Serialism
In music, serialism is a method of composition using series of pitches, rhythms, dynamics, timbres or other musical elements. Serialism began primarily with Arnold Schoenberg's twelve-tone technique, though some of his contemporaries were also working to establish serialism as a form of post-tonal thinking. Twelve-tone technique orders the twelve notes of the chromatic scale, forming a row or series and providing a unifying basis for a composition's melody, harmony, structural progressions, and variations. Other types of serialism also work with sets, collections of objects, but not necessarily with fixed-order series, and extend the technique to other musical dimensions (often called "parameters"), such as duration, dynamics, and timbre.
The idea of serialism is also applied in various ways in the visual arts, design, and architecture,[2][3] and the musical concept has also been adapted in literature.[4][5][6]
Integral serialism or total serialism is the use of series for aspects such as duration, dynamics, and register as well as pitch.[7] Other terms, used especially in Europe to distinguish post-World War II serial music from twelve-tone music and its American extensions, are general serialism and multiple serialism.[8]
Composers such as Arnold Schoenberg, Anton Webern, Alban Berg, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Pierre Boulez, Luigi Nono, Milton Babbitt, Elisabeth Lutyens, Henri Pousseur, Charles Wuorinen and Jean Barraqué used serial techniques of one sort or another in most of their music. Other composers such as Tadeusz Baird, Béla Bartók, Luciano Berio, Benjamin Britten, John Cage, Aaron Copland, Ernst Krenek, György Ligeti, Olivier Messiaen, Arvo Pärt, Walter Piston, Ned Rorem, Alfred Schnittke, Ruth Crawford Seeger, Dmitri Shostakovich, and Igor Stravinsky used serialism only in some of their compositions or only in some sections of pieces, as did some jazz composers, such as Bill Evans, Yusef Lateef, Bill Smith, and even rock musicians like Frank Zappa.
Basic definitions
Serialism is a method,[9] "highly specialized technique",[10] or "way"[11] of composition. It may also be considered "a philosophy of life (Weltanschauung), a way of relating the human mind to the world and creating a completeness when dealing with a subject".[12]
Serialism is not by itself a system of composition or a style. Neither is pitch serialism necessarily incompatible with tonality, though it is most often used as a means of composing atonal music.[9]
"Serial music" is a problematic term because it is used differently in different languages and especially because, shortly after its coinage in French, it underwent essential alterations during its transmission to German.[13] The term's use in connection with music was first introduced in French by René Leibowitz in 1947,[14] and immediately afterward by Humphrey Searle in English, as an alternative translation of the German Zwölftontechnik (twelve-tone technique) or Reihenmusik (row music); it was independently introduced by Stockhausen and Herbert Eimert into German in 1955 as serielle Musik, with a different meaning,[13] but also translated as "serial music".
Twelve-tone serialism
Serialism of the first type is most specifically defined as a structural principle according to which a recurring series of ordered elements (normally a set—or row—of pitches or pitch classes) is used in order or manipulated in particular ways to give a piece unity. "Serial" is often broadly used to describe all music written in what Schoenberg called "The Method of Composing with Twelve Notes related only to one another",[15][16] or dodecaphony, and methods that evolved from his methods. It is sometimes used more specifically to apply only to music in which at least one element other than pitch is treated as a row or series. Such methods are often called post-Webernian serialism. Other terms used to make the distinction are twelve-note serialism for the former and integral serialism for the latter.[citation needed]
A row may be assembled pre-compositionally (perhaps to embody particular intervallic or symmetrical properties), or derived from a spontaneously invented thematic or motivic idea. The row's structure does not in itself define the structure of a composition, which requires development of a comprehensive strategy. The choice of strategy often depends on the relationships contained in a row class, and rows may be constructed with an eye to producing the relationships needed to form desired strategies.[17]
The basic set may have additional restrictions, such as the requirement that it use each interval only once.[citation needed]
Non-twelve-tone serialism
"The series is not an order of succession, but indeed a hierarchy—which may be independent of this order of succession".[18][19]
Rules of analysis derived from twelve-tone theory do not apply to serialism of the second type: "in particular the ideas, one, that the series is an intervallic sequence, and two, that the rules are consistent".[20] For example, Stockhausen's early serial works, such as Kreuzspiel and Formel, "advance in unit sections within which a preordained set of pitches is repeatedly reconfigured ... The composer's model for the distributive serial process corresponds to a development of the Zwölftonspiel of Josef Matthias Hauer".[21] Goeyvaerts's Nummer 4
provides a classic illustration of the distributive function of seriality: 4 times an equal number of elements of equal duration within an equal global time is distributed in the most equable way, unequally with regard to one another, over the temporal space: from the greatest possible coïncidence to the greatest possible dispersion. This provides an exemplary demonstration of that logical principle of seriality: every situation must occur once and only once.[22]
Henri Pousseur, after initially working with twelve-tone technique in works like Sept Versets (1950) and Trois Chants sacrés (1951),
evolved away from this bond in Symphonies pour quinze Solistes [1954–55] and in the Quintette [à la mémoire d’Anton Webern, 1955], and from around the time of Impromptu [1955] encounters whole new dimensions of application and new functions.
