2017–18 Bergen County eruv controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2017–18 Bergen County eruv controversy
Lechi Mahwah 2.jpg
Utility pole with lechis attached, Mahwah, New Jersey
Date July 2017 – present
Location Mahwah, New Jersey
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Montvale, New Jersey
Outcome Eruv to remain and be completed under settlement between the eruv association and the three municipalities. The New Jersey Attorney General's lawsuit against Mahwah remains pending.

In July 2017 the municipalities of Mahwah, Upper Saddle River and Montvale in Bergen County, New Jersey, in the United States, opposed extension of an eruv within their borders. An eruv is a land area surrounded by a boundary of religious significance, often marked by small plastic pipes (called lechis) attached to utility poles. The demarcation permits Orthodox Jews to push or carry objects (such as prayer books, keys or baby strollers) within the eruv on the Jewish Sabbath, in a way that is otherwise considered forbidden under Orthodox Jewish law. However, other Jewish denominations, such as Reform or Reconstructionist, do not deem those actions to be prohibitive without an eruv.[1][2]

The three municipalities ordered that the borders of the eruv be taken down within their limits, as their permission had not been obtained. But the boundary remained pending federal lawsuits filed in response and the settlements of the lawsuits allowed the remaining construction to proceed. Many Mahwah residents angrily protested against the prospect of Orthodox Jews from Rockland County, New York, using local parks or seeking to buy homes there.

After no agreement could be reached short of litigation, the eruv association brought suit against each of the municipalities. Mahwah's actions in passing a township ordinance to bar nonresidents of New Jersey from its parks, and the hostility of some residents and council members towards those who supported the eruv led Democratic candidate for Governor of New Jersey Phil Murphy and others to make accusations of anti-Semitism. The presiding judge in the lawsuits, John Michael Vazquez, in January 2018 made it clear he felt the municipalities did not have a strong case, and urged them to settle. The three municipalities have settled with the eruv association, allowing the eruv borders to remain in New Jersey with some of the route details yet to be resolved. Mahwah still faces a lawsuit from the New Jersey Attorney General accusing it of discrimination.

Background[edit]

Bergen County, New Jersey. Mahwah is the large area at upper left (northwest), with Upper Saddle River and Montvale the next to the east along the state line (at top).
Location map of Bergen County in New Jersey. Rockland County in New York is seen, in part, to the north.

The township of Mahwah, and the boroughs of Upper Saddle River and Montvale, are neighboring municipalities in northwestern Bergen County, New Jersey. All three are adjacent to the state line with New York,[3] on the other side of which is Rockland County, where there are large communities of Orthodox Jews.[4]

An eruv (plural "eruvin", or sometimes "eruvim") is an enclosure defined by string, rope, wires, cables, etc., that allows observant Jews, including the Orthodox, to carry or push objects further than is normally permitted on the Jewish Sabbath (or Shabbat). Normally, on Shabbat, an object may not be taken from a private domain, such as a house, into a public one, such as a street or sidewalk, or moved, in a public area, more than 4 cubits (about 6 feet; 1.7 meters). Note that "domain" is a technical term referring to how enclosed an area is, not property ownership.[5]

Objects may be moved freely if they remain within a private domain, and an eruv effectively extends the private domain through the area it encloses, including streets and sidewalks. The boundary of an eruv is often marked by utility poles surrounding a given area, with the space between regarded as doorways, topped by lintels, the telephone or power wires.[6] The poles are regarded as doorposts, and are marked by lechis (singular: lechi), solid objects such as lengths of twine or of plastic pipe, which run from near the ground to just below the wires.[7] In short, the act of stringing such a boundary around a public area by a Jewish community creates the pretense for its members that that public area is enclosed for the limited purpose of allowing the members to do some otherwise forbidden things in that public area on the Sabbath.

There are many requirements for eruvin; the Talmud devotes an entire tractate to the subject. This complexity makes rabbinic supervision and regular inspection mandatory. An operating eruv allows observant Jews to carry prayer books from home to synagogue on Shabbat, or to push strollers or baby carriages.[6]

An eruv boundary, Airmont, New York. Note the white plastic lechi at right of nearest pole.

