18F

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
18F logo.svg
Agency overview
FormedMarch 19, 2014; 6 years ago (2014-03-19)
HeadquartersGeneral Services Administration Building
1800 F Street NW
Washington, D.C.
Employees99 (6/17/2020)
Parent agencyGeneral Services Administration (GSA)
Website18f.gsa.gov

18F is a digital services agency within the United States Government. Their purpose is to deliver digital services and technology products.[1]

Overview[edit]

18F is an office of federal employees within the General Services Administration (GSA) that collaborates with other agencies to improve the user experience of government services by helping them build and buy technology. The group works with government organizations to define a strategy and work towards a solution for their modernization efforts. 18F uses agile and lean methodologies, open source code, and user centered design approaches. Its name refers to its office location in northwest Washington, D.C., on 18th and F Streets. 18F is within Technology Transformation Services, part of the Federal Acquisition Service.

In addition to its Washington, D.C office, the agency has offices in New York, San Francisco, and Chicago.

History[edit]

In March 2014, a group of Presidential Innovation Fellows started 18F to extend their efforts to improve and modernize government technology.

The United Kingdom created a similar agency in April 2011, Government Digital Service, following their own healthcare IT issues,[2] which saves an estimated $20 million a year over previous methods.[3] 18F runs on a cost recovery model where client agencies reimburse the digital agency for its work.[4] Their operation is closer to a traditional business than government organizations like the DSI Center.[4]

18F's creation was announced by GSA Administrator Dan Tangherlini on March 19, 2014 with a mission to simplify the government's digital services,[4] but no project-specific directive.[3] The agency started with 15 employees, including 11 former Presidential Innovation Fellows from both the private and public sectors.[4] The staff previously worked in front and backend development, design and usability, and product management.[4] The Verge's Adrienne Jeffries reported that the agency released a GSA website code update in a half hour, which would normally take weeks or longer. She added that the team did not appear equipped to handle a rollout similar to that of HealthCare.gov.[3]

Upon its opening, 18F began to host the Presidential Innovation Fellows program that started in May 2012 in the Digital Government Strategy.[4] An initial list of projects will be drafted in the months following the agency's creation.[4] A possible program called FBOpen, an open source small business and federal contractor interface for bidding on government contracts, was discussed at a Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs hearing.[4]

On March 19, 2015, 18F and collaborators launched analytics.usa.gov.[5][6][7][8] On September 12, 2015, the group launched the College Scorecard.[9] Other projects of 18F have included myRA for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Every Kid in a Park for the U.S. Department of the Interior, and MyUSA for the General Services Administration, in addition to redesigned websites for the PeaceCorps and Federal Election Commission. All of its projects are open source, meaning anyone can review and suggest updates to the code.[10]

The existence of the agency in general and such projects in particular has led to resistance from established government IT firms.[11] In addition, the agency faces the additional challenge of staying fiscally solvent. According to a recent GAO report,[12] 18F is currently spending on average more than $1 million per month more than it recovers. In 2016 alone, the group will receive approximately $33 million for its services, but will spend almost $48 million.[13] 18F is not expected to break even.[14]

The following is an update to cost recovery based on FY19 data and was taken from Congressional testimony: “From a FY19 financial standpoint, 18F’s net operating loss was approximately $600k, which translated into an improvement of over $5m from FY18. The loss in FY19 was primarily attributable to the loss of approximately $1.3m in revenue during the government shutdown and limited opportunity to offset costs during this period. Billable utilization rates for 18F increased by 6.6% in FY19 from FY18 and was a primary factor in improved profitability.”

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "18F: Digital service delivery | Home". 18f.gsa.gov. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
  2. ^ Bracken, Mike. "U.K. Official Urges U.S. Government To Adopt A Digital Core". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  3. ^ a b c Jeffries, Adrianne (March 21, 2014). "The government now has a fast-moving IT office modeled after a startup". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Miller, Jason (March 19, 2014). "GSA envisions 18F will be the new hub of digital innovation". Federal News Radio. Archived from the original on March 23, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
  5. ^ "Turning Government Data into Better Public Service". whitehouse.gov. March 19, 2015. Retrieved March 21, 2015 – via National Archives.
  6. ^ Ruiz, Rebecca (March 20, 2015). "A Real-Time Peek at Traffic to U.S. Government Websites". The New York Times Bits blog. Retrieved March 21, 2015.
  7. ^ Brown, Molly (March 19, 2015). "Several U.S. government websites now offer real-time analytics". GeekWire. Retrieved March 21, 2015.
  8. ^ "Who's online now? 18F builds web analytics dashboard". GCN. March 19, 2015. Retrieved March 21, 2015.
  9. ^ "Fact Sheet: Empowering Students to Choose the College that is Right for Them". whitehouse.gov. 2015-09-12 – via National Archives.
  10. ^ "18F: Digital service delivery | Press". 18f.gsa.gov. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
  11. ^ "The history and future of an agile federal consultancy - Agile Government Leadership". www.agilegovleaders.org. 2016-08-16. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
  12. ^ Digital Service Programs: Assessing Results and Coordinating with Chief Information Officers Can Improve Delivery of Federal Projects (Report). U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2016-06-10.
  13. ^ "EXCLUSIVE: 18F Tech Team Struggles to Cover its Costs, Draft Report Shows". Nextgov. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
  14. ^ "18F, USDS lack performance and accountability measures". FCW. Retrieved 2016-12-17.

External links[edit]