The twelve-tone series loses its imperative function as a prohibiting, regulating, and patterning authority; its working-out is abandoned through its own constant-frequent presence: all 66 intervallic relations among the 12 pitches being virtually present. Prohibited intervals, like the octave, and prohibited successional relations, such as premature note repetitions, frequently occur, although obscured in the dense contexture. The number twelve no longer plays any governing, defining rôle; the pitch constellations no longer hold to the limitation determined by their formation. The dodecaphonic series loses its significance as a concrete model of shape (or a well-defined collection of concrete shapes) is played out. And the chromatic total remains active only, and provisionally, as a general reference.[23]
In the 1960s Pousseur took this a step further, applying a consistent set of predefined transformations to preexisting music. One example is the large orchestral work Couleurs croisées (Crossed Colours, 1967), which performs these transformations on the protest song "We Shall Overcome", creating a succession of different situations that are sometimes chromatic and dissonant and sometimes diatonic and consonant.[24] In his opera Votre Faust (Your Faust, 1960–68) Pousseur used many quotations, themselves arranged into a "scale" for serial treatment. This "generalised" serialism (in the strongest possible sense) aims not to exclude any musical phenomena, no matter how heterogeneous, in order "to control the effects of tonal determinism, dialectize its causal functions, and overcome any academic prohibitions, especially the fixing of an anti-grammar meant to replace some previous one".[25]
At about the same time, Stockhausen began using serial methods to integrate a variety of musical sources from recorded examples of folk and traditional music from around the world in his electronic composition Telemusik (1966), and from national anthems in Hymnen (1966–67). He extended this serial "polyphony of styles" in a series of "process-plan" works in the late 1960s, as well as later in portions of Licht, the cycle of seven operas he composed between 1977 and 2003.[26]
History of serial music
Before World War II
In the late 19th and early 20th century, composers began to struggle against the ordered system of chords and intervals known as "functional tonality". Composers such as Debussy and Strauss found ways to stretch the limits of the tonal system to accommodate their ideas. After a brief period of free atonality, Schoenberg and others began exploring tone rows, in which an ordering of the 12 pitches of the equal-tempered chromatic scale is used as the source material of a composition. This ordered set, often called a row, allowed for new forms of expression and (unlike free atonality) the expansion of underlying structural organizing principles without recourse to common practice harmony.[27]
Twelve-tone serialism first appeared in the 1920s, with antecedents predating that decade (instances of 12-note passages occur in Liszt's Faust Symphony[28] and in Bach.[29]) Schoenberg was the composer most decisively involved in devising and demonstrating the fundamentals of twelve-tone serialism, though it is clear it is not the work of just one musician.[11] In Schoenberg's own words, his goal of l'invention contrariée was to show constraint in composition.[30] Consequently, some reviewers have jumped to the conclusion that serialism acted as a predetermined method of composing to avoid the subjectivity and ego of a composer in favour of calculated measure and proportion.[31]
After World War II
Along with John Cage's indeterminate music (music composed with the use of chance operations) and Werner Meyer-Eppler's aleatoricism, serialism was enormously influential in postwar music. Theorists such as Milton Babbitt and George Perle codified serial systems, leading to a mode of composition called "total serialism", in which every aspect of a piece, not just pitch, is serially constructed.[32] Perle's 1962 text Serial Composition and Atonality became a standard work on the origins of serial composition in the music of Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern.[citation needed]
The serialization of rhythm, dynamics, and other elements of music was partly fostered by the work of Olivier Messiaen and his analysis students, including Karel Goeyvaerts and Boulez, in postwar Paris. Messiaen first used a chromatic rhythm scale in his Vingt Regards sur l'enfant-Jésus (1944), but he did not employ a rhythmic series until 1946–48, in the seventh movement, "Turangalîla II", of his Turangalîla-Symphonie.[33] The first examples of such integral serialism are Babbitt's Three Compositions for Piano (1947), Composition for Four Instruments (1948), and Composition for Twelve Instruments (1948).[34][35] He worked independently of the Europeans.[citation needed]
