37 mm gun M3
|37mm gun M3 on carriage M4|
|Place of origin||United States|
|Used by||United States|
National Revolutionary Army
National Guard of Nicaragua
|Wars||World War II|
Second Sino-Japanese War
First Indochina War
|Manufacturer||Gun: Watervliet Arsenal,|
Carriage: Rock Island Arsenal
|Mass||413.68 kg (912.01 lb)|
|Length||3.92 m (12 ft 10.3 in)|
|Barrel length||overall: 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in) L/56.6|
bore: 1.98 m (6 ft 6 in) L/53.5
|Width||1.61 m (5 ft 3.4 in)|
|Height||0.96 m (3 ft 1.8 in)|
|Shell||37×223 mm. R|
|Caliber||37 mm (1.45 inch)|
|Elevation||-10° to +15°|
|Rate of fire||up to 25 rpm|
|Muzzle velocity||up to 884 m/s (2,900 ft/s)|
|Maximum firing range||6.9 km (4.29 mi)|
The 37 mm gun M3 is the first dedicated anti-tank gun fielded by United States forces in numbers. Introduced in 1940, it became the standard anti-tank gun of the U.S. infantry with its size enabling it to be pulled by a jeep. However, the continuing improvement of German tanks quickly rendered the 37 mm ineffective and, by 1943, it was being gradually replaced in the European and Mediterranean theaters by the more powerful British-developed 57 mm gun M1. In the Pacific, where the Japanese tank threat was less significant, the M3 remained in service until the end of the war, but some 57mm guns were issued.
The M5 and M6 tank mounted variants were used in several models of armored vehicles most notably in the Stuart Light Tank M3/M5, the Lee Medium Tank M3, and Greyhound Light Armored Car M8. In addition, the M3 in its original version was mated to a number of other self-propelled carriages.
The inability of the 37mm round to penetrate the frontal armor of mid-war tanks severely restricted the anti-armor capabilities of units armed with them.
In the mid-1930s, the United States Army had yet to field a dedicated anti-tank artillery piece; anti-tank companies of infantry regiments were armed with .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns. Although some consideration had been given to replacing the machine guns with a more powerful anti-tank gun, the situation began to change only after the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. Combat experience from Spain suggested that a light anti-tank gun, such as the German 37 mm PaK 35/36, was capable of neutralizing the growing threat posed by tanks.
In January 1937, the Ordnance Committee recommended development of such a weapon; two PaK 36 guns were acquired for study. As the projected main user of the weapon, the Infantry Branch was chosen to oversee the work. They wanted a lightweight gun that could be moved around by the crew, so any ideas of using a larger caliber than that of the German gun were discarded. The 37 mm was a popular caliber of anti-tank guns in the 1930s; other anti-tank guns of the same caliber included Swedish Bofors gun, Czechoslovakian vz. 34 and vz. 37, Japanese Type 94 and Type 1.
Development and testing continued until late 1938. Several variants of gun and carriage were proposed until on 15 December a combination of the T10 gun and T5 carriage was officially adopted as the 37 mm gun M3 and carriage M4. Although the weapon followed the concept of the PaK 36 and was often referred to as a copy of it, the M3 differed significantly from the German design and used different ammunition.
Some minor changes in the gun construction were introduced during production. The carriage received a modified shoulder guard and traverse controls (carriage M4A1, standardized on 29 January 1942). Although ordnance requested an upgrade of all M4 carriages to M4A1, this process was not completed. Another change was a threaded barrel end to accept a big five-port muzzle brake (gun M3A1, adopted on 5 March 1942). According to some sources, the latter was intended to avoid kicking too much dust in front of the gun, which hindered aiming; however, the brake turned out to be a safety problem when firing canister ammunition and consequently the M3A1 went into combat without the muzzle brake. Other sources state that the muzzle brake was intended to soften the recoil, and that it was dropped simply because additional recoil control measures were not really needed.
In an attempt to increase the armor penetration of the M3, several squeeze bore adapters (including the British Littlejohn adaptor) were tested; none was adopted. Experiments with rocket launchers on the M4 carriage (e.g. 4.5 in (110 mm) rocket projector T3) did not produce anything practical either.
The barrel was of one-piece forged construction, with uniform rifling (12 grooves, right-hand twist, one turn in 25 calibers). The breech end of the barrel was screwed into a breech ring. The breech mechanism was of vertical sliding-block type. The barrel was fitted with a hydrospring recoil system.
