edits you do. ❤ LoreMaster22 (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scooby-Doo! Adventures: The Mystery Map

Hi Treker, hope you're doing well! I wanted to ask if there was any particular reason you changed all instances of "movie" to "special," on Scooby-Doo! Adventures: The Mystery Map. I'm minded to agree that the length of it would justify it being called a special, but most sources call it a "movie." I don't disagree with you, just was curious on your take on that or if you had an explanation for why you changed it. Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 02:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KatnissEverdeen:! I'm doing well. How are you? You're correct in assuming that I changed it because of the lenght, I've noticed a lot of the Scooby-Doo specials get labeled "movies" when they're actually specials, but if this one is specifically named as a film in all the sources then I guess we should do as the sources say.★Trekker (talk) 03:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm doing good! None of the references on the page list it as a special. Two 1 2 of the three references currently on the article all list it as a film, and the third just says "installment." I guess based on that, I think we should go by the sources and put "film" instead of special, but I'm open to your thoughts too! I won't re-add it unless you think so too. Thanks and let me know, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 23:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@KatnissEverdeen: I'm a bit on the fence honestly, films shorter than 60 minutes do exist, often called featurettes.★Trekker (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’m happy to just leave it as is then. I wasn’t overly concerned about it, just thought I’d bring it up since none of sources say “special.” Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 01:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian's Inferno draft

Hey. I saw you started a draft for this. I don't know if there's any notability in and of itself to warrant an eventual article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentaries about bisexuality has been nominated for merging

Category:Documentaries about bisexuality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentaries about same-sex marriage has been nominated for merging

Category:Documentaries about same-sex marriage has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentaries about gay men has been nominated for deletion

Category:Documentaries about gay men has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentaries about lesbians has been nominated for merging

Category:Documentaries about lesbians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Former" categories

Hey, I fully understand that most people who detransitioned no longer consider themselves transgender. But generally we tend to put "Former X" categories also under "X" because they have been X. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marcocapelle Most people who detransition would say that they never were trans at all, just confused, and would likely find it offensive to still be listed as trans. Being transgender is something you are, not something you do. Transition or detransition is something you do, but being transgender is not.★Trekker (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, and therefore that category label should not directly appear in the articles. But for anyone who is interested in transgender topics and browses in the category tree it can also be important to learn more about people who formerly considered themselves to be transgender. Shall I add a "see also" link instead? Marcocapelle (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcocapelle: A see also link would be great.★Trekker (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images in The Amazing Spider-Man 129

Hi. The removal of those images is per WP:NFCC, the policy that governs when Wikipedia is allowed to host images of work copyrighted by other people. The images I removed failed two of the criteria:

  • 3a - minimal number of non-free images
  • 8 - Critical to the understanding of the article topic

If an image fails any criteria, it cannot be used.

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC) @The Squirrel Conspiracy:[reply]

"Minimal number of non-free images" seems like one of those "vague enough to enforce based on how we feel today" rules. It's not a concrete example and in that case I can choose to say that the amount of images used in the article if "minimal number" to make for the best article possible.
"Critical to the understanding of the article topic" it also essentially based on POV. You may feel that its not needed or not helpful enough. But I think that just stating in the article that homages have been made wouldn't actually be effective like actually showing an homage is, those images don't exist in the article just to "decorate" it, they're helpful and concrete examples of the topic at hand. It's a specific section dedicated to the appearence of those images, they're described and relevent.★Trekker (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bible Films

Hi, I saw that you edited the page on Wikipedia that lists Bible films. This subject interests me greatly. In fact, I wrote a book on the topic. It's called Hollywood and the Bible by Benjamin Sambul, available on Amazon. Anyway, it seems you took out all TV series from that section, leaving only films. Yet you left a TV series from Brazil in there, about Joshua, that lasted for an entire year. Is there any reason for that? Take care, Ben Gilli666 (talk) 21:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gilli666:! I don't have any memory of these edits, I tend to edit a lot of different pages each day and I can't recal this one. If I did neglect to remove that series, it was likely just a mistake on my part. I'm glad to see that you've joined Wikipedia, it's always nice to get new users interested in specific subjects.★Trekker (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voluntary childlessness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maternal instinct (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, StarTrekker. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DÅRTHBØTTØ (T•C) 18:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the pages for AvP and Predator - I keep finding edits TurokSwe made where he added baseless claims with references that don't even remotely substantiate them. He added his fan theories, like that Peter Weyland was a successor to Charles Bishop Weyland. The latest one I found on all the pages had Fox's Emma Watts saying that she had big plans for Alien, but he used it to claim that she was referring to AvP and Predator. I wonder if we should call on copy editors to comb through the pages and look for references that don't even remotely correlate like that. DÅRTHBØTTØ (T•C) 17:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DarthBotto: How do we call on a copy editor?★Trekker (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I made a very big edit to the Predator franchise page, with a smaller follow-up one. To me, it seems necessary, as I believe we need to move away from having three identical pages built around original research, one banned editor's outlier fan theory and replication, but I wanted to hear what you think about it. DÅRTHBØTTØ (T•C) 19:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DarthBotto: It seems fine to me.★Trekker (talk) 22:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Killers

Stop! Kaiju do not count as killers! Never have, never will! That is final! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8D:501:AEB0:411E:2204:8BBF:29CB (talk) 02:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The list clearly states villains, and you don't have any power/right to enforce your POV on this site.★Trekker (talk) 02:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - June 2020

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter
The September 2024 Issue / June 2020
Newly nominated content
Recent RFC
Collaboration of the Month
Announcements and open tasks
Open tasks logo WikiProject Horror
Announcements and open tasks

→ Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages!