In Teaneck, in southeastern Bergen County and home to large numbers of Orthodox Jews, an eruv has existed since the 1970s with little controversy, and, as the Jewish population increased, was extended to nearby Bogota and Bergenfield. Other eruvin in Bergen County are in Fair Lawn and in Paramus.[4]

A previous instance in which an eruv had been constructed in Bergen County, and had been challenged by local authorities, occurred in Tenafly, in the eastern part of the county. Attempts by municipal authorities to ban eruvin had failed when challenged in the federal courts, and the settlement in 2006 after a six-year battle obliged the borough to pay $325,000 for the eruv association's legal costs.[4] In some cases involving conflict over whether an eruv should be permitted, the municipality has lost and the construction of the eruv allowed to continue.[8]

Construction and controversy[edit]

Portion of a lechi attached to a utility pole, Mahwah, New Jersey

Orthodox Jews in Rockland County gained a license from Orange and Rockland Utilities (which serves parts of both Rockland County in New York and Bergen County in New Jersey) to construct an eruv using its utility poles in 2015,[9] and in March 2017 the company granted permission for the South Monsey Eruv Fund to install lechis, made from white PVC pipe, on its utility poles in northwestern Bergen County.[10] This was an extension of an existing eruv in Rockland County, and was intended to run through Mahwah, Upper Saddle River and Montvale.[11] According to Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz, head of the eruv association, the purpose was to accommodate those living in Rockland County close to the border, near New York State Route 59.[4] The boundaries had to be run through New Jersey due to the lack of a road along the state line.[12] Mahwah police noted construction being done on utility poles in May and made inquiries. On learning that Orange and Rockland had authorized the work, they provided police protection, for which the department was paid about $2,000 by the eruv fund. The work in Mahwah was complete by June.[11]

When the matter became generally known in mid-July, there was what local reporter Tom Nobile called a "firestorm of opposition" from local residents, with some expressing concerns that the eruv would allow Orthodox communities in Rockland County to expand into New Jersey.[11] Groups formed on social media, including one named Mahwah Strong, in opposition to the eruv.[13] Mahwah Strong claimed 3,000 members within days; a founder, Robert Ferguson, stated that his group would act as a check and balance to ensure the township enforced its laws, and noted, "I don't view this as a hostile takeover of the town."[14] Two hundred people gathered in a Mahwah park on July 22 to support the eruv's removal. An online petition to "Protect the Quality of Our Community in Mahwah", initiated by former township council member John Roth, reached 1,200 names before being taken down due to what Roth called inappropriate comments, made by some signers.[14] Similarly, Mahwah Strong lost its Facebook page following an influx of comments deemed "hateful".[15]

Municipal and public reaction[edit]

Mahwah tried to ban out-of-staters from its parks. Airmount Park shown; seen in 2018.

In early July 2017, the eruv was completed in part of Upper Saddle River.[12] Montvale acted first against the eruv, with Mayor Michael Ghassali issuing a stop work order on July 10, after the eruv association had rented equipment and arranged with local police to provide security.[9] Montvale authorities objected on the grounds that the lechis constituted a sign, forbidden by borough ordinance. This was done prior to construction with the result that the eruv did not extend into Montvale.[14] On July 18, Upper Saddle River's attorney sent a letter demanding the removal of the lechis that had been erected there,[16] with a deadline of July 26, but the borough agreed to let them remain for the time being after two New York State residents filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, requesting a temporary restraining order against the borough and Mayor Joanne Minichetti. The borough's agreement was in exchange for an undertaking from the eruv association not to expand the eruv, and the motion for a restraining order was withdrawn. The eruv was vandalized on July 26 and 27, requiring immediate repair work.[17][18] Mahwah's township engineer, Mike Kelly, sent a letter to the eruv association on July 21, taking a stance similar to Montvale's, and demanding the removal of the eruv by August 4. Mayor Bill Laforet stated, "This sends a very strong message to those who choose to violate our sign ordinances."[16]

