User talk:Strikerforce: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:01, 20 December 2018

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Strikerforce.

Welcome to my talk page! Here are a few things that you might want to be aware of, prior to beginning a new thread:

I am not an Administrator, so I did not delete your page, nor do I have the power to do so. If I have tagged your page as a CSD or PROD and you would like to know why, I can provide you with an answer. However, I do not have the power to retrieve your page, if it has been deleted.
I prefer to keep all communication in one place. If I posted on your talk page, please feel free to leave a {{tb}} that directs me to your page, but please respond as you see fit on your page, rather than mine. The odds are pretty good, though, that if I have posted on your talk page, I have placed it on my watchlist, so if you have responded, I'll likely be around shortly.
Please remember to sign any comments left on this page by placing ~~~~ at the end of your comment.
While Wikipedia itself is not censored, I do not appreciate profane language of any kind on my talk page. I reserve the right to remove any comment containing profanity once I have reviewed the comment and acted upon it as needed.
As noted below, my talk page is watched by a few nice folks. In regard to issues of policy here on Wikipedia, any response by a talk page stalker may be considered as good as coming from me personally. Outside of policy questions, I appreciate their opinions, but please wait for a response from me.
While my edit count (currently in the neighborhood of 7000) may not be indicative of it, I have been around Wikipedia for over ten years now. As such, I would prefer not to be templated. If I have made an error that normally bring out a template, I would ask that you take the time to write a personal comment, rather than the alternative. In asking, I explicitly agree to extend the same courtesy to others.
My talk page is bot archived on a regular basis. Previous discussions may be found in the archive here.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Malcolm Kendrick as a source

Kendrick's personal blog is being used a source. See George D. Lundberg, a user keeps trying to add his blog. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 13:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Skeptic from Britain: Sorry, I'm not typically active on weekends, so I'm just getting caught up. I've watchlisted the article.Strikerforce^Talk 14:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another writer similar to Malcolm Kendrick and Uffe Ravnskov - Andreas Eenfeldt, I submitted for deletion. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

) I would appreciate clarification on the deletion of the Malcolm Kendrick page. I would like clarification on what WOULD satisfy the editors of the notability of Dr Kendrick? Is it peer reviewed papers? Newspaper or other media coverage of him? Number of books published and sold? OR what? I would genuinely appreciate this being clarified. I also note Skeptic from Britain now wants to delete another bio - that of Uffe Ravsnskov - who like Kendrick is a member of THINCS - a loose assocation of doctors, scientists and others who question the conventional position on cholesterol. This is two members "targeted" by Skeptic. Why? I am not a frequent contributor or editor but that in itself should not disqualify my edits or contributions - we cannot all be experts or knowledgeable about everything!Boddisatva 10:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPainter (talk • contribs)

Have a look at what constitutes a reliable source WP:RS. If there were peer-reviewed papers discussing his work or that mention him I would have voted to keep the article and so would others but there are none. Mainstream science does not take his ideas seriously, this would probably explain why no medicine journals reviewed his book in detail. In a few years there might be reliable secondary sources, but for now per policy his article has been deleted. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pirate hamster (talk) 05:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pirate hamster: I have thoughts about your report, but as I am currently dealing with an off-Wiki crisis, it will be several days before I am able to offer them. Thanks for the notification, however. StrikerforceMobile (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My response may be found here. Strikerforce^Talk 16:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I appreciate your help on some of the articles I edited and your advice. You are a good editor. Unfortunately regarding the Malcolm Kendrick thing I was doxxed by some of his associates such as Tom Naughton, Jimmy Moore etc and these people including Kendrick have posted my real life name etc on various social media platforms and low-carb websites. Jimmy Wales spoke to some of these people via twitter but they ended up insulting him. They are not to be reasoned with! I will leave them to their irrational conspiracy theories. I will be leaving Wikipedia. I have requested a courtesy blanking of my username. MatthewManchester1994 (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Strikerforce,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 :{{replyto|Pirate hamster}} I have thoughts about your report, but as I am currently dealing with an off-Wiki crisis, it will be several days before I am able to offer them. Thanks for the notification, however. [[User:StrikerforceMobile|StrikerforceMobile]] ([[User talk:StrikerforceMobile|talk]]) 23:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 ::My response may be found [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Strikerforce/Dec_2018_ANI_response here]. [[User:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">'''Striker'''</span><span style="color:#330099;">'''force'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 16:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
+::Hey, I appreciate your help on some of the articles I edited and your advice. You are a good editor. Unfortunately regarding the Malcolm Kendrick thing I was doxxed by some of his associates such as Tom Naughton, Jimmy Moore etc and these people including Kendrick have posted my real life name etc on various social media platforms and low-carb websites. Jimmy Wales spoke to some of these people via twitter but they ended up insulting him. They are not to be reasoned with! I will leave them to their irrational conspiracy theories. I will be leaving Wikipedia. I have requested a courtesy blanking of my username. [[User:MatthewManchester1994|MatthewManchester1994]] ([[User talk:MatthewManchester1994|talk]]) 00:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 == NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018 ==