Étude Op. 10, No. 2 (Chopin)
Étude Op. 10, No. 2, in A minor, is a technical study composed by Frédéric Chopin for the piano. Composed in 1829, it was first published in 1833 in France, Germany, and England This étude is an exercise in developing the independence of the weaker fingers of the right hand by playing rapid chromatic scale figures with the third, fourth, and fifth fingers of the right hand. Meanwhile, the first two fingers of the right and the left hand play an accompaniment of short chords and single notes. Chopin indicated the fingering himself note by note for almost 800 notes.
Structure and stylistic traits
The melody consists of rapid chromatic scale figures played by the outer right-hand fingers, accompanied by chord attacks. Like most of Chopin’s other études, this work is in ternary form A-B-A. The harmonic scheme of the A section is relatively simple, with A minor, E major, A minor, but the chromatic scale and the exotic clash of its C-sharps with the A minor chords tend to veil the clarity of A minor and create a mysterious sound effect further increased by the Neapolitan chord, bar 15. The middle section brings a dramatic increase with the dynamic climax exactly in the center of the piece, bar 25. This climax is approached by stepwise rising two-bar sequences from F major to A minor via G minor. The final dominant seventh chord of each sequence leads to the next one by means of a deceptive cadence. The longer and asymmetric second part of the B section, leading back to the restatement of the A section, uses a similar harmonic progression but shorter sequences. The final A section is a quite literal though shortened restatement of the first one ending with a Coda of a rising and falling scale into a Picardy ending.
A copy by Józef Linowski of Chopin's autograph reads cut time (alla breve) for No. 2, but this seems to have been overlooked. The original (first French, German, and English) editions have common time. Chopin’s metronome marking for the piece is MM 144 referring to quarter notes. Later editors have followed Chopin in this regard with the exception of Hans von Bülow who suggests MM 114.
Musicologist Hugo Leichtentritt (1874–1951) calls the étude a "moto perpetuo." The transparent texture of nonstop semiquavers accompanied by a light "dancing" bass has its forerunners in Bach’s Prelude No. 5 in D major (BWV 850) from the first book of the Well Tempered Clavier and resembles other virtuoso pieces from around 1830 such as Paganini’s Moto Perpetuo for violin and piano. In Schumann’s substantial NZM article on Pianoforte-Études, NZM (1836), all Chopin Etudes Op. 10 are awarded an asterisk (*) for "poetic character" except No. 2. But Leichtentritt describes its sound effect as the "murmuring and blowing of a gentle wind", French pianist Alfred Cortot (1877–1962) mentions its "gliding and vaporous character" and Alfredo Casella talks about a "character of swift, aerial and unsubstantial mysteriousness". The American music critic James Huneker (1857–1921) writes that "the entire composition, with its murmering, meandering, chromatic character, is a forerunner to the whispering, weaving, moonlit effects in some of [Chopin's] later studies".
The technical novelty of this étude is the chromatic scale to be played by the three outer fingers of the right hand together with short semiquaver notes to be played by the first and second fingers of the same hand and the difficulty is to do this evenly in piano and legato at the required tempo of MM 144. Other piano composers before Chopin, such as Ignaz Moscheles (1794–1870) in his Études Op. 70, have introduced chromatic scales with accompanying notes to be played by the same hand. But the chromatic scale is never given to the "weak" fingers. Leichtentritt believes that Chopin in his Étude Op. 10 No. 2 revives an old fingering habit [of not using the thumb] from the pre-Bach clavichord time of the 17th century which had already long been regarded as obsolete. The technical significance of this étude for Chopin is proved by the extensiveness of his fingerings, an effort he did not apply to any other piece. An analysis of Chopin’s fingering reveals that, like in the "standard" chromatic scale fingering, the long 3rd finger plays the black keys, the 2nd finger, which "normally" plays C and F, is replaced by the 5th one. The 1st finger, usually playing all other white keys, is replaced by the 4th one. While it is fairly easy to cross the long 3rd finger over the short thumb, acrobatic dexterity is required to cross the 3rd finger over the 4th one. An obvious way to proceed is straightening 3 while bending 4 and 5.