Several of the composers associated with Darmstadt, notably Stockhausen, Goeyvaerts, and Pousseur, developed a form of serialism that initially rejected the recurring rows characteristic of twelve-tone technique in order to eradicate any lingering traces of thematicism.[37] Instead of a recurring, referential row, "each musical component is subjected to control by a series of numerical proportions".[38] In Europe, some serial and non-serial music of the early 1950s emphasized the determination of all parameters for each note independently, often resulting in widely spaced, isolated "points" of sound, an effect called first in German "punktuelle Musik" ("pointist" or "punctual music"), then in French "musique ponctuelle", but quickly confused with "pointillistic" (German "pointillistische", French "pointilliste"), the term associated with the densely packed dots in Seurat's paintings, even though the concept was unrelated.[39]
Pieces were structured by closed sets of proportions, a method closely related to certain works from the de Stijl and Bauhaus movements in design and architecture some writers called "serial art",[40][41][42][43] specifically the paintings of Piet Mondrian, Theo van Doesburg, Bart van Leck, Georg van Tongerloo, Richard Paul Lohse, and Burgoyne Diller, who had sought to "avoid repetition and symmetry on all structural levels and working with a limited number of elements".[44]
Stockhausen described the final synthesis in this manner:
So serial thinking is something that's come into our consciousness and will be there forever: it's relativity and nothing else. It just says: Use all the components of any given number of elements, don't leave out individual elements, use them all with equal importance and try to find an equidistant scale so that certain steps are no larger than others. It's a spiritual and democratic attitude toward the world. The stars are organized in a serial way. Whenever you look at a certain star sign you find a limited number of elements with different intervals. If we more thoroughly studied the distances and proportions of the stars we'd probably find certain relationships of multiples based on some logarithmic scale or whatever the scale may be.[45]
Stravinsky's adoption of twelve-tone serial techniques shows the level of influence serialism had after the Second World War. Previously Stravinsky had used series of notes without rhythmic or harmonic implications.[46] Because many of the basic techniques of serial composition have analogs in traditional counterpoint, uses of inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion from before the war do not necessarily indicate Stravinsky was adopting Schoenbergian techniques. But after meeting Robert Craft and other younger composers, Stravinsky began to study Schoenberg's music, as well as that of Webern and later composers, and to adapt their techniques in his work, using, for example, serial techniques applied to fewer than twelve notes. During the 1950s he used procedures related to Messiaen, Webern and Berg. While it is inaccurate to call them all "serial" in the strict sense, all his major works of the period have clear serialist elements.[citation needed]
During this period, the concept of serialism influenced not only new compositions but also scholarly analysis of the classical masters. Adding to their professional tools of sonata form and tonality, scholars began to analyze previous works in the light of serial techniques; for example, they found the use of row technique in previous composers going back to Mozart and Beethoven.[47][48] In particular, the orchestral outburst that introduces the development section halfway through the last movement of Mozart's Symphony No. 40 is a tone row that Mozart punctuates in a very modern and violent way that Michael Steinberg called "rude octaves and frozen silences".[49]
Ruth Crawford Seeger extended serial control to parameters other than pitch and to formal planning as early as 1930–33[50] in a fashion that goes beyond Webern but was less thoroughgoing than the later practices of Babbitt and European postwar composers.[citation needed] Charles Ives's 1906 song "The Cage" begins with piano chords presented in incrementally decreasing durations, an early example of an overtly arithmetic duration series independent of meter (like Nono's six-element row shown above), and in that sense a precursor to Messiaen's style of integral serialism.[51] The idea of organizing pitch and rhythm according to similar or related principles is also suggested by both Henry Cowell's New Musical Resources (1930) and the work of Joseph Schillinger.[citation needed]
Reactions to serialism
the first time I ever heard Webern in a concert performance …[t]he impression it made on me was the same as I was to experience a few years later when … I first laid eyes on a Mondriaan canvas...: those things, of which I had acquired an extremely intimate knowledge, came across as crude and unfinished when seen in reality.