The carriage was of split trail type, with pneumatic tires. Mounted on the axle next to the wheels were the "wheel segments"; these were segment-shaped supports that could be lowered to provide more stability in the firing position or raised so that they would not impede movement of the gun.
The telescopic sight on the M6 and both elevation and traverse controls were located on the left side, so one gunner was able to aim the gun. The traverse gear had a release mechanism which allowed free movement of the barrel in case a quick traverse was needed.
Under the April 1942 organization, each infantry battalion had an anti-tank platoon with four 37 mm guns (1/4 ton trucks, better known as jeeps, were authorized as prime movers) and each regiment an anti-tank company with twelve (towed by 3/4 ton trucks). Each of the four divisional artillery battalions possessed six anti-tank guns, the combat engineering battalion had nine pieces (towed by M2 halftracks); in addition, the division's headquarters company had four (towed by 3/4 ton trucks) and the divisional maintenance company two.
Although an earlier organization included a divisional anti-tank battalion (two companies of 37 mm guns and one company of 75 mm guns), in December 1941 these AT battalions were removed from the divisional structure and reorganized as independent tank destroyer battalions; their towed guns were replaced with self-propelled ones as soon as the latter became available.
In 1942, the first airborne divisions were formed. According to their October 1942 organizational structure, an airborne division had 44 37 mm anti-tank guns: four in divisional artillery (AA/AT battery of parachute field artillery battalion), 24 in the AA/AT battalion, and eight in each of two glider infantry regiments; parachute infantry regiments did not have anti-tank guns. In practice, airborne divisions often had only one glider infantry regiment and therefore 36 guns.
Finally, U.S. armored divisions under the March 1942 organization possessed 68 37 mm anti-tank guns. Of these, 37 belonged to the armored infantry regiment (four in each company and one in regiment HQ); 27 to the armored engineer battalion; three to the divisional train and one to division HQ.
US Marine Corps
Under the D-series Tables of Organization (TO) from 1 July 1942, the role of AT weapons in Marine Corps service was officially entrusted to 20 mm automatic guns, which were in the regimental weapon company (three platoons) and the battalion weapon company (one platoon). In practice, units used the World War I-era 37 mm M1916 for training. They were equipped with the M3 (four in each platoon) before being sent to the frontline. Additionally, a divisional special weapons battalion was equipped with self-propelled 37 mm GMC M6.
Under the E-series TO from 15 April 1943, self-propelled guns in the divisional special weapons battalion were replaced with eighteen 37 mm towed guns in three batteries of six; an infantry regiment had a weapons company with 12, in three platoons of four. The battalion-level AT guns were removed. In total, a division possessed 54 pieces. The F-series TO from 5 May 1944 removed the special weapons battalion from the divisional organization, resulting in a total of 36 guns per division. The subsequent G-series TO reduced regimental weapon companies to two platoons, meaning 24 pieces per division. Although the G-series TO was only adopted on 4 September 1945, in practice in some divisions this change was introduced early in 1945.
The only major lend lease recipient of the M3 was the Chinese National Revolutionary Army (1,669 pieces). The gun was also supplied to Bolivia (4), Canada (3), Chile (198), Colombia (4), Cuba (1), El Salvador (9), France (130), Paraguay (12), United Kingdom (78), USSR (63) and other countries. Some nations still had it in service in the early 1970s.
As an infantry anti-tank gun
The M3 saw action for the first time during the defense of the Philippines in December 1941. It went on to become a factor in the Guadalcanal Campaign, where it was successfully employed against both Japanese armor and infantry. Throughout the war it remained effective against Japanese vehicles, which were thinly armored and were rarely committed in large groups. The light weight of the gun made it easy to move through difficult terrain; for example, when attacked by Japanese tanks on Betio during the Battle of Tarawa, Marines were able to heave the M3 over the 5 ft (1.5 m)-high seawall. While high-explosive and canister ammunition proved useful in stopping Japanese infantry attacks, against enemy fortifications the M3 was only somewhat effective because of its small high-explosive projectile. Its overall effectiveness and ease of use meant the gun remained in service with the Marine Corps and with some army units in the Pacific until the end of the war. Unhappy with the unusually low shield of the M3, some Marine Corps units extended it to provide better protection. These extensions sometimes had a scalloped top edge, intended to improve camouflage. A standard kit was tested in 1945, but was never issued.