On June 29, the Mahwah Township Council had passed an ordinance, effective July 27, barring nonresidents of New Jersey from its parks. Residents had complained that out-of-staters were flooding Mahwah's parks, sometimes by the busload. After the ordinance passed, but before it went into effect, Mahwah police chief James Batelli received many phone calls from residents asking that it be enforced against Orthodox Jews. He contacted the Bergen County Prosecutor, Gurbir Grewal, for advice. On July 27, the date the ordinance was to go into effect, Grewal issued a directive ordering Mahwah police to disregard the ban, stating that the ban could lead to racial profiling, unlawful searches and seizures and the illegal targeting of Orthodox Jews.[19] In response, Rob Hermansen, president of the township council, stated that that body would rework the ordinance to continue putting Mahwah residents first.[20]

When the Mahwah Township Council met on the evening of July 27, it did so before an overflow crowd. Despite warnings from the township attorney not to discuss issues of religion, some did. Others complained of nonresidents crowding parks, and that they had been visited by people wanting to buy their homes. The lawyer for Mahwah Strong urged the council to enforce the law by requiring the takedown of the eruv.[13] Ferguson was quoted as saying at the meeting, "We do not not want these people living in our neighborhoods. We want them following the law."[3]

As the eruv controversy intensified, Mahwah and Montvale, as well as neighboring boroughs, enacted or made stricter ordinances restricting those making unsolicited offers to buy houses from knocking on doors. Municipal officials stated that this was being done because of the concerns of residents, who feared the Orthodox moving in would result in a population explosion, that the schools would suffer, and high-density housing built. Residents cited Lakewood in Ocean County as an example of such problems.[21]

To a standing ovation from some 200 residents in attendance, the Mahwah council on August 10 unanimously voted to issue summonses because the eruv had not been taken down. Mayor Laforet, though, urged the council not to take this step, pointing to the large expense the unsuccessful eruv litigation had cost Tenafly, and advocated negotiation. In response to the council's action, the Bergen-Rockland Eruv Association (of which the South Monsey group is a part) and several Orthodox Jews resident in Rockland County filed suit in federal court against Mahwah on August 11, and promised to defy any summonses.[22][23] Residents of Teaneck and Englewood, each in southeastern Bergen County and home to large communities of Orthodox Jews, had gone to Mahwah and Upper Saddle River to make known their views at council meetings. Council members from Teaneck and Englewood had spoken there in support of the eruv's retention, only to meet a hostile reception. Citizens for a Better Upper Saddle River posted a screenshot of the Teaneck council schedule online, urging members to mark their calendars with the dates. Council member Mark Schwartz of Teaneck stated that visitors would be welcome, and could view how a diverse community functioned. Michael Cohen of the Englewood council stated, "We have repeatedly attempted to communicate to the leadership of Upper Saddle River and Mahwah why it is that the rhetoric and actions being seen and taken by certain members of their governing bodies and by certain members of their communities are being viewed by the outside world as anti-Semitic. However, those attempts have largely continued to fall on deaf ears."[24]

Litigation[edit]

Following failed settlement negotiations and a closed-door council meeting on October 10, the Bergen-Rockland Eruv Association and individual plaintiffs sued Montvale on October 18, alleging that Mayor Ghassali's stop work order inhibited them in practicing their religion. They cited a 2015 statement from then-mayor Roger Fyfe, from when rumors of an eruv had first circulated, that an eruv was a simple accommodation and a matter in which the borough had only a slight part. The plaintiffs also alleged that Mahwah and Upper Saddle River were aware of the eruv construction, but had no problem with it until they gave in to a campaign of xenophobia and anti-Semitism.[9] The next day, the Democratic candidate for governor, Phil Murphy, accused the residents of Mahwah of causing an "overarching perception of anti-Semitism and discrimination".[25] According to Murphy, "When a Holocaust survivor at a public meeting is heckled, and then denounced as a fraud, there is a problem. When well-intentioned residents are disparaged as 'paid actors' for a 'Jewish money conspiracy scheme' there is a problem."[25]

State Attorney General Christopher Porrino sued Mahwah for discrimination.