Karel Goeyvaerts on Anton Webern's music.[52]
Some music theorists have criticized serialism on the basis that its compositional strategies are often incompatible with the way the human mind processes a piece of music. Nicolas Ruwet (1959) was one of the first to criticise serialism by a comparison with linguistic structures, citing theoretical claims by Boulez and Pousseur, taking as specific examples bars from Stockhausen's Klavierstücke I & II, and calling for a general reexamination of Webern's music. Ruwet specifically names three works as exempt from his criticism: Stockhausen's Zeitmaße and Gruppen, and Boulez's Le marteau sans maître.[53]
In response, Pousseur questioned Ruwet's equivalence between phonemes and notes. He also suggested that, if analysis of Le marteau sans maître and Zeitmaße, "performed with sufficient insight", were to be made from the point of view of wave theory—taking into account the dynamic interaction of the different component phenomena, which creates "waves" that interact in a sort of frequency modulation—the analysis "would accurately reflect the realities of perception". This was because these composers had long since acknowledged the lack of differentiation found in punctual music and, becoming increasingly aware of the laws of perception and complying better with them, "paved the way to a more effective kind of musical communication, without in the least abandoning the emancipation that they had been allowed to achieve by this 'zero state' that was punctual music". One way this was achieved was by developing the concept of "groups", which allows structural relationships to be defined not only between individual notes but also at higher levels, up to the overall form of a piece. This is "a structural method par excellence", and a sufficiently simple conception that it remains easily perceptible.[54] Pousseur also points out that serial composers were the first to recognize and attempt to move beyond the lack of differentiation within certain pointillist works.[55] Pousseur later followed up on his own suggestion by developing his idea of "wave" analysis and applying it to Stockhausen's Zeitmaße in two essays.[56][57]
Later writers have continued both lines of reasoning. Fred Lerdahl, for example, in his essay "Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems",[58] argues that serialism's perceptual opacity ensures its aesthetic inferiority. Lerdahl has in turn been criticized for excluding "the possibility of other, non-hierarchical methods of achieving musical coherence," and for concentrating on the audibility of tone rows,[59] and the portion of his essay focusing on Boulez's "multiplication" technique (exemplified in three movements of Le Marteau sans maître) has been challenged on perceptual grounds by Stephen Heinemann and Ulrich Mosch.[60][61] Ruwet's critique has also been criticised for making "the fatal mistake of equating visual presentation (a score) with auditive presentation (the music as heard)".[62]
In all these reactions discussed above, the "information extracted", "perceptual opacity", "auditive presentation" (and constraints thereof) pertain to what defines serialism, namely use of a series. And since Schoenberg remarked, "in the later part of a work, when the set [series] had already become familiar to the ear",[63] it has been assumed that serial composers expect their series to be aurally perceived. This principle even became the premise of empirical investigation in the guise of "probe-tone" experiments testing listeners' familiarity with a row after exposure to its various forms (as would occur in a 12-tone work).[64] In other words the supposition in critiques of serialism has been that, if a composition is so intricately structured by and around a series, that series should ultimately be clearly perceived or that a listener ought to become aware of its presence or importance. Babbitt denied this:
That's not the way I conceive of a set [series]. This is not a matter of finding the lost [series]. This is not a matter of cryptoanalysis (where's the hidden [series]?). What I'm interested in is the effect it might have, the way it might assert itself not necessarily explicitly.[65]
Seemingly in accord with Babbitt's statement, but ranging over such issues as perception, aesthetic value, and the "poietic fallacy", Walter Horn offers a more extensive explanation of the serialism (and atonality) controversy.[66]
Within the community of modern music, exactly what constituted serialism was also a matter of debate. The conventional English usage is that the word "serial" applies to all twelve-tone music, which is a subset of serial music, and it is this usage that is generally intended in reference works. Nevertheless, a large body of music exists that is called "serial" but does not employ note-rows at all, let alone twelve-tone technique, e.g., Stockhausen's Klavierstücke I–IV (which use permuted sets), his Stimmung (with pitches from the overtone series, which is also used as the model for the rhythms), and Pousseur's Scambi (where the permuted sounds are made exclusively from filtered white noise).[citation needed]
When serialism is not limited to twelve-tone techniques, a contributing problem is that the word "serial" is seldom if ever defined. In many published analyses of individual pieces the term is used while actual meaning is skated around.[67]
Theory of twelve-tone serial music
