User talk:Jpgordon

Cleared 02:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC) -- check history for record.

Much respect to the Boingo. -- RyanFreisling @ 04:46, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

VFD List

If, and when my bot gets working, I should be able to produce a list updated hourly... something for a watchlist to track. -- AllyUnion (talk) 15:53, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Pathetic nazioid whining

Jpgordon, Why do you keep deleting the links I add to Holocaust Denial? Why are you abusing your administrator powers? Its time to bring a movement against abuse administrators to have you lose your admin status.

(...links removed...)

• Fuck off, Nazi. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:27, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dear jpgordon,

Could we both strive to not revert to childish and immature personal insults and ad hominen attacks. I would like to know hy do you keep deleting the links I add to Holocaust Denial? I understand that the holocaust denial section is not a directory and I do not feel that there being a dozen or so links on the holocaust denial article to holocaust denial web sites constitutes making wikipedia or the specific article on holocaust denial a directory. I am not a nazi by the way, so I would appreciate you not categorizing me. Can we please strive to be neutral and allow a fair and balanced spectrum of view points. Can't the average person check the validity of the claims made by these people from sites which debunk holocaust denial? Can you and I please bring this issue to arbitration, because I feel that maybe your emotional bias towards judaism is clouding your ability to be fair, balanced and neutral.

can you please answer my questions without reverting to childish insults?

Thanks,

Dnagod 02:20, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Fuck off, Nazi apologist. That better? --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:28, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dear jpgordon,

Lets try again.

Can you please stop the abusive, insensitive and childish insults and answer my question?

Jpgordon, Why do you keep deleting the holocaust denial links I add to the external links section of the Holocaust Denial article? I wish to know as I am bringing this issue to arbitration. (...repeat of links removed...)

Dnagod 02:39, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• I already answered your question. ''Wikipedia is not a web directory. There are sufficient links to your Nazi friends' sites; the ones you provided added nothing to the discussion. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:44, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dear Jpgordon,

It's a shame that you have to revert to childish name calling, digression and insults. The links I provided for the holocaust denial section were valid and contributed vastly to the holocaust denial section and discussion - they in no way turned the holocaust denial section into a directory. The fact that you deleted legit links is a reflection of your childishness, censorous bigotry, personal and emotional biases which are deeply and negatively hurting the wikipedia project. You should have your administrator privileges revoked as your personal biases and childish emotionalism are not worthy of this project. I say these not as personal insults, but as facts regarding your actions in this project which clearly violate neutrality.

This is my last and final response to you as I see that I am getting no where trying to appeal to any remote sense of intelligence, fairness, ballance and neutrality in you. Best of luck and I hope you grow up little girl and some day discover that these efforts at censorship ultimately fail in the larger picture. In this sense I am glad that I was able to see what this place is in a short amount of time so quickly, before getting too deeply involved in this wikipedia project. It is clear that this wikipedia projects is deeply infected with immature children, censorship, childishness, jewish bias, jewish supremacists and lackeys of the jews. This is good that I discover this early and realize that the only way for their to ever to be a fair, ballanced and neutral encyclopedia is to start one on my own! Now that's a huge project in its own, but one worthy of the effort.

Good Bye, Best wishes and take care.

Dnagod 05:13, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Fuck off, Nazi. And goodbye; have fun with your new encyclopedia. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:52, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Ok! -waves- Hugs and Kisses!

Dnagod 01:04, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations on your, er, fame!

You've made Stormfront. Bet you're thrilled. Apparently they plan to do something about Wikipedia. I predict it'll be like a swarm of Vogels, but anyway ... David Gerard 17:50, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC) (apparently part of both the Jewish and Muslim conspiracies)

• Yay! --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:11, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Conscious evolution

You may be interested to know that User:Dnagod has created an article on Conscious evolution, which has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Conscious evolution. Best, SlimVirgin 04:49, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks. The article is pretentious claptrap that doesn't belong here, but I'll recuse myself from voting, since the author might get the idea somehow that I'm biased against him. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:49, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

ADL

FYI, if it becomes necessary to count reverts, there are signs that user:Molloy and an active Anon may be the same user. [1]. Apparently Molloy is the "Auckland Youthrep" for the New Zealand National Front.[2] Stormfront down under? -Willmcw 07:54, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Why did you revert my last edit to New anti-Semitism? -==SV 03:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No problem. I figured you wanted to revert to the long version of the vfd header and didnt quite see the changes I made. Be well. -==SV 04:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Prometheism