On October 24, the Attorney General of New Jersey, Christopher Porrino, sued Mahwah and its council, alleging that by voting for the parks ban and for the summonses, they had violated the constitutional rights of Orthodox Jews. The case, filed in state court in Hackensack, sought nullification of the council's actions, statutory penalties, attorney's fees, and the return of $3.5 million in state-provided Green Acres funds with which Mahwah had purchased and maintained parks. Under the Green Acres program, parks benefitting from the funds may not discriminate, including on the basis of religion or residency. Porrino stated, "To think that there are local governments here in New Jersey, in 2017, making laws on the basis of some archaic, fear-driven and discriminatory mindset, is deeply disappointing and shocking to many, but it is exactly what we are alleging in this case. Of course, in this case we allege the target of the small-minded bias is not African-Americans, but Orthodox Jews. Nonetheless, the hateful message is the same."[26] Mayor Laforet accused Council President Hermansen of fear-mongering and stoking passions, "His disgraceful behavior is now worsened by the severe potential financial penalties facing the township's taxpayer."[27] In the municipal election on November 7, Mahwah voters easily re-elected two anti-eruv council members, defeating challengers supported by Laforet.[28] The case was removed from state to federal court by Mahwah on November 22 as it raised questions under the federal constitution.[29] On December 1, the council voted unanimously to allocate $175,000 to fight the lawsuits, which supplemented the $90,000 previously appropriated.[30]

In the Upper Saddle River case, on October 10, 2017, the eruv association moved for a preliminary injunction allowing the eruv to remain pending the outcome of the litigation. In support, the association provided documentation showing that Mayor Minichetti had told the borough council about the proposed eruv in 2015, and the new sign ordinance had rapidly followed.[31] In response to the motion, filed on November 2, Upper Saddle River stated that the sign law was tightened because of a divisive municipal election in 2014, that had seen many signs. The borough argued that the lawsuit was premature, as the eruv association had not sought permission. It argued that it had not violated the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs; its sign ordinance was content-neutral, banning all signs of whatever sort, and thus the plaintiffs had not been discriminated against. It alleged that permission to erect the lechis from Orange and Rockland was insufficient; the eruv association also had to comply with local law, and in any event the communications company Verizon had joint use of the poles and had not been asked for consent. Upper Saddle River distinguished its situation from that of Tenafly, stating that in Tenafly, exceptions had been made to the sign ordinance, but in Upper Saddle River it had been strictly enforced.[32] Towards the end of December, Montvale Mayor Ghassali indicated that his borough was negotiating with the plaintiffs, seeking to reach an amicable settlement of the federal lawsuit.[33]

Settlements[edit]

A lechi from the extended eruv rises above a sign urging Mayor Laforet's recall, Mahwah. Seen in 2018.

Murphy was elected governor in November and designated Bergen County Prosecutor Grewal as the new Attorney General. Thus, once they took office, opponents of Mahwah's position would hold powerful posts in the state capital of Trenton, and municipal officials began to have second thoughts about whether to fight the eruv.[34] On December 14, 2017, following the advice of legal counsel, the Mahwah council repealed the still-unenforced ban on out-of-state park users, and abandoned an attempt to amend the sign ordinance to bar "other matter" (the lechis) from being affixed to utility poles.[35] The "other matter" language would have imitated the 2015 changes to the Upper Saddle River sign law which had followed Minichetti informing the borough council about the plans for the eruv, and was withdrawn, according to Hermansen, lest Mahwah's motives be misinterpreted.[36] The vote to repeal the park ban was unanimous, with one council member absent. After the vote, Laforet called the ordinances "ill-advised" before being silenced by the council. He resumed outside the council chamber and disclosed that the members could have faced prosecution. "They are hiding from you that if they failed to do so, the Attorney General can come into Mahwah to press civil or criminal bias charges. For people who did a lot of shouting, and shouting down the past several months, they are strangely quiet about that."[35]