The experience of the M3 in the North African Campaign was completely different. The gun was not powerful enough to deal with late production German Panzer III and IV tanks. After the nearly disastrous Battle of Kasserine Pass in February 1943, reports from some of the involved units mentioned 37 mm projectiles "bouncing off like marbles" from the turret and front armor of German medium tanks and proclaimed the gun "useless unless you have gun crews with the guts to stand and shoot from 100 yards". The Army was initially uncertain if these reports reflected the obsolescence of the weapon, or whether unrefined tactics and lack of experience were to blame.[note 1] Yet, on 26 May 1943, a new organization had the M3 replaced by the 57 mm Gun M1 (the U.S.-produced version of the British 6-pounder gun),[note 2] with Dodge 1½ ton trucks as prime movers. Only by spring 1944 did the 57 mm gun reach the battlefield in large numbers.
Meanwhile, the Italian campaign was launched, and M3 guns saw action from the day of the Sicily landing on 10 July 1943. That day the 37 mm guns demonstrated once again both their effectiveness against pre-war tanks—when they helped to repel an attack by Italian Renault R 35s—and inability to cope with modern threats in a subsequent encounter with Tiger Is from the Hermann Göring division. The Italian theater had a lower priority for reequipment than Northwest Europe, and some M3s were still in use in Italy in late 1944.
By mid-1944, the M3 had fallen out of favor even with airborne troops, despite their strong preference for compact and lightweight weapon systems. The Airborne Command had rejected the 57 mm M1 in the summer of 1943 claiming its unfitness for airlifting and the Table of Organisation and Equipment (TO&E) of February 1944 still had airborne divisions keeping their 37 mm guns. Nevertheless, the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions were reequipped with British-manufactured 6-pounder gun (57 mm) on carriage Mk III (designed to fit into the British Horsa glider) for the Normandy airdrops. This change was officially introduced in the TO&E of December 1944.
As a tank gun
The 37mm gun is essentially an antimechanized weapon... 37mm guns will be disposed to protect the flanks and rear of the (Cavalry Reconnaissance) Squadron against mechanized attack and also, in the base of fire, to support the attack. Armor-piercing ammunition is effective against mechanized vehilces, matérial, and weapons. High Explosive ammunition is effective against personnel, light matérial, automatic weapons, and mortars.
– FM 2-30 Cavalry Field Manual - Cavalry Mechanized Reconnaissance Squadron, March 29 1943, P.71
The 37mm gun was used as the primary armament for M3/M5 Stuart light tanks and M8 Greyhound armored cars. AP rounds from these guns could defeat light enemy armor, including all Japanese and Italian armor, German half-tracks and armored cars, and most surfaces of tanks and early self-propelled guns based on the German Panzer II, Panzer III, and early Panzer IV chassis, but were useless against later Panzer IV, Panzer VI (Tiger) tanks and the frontal armor of Panzer V (Panther) tanks. It was also similarly useless against later, more heavily armored self-propelled guns and Jagdpanzer tank destroyers. The HE rounds were not powerful enough for effective infantry support in most situations. The rounds were enough, however, to attack enemy light reconnaissance units, and both the M3/M5 Stuart and M8 Greyhound were restricted to reconnaissance for the majority of the war in Europe. Canister rounds were often used to good effect against Japanese infantry in many battles, such as Bloody Ridge.
"The company commanders and platoon leaders in the valley were convinced that the fire direction was from the church steeple and wanted it eliminated. Eventually, the 37-mm gun of the light tank proved to be the perfect weapon to cause the evacuation of a church steeple without completely demolishing it. Perhaps this was the only ideal target for a 37-mm gun encountered during World War II."
"Later in the day, the Germans attempted to retake the hill with one heavy assault gun (est 105mm) [note 3] and a few infantry men and succeeded in penetrating our position. From 100 yards he knocked out two light tanks. However, the advance of "A" company's tanks concentrated so much fire on him and held their ground so effectively that he lost his nerve and retired from the fight, with his supporting troops, if he had any left. The 37mm gun on the Light Tanks did no appreciable damage to the German self-propelled weapon, although over 100 direct hits were placed on him from ranges varying from 75 to 500 yards."
There were also serious issues with the gun's ability to function effectively in the infantry support role. The 752nd Tank Battalion referred to the 37mm guns of its light tanks as "peashooters". The 37mm HE round had 39 grams (0.085 lb) of TNT, producing an explosive power of 161 Kilojoules.  By way of contrast, the HE round from a Sherman 75mm gun had 667 grams (1.47 lb) of TNT, producing 2790 Kilojoules, while the modern 40mm shell from M203 grenade launchers has 32 grams (0.07 lb) of Comp B, producing an explosive power of 134 Kilojoules.
