Jump to content

World Tribunal on Iraq: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
d uncited
rm non-RS & POV
Line 4: Line 4:
The '''World Tribunal on Iraq''' ('''WTI''') was a people's court consisting of intellectuals, [[human rights]] campaigners and [[non-governmental organization]]s, and was active from 2003 to 2005. Set up following the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]] it sprung from the anti-war movement and is modelled on the [[Russell Tribunal]] of the American movement against the [[Vietnam War]].
The '''World Tribunal on Iraq''' ('''WTI''') was a people's court consisting of intellectuals, [[human rights]] campaigners and [[non-governmental organization]]s, and was active from 2003 to 2005. Set up following the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]] it sprung from the anti-war movement and is modelled on the [[Russell Tribunal]] of the American movement against the [[Vietnam War]].


It was supported by [[India]]n leftist author [[Arundhati Roy]], by American international lawyer [[Richard Falk]] and [[United Nations]] Assistant General Secretary [[Denis Halliday]], but it consciously avoided a hierarchical structure. The WTI routinely found that the coalition forces in [[Iraq]] are guilty of [[war crimes]] and violations of the [[Geneva Conventions]]. The Tribunal tended to receive less coverage in the [[United States]] and [[United Kingdom]] than in the [[Middle East]] and [[Europe]], and was frequently described by supporters of the war as a "[[kangaroo court]]".<ref>http://www.medialens.org/alerts/05/050706_the_mysterious_case.php</ref> Its members were not popularly elected.
It was supported by [[India]]n leftist author [[Arundhati Roy]], by American international lawyer [[Richard Falk]] and [[United Nations]] Assistant General Secretary [[Denis Halliday]], but it consciously avoided a hierarchical structure. The WTI routinely found that the coalition forces in [[Iraq]] are guilty of [[war crimes]] and violations of the [[Geneva Conventions]].


==Actions==
==Actions==

Revision as of 19:27, 12 February 2017

The World Tribunal on Iraq (WTI) was a people's court consisting of intellectuals, human rights campaigners and non-governmental organizations, and was active from 2003 to 2005. Set up following the 2003 invasion of Iraq it sprung from the anti-war movement and is modelled on the Russell Tribunal of the American movement against the Vietnam War.

It was supported by Indian leftist author Arundhati Roy, by American international lawyer Richard Falk and United Nations Assistant General Secretary Denis Halliday, but it consciously avoided a hierarchical structure. The WTI routinely found that the coalition forces in Iraq are guilty of war crimes and violations of the Geneva Conventions.

Actions

See also

Publications

The most complete collection of the proceedings of the Tribunal has been collected in Sökmen, M. G. Roy, A., Falk, R. (eds.) 2008. World Tribunal on Iraq: Making the Case Against War. Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press.

See also: Borowiak, C. 2008. 'The World Tribunal on Iraq: Citizens’ Tribunals and the Struggle for Accountability'. New Political Science, 30:161-186. Cubukcu, A. 2011. ‘On Cosmopolitan Occupations. The Case of the World Tribunal on Iraq’, Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 13:422-442.

References