The Upper Saddle River lawsuit was scheduled for argument before Judge John Michael Vazquez of the federal court for New Jersey. When he convened that hearing on January 9, 2018, rather than hear the lawyers argue the positions set forth in the legal briefs, Judge Vazquez told them his views. He questioned whether the borough had consistently enforced the ordinance, as plaintiffs' lawyers had discovered a number of signs and even mailboxes attached to utility poles, that Upper Saddle River had not taken down. The judge voiced his skepticism that the 2015 sign ordinance had been passed because of a contentious municipal election the previous year, as the borough maintained, and indicated that he was inclined to believe it was passed because of the eruv. He urged Upper Saddle River to try to settle the case, and to do so in coordination with the other two municipalities—he was also presiding judge in those cases.[37]

On January 30, 2018, the Mahwah council voted 5–2 to accept a negotiated settlement of the eruv litigation, despite some residents who urged the council to fight all the way to the Supreme Court. Council President Hermansen supported the deal as the best possible outcome, "We're trying to do the right thing. This is a good town with good people, and we're making this decision for good people."[38] He wrote on Facebook that Mahwah "should be known more for our open space, parks and our overall community than the negative comments made about our residents from outsiders."[15] The terms of the settlement were not announced at that meeting as the deal was still pending agreement by the plaintiffs,[38] but were disclosed the following day. The eruv is to remain, but the lechis were to be painted to match the pole, or replaced with ones of that color, The township was to pay the association $10,000 or such other sum as mutually agreed for legal fees.[39] The association may expand the eruv, but is to consult with the council before doing so. On February 7, a public meeting that was called for that day to discuss the terms of the settlement was postponed to a future date on the advice of the township's attorneys.[40] Settlement talks in the Attorney General suit were scheduled for July 2, 2018.[41]

Montvale also undertook negotiations with the eruv association plaintiffs. Some Montvale residents sought to minimize the land covered by the eruv within the borough by having the boundary run through backyards close to the state line, but the consent of all landowners could not be obtained.[42] On February 13, the Montvale council voted to approve a settlement whereby the eruv boundary would be placed on streets in the northern part of the borough, and efforts will be made to reroute it through private land. Montvale will pay the eruv association attorneys at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP $10,000 towards legal costs and be shielded from further lawsuits from it for two years. Yehudah Buchweitz, an attorney for the eruv association, stated: "Our lawsuit against Montvale was filed to permit an eruv in a small portion of Montvale, so families could enjoy the same religious freedom as so many others throughout Bergen and Rockland counties and beyond. This settlement preserves and protects the people's right to have an eruv."[43]

After a closed-door meeting, the Upper Saddle River Borough Council voted on January 15 to attempt to reach a settlement with the plaintiffs.[44] On February 21, the borough announced over its emergency notification system that it had reached a tentative agreement whereby the eruv boundary would be run along the roads until it could be relocated as close to the state line as possible.[45] The borough stated that the agreement was being entered into "because of a variety of reasons outside of the Borough’s control, including the recent settlements by Mahwah and Montvale".[46] The borough agreed to pay $75,000 towards the eruv association's legal costs.[47] The agreement went into force on April 5, 2018.[48] Under the agreement, 12 poles are to be erected on the municipal right-of-way to allow the eruv boundary to run on a shortened route through the borough, close to the state line. The lechis are to be made of black plastic, and the eruv association may not ask for a change of route for three years.[49]

On February 15, 2018, Judge Vazquez accepted the Mahwah and Montvale settlements, and on April 19, that of Upper Saddle River. He retains continuing jurisdiction over the matters, and they can be re-opened if a dispute arises.[50][51][52] A temporary eruv boundary was run across the original Upper Saddle River route, pending a final routing. On July 17, 2018, Upper Saddle River posted maps and stated that work on implementing the settlement would occur over the following several weeks.[47] The precise route of the boundary in Montvale was changed by the settlement. Both the borough and the eruv association have to obtain permission from various right-of-way owners before they can construct the new eruv boundary and take down the old one built in 2017.[51](p. 6, ¶12)[53]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Eruvs". BBC. July 23, 2009. Retrieved July 26, 2018. 
  2. ^ "Eruv in Oak Park Splits Community". Los Angeles Daily News. January 29, 2007. Retrieved July 26, 2018. 
  3. ^ a b Yudelson, Larry (July 25, 2017). "Mahwah mayor wants to talk with eruv association". The Jewish Standard. Archived from the original on February 12, 2018. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  4. ^ a b c d Nobile, Tom; Burrow, Megan (July 27, 2017). "Jewish group prepares for legal fight over religious boundary". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 10, 2017. Retrieved February 7, 2018. 
  5. ^ "About Eruv". Chabad of West Monmouth County. Retrieved July 27, 2018. Private and public do not refer to ownership. An enclosed area is considered a private domain, whereas an open area is considered public for the purposes of these laws. 
  6. ^ a b Lozovsky, Lorne. "What is an Eruv?". chabad.org. Archived from the original on February 8, 2018. Retrieved February 7, 2018. 
  7. ^ "Eruv Glossary". Greater Boston Eruv Corporation. Archived from the original on March 19, 2018. Retrieved February 7, 2018. 
  8. ^ Banco, Erin (October 29, 2017). "Three North Jersey towns face lawsuits over alleged Orthodox Jewish discrimination". NJ.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2018. Retrieved April 10, 2018. 
  9. ^ a b c Nobile, Tom (October 20, 2017). "Montvale sued for blocking eruv expansion". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  10. ^ Nobile, Tom (July 22, 2017). "Mahwah engineer orders Jewish group to take down religious boundary". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2017. Retrieved February 8, 2018. 
  11. ^ a b c Nobile, Tom (July 22, 2017). "Attorney: Mahwah PD supervised eruv installation". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 4, 2017. Retrieved February 8, 2018. 
  12. ^ a b Yudelson, Larry (August 3, 2017). "Eruv is live in Upper Saddle River". The Jewish Standard. Archived from the original on September 19, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  13. ^ a b Nobile, Tom (July 28, 2017). "Mahwah residents voice opposition, support for eruv". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 12, 2017. Retrieved February 8, 2018. 
  14. ^ a b c Nobile, Tom (July 25, 2017). "200 people meet to support removal of Mahwah eruv". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018. 
  15. ^ a b Spiro, Amy (February 1, 2018). "Jewish group wins New Jersey eruv battle". Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on February 12, 2018. Retrieved February 15, 2018. 
  16. ^ a b "Orthodox Jewish community and Mahwah residents at war over orders to remove the eruv". The Yeshiva World. July 25, 2017. Archived from the original on February 14, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  17. ^ "Update on eruv litigation". Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. October 11, 2017. Archived from the original on March 19, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  18. ^ Nobile, Tom (July 29, 2017). "Plaintiffs withdraw request for restraining order in eruv dispute". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 3, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  19. ^ Shkolnikova, Svetlana (July 28, 2017). "Prosecutor: Mahwah park ban could illegally target Jews". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 13, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  20. ^ "Prosecutor tells NJ police to ignore rule that may target Jews". WPIX-TV. Associated Press. July 28, 2017. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  21. ^ Nobile, Tom (August 4, 2017). "As eruv heads south, Bergen County on alert". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 13, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  22. ^ Jerde, Sara (August 11, 2017). "Here's what you need to know about the eruv dispute brewing in North Jersey". NJ.com. Archived from the original on September 14, 2017. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  23. ^ Nobile, Tom; Shkolnikova, Svetlana (August 11, 2017). "Orthodox Jewish group sues Mahwah over plan to issue eruv summonses". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  24. ^ Nobile, Tom; Burrow, Megan (September 5, 2017). "Teaneck plans to welcome Upper Saddle River group's potential protest". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on September 10, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  25. ^ a b Nobile, Tom (October 20, 2017). "Murphy slams 'anti-Semitic' rhetoric around Mahwah eruv". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on October 23, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  26. ^ "Attorney General Porrino announces state lawsuit charging Mahwah Township Council with excluding Orthodox Jews" (Press release). Attorney General of New Jersey. October 24, 2017. Archived from the original on October 26, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  27. ^ Racioppi, Dustin (October 24, 2017). "New Jersey sues Mahwah over eruv, alleging discriminatory ordinance against Orthodox Jews". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on February 8, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  28. ^ Hubbard, Daniel (November 9, 2017). "Mayor Laforet says election results have no bearing on him". Mahwah Patch. Archived from the original on February 12, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  29. ^ "Letter from Eric L. Harrison to Clerk, United States District Court" (PDF). November 22, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 12, 2018. Retrieved February 11, 2018. 
  30. ^ Nobile, Tom (December 1, 2017). "Mahwah council approves $175,000 for eruv legal costs". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on December 2, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  31. ^ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP (October 10, 2017). "Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (PDF). Retrieved April 10, 2018 – via EruvLitigation.com. 
  32. ^ "Defendant Borough of Upper Saddle River's Memorandum of Law" (PDF). Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. November 2, 2017. pp. 3–5. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 19, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  33. ^ Nolan, Sarah (December 28, 2017). "Montvale working to settle eruv lawsuit". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on January 4, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  34. ^ Yudelson, Larry (December 21, 2017). "Mahwah changes its mind". The Jewish Standard. Archived from the original on February 12, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  35. ^ a b Nobile, Tom (December 15, 2017). "Mahwah walks back controversial eruv and parks bans". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  36. ^ Nobile, Tom (December 6, 2017). "Upper Saddle River sign ordinance targeted eruv, Orthodox Jewish group alleges". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  37. ^ Nobile, Tom (January 9, 2018). "Judge urges Upper Saddle River to settle eruv litigation". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  38. ^ a b Nobile, Tom (January 31, 2018). "Mahwah approves settlement over eruv litigation". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  39. ^ Nobile, Tom (January 31, 2018). "Mahwah eruv will remain standing, settlement says, and town will pay group $10,000". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  40. ^ Nobile, Tom (February 6, 2018). "Mahwah postpones Tuesday's eruv settlement meeting". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  41. ^ Nobile, Tom (June 11, 2018). "Settlement talks scheduled in AG suit against Mahwah". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved June 13, 2018. 
  42. ^ Nolan, Sarah (January 31, 2018). "Montvale tables eruv settlement agreement as negotiations continue". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  43. ^ Nolan, Sarah (February 13, 2018). "Montvale approves settlement that will allow eruv in northern part of town". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 14, 2018. 
  44. ^ Nobile, Tom (January 16, 2018). "Upper Saddle River will try to settle eruv lawsuit, attorney says". NorthJersey.com. Retrieved February 10, 2018. 
  45. ^ Nobile, Tom (February 21, 2018). "Upper Saddle River tentatively settles eruv litigation". NorthJersey.com. Archived from the original on February 22, 2018. Retrieved February 22, 2018. 
  46. ^ "The Borough of Upper Saddle River has tentatively settled the eruv litigation". Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. February 21, 2018. Retrieved February 24, 2018. 
  47. ^ a b "Questions and answers regarding the proposed eruv settlement". Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. July 17, 2018. Retrieved July 18, 2018. 
  48. ^ "Settlement Agreement and Release" (PDF). Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. April 5, 2018. Retrieved April 10, 2008. 
  49. ^ "Questions and Answers regarding the proposed eruv settlement". Borough of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. March 30, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2018. 
  50. ^ "Order in Bergen Rockland Eruv Association v. Township of Mahwah" (PDF). United States District Court. February 15, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2018. Retrieved February 17, 2018 – via EruvLitigation.com. 
  51. ^ a b "Order in Bergen Rockland Eruv Association v. Borough of Montvale" (PDF). United States District Court. February 15, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2018. Retrieved February 17, 2018 – via EruvLitigation.com. 
  52. ^ "Order in Bergen Rockland Eruv Association v. Borough of Upper Saddle River" (PDF). United States District Court. April 19, 2018. Retrieved May 13, 2018 – via EruvLitigation.com. 
  53. ^ "Montvale Settles Eruv Dispute". Eruv Litigation Information. February 14, 2018. Retrieved July 15, 2018. Montvale will have 45 days to get necessary permissions to use the path identified in the accompanying map. If they cannot get the required permission from private property owners, the BREA may use the map included in the original complaint 

External links[edit]