The M3 was phased out of U.S. service soon after the end of the war.
- Test variants:
- Model variants
- Carriage variants:
Variants of the M3 should not be confused with other 37 mm guns in the U.S. service. Those other pieces included the M1916 infantry gun of French design (these were later used extensively as subcaliber devices for heavy artillery.), M1 antiaircraft autocannon, M4/M9/M10 aircraft-mounted autocannons, M12/M13/M14/M15 subcaliber guns.
Two tank gun variants were developed based on the barrel of the M3. The first, initially designated M3A1 but renamed M5 on 13 October 1939, was shortened by 5.1 in (130 mm) to avoid damage to the tube in wooded areas. Later, a variant with a semi-automatic breech (with empty cartridge ejection) was developed. This variant—initially designated M5E1, adopted as M6 on 14 November 1940—received a full length barrel. The tubes were interchangeable, but replacing M5 with M6 and vice versa would result in an unbalanced mount and was therefore prohibited. These guns were mounted on several models of tanks and other armored vehicles:
- Light Tank M2A4: M5 in mount M20. The recoil mechanism, protruding beyond the gun mask, had to be protected by an armored casing.
- Light Tank M3: M5 in mount M22, in late production vehicles M6 in mount M23. These mounts were fitted with more compact recoil mechanism, eliminating the need for the protective casing.
- Light Tank M3A1, M5: M6 in mount M23.
- Light Tank M3A3, M5A1: M6 in mount M44.
- Light Tank (Airborne) M22: M6 in mount M53.
- M3 series medium tanks (as a secondary weapon): M5 or M6 in mount M24.
- Heavy Tank M6 (as a secondary weapon): M6 in mount T49.
- LVT(A)-1 "amtank": M6 in mount M44.
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T22 – eventually Light Armored Car M8: M6 in mount M23A1; the competing designs 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T43 / Light Armored Car T21 and 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T23 / Light Armored Car T23 mounted the same weapon.
- Armored Car T13.
- Armored Car T17: M6 in mount M24.
- Armored Car T17E1 in the "Staghound Mk I" configuration: M6 in mount M24A1.
- The first pilot of the Armored Car T18: M6. The production variant T18E2 received the 57mm M1.
- Armored Car T19: M6 in mount M23A1.
- Armored Car T27: M6 in mount M23A1 modified.
- Armored Car T28 / M38: M6 in mount M23A2.
- British Humber Armoured Car Mk IV: M6.
Versions of the gun in turret mounts were also used in the Medium Tank T5 Phase III (T3 barrel, mount T1), in the Medium Tank M2 / M2A1 (M3 barrel, M2A1: mount M19), and in the 37mm Gun Motor Carriage T42 (mount M22).
In addition, the M3 on different pedestal mounts was mated to a number of other vehicles, resulting in an assortment of 37 mm gun motor carriages. Only the M6 reached mass production.
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T2 (Bantam jeep).
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T8 (Ford 4x4 "Swamp Buggy").
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T13, T14 (Willys 6x6 "Super Jeep").
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T21 / M4 / M6 (Fargo 3/4 ton 4x4 truck).
- 37 mm Gun Motor Carriage T33 (Ford 3/4 ton 4x4 cargo carrier).
- M3A1E3 Scout Car.
- The gun was sometimes mounted on M2 Halftrack, M29 Weasel and on the 1/4 ton Willys MB / Ford GPW jeep (see photo on the right).
On several occasions, the M3 was mounted on PT boats to increase their firepower. One of these boats was John F. Kennedy's PT-109. The gun with its wheels removed was mounted on wooden planks nailed to the deck.
The M3 utilized fixed ammunition. Projectiles were fitted with a 37x223R cartridge case, designated Cartridge Case M16. Available projectiles included armor-piercing, high-explosive and canister.
