User talk:Flyer22 Frozen: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
clear user's page. An Inconvenient Truth isn't yet blocked even though he was apparently reported. WP:WMF useless. |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What's up doc?== |
|||
You could have gone to my talk page first, it would have been more professional. So would a longer history on your talk page. Will you please discuss your revisions with me. I have rollback on Uncyclopedia, that tool might make it easier for you in the future. [[User:An Inconvenient Truth|An Inconvenient Truth]] ([[User talk:An Inconvenient Truth|talk]]) 00:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:An Inconvenient Truth|An Inconvenient Truth]], let me ask you a question: Did you think that you could take advantage of the situation because the Flyer22 Reborn account had not edited in weeks? Do you think it was smart to make the same type of child sex doll edit here as you did at the other wiki? By "the other wiki", we both know that I don't mean Uncyclopedia. I suppose if others are willing to let you roam free, there isn't much the Flyer22 Reborn account can do. [[User:Flyer22 Reborn|Flyer22 Reborn]] ([[User talk:Flyer22 Reborn#top|talk]]) 00:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Why are you being deliberately vague? Just say what other wiki you mean, you clearly haven;t been watching Hillary winning the debates, just be open and honest. I'm not going to revert you, you can stomp me out if that makes you feel better but I have the feeling the fact those edits are legitimate is going to revert your edits. LWho do you think I'm sock puppeting; your being awfully round about and this level of hostility isn't welcomes after the presidential debates depleted by patience for poorly constructed arguments. [[User:An Inconvenient Truth|An Inconvenient Truth]] ([[User talk:An Inconvenient Truth|talk]]) 01:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Why are you deliberately being so obvious? Your username doesn't do you any justice. Neither does your interest in bonobos. Here's a hint: [[Wikipediocracy]] has eyes as well. [[User:Flyer22 Reborn|Flyer22 Reborn]] ([[User talk:Flyer22 Reborn#top|talk]]) 02:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::What's with the vague mysterious indirect talk? I asked you a question, who do you think I am? Has eyes, yes and a lot of them are blood shot I'm sure, do you know of a journal study on blood shot eyes from staring at screens too much? I wonder how looking at still text compared to moving images. I doubt that study exists, but it would be interesting. And yes, animals we share like 99% of our DNA in common with are fascinating, and sex dolls are gross, both of which you can learn watching an episode of House MD. Clearly wikipediocracy doesn't have a very good mouth or else MSNBC or planned parenthood or someone would have mentioned you or Fox News would have mentioned you. Please say what your trying to say with less mystery, it's threatening and treats me like I don't deserve to be given basic information pertinent to a conversation with someone on doing my otherwise pleasant volunteering here. [[User:An Inconvenient Truth|An Inconvenient Truth]] ([[User talk:An Inconvenient Truth|talk]]) 02:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Would you please let me be innocent until proven guilty. == |
|||
Ok this is a longshot, I can't request a checkuser on myself to clear this up, could you call for one or give me back my edits? I want this issue settled and you don't seem to be questioning that most of those were good edits just that I shouldn't be allowed to make them, based off... [[User:An Inconvenient Truth|An Inconvenient Truth]] ([[User talk:An Inconvenient Truth|talk]]) 20:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:All the blather on this page proves one thing—[[WP:NOTHERE]]. A good-faith editor with a total of 55 edits would not be rubbing-in "checkuser". Find something to do that does not involve poking Flyer. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 22:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::The editor is a sock, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions&oldid=745602301#All_my_edits_were_just_reverted.2C_what_do_I_do.3F and others], including yourself, know it. He knows I know who he is. I gave a big hint above if anyone wants to look into it and not rely solely on [[WP:CheckUser|CheckUser]] data. He's committed mistake after mistake that has allowed me to identify him, including his quirky username and excessive and awkward comma use. And he knows that I probably can't do much about it if CheckUser says otherwise. Another editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions&oldid=745602301#All_my_edits_were_just_reverted.2C_what_do_I_do.3F pointed this out] at the Teahouse the sock complained at. And like I've pointed out before, sock cases should not be limited to CheckUser evidence. I can wait, though. Recently, I waited for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Plmokg22345 this sock] to be indefinitely blocked; I can wait for the above sock to be indefinitely blocked too. In the meantime, I will monitor his edits. |
|||
::An Inconvenient Truth, bravo on learning to mask yourself as far as CheckUser is concerned; it's about time you learned. One slip-up with the masking, though, and CheckUser will nail you. [[User:Flyer22 Reborn|Flyer22 Reborn]] ([[User talk:Flyer22 Reborn#top|talk]]) 09:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||