Jump to content

Efforts to stem the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monkbot (talk | contribs) at 04:57, 22 January 2021 (Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 53 templates: hyphenate params (62×);). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is part of a series about the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill

Efforts to stem the Deepwater Horizon oil spill were ongoing from the time that the Deepwater Horizon exploded on 4/20/2010 until the well was sealed by a cap on July 15, 2010.[1] Various species of dolphins and other mammals (61 casualties), birds (2,095 casualties), and the endangered sea turtles (467 casualties) have been killed either directly or indirectly by the oil spill.[2] The Deepwater Horizon spill has surpassed in volume the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill as the largest ever to originate in U.S.-controlled waters; it is comparable to the 1979 Ixtoc I oil spill in total volume released (Ixtoc discharged 140 million US gallons (530,000 m3) to 148 million US gallons (560,000 m3); as of mid-July 2010, Deepwater Horizon has spilled 90 million US gallons (340,000 m3) to 180 million US gallons (680,000 m3)).[3][4]

Much of the oil is so far down in the Gulf that only nature, including microbes, will be able to remove it using a process called bioremediation.[5] Terry Hazen of the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory said the process could take months or years.[5] But after six weeks of research, he said that microbes could work quickly in 84 °F (29 °C) water as opposed to colder-temperature waters. The A Whale, which is an oil tanker converted into a giant oil skimmer owned by the Taiwan Marine Transport Co (TMT), could do little because of BP's use of chemical dispersants, the company said.[6] Robert Bea of The University of California, who worked on the Ixtoc spill and the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill, said the old methods would be the best ones. Dispersants, he said, did not work except in keeping beaches clean, and they hurt the environment.[5]

Non-explosive closure attempts

Short Term Efforts

Oil containment dome under construction in Port Fourchon, Louisiana, at Wild Well Control on 26 April

The first attempts to stop the oil spill were to use remotely operated underwater vehicles to close the blowout preventer valves on the well head; however, all these attempts failed.[7][8] The second technique, placing a 125-tonne (276,000 lb) containment dome (which had worked on leaks in shallower water) over the largest leak and piping the oil to a storage vessel on the surface, failed when gas leaking from the pipe combined with cold water formed methane hydrate crystals that blocked the opening at the top of the dome.[9]

On May 14, engineers began the process of positioning a 6-inch (15 cm) wide riser insertion tube into the 21-inch (53 cm) wide burst pipe.[9] There was a stopper-like washer around the tube that plugs the end of the riser and diverts the flow into the insertion tube.[10] The collected gas was flared and oil stored on the board of drillship Discoverer Enterprise.[11] 924,000 US gallons (22,000 barrels) of oil was collected before removal of the tube.[12]

On May 26, BP tried to close the well using a technique called "top kill", which also failed.[13] This process involved pumping heavy drilling fluids through two 3-inch (7.6 cm) lines into the blowout preventer to restrict the flow of oil before sealing it permanently with cement.[14][15][16]

The Q4000 and the Discoverer Enterprise during the failed top kill procedure

On May 29, BP moved to the Lower Marine Riser Package (LMRP) Cap Containment System by removing the damaged riser from the top of the blowout preventer and covering the pipe by the cap which connects it to a riser. The cap was attached on June 3, and the system began to capture the leaking oil.[17] On June 6, the CEO of BP Tony Hayward, stated that the amount captured was "probably the vast majority of the oil."[18] However, Ira Leifer, a member of the Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG), claimed that more oil was escaping than before the riser was cut and the cap containment system was placed.[19]

On June 16, a second containment system connected directly to the blowout preventer became operational carrying oil and gas through a subsea manifold to the Q4000 service vessel with a processing capacity for about 5,000 barrels (210,000 US gallons; 790 cubic metres) of oil per day. Oil and gas are both burned on Q4000 in a clean-burning system.[20]

As Discoverer Enterprise's processing capacity was insufficient, drillship Discoverer Clear Leader and the floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel Helix Producer 1 were added, offloading oil with tankers Evi Knutsen, and Juanita.[21][22] Each tanker has a total capacity of 750,000 barrels (32,000,000 US gallons; 119,000 cubic metres).[20] In addition, FPSO Seillean, and well testing vessel Toisa Pisces would process oil. They are offloaded by shuttle tanker Loch Rannoch.[20]

On July 5, BP announced that its one-day oil recovery effort accounted for 24,980 barrels (3,972 m3) of oil, and the flaring off of 57.1 million cubic feet (1,620,000 m3) of natural gas. The total oil collection to date for the spill was estimated at 657,300 barrels (104,500 m3).[23] The government's estimates suggested the cap and other equipment were capturing less than half of the oil leaking from the sea floor as of late June.[24]