Due to Babbitt's work, in the mid-20th century serialist thought became rooted in set theory and began to use a quasi-mathematical vocabulary for the manipulation of the basic sets. Musical set theory is often used to analyze and compose serial music, and is also sometimes used in tonal and nonserial atonal analysis.[citation needed]
The basis for serial composition is Schoenberg's twelve-tone technique, where the 12 notes of the chromatic scale are organized into a row. This "basic" row is then used to create permutations, that is, rows derived from the basic set by reordering its elements. The row may be used to produce a set of intervals, or a composer may derive the row from a particular succession of intervals. A row that uses all of the intervals in their ascending form once is an all-interval row. In addition to permutations, the basic row may have some set of notes derived from it, which is used to create a new row. These are derived sets.[citation needed]
Because there are tonal chord progressions that use all twelve notes, it is possible to create pitch rows with very strong tonal implications, and even to write tonal music using twelve-tone technique. Most tone rows contain subsets that can imply a pitch center; a composer can create music centered on one or more of the row's constituent pitches by emphasizing or avoiding these subsets, respectively, as well as through other, more complex compositional devices.[68][69]
To serialize other elements of music, a system quantifying an identifiable element must be created or defined (this is called "parametrization", after the term in mathematics). For example, if duration is serialized, a set of durations must be specified; if tone colour (timbre) is serialized, a set of separate tone colours must be identified; and so on.[citation needed]
The selected set or sets, their permutations and derived sets form the composer's basic material.[citation needed]
Composition using twelve-tone serial methods focuses on each appearance of the collection of twelve chromatic notes, called an aggregate. (Sets of more or fewer pitches, or of elements other than pitch, may be treated analogously.) One principle operative in some serial compositions is that no element of the aggregate should be reused in the same contrapuntal strand (statement of a series) until all the other members have been used, and each member must appear only in its place in the series. Yet, since most serial compositions have multiple (at least two, sometimes as many as a few dozen) series statements occurring concurrently, interwoven with each other in time, and feature repetitions of some of their pitches, this principle as stated is more a referential abstraction than a description of the concrete reality of a musical work that is termed "serial".[citation needed]
A series may be divided into subsets, and the members of the aggregate not part of a subset are said to be its complement. A subset is self-complementing if it contains half of the set and its complement is also a permutation of the original subset. This is most commonly seen with hexachords, six-note segments of a tone row. A hexachord that is self-complementing for a particular permutation is called prime combinatorial. A hexachord that is self-complementing for all the canonic operations—inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion—is called all-combinatorial.[citation needed]
Notable composers
- Hans Abrahamsen
- Gilbert Amy
- Louis Andriessen
- Denis ApIvor
- Hans Erich Apostel
- Kees van Baaren
- Milton Babbitt
- Tadeusz Baird
- Osvaldas Balakauskas
- Don Banks
- Jean Barraqué
- Jürg Baur
- Alban Berg
- Gunnar Berg
- Arthur Berger
- Erik Bergman
- Luciano Berio
- Karl-Birger Blomdahl
- Konrad Boehmer
- Rob du Bois
- André Boucourechliev
- Pierre Boulez
- Martin Boykan
- Ole Buck
- Jacques Calonne
- Niccolò Castiglioni
- Aldo Clementi
- Salvador Contreras
- Aaron Copland
- Luigi Dallapiccola
- Franco Donatoni
- Hanns Eisler
- Manuel Enríquez
- Karlheinz Essl
- Franco Evangelisti
- Brian Ferneyhough
- Jacobo Ficher
- Irving Fine
- Wolfgang Fortner
- Roberto Gerhard
- Frans Geysen
- Michael Gielen
- Alberto Ginastera
- Lucien Goethals
- Karel Goeyvaerts
- Jerry Goldsmith
- Henryk Górecki
- Glenn Gould
- Pelle Gudmundsen-Holmgreen
- César Guerra-Peixe
- Lou Harrison
- Jonathan Harvey
- Josef Matthias Hauer
- Paavo Heininen
- Hermann Heiss
- Hans Werner Henze
- York Höller
- Heinz Holliger
- Bill Hopkins
- Klaus Huber
- Karel Husa
- Hanns Jelinek
- Ben Johnston
- Nikolai Karetnikov
- Rudolf Kelterborn
- Gottfried Michael Koenig
- Józef Koffler
- Ernst Krenek
- Meyer Kupferman
- René Leibowitz
- Ingvar Lidholm
- Witold Lutosławski
- Elisabeth Lutyens
- John McGuire
- Bruno Maderna
- Ursula Mamlok
- Philippe Manoury
- Donald Martino
- Paul Méfano
- Jacques-Louis Monod
- Robert Morris
- Luigi Nono
- Per Nørgård
- Krzysztof Penderecki
- Goffredo Petrassi
- Michel Philippot
- Walter Piston
- Henri Pousseur
- Einojuhani Rautavaara
- Roger Reynolds
- Terry Riley
- George Rochberg
- Leonard Rosenman
- Cláudio Santoro
- Peter Schat
- Leon Schidlowsky
- Dieter Schnebel
- Arnold Schoenberg, considered the founder of serialism
- Humphrey Searle
- Ruth Crawford Seeger
- Mátyás Seiber
- Roger Sessions
- Nikos Skalkottas
- Roger Smalley
- Ann Southam
- Leopold Spinner
- Karlheinz Stockhausen
- Igor Stravinsky
- Robert Suderburg
- Richard Swift
- Louise Talma
- Camillo Togni
- Gilles Tremblay
- Fartein Valen
- Wladimir Vogel
- Anton Webern
- Hugo Weisgall
- Peter Westergaard
- Stefan Wolpe
- Charles Wuorinen
- La Monte Young
See also
References
- ^ Whittall 2008, p. 165.