Josh, I've nominated Prometheism for deletion, as it's promoting Dnagod's websites. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Prometheism. Best, SlimVirgin 08:42, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

Dnagod again

I think User:Dnagod may be back as User:Dariodario contribs and User:Tchardin contribs]. The two new accounts are interested in the same subjects (transhumanism, prometheism), and want to add the Dnagod website links and views to Transhumanism, as Dnagod did, using the same arguments. They also make the same spelling mistakes. I've put some evidence of this on Talk:Transhumanism here. Should the other two be blocked because Dnagod is blocked, or does the block apply only to that one user account? Best, SlimVirgin 10:19, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

for removing 83.200.251.157 's external links. Stbalbach 00:18, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

yeah thats the one! Stbalbach 05:36, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Adminship

Josh, thanks for your support, which is much appreciated, though clearly I'll have to watch what I say about dogs. ;-) About the edit-disputes issue, I was thrown into the deep end somewhat by being attacked by the LaRouchies when I first started because I wrote an article they objected to (I'm using the plural though I think they were sockpuppets); and that situation lasted around three months until I and a few other editors took it to the arbcom. While battling with the LaRouchies, it was important not to compromise too much, because they often tried to insert utter nonsense i.e. consensus editing was rarely appropriate with them. Since they've left, I've been trying to get more practised at consensus editing, so that's what I meant when I wrote that I'd like more experience. I'm watching the work of editors I know are good at finding consensus and trying to learn from them. I'll give the issue of nomination some serious thought though. Also, I'm a bit daunted by the voting process itself. I think I'd have to go lie down in a dark room until it was over. ;-) SlimVirgin 22:28, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)

Please don't revert my edits on my own talk page

Can you please not revert my edits on my talk page. My talk page is my own and if there are messages I want removed then I can remove them. Admins, sysops, etc do it all the time. If there is a rule that prevents me from doing so, please point it out and enforce it on everyone. If there isn't a wikipedia rule on it, but should be, then please go through the procedure of having the rule added. Earl Turner 07:27, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Fuck off, Nazi. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:26, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Question

Just curious, is there a template I can use that will automatically put "Reverted edits by X to last version by Y" in the edit summary? Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:41, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Thanx for the response, I thought that might be the case. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:57, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

L&O Thanks

Salve, Jpgordon!
Thanks for your reply re the Law and Order "doink doink" sound. I recall in one of Roger Ebert's "Movie Answer Man" columns his describing the sound oft heard in slasher films and on Buffy that sounds knife-like as a "stinger" and didn't know if that was that knife sound or the effect in general. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 17:44, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

Adminship

Okay, I bit the bullet. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SlimVirgin  ;-) SlimVirgin 05:14, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

VfU Deville thanks

Thanks for your support on VfU on RE Lee Deville. I agree with your comments 100%--I'm not convinced Deville is notable, but I'm sure he's more notable than [insert favorite fancruft here]. Of course, I understand next to nothing of his CV, so I'm hardly a good judge. Remes 21:32, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Red Rock Resort

To answer your poker question, yes. You can look at http://www.redrockstation.com/templates/www_department.asp?p=18&d=48

comments

Thanks for your advise. I'm still trying to decide on a wiki name.

I'll try to remember the Vegaswikian 03:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) sig thing if I figure out where to put it.

Yes, the Mandalay bay sinking should be noted and included in the category for engineering disasters.

I just added an entry for the Fremont street experience, I was suprised that one did not already exist. It needs a lot more work. One difficulty is finding out the catagories that are available and which ones it should be in. It's engineering, computers (software shape adjusting to fit a curved surface), theatre, landmarks and a few other things.

Of course the Red Rock entry pointed out the problem with the Spa entry in wiki.

Once the Red Rock debate closes, I think the concensus says keep, have a look at the casinos catagory. Is an online casino a casino? Is a "Richmond proposal" a casino? I know I make some mistakes, but when I see what is not being looked at.

If you watch the vegas articles you should see me with some name soon. Well, you forced the issue, it's vegaswikian.

Finally, I think that it might be good to consider adding something to crystal ball about buildings. Likewise, a lot of stuff that is tourist and travel and airport and park related could be moved into travel. But that would need to be well discussed and would take some time to pull off. My opinion is to keep the significant summary in wikipedia and move everything else to travel as long as it can be searched from wikipedia. I'd also like to see a bunch of infoboxes added when that happens. Makes it easier to find key facts and creates a cleaner page. Oh, which Convention Center is larger, LV at 3.2 million or Chicago at 2.2 million?