On July 10, robots removed the containment cap to replace it with a better-fitting cap ("Top Hat Number 10"); this meant all of the leaking oil would escape until the new cap was in place.[25] A broken pipe was taken out on July 11 and replaced with a flange spool resembling a pipe, on top of which the new cap was located.[26][27] The well integrity test was scheduled to take place after the installation of a three-ram capping stack over the lower marine riser package of the Deepwater Horizon semi-submersible rig on July 13. On July 14, BP announced that the test would be delayed under Allen's orders; oil continued to flow into the Gulf.[4][28]

Temporary closure

On July 15, 2010, BP announced that it had successfully plugged the oil leak using a tightly fitted cap. The cap, weighing 75 tons and standing 30 feet (9.1 m) high, is now bolted to the failed blowout preventer. It consists of a Flange Transition Spool and a 3 Ram Stack and is a temporary solution.[29][30]

President Barack Obama cautiously welcomed the news that the leak had been stopped, though stressing, "it is important we don't get ahead of ourselves".[31] If the cap holds for the planned 48 hours, its valves will be reopened temporarily in order to allow for seismic tests to ensure that oil is not escaping into the bedrock.[29] At the time of the stoppage, oil had been leaking continuously into the Gulf of Mexico for 85 days, 16 hours and 25 minutes since the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded on April 20, 2010.[29]

Until July 19, 2010, there was no evidence that the well had ruptured, meaning that the cap appeared to be working.[31][32] According to Thad Allen, the retired US Coast Guard admiral in charge of the operation to stop the leak, the cap will be used to channel the flowing oil to surface ships for collection after the 48-hour test period and will be used to shut the well down during bad weather rather than permanently cap the well, which is expected to happen in mid-August 2010, when relief wells have been completed.[32] However, on July 19, 2010, seepage was detected from the seafloor within two kilometres of the well. Allen believes it probably has nothing to do with the well, as oil and gas are known to ooze naturally from fissures in the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.[33][34]

On July 22, Adm. Thad Allen faced a difficult decision. Forecasts of the track of tropical storm Bonnie made it imperative that the support ships and rigs leave the site. The capping stack would thus be unsupervised for several days. The safe option would have been to open the valves and relieve pressure in the riser; however, that would obviously have the effect of turning back on the gush of oil and gas, with no option to either collect it or burn it off. Allen, in consultation with Energy Secretary Steven Chu, made the decision to leave the valves closed. Kent Wells, a senior vice president of BP, said “We have enough confidence to leave the well shut in.”[35] Since the storm proved weaker than expected on July 24, the ships returned to finish off the job once and for all. Efforts to close the well on a permanent basis soon began.[36]

Permanent closure

BP drilled two relief wells into the original well to enable them to block it. Once the relief wells reached the original borehole, the operator pumped drilling fluid into the original well. Transocean's Development Driller III started drilling a first relief well on May 2 and was at 13,978 feet (4,260 m) out of 18,000 feet (5,500 m) as of June 14. GSF Development Driller II started drilling a second relief on May 16 and was halted at 8,576 feet (2,614 m) out of 18,000 feet (5,500 m) as of June 14 while BP engineers verified the operational status of the second relief well's blowout preventer.[37][38][39][40][41][42] The relief wells began operating in August 2010[43] at a cost of about $100 million per well.[44][45]

Despite delays caused by Tropical Storm Bonnie, the first phase of stopping the leak was expected to start on July 30. Lining a relief shaft with steel casing was expected to resume on July 28, and a relief tunnel would take a week to drill but may be needed if phase one does not work.[36]

Adm. Thad Allen said on July 26 that the "static kill", using mud and cement poured into the top of the well, could start on August 2. The "bottom kill" would follow, with mud and cement entering the well under the sea floor, possibly by August 7.[46]

Starting at 15:00 CDT on August 3, first test oil then drilling mud was pumped at a slow rate of approximately two barrels/minute into the well-head. Pumping continued for eight hours, at the end of which time the well was declared to be "in a static condition."[47]

At 09:15 CDT on August 4, with Adm. Allen's approval, BP began pumping cement from the top, sealing that part of the flow channel permanently.[48]

On August 4, Allen said the static kill was working.[49] Two weeks later, though, Allen said it was uncertain when the well could be declared completely sealed. The bottom kill had yet to take place, and the relief well had been delayed by storms. Even when the relief well was ready, he said, BP had to make sure pressure would not build up again.[50]

On September 10, Allen said the bottom kill could start sooner than expected because a "locking sleeve" could be used on top of the well to prevent excessive pressure from causing problems. BP said the relief well was about 50 feet (15 m) from the intersection, and finishing the boring would take four more days.[51] On September 16, the relief well reached its destination and pumping of cement to seal the well began.[52] Officials said on September 18 that the cement pumped in from the base of the well had completed the sealing of the well.[53] On September 19, after pressure testing, Allen declared the well "officially dead".[54]

Considerations of using explosives

In mid-May 2010, United States Secretary of Energy Steven Chu assembled a team of nuclear physicists, including hydrogen bomb designer Richard Garwin and Sandia National Laboratories director Tom Hunter.[55] On May 24, BP ruled out conventional explosives, saying that if blasts failed to clog the well, "We would have denied ourselves all other options."[56]

Federal officials also ruled out nuclear devices due to environmental and political risks, as doing so would be a violation of Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty that the United States has signed.[57] Admiral Thad Allen stated, "since we don't know the condition of that well bore or the casings, I would be cautious about putting any kind of kinetic energy on that well head, because what you may do is create open communication between the reservoir and the sea floor."[58] Allen also said that the result could be oil seeping through cracks and through the seafloor, "and then be uncontrolled until the reservoir pressure equalized with the hydrostatic pressure; I think that's a risk that's too great to take a chance on, myself."[59] Casing integrity concerns also influenced the pressure chosen for the top kill procedure.[60]

References

  1. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/16/us/16spill.html?hp New York Times – July 16, 2010
  2. ^ Collection Report(PDF). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 5 July 2010.
  3. ^ "BP oil disaster: How much oil is left?". Christian Science Monitor. Associated Press. 2010-06-17. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
  4. ^ a b Breen, Tom; Weber, Harry R. (2010-07-14). "BP delays work on stopgap and permanent well fix". The Sun News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2010-07-16. Retrieved 2010-07-14.
  5. ^ a b c Berkeley scientist advises on clean-up in gulf oil spill - June 4, 2010 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 5 July 2010.
  6. ^ Giant oil skimmer 'A Whale' deemed a bust for Gulf of Mexico spill | NOLA.com
  7. ^ Staff writer (2010-04-25). "Robot subs trying to stop Gulf oil leak". CBC News. Retrieved 2010-04-25.
  8. ^ "US oil spill 'threatens way of life', governor warns". BBC News. 2 May 2010. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  9. ^ a b Bolstad, Erika; Clark, Lesley; Chang, Daniel (2010-05-14). "Engineers work to place siphon tube at oil spill site". Toronto Star. McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved 2010-05-14.
  10. ^ Brenner, Noah; Guegel, Anthony; Pitt, Anthea (2010-05-15). "BP misses on first tube try". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-06-30.
  11. ^ "Update on Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Response – 24 May" (Press release). BP. 2010-05-24. Archived from the original on 2010-05-24. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  12. ^ Nuckols, Ben; Bluestein, Greg (2010-05-27). "Gulf awaits word on latest bid to plug oil leak". Knoxville News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
  13. ^ "'Top kill' BP operation to half US oil leak fails". BBC News. 29 May 2010. Retrieved 29 May 2010.
  14. ^ Fowler, Tom (2010-05-18). "BP Prepared for Top Kill to Plug Well". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2010-05-22.
  15. ^ Kraus, Clifford; Brown, Robbie (2010-05-26). "BP Attempts 'Top Kill' Method to Seal Oil Well in Gulf". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2010-05-26.
  16. ^ "Top kill fails". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 2010-05-28. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-06-01.
  17. ^ Nelson, Melissa; Mohr, Holbrook (2010-06-05). "Oil stains beaches and tourists as slick spreads". CNBC. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2011-04-30. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
  18. ^ Shirbon, Estelle (2010-06-06). "BP chief hopes cap will capture most of Gulf oil". Reuters. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
  19. ^ Gillis, Justin; Fountain, Henry (2010-06-07). "Rate of Oil Leak, Still Not Clear, Puts Doubt on BP". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
  20. ^ a b c Brenner, Noah (2010-06-17). "Hayward says spill 'never should have happened'". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-06-17.
  21. ^ Brenner, Noah; Pitt, Anthea (2010-06-08). "BP calls in FPSO for Macondo". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
  22. ^ Brenner, Noah; Pitt, Anthea; Lewis, Josh (2010-06-10). "Clear Leader, Helix Producer tapped for Macondo". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  23. ^ Gonzalez, Angel (2010-07-06). "BP: About 24,980 Barrels Of Total Oil Recovered 5 July". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones Newswires. Archived from the original on July 9, 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-06.
  24. ^ Kunzelman, Michael (2010-06-24). "Oil spewing once again in the Gulf". The Sun News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
  25. ^ Breen, Tom (2010-07-09). "Robots begin work to remove cap from gushing well". The Sun News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2010-07-12. Retrieved 2010-07-10.
  26. ^ Breen, Tom (2010-07-12). "BP cautiously optimistic". The Sun News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2010-07-13. Retrieved 2010-07-12.
  27. ^ Breen, Tom; Weber, Harry R. (2010-07-13). "New BP cap set for slow tests of how it holds oil". The Sun News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2010-07-15. Retrieved 2010-07-13.
  28. ^ "BP postpones Macondo well test". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 2010-07-14. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-07-14.
  29. ^ a b c Strassmann, Mark (July 15, 2010). "BP: No New Oil Flowing into Gulf of Mexico". CBS News. CBS. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
  30. ^ Wells, Kent. "Sealing Cap Installation Animation". BP. Retrieved 18 July 2010.
  31. ^ a b "Gulf of Mexico oil stoppage going well, BP says". BBC News. BBC. July 16, 2010. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
  32. ^ a b Robertson, Campbell; Henry Fountain (July 16, 2010). "Obama Reacts Cautiously to Hopeful BP Test Results". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
  33. ^ "Is experimental well cap making disaster worse?".
  34. ^ "Engineers detect seepage near BP oil well". Reuters. 2010-07-19.
  35. ^ Fountain, Henry (2010-07-23). "Tropical Storm in Gulf Halts Spill Response Efforts". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-07-23.
  36. ^ a b Dishneau, David; Weber, Harry R. (2010-07-24). "Ships prepare to return to spill as storm weakens". The Sun News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-07-24. [dead link‍]
  37. ^ "Relief wells and Subsea containment illustration". BP. Archived from the original on 2010-07-20.
  38. ^ Daly; et al. (26 May 2010). "Heat on White House to do more about Gulf spill". Washington Examiner. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 21 July 2010. Retrieved 2010-05-26.
  39. ^ "Second Macondo relief well under way". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 2010-05-17. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-05-25.
  40. ^ "Update on Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill – 1 June". BP. 2010-06-01. Retrieved 2010-06-01.
  41. ^ "Update on Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill – 29 May". BP. 2010-05-30. Archived from the original on 2010-05-30. Retrieved 2010-05-30.
  42. ^ Vergano, Dan (2010-06-14). "Relief wells aim at pipe 18,000 feet deep". USA Today. Retrieved 2010-06-15.
  43. ^ Nuckols, Ben (30 May 2010). "BP turns to next attempt after top kill fails". Associated Press. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  44. ^ Brenner, Noah; Guegel, Anthony; Hwee Hwee, Tan; Pitt, Anthea (2010-04-30). "Congress calls Halliburton on Macondo". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. (subscription required). Retrieved 2010-05-01.
  45. ^ "BP MC252 Gulf Of Mexico Response Continues To Escalate On And Below Surface" (Press release). BP. 2010-04-29. Retrieved 2010-04-29.
  46. ^ Wardell, Jane (2010-07-27). "BP replaces CEO Hayward, reports $17 billion loss". News & Observer. Associated Press. Archived from the original on July 29, 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-27.
  47. ^ BP's Deepwater Oil Spill - Tests End and the Kill Begins, Well Reaches Static Condition
  48. ^ BP begins pumping cement in next stage of 'static kill'
  49. ^ Cappiello, Dina (2010-08-04). "Gov't has 'high confidence' oil spill almost over". The Sun News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-08-05.[permanent dead link‍]
  50. ^ Weber, Harry (2010-08-19). "Feds: No timeline for completing Gulf relief well". The Charlotte Observer. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2010-08-22. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
  51. ^ Fausset, Richard (2010-09-11). "Sealing to start on BP well". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2010-09-26. Retrieved 2010-09-11.
  52. ^ "BP: Cement being pumped in to permanently seal company's blown-out well in Gulf of Mexico". Fox News. 2010-09-16. Retrieved 2010-09-18.
  53. ^ Weber, Harry (2010-09-19). "BP's well plugged; worries remain". The Sun News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-09-19.
  54. ^ Fausset, Richard (2010-09-20). "Few cheers for BP well's final plugging". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2013-02-04. Retrieved 2010-09-20.
  55. ^ Quinn, James (2010-05-14). "Barack Obama sends nuclear experts to tackle BP's Gulf of Mexico oil leak". The Daily Telegraph. London: Telegraph Media Group Limited. Retrieved 2010-06-30.
  56. ^ Revkin, Andrew C. (2010-06-03). "No Surprise: U.S. Rejects Nuclear Option for Gulf Oil Gusher". The New York Times Blogs. Retrieved 2010-06-30.
  57. ^ Broad, William J. (2010-06-02). "Nuclear Option on Gulf Oil Spill? No Way, U.S. Says". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  58. ^ Achenbach, H.; MacGillis, A. (30 May 2010). As 'top kill' effort fails, BP must fall back on oil spill containment strategy. The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-07-04.
  59. ^ "Update on Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill (Admiral Thad Allen)" (Video and partial transcript). CSPAN Washington Journal. C-SPAN Video Library. 2010-05-26. Retrieved 2010-06-16.
  60. ^ Mowbray, Rebecca (2010-06-18). "Oil spill containment efforts could be putting strain on damaged well". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2010-06-22.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Efforts_to_stem_the_Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill&oldid=1001966317"