- ^ Bandur 2001, pp. 5, 12, 74.
- ^ Gerstner 1964, passim.
- ^ Collot 2008, p. 81.
- ^ Leray 2008, pp. 217–219.
- ^ Waelti-Walters 1992, pp. 37, 64, 81, 95.
- ^ Whittall 2008, p. 273.
- ^ Grant 2001, pp. 5–6.
- ^ a b Griffiths 2001, p. 116.
- ^ Wörner 1973, p. 196.
- ^ a b Whittall 2008, p. 1.
- ^ Bandur 2001, p. 5.
- ^ a b Frisius 1998, p. 1327.
- ^ Leibowitz 1947.
- ^ Schoenberg 1975, p. 218.
- ^ Anon. 2008.
- ^ Mead 1985, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Boulez 1954, p. 18.
- ^ Griffiths 1978, p. 37.
- ^ Maconie 2005, p. 119.
- ^ Maconie 2005, 56.
- ^ Sabbe 1977, p. 114.
- ^ Sabbe 1977, p. 264.
- ^ Locanto 2010, p. 157.
- ^ Bosseur 1989, pp. 60–61.
- ^ Kohl 2002, pp. 97 et passim.
- ^ Delahoyde n.d.
- ^ Walker 1986, p. [page needed].
- ^ Cope 1971, p. [page needed].
- ^ Moore 1995, p. 77.
- ^ Granade 2015.
- ^ Ball 2011, pp. 24–41.
- ^ Sherlaw Johnson 1989, p. 94.
- ^ Whittall 2008.
- ^ Mead 1985.
- ^ Whittall 2008, p. 178.
- ^ Felder 1977, p. 92.
- ^ Morgan 1975, p. 3.
- ^ Stockhausen and Frisius 1998, p. 451.
- ^ Bochner 1967.
- ^ Gerstner 1964.
- ^ Guderian 1985.
- ^ Sykora 1983.
- ^ Bandur 2001, p. 54.
- ^ Cott 1973, p. 101.
- ^ Shatzkin 1977.
- ^ Jalowetz 1944, p. 387.
- ^ Keller 1955, passim.
- ^ Steinberg 1998, p. 400.
- ^ Tick 2001.
- ^ Schoffman 1981.
- ^ Goeyvaerts 1994, p. 39.
- ^ Ruwet 1959, pp. 83, 85, 87, 93–96.
- ^ Pousseur 1959, pp. 104–105, 114–115.
- ^ Campbell 2010, p. 125.
- ^ Pousseur 1970.
- ^ Pousseur 1997.
- ^ Lerdahl 1988.
- ^ Grant 2001, p. 219.
- ^ Heinemann 1998.
- ^ Mosch 2004.
- ^ Grant 2006, p. 351.
- ^ Schoenberg 1975, p. 226.
- ^ Krumhansl, Sandell & Sergeant 1987.
- ^ Babbitt 1987, p. 27.
- ^ Horn 2015.
- ^ Koenig 1999, p. 298.
- ^ Newlin 1974.
- ^ Perle 1977.
Sources
- Anon. (1 December 2008). "Arnold Schoenberg". Milken Archive of American Jewish Music. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
- Babbitt, Milton. 1987. Words about Music, edited by Stephen Dembski and Joseph N. Straus. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Ball, Philip (2011). "Schoenberg, Serialism and Cognition: Whose Fault If No One Listens?". Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 36 (1): 24–41. Bibcode:2011ISRv...36...24B. doi:10.1179/030801811X12941390545645. S2CID 143370540.
- Bandur, Markus. 2001. Aesthetics of Total Serialism: Contemporary Research from Music to Architecture. Basel, Boston and Berlin: Birkhäuser.
- Bochner, Mel. 1967. "The Serial Attitude". Artforum 6, no. 4 (December): 28–33.
- Bosseur, Jean-Yves. 1989. "Votre Faust, miroir critique". Revue belge de musicologie/Belgisch tijdschrift voor muziekwetenschap 43 (Liber amicorum Henri Pousseur: Henri Pousseur, ou, Le sérialisme entre modernisme et postmodernisme/Henri Pousseur, of, De lange weg naar de toekomst): 57–70.
- Boulez, Pierre. 1954. "… auprès et au loin". Cahiers de la Compagnie Madeleine Renaud–Jean-Louis Barrault 2, no. 3:7–27. Reprinted in Relevés d’apprenti, edited by Paule Thévenin. Collection "Tel quel". Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1966, 183–203. Also reprinted in Points de repère, third edition, 1:287–314. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1995. English version, as ". . .Auprès et au loin", in Pierre Boulez, Notes of an Apprenticeship, texts collected and presented by Paule Thévenin, translated by Herbert Weinstock, 182–204. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968. Another English version, as "Near and Far", in Pierre Boulez, Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, translated by Stephen Walsh, with an introduction by Robert Piencikowski, 141–157. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. ISBN 0193112108.