|Type||Model||Weight, kg (round/projectile)||Filler||Muzzle velocity, m/s (M3&M6/M5)|
|AP-T||AP M74 Shot||1.51 / 0.87||–||884 / 870|
|APCBC-T||APC M51 Shot||1.58 / 0.87||–||884 / 870|
|HE||HE M63 Shell||1.42 / 0.73||TNT, 39 g||792 / 782|
|HE||HE Mk II Shell||1.23 / 0.56||TNT, 27 g|
|Canister||Canister M2||1.58 / 0.88||122 steel balls||762 / 752|
|Target practice with tracer||TP M51 Shot||1.54 / 0.87||–|
|Drill (simulates APC M51)||Drill Cartridge M13||1.45 / 0.87||–||–|
|Drill (simulates HE M63)||Drill Cartridge T5||1.45 / 0.73||–||–|
|Blank||Blank Cartridge 10-gauge with adapter M2||0.93 / –||–||–|
|Ammunition \ Distance, yd / m||500 / 457||1,000 / 914||1,500 / 1,371||2,000 / 1,828|
|AP M74 Shot (meet angle 0°)||36|
|AP M74 Shot (meet angle 20°)||25|
|APC M51 Shot (meet angle 0°)||61|
|APC M51 Shot (meet angle 20°)||53|
|APC M51 Shot (meet angle 30°, homogeneous armor)||53||46||40||35|
|APC M51 Shot (meet angle 30°, face-hardened armor)||46||40||38||33|
|Different methods of armor penetration measurement were used in different countries / periods. Therefore, direct comparison is often impossible.|
Armor penetration of the M5 was about 3 mm less at all ranges.
A dug in 37 mm gun at Camp Carson.
The M3 being unloaded from a transport plane during a military demonstration at Fort Bragg.
U.S. 37 mm gun crew in action, Saipan, 1944. From left to right are two ammunition carriers, gunner and assistant gunner. Note extended shield.
- The situation mirrored German experience with their 3.7 cm Pak 36, which was nicknamed Heeresanklopfgerät (literally "army door-knocking device") by its crews for its inability to affect Soviet T-34 tanks aside from notifying its presence by futilely bouncing rounds off its armour, regardless of the angle or distance.
- In service with the British Army since 1942
- It is likely that the vehicle in question was either a Jagdpanther (88mm) or Jagdtiger (128mm). The American observer could not accurately measure the caliber of the weapon, but his use of the word "heavy" suggests a heavily armored vehicle.
- Zaloga – US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p. 3–7.
- Hogg – Allied Artillery of World War Two, p 149.
- E.g. see Rottman – The US Marine Corps 1941–45, p 17: "M3A1 ... was copied from the standard German AT gun" or Sayen – US Army Infantry Divisions 1942–43, p 13: "M3 or M3A1 towed guns were unlicensed versions of the German Pak 35/36".
- Zaloga – US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p 21.
- Chamberlain, Gander – Anti-Tank Weapons, p 47.
- Technical Manual TM 9-2005 volume 3, Infantry and Cavalry Accompanying Weapons, p 11-15.
- Sayen – US Army Infantry Divisions 1942–43, p 9, 15, 25, 28, 33, 36.
- Zaloga – US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p 9-12.
- Rottman – US Airborne Units in the Mediterranean Theater 1942–44, p 30-39; Zaloga – US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45, p 16-25, 33, 41.
- Anderson – US Army in World War II; Cavalry and Infantry.
- Zaloga – US Armored Units in the North African and Italian Campaigns 1942–45, p 24-28.
- Rottman – US Marine Corps Pacific Theater of Operations 1941–43, p 25-30.
- History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II, Vol II: Table of Organization E-100, p 571, 572; Vol III: Table of Organization F-100, p 618, 619; Rottman – The US Marine Corps 1941–45, p 5-8; ww2gyrene: The Marine Division; ww2gyrene: M3A1 37mm Antitank Gun.
- Zaloga – US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p 44.
- History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II, Vol I: The Battle of the Tenaru, p.290; Vol I: Japanese Counteroffensive, pp.330 & 332.
- Rottman – The US Marine Corps 1941–45, p 12-13.
- Zaloga, US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, pp.6 & 46.
- Zaloga, US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, pp.21 & 22.
- Zaloga – US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p 15.
- Zaloga, US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45, pp.16–25, 33, & 41; Zaloga, US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p.23.
- "Armor in Operation Neptune (establishment of the Normandy Beachhead)". pp. 117 of 175. Retrieved 4 April 2019.
- "After action report, 759th Light Tank Battalion, July 44 through March 45". pp. 27 of 42. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- ""752nd Tank Bn", World War Regimental Histories". United States Army. 1945. pp. 60 of 85. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- Hogg, Ian V. (2001). The American Arsenal: The World War II Official Standard Ordnance Catalogue. p. 266. ISBN 9781473897038. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
- "Complete Round Table for ammunition for 37mm guns (M63/TNT)". TM 9-1901 Artillery Ammunition, 1944. 1944. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- "CARTRIDGE, 40-MILLIMETER: HE, M381". TM 43-0001-28 Army Ammunition Data Sheets. 1994. pp. 574–575 of 913. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 118, 143.
