Jump to content

Sayed Ishaq Gailani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ForsythiaJo (talk | contribs) at 00:46, 21 September 2023 (removed Category:Pashtun people; added Category:Pashtun politicians using HotCat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sayed Ishaq Gailani

Sayed Ishaq Gailani (born 1954) is a politician in Afghanistan representing Paktika province in the Wolesi Jirga, Afghanistan's lower house of parliament.[1] He is the founder and chairman of the National Solidarity Movement of Afghanistan and currently serves on the Wolesi Jirga's International Relations committee. While still an influential member of the Gailani family, he has claimed leadership of the family and adopted the title Pir. Some of his family recognizes his uncle, Ahmed Gailani, as the leader of the family and the Qadiriyya Sufi order. The resulting dispute has created a feud between the two men.[2]

Ishaq Gailani was born in 1954 in the Shāre Naw section of Kabul. He attended Masod-e Sad School for his primary and secondary education and later went to Naderia High School.[3]

During testimony at Kako Kandahari's Combatant Status Review Tribunal Haji Ghalib testified that he had traveled to Persian Gulf during the Gulf War, under the leadership of Said Ghalani, to join the coalition opposing Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.[4] He testified Ghalani was leading a group of Afghan mujahideen called the Mahazamili.

References

  1. ^ "Paktika Executive Summary" (PDF). Navy Postgraduate School. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-06.
  2. ^ IDS International (2010). Paktika Provincial Handbook: A Guide to the People and the Province. Southeastern Region Series. IDS International. {{cite book}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ About Sayed Ishaq Gailani (Founder of NSMA) Archived 2011-07-27 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Kako Kandahari's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 62-73