- Campbell, Edward. 2010. Boulez, Music and Philosophy. Music in the Twentieth Century 27. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86242-4.
- Collot, Michelle. 2008. "Le génie des lieux". In Michel Butor: déménagements de la littérature, edited by Mireille Calle-Gruber, 73–84. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. ISBN 9782878544176.
- Cope, David. 1971. New Directions in Music. Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown Co. ISBN 9780697035561.
- Cott, Jonathan. 1973. Stockhausen; Conversations with the Composer, New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Delahoyde, Michael. n.d. "20th-Century Music". Author's website, Washington State University.
- Felder, David. 1977. "An Interview with Karlheinz Stockhausen". Perspectives of New Music 16, no. 1 (Fall–Winter): 85–101.
- Frisius, Rudolf. 1998. Serielle Musik. In: Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart: allgemeine Enzyklopädie der Musik. Second, newly compiled edition, edited by musicologists Ludwig Finscher, part 1 (Sachteil), vol. 8 (Quer–Swi): 1327–1354. Kassel & New York: Bärenreiter; Stuttgart: Metzler. ISBN 978-3-7618-1109-2 (Bärenreiter) ISBN 978-3-476-41008-5 (Metzler).
- Gerstner, Karl. 1964. Designing Programmes: Four Essays and an Introduction, with an introduction to the introduction by Paul Gredinger. English version by D. Q. Stephenson. Teufen, Switzerland: Arthur Niggli. Enlarged, new edition 1968.
- Goeyvaerts, Karel. 1994. "Paris–Darmstadt 1947–1956: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait", translated by Patrick Daly, Peter Vosch, and Roger Janssens. Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 48 (The Artistic Legacy of Karel Goeyvaerts: A Collection of Essays): 35–54.
- Granade, S. Andrew (12 January 2015). "Music in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries and Anthology for Music in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, by Joseph Auner". College Music Symposium (Review). 55. doi:10.18177/sym.2015.55.rev.10874. ISSN 2330-2011. JSTOR 26574410.
- Grant, Morag Josephine. 2001. Serial Music Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe. Music in the Twentieth Century, Arnold Whittall, general editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-80458-2.
- Grant, Morag Josephine. 2006. Untitled review of Wege zum musikalischen Strukturalismus: René Leibowitz, Pierre Boulez, John Cage und die Webern-Rezeption in Paris um 1950, by Inge Kovács (Schliengen: Argus, 2003); Die soziale Isolation der neuen Musik: Zum Kölner Musikleben nach 1945, by Michael Custodis (supplement to the Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 54, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004); Reihe und System: Signaturen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Symposiumsbericht, edited by Sabine Meine (Monographien der Institut für Musikpädogogische Forschung der Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hannover 9, Hannover: Institut für Musikpädagogische Forschung, 2004). Music & Letters 87, no. 2 (May): 346–352.
- Griffiths, Paul. 1978. Boulez. Oxford Studies of Composers 16. London and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-315442-0.
- Griffiths, Paul. 2001. "Serialism". The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell, 23:116–123. London: Macmillan.
- Guderian, Dietmar. 1985. "Serielle Strukturen und harmonikale Systeme". In Vom Klang der Bilder: die Musik in der Kunst des 20. Jahrhunderts, edited by Karin von Maur, 434–437. Munich: Prestel-Verlag.
- Heinemann, Stephen. 1998. "Pitch-Class Set Multiplication in Theory and Practice". Music Theory Spectrum 20, no. 1:72–96.
- Horn, Walter. 2015. "Tonality, Musical Form, and Aesthetic Value" . Perspectives of New Music 53, no. 2:201–235.
- Jalowetz, Heinrich. 1944. "On the Spontaneity of Schoenberg's Music". (Subscription access) The Musical Quarterly 30, no. 4 (October): 385–408.
- Keller, Hans. 1955. "Strict Serial Technique in Classical Music". Tempo (new series) no. 37 (Autumn): 12–16, 21–24.
- Koenig, Gottfied Michael. 1999. Ästhetische Praxis: Texte zur Musik, Supplement I, edited by Stefan Fricke, Wolf Frobenius, and Sigrid Konrad. Quellentexte der Musik des 20. Jahrhunderts 1.4. Saarbrücken: Pfau-Verlag, 1999. ISBN 3-89727-056-0.
- Kohl, Jerome. 2002. "Serial Composition, Serial Form, and Process in Karlheinz Stockhausen's Telemusik." In Electroacoustic Music: Analytical Perspectives, ed. Thomas Licata, 91–118. Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-31420-9.