French pianist Alfred Cortot (1877–1962) states that the first difficulty to overcome is the "crossings of the 3rd, 4th and 5th fingers" and the "strain resulting from the continuous action of the said fingers." Preparatory exercises introduced by Cortot, Gottfried Galston and Alfredo Casella always commence with the chromatic scale (top voice) alone without the filling voice. Cortot divides the hand into an "active element" and an "accompanying element." He first insists on practicing chromatic scales with the three outer fingers in all permutations. Galston recommends to hold and press a little object with the 1st and 2nd fingers while playing the chromatic semiquavers with the other ones. Cortot recommends the "pizzicato" notes to be "plucked rather than struck" and Casella wittily compares the three outer fingers to a "motorcycle dragging along its own sidecar [the first two fingers]". Australian pianist Alan Kogosowski (born 1952) recommends keeping 1 and 2 completely relaxed while playing the top voice alone: The "little two-note chords on each beat in the right hand" should be released "as soon as they’ve been played." The thumb should not be operated vertically to avoid strain and "play its notes extremely lightly –becoming as light as a feather, almost as if it is hardly there at all." Von Bülow orders "the middle harmonies to be played throughout distinctly, and yet transiently [flüchtig]." Galston suggests to accentuate all the upper notes of the two-note chords (played by the 2nd finger) while practicing the right hand.
It is a particular physical and psychological challenge to perform this étude in public and especially after the C major one with its enormous stretches. Kogosowski reports that even "the imposingly powerful Sviatoslav Richter, who possessed the most awesome technical equipment of any pianist in the world, would quake before this tiny piece. When performing the twelve Etudes Op. 10 as a set, he’d hesitate and sometimes skip over the quiet but treacherous second Etude. And Richter was certainly not the only pianist to feel this way about this little Etude." Galston believes that "he who wants to perform at Chopin's tempo (MM 144) has to be able to control it at home [im Kämmerlein] at MM 152, or MM 160."
Paraphrases and arrangements
Three years after the publication of Chopin’s Études Op. 10 Carl Czerny who had frequently entertained Chopin at his Viennese home, 1829, included a study in his Schule des Virtuosen, 1836, that begins like a parody of Chopin’s Op. 10 No. 2. In the course of this study the chromatic scale and the two-note accompaniment chords appear in all kinds of permutations given to the right to the left and to both hands simultaneously. Busoni in his Klavierübung introduces an extensive exercise, somewhat reminiscent of this. An exercise in double notes is included Leopold Godowsky’s 53 Studies on Chopin's Études include two versions. The first one is for the left hand alone while the popular second one, Ignis Fatuus (will-o'-the-wisp), is an exercise in polyrhythm superimposing Chopin’s right-hand part transposed to the left hand with triplet two-note chords in the right hand. The result sounds much faster than the actual tempo which is MM 120-132. German pianist Friedrich Wührer’s version resembles Godowsky’s first one but with an accompaniment in the right hand. In his Triple Étude (after Chopin) from 1992, Canadian pianist Marc-André Hamelin combines Chopin’s Étude Op. 10 No. 2 with Chopin’s other A minor études, Op. 25 No. 4 and Op. 25 No. 11, trying to emulate Godowsky whose triple version has been lost. Scottish composer Alistair Hinton likewise combines Chopin’s A minor Études Op. 10 No. 2 and Op. 25 No. 11 in his Étude en forme de Chopin Op. 26.
|Problems playing this file? See media help.|
Notes and references
- ("French edition"). Paris: M. Schlesinger, June 1833.
- ("German edition"). Leipzig: Fr. Kistner, August 1833 .
- ("English edition"). London: Wessel & Co, August 1833.
- Below that of Chopin, an alternative fingering by Paderewski is given in the edition published in Cracow by the Instytut Fryderyka Chopina Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne
- Leichtentritt, Hugo. "Die Etüden." In Analyse der Chopin’schen Klavierwerke [Analysis of Chopin’s Piano Works]. Band II. Berlin: Max Hesses Verlag, 1922, p. 92.
- Ekier, Jan, ed. (National Edition). "Source Commentary." Chopin Etudes. Warsaw: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne, 1999.
- Palmer, W: Chopin Etudes for the Piano, page 10. Alfred Publishing Co., Inc., 1992
- Huneker, James. "The Studies—Titanic Experiments." In Chopin: The Man and His Music. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1900.
- Leichtentritt, Hugo. "Die Etüden." In Analyse der Chopin’schen Klavierwerke [Analysis of Chopin’s Piano Works]. Band II. Berlin: Max Hesses Verlag, 1922.
- Schumann, Robert. "Die Pianoforte-Etuden [sic], ihren Zwecken nach geordnet" ["The Pianoforte Études, Categorized According to their Purposes"]. Neue Zeitschrift für Musik No. 11, February 6, 1836, p. 45.
- Cortot, Alfred. Frédéric Chopin. 12 Études, op. 10. Édition de travail des oeuvres de Chopin. Paris: Éditions Salabert, 1915.
- Casella, Alfredo. F. Chopin. Studi per pianoforte. Milano: Edizioni Curci, 1946.
- Moscheles, Ignaz. Studien für das Pianoforte zur höheren Vollendung bereits ausgebildeter Klavierspieler, bestehend aus 24 charakteristischen Tonstücken in verschiedenen Dur- und Molltonarten. Leipzig: H. A. Probst, 1827, reprint Kistner, 1860, No. 3, G major, p. 20.
- Leichtentritt, Hugo. "Die Etüden." In Analyse der Chopin’schen Klavierwerke [Analysis of Chopin’s Piano Works]. Band II. Berlin: Max Hesses Verlag, 1922, p. 90.
- Cortot, Alfred. Frédéric Chopin. 12 Études, op. 10. Édition de travail des oeuvres de Chopin. Paris: Éditions Salabert, 1915, p. 14.
- Galston, Gottfried. Studienbuch [Study Book]. III. Abend [3rd Recital] (Frédéric Chopin). Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1910, p. 15.
- Kogosowski, Alan. "Mastering the Chopin Études." A compendium to Chopin: Genius of the Piano. E-Book, 2010.
- Czerny, Carl. Schule des Virtuosen ["School of Virtuosity"]. Vienna: Haslinger, 1836, No. 19.
- Busoni, Ferruccio. Klavierübung in zehn Büchern [Keyboard Study in Ten Books], zweite umgestaltete und bereicherte Ausgabe. Buch 8 (Variationen und Varianten nach Chopin). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1925.
- Wührer, Friedrich. Achtzehn Studien zu Frederic Chopins Etuden [sic] [18 Studies on Chopin’s Etudes]. In Motu Contrario [In Contrary Motion]. Heidelberg: Willy Müller, Süddeutscher Musikverlag, 1958.
- Hamelin, Marc-André. "Triple Étude nach Chopin" in 12 Études in allen Moll-Tonarten ["12 Etudes in all the Minor Keys"]. Edition Peters (EP68235).
- Chopin, Frédéric. Etude Op. 10 No. 2 "chromatic" . Transcription of I. Butirsky. Moscow: Muzgiz [state Music Publishing House].
- Analysis of Chopin Etudes at Chopin: the poet of the piano
- Find an entry on this piece and hear a performance by pianist Xiaofeng Wu at the Chopin Project site or watch his performance
- Études Op.10: Scores at the International Music Score Library Project
- Sheet music available in .pdf or LilyPond format, from Mutopia.
- Chopin Etude Op. 10, No. 2 played by Alfred Cortot (YouTube)
- Chopin Etude Op. 10, No. 2 played by Wilhelm Backhaus, 1928 (YouTube)
- Chopin Etude Op. 10, No. 2 and Chopin-Godowsky Etude op. 10 No. 2 (2nd version) played by David Saperton (YouTube)
- Chopin-Godowsky - Etude op. 10, No. 2 (2nd version "Ignis Fatuus") played by Marc-André Hamelin (YouTube)
- Chopin-Godowsky - Etude op. 10, No. 2 (2nd version "Ignis Fatuus") played by Francesco Libetta (YouTube)