2006 California Proposition 90
Jump to navigation Jump to search
|Elections in California|
- Eminent domain could not be used by government except to provide facilities for public use, to abate specific public nuisances, and to act in a declared state of emergency. (This was a reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London.)
- Government would be required to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result of any government regulation or action.
The initiative was similar to the controversial Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004).
- League of Women Voters of California Education Fund: In-Depth Nonpartisan Analysis of Proposition 90
|This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|