- Krumhansl, Carol., Sandell, Gregory, and Sergeant, Desmond. 1987. "The perception of tone hierarchies and mirror forms in twelve-tone music", Music Perception 5, no. 1: 31–78.
- Leibowitz, René. 1947. Schoenberg et son école: l'étape contemporaine du langage musical. [Paris]: J.B. Janin. (English edition, as Schoenberg and His School: The Contemporary Stage in the Language of Music. Translated by Dika Newlin. New York: Philosophocal Library, 1949).
- Leray, Pascal. 2008. Portrait de la série en jeune mot. Mazères: Le chasseur abstrait éditeur. ISBN 978-2-35554-025-7.
- Lerdahl, Fred. 1988. "Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems". In Generative Processes in Music, ed. John Sloboda. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Contemporary Music Review 6, no. 2 (1992):97–121.
- Locanto, Massimiliano. 2010. "Karel Goeyvaerts – Henry [sic] Pousseur: deux compositeurs belges au cœur de la Nouvelle Musique". In Album Belgique, edited by Annamaria Laserra, 151–164. Brussels: P. I. E. Peter Lang. ISBN 978-90-5201-635-1.
- Maconie, Robin. 2005. Other Planets: The Music of Karlheinz Stockhausen. Lanham, Maryland, Toronto, Oxford: The Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0-8108-5356-6.
- Mead, Andrew. 1985. "Large-Scale Strategy in Arnold Schoenberg's Twelve-Tone Music". Perspectives of New Music 24, no. 1 (Fall–Winter): 120–157.
- Moore, Allan F. (June 1995). "Serialism and Its Contradictions". International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music. 26 (1): 77–95. doi:10.2307/836966. JSTOR 836966.
- Morgan, Robert. 1975. "Stockhausen's Writings on Music". (Subscription access) The Musical Quarterly 61, no. 1 (January): 1–16. Reprinted in The Musical Quarterly 75, no. 4 (Winter 1991): 194–206.
- Mosch, Ulrich. 2004. Musikalisches Hören serieller Musik: Untersuchungen am Beispiel von Pierre Boulez' "Le Marteau sans maître". Saarbrücken: Pfau-Verlag.
- Newlin, Dika. 1974. "Secret Tonality in Schoenberg's Piano Concerto". Perspectives of New Music 13, no. 1 (Fall–Winter):137–139.
- Perle, George. 1977. Twelve-tone Tonality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Pousseur, Henri. 1959. "Forme et pratique musicales". Revue Belge de Musicologie 13:98–116. Slightly revised and expanded version, trans. into English as "Music, Form and Practice (An Attempt to Reconcile Some Contradictions)". Die Reihe 6 (1964): 77–93.
- Pousseur, Henri. 1970. "En guise de conclusion: Pour une Périodicitée generalisée". In his Fragments théoriques I: Sur la musique expérimentale, 241–290. Études de sociologie de la musique. Brussels: Editions de l’Institut de Sociologie Université Libre de Bruxelles.
- Pousseur, Henri. 1997. "Zeitmasze: série, périodicité, individuation". Chapter 12 of his Musiques croisées, preface by Jean-Yves Bosseur, 171–189. Collection Musique et Musicologie. Paris: L'Harmattan.
- Ruwet, Nicolas. 1959. "Contradictions du langage sériel". Revue Belge de Musicologie 13 (1959), 83–97. English trans., as "Contradictions within the Serial Language". Die Reihe 6 (1964): 65–76.
- Sabbe, Herman. 1977. Het muzikale serialisme als techniek en als denkmethode: Een onderzoek naar de logische en historische samenhang van de onderscheiden toepassingen van het seriërend beginsel in de muziek van de periode 1950–1975. Ghent: Rijksuniversiteit te Gent.
- Schoenberg, Arnold. 1975. Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg. Edited by Leonard Stein, translated by Leo Black. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05294-3.
- Schoffman, Nachum. 1981. "Serialism in the Works of Charles Ives". Tempo 138: 21–32.
- Shatzkin, Merton. 1977. "A Pre-Cantata Serialism in Stravinsky". Perspectives of New Music 16, no. 1 (Fall–Winter): 139–143.
- Sherlaw Johnson, Robert. Messiaen, revised and updated edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06734-9.
- Steinberg, Michael. 1998. The Symphony: A Listener's Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Stockhausen, Karlheinz, and Rudolf Frisius. 1998. "Es geht aufwärts". In: Karlheinz Stockhausen, Texte zur Musik 9, edited by Christoph von Blumröder, 391–512. Kürten: Stockhausen-Verlag.
- Sykora, Katharina . 1983. