Jump to content

United States v. Shabani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) at 03:21, 13 September 2023 (top: add "use mdy dates" template). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

United States v. Shabani
Argued October 3, 1994
Decided November 1, 1994
Full case nameUnited States, Petitioner v. Reshat Shabani
Citations513 U.S. 10 (more)
115 S. Ct. 382; 130 L. Ed. 2d 225
Case history
PriorConvicted, conspiracy to distribute cocaine; conviction overturned, 993 F. 2d 1419 (9th Circuit, 1993)
Subsequent9th Circuit Reversed by Supreme Court and conviction upheld
Holding
Absent contrary indications, Congress intends to adopt the common law definition of statutory terms. The common law understanding of conspiracy "does not make the doing of any act other than the act of conspiring a condition of liability."
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
MajorityO'Connor, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
21 U.S.C. § 846

United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified standards for conspiracy liability under a federal drug conspiracy statute.[1] In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that government prosecutors need not prove evidence of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy when prosecuting individuals under the drug conspiracy statute codified at 21 U.S.C. § 846.[2] Justice O'Connor wrote that Congress intended to "adopt the common law definition" of conspiracy for section 846, which did not require an overt act as a precondition of liability.[3] Justice O'Connor's opinion also compared the drug conspiracy statute to the general conspiracy statute,[4] which requires that a conspirator commit an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, noting that "[i]n light of this additional element in the general conspiracy statute, Congress' silence in § 846 speaks volumes."[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10, 11 (1994).
  2. ^ Shabani, 513 U.S. at 13-17.
  3. ^ Shabani, 513 U.S. at 13-15.
  4. ^ Codified at 18 U.S.C. § 371.
  5. ^ Shabani, 513 U.S. at 14.