- Zaloga, US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45, p 14.
- TM 9-2300. Standard Artillery and Position Finding Equipment. 1944.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 119, 143.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 127, 143.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 496.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 484.
- Hunnicutt – Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank, p 528.
- Hunnicutt – Firepower: A History of the American Heavy Tank, p 193, 194.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 108.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 71, 73.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 315.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 316.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 98.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 324.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 322.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 323.
- Moschanskiy – Armored vehicles of the Great Britain 1939–1945 part 2, p 9.
- Hunnicutt – Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank, p 34.
- Hunnicutt – Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank, p 36, 40.
- Hunnicutt – Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 303.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 152.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 153.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 158.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 154, 155.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 160.
- Hunnicutt – Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles, p 58.
- Hunnicutt – Half-Track: A History of American Semi-Tracked Vehicles, p 230.
- West – Iron men, wooden boats, p 146.
- Field Manual FM 23–81, 37-mm Gun, Tank, M6, p 45-51.
- Technical Manual TM 1–1901, Artillery Ammunition.
- Chamberlain, Peter; Terry Gander (1974). Anti-Tank Weapons. WWII Fact Files. Arco Publishing Company, New York. ISBN 0-668-03505-6.
- Hogg, Ian V. (1998). Allied Artillery of World War Two. Crowood Press, Ramsbury. ISBN 1-86126-165-9.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (1988). Firepower: A History of the American Heavy Tank. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-304-9.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (1992). Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-462-2.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (1994). Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-080-5.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (2001). Half-Track: A History of American Semi-Tracked Vehicles. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-742-7.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (2002). Armored Car: A History of American Wheeled Combat Vehicles. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-777-X.
- Moschanskiy, I. (1999). Armored vehicles of the Great Britain 1939–1945 part 2, Modelist-Konstruktor, Bronekollektsiya 1999–02 (Мощанский, И. (1999). Бронетанковая техника Великобритании 1939–1945 часть 2. Моделист-Конструктор, Бронеколлекция 1999–02.).
- Rottman, Gordon (1995). The US Marine Corps 1941–45. Elite 59. illustrated by Mike Chapell. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-85532-497-0.
- Rottman, Gordon (2004). US Marine Corps Pacific Theater of Operations 1941–43. Battle Orders 1. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-518-X.
- Rottman, Gordon (2006). US Airborne Units in the Mediterranean Theater 1942–44. Battle Orders 22. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-920-7.
- Sayen, John J. (2006). US Army Infantry Divisions 1942–43. Battle Orders 17. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-952-5.
- West, Howard F. (2006). Iron men, wooden boats: the epic story of American PT boats in World War II. Heritage Books. ISBN 0-7884-2537-4.
- Zaloga, Steven J. (2005). US Anti-tank Artillery 1941–45. New Vanguard 107. illustrated by Brian Delf. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-690-9.
- Zaloga, Steven J. (2007). US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45. Battle Orders 25. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-118-2.
- Zaloga, Steven J. (2006). US Armored Units in the North African and Italian Campaigns 1942–45. Battle Orders 21. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-966-5.
- Field Manual FM 23-81, 37-mm Gun, Tank, M6. War Department, 1942.
- Technical Manual TM 1-1901, Artillery Ammunition. War Department, 1944.
- Technical Manual TM 9–2005 volume 3, Infantry and Cavalry Accompanying Weapons. War Department, 1942.
- Anderson, Rich. "US Army in World War II; Cavalry and Infantry". militaryhistoryonline.com. Archived from the original on 13 August 2007. Retrieved 27 September 2007.
- "History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II". HyperWar. Archived from the original on 7 July 2007. Retrieved 1 July 2007.
- "The Marine Division". WW2Gyrene. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2007.
- "M3A1 37mm Antitank Gun". WW2Gyrene. Archived from the original on 22 March 2007. Retrieved 1 July 2007.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to M3 37 mm gun.|
- Photo gallery at Fightingiron.com
- Photo gallery at SVSM.org.
- Popular Science, April 1940, "Tanks Can Be Destroyed"—article on early US Army concepts for tank destroyers using Gun M3 on various vehicles
- "Little Poison", August 1942, Popular Science—excellent detailed article on the M3 antitank cannon