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (StarTrekker) from the Delivery list.


Sent by Path slopu on the behalf of WikiProject Horror.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected article

Do you think it is eligible for this Max Caulfield to be restored as it looks notable but was made by blocked user mostly, plenty of users from life is strange wiki try to restore it but rejected. 139.0.62.99 (talk) 07:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with this character or game, so I'm not sure I can help you. Sorry.★Trekker (talk) 07:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Spider-Man toys" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of Spider-Man toys. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 21#List of Spider-Man toys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, *Treker

Thank you for creating List of pro wrestling websites.

User:Dmehus, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this useful redirect from a commonly used variant title, noting pro is common shorthand for professional and, thus, likely to be commonly searched.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dmehus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dmehus (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional military brats has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional military brats has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Hope van Dyne

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Draft:Hope van Dyne and Hope Pym. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe-specific characters has been nominated for renaming

Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe-specific characters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template sorting

Per WP:SORTKEY, sort keys may be prefixed with Greek letters to place entries after the main alphabetical list. This applies for Books, Stub categories, Portals, and Templates, among others. They continue to work for me and are always placed after the last alpha entry. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: Well I have no idea why they have always refused to work for me. Sorry.★Trekker (talk) 21:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prejudice against LGBT people has been nominated for renaming

Category:Prejudice against LGBT people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television programs by franchise

A tag has been placed on Category:Television programs by franchise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill iconic scene.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill iconic scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - July 2020

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter
The September 2024 Issue / July 2020
Newly nominated content
Article of the month

The Brute Man is a 1946 American horror film starring Rondo Hatton as the Creeper, a murderer seeking revenge against the people he holds responsible for the disfigurement of his face.

Quotes
“Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn and caldron bubble.”
Macbeth (William Shakespeare).
Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Horror. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Collaboration of the Month
Announcements and open tasks
Open tasks logo WikiProject Horror
Announcements and open tasks

→ Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages!

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (StarTrekker) from the Delivery list.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi *Treker! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Template for disambiguation page which should be rewritten to be an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Günter Bechly‎ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Günter Bechly‎ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Günter Bechly (2nd nomination)‎ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I'm a an Italian user, and I published a page, but I don't know if it is correct.--Dany 13:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Dany1000: You need to always add categories like Category:Fantasy novel series to pages, as well as add a reflist under the "References" section. Besides that there is nothing really wrong with the page. Does the series have an article in the italian Wikipedia?★Trekker (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes,it has----Dany 14:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
@Dany1000: I conected the two on Wikidata.★Trekker (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--Dany 15:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the page but I did a mistake?--Dany 15:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC) page--Dany 16:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dany1000: You did a few minor mistakes, but nothing big. Is there anything specific you want help with?★Trekker (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No,I edit crosswiki in the pages that I know.In fact now I edit in the French's wiki--Dany 11:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New page

Why the template in this page is hidden--Dany 15:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I use mobile phone--Dany 15:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dany1000: The Fantasy project appears to redirect to the Novels project.★Trekker (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now?--Dany 16:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dany1000: It doesn't really matter much.★Trekker (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, StarTrekker. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--ValeJappo (talk) 20:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Can you Help me for References in this page?----Dany 09:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scream films has been nominated for merging

Category:Scream films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A note about PubMed

(the following is a comment on an edit you made in 2018, so if someone's already communicated this, I'm sorry for repeating it)

Until recently, the article Intersex people and military service in the United States, which you wrote a substantial chunk, contained the sentence:

Publications by the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information recommends that intersex individuals be allowed to serve in the armed forces, but not combat units.[1]

References

  1. ^ Marom, Tal; Itskoviz, David; Ostfeld, Ishay (November 2008). "Intersex patients in military service". Military Medicine. 173 (11): 1132–1135. doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.11.1132. ISSN 0026-4075. PMID 19055190.

While PubMed is run by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, and does exercise some degree of quality control over the site, it's a repository of academic papers that don't necessarily reflect the views of the NCBI or the NIH more broadly. That particular paper was written entirely by people affiliated with the IDF, as the paper itself states. I removed the sentence from the article, as its judgement isn't about the US; it's already cited in the global perspective article and the Israeli article. Vahurzpu (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Grudge (franchise) films has been nominated for merging

Category:The Grudge (franchise) films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cross-sibling" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cross-sibling. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 16#Cross-sibling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 198.151.8.4 (talk) 23:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StarTrekker&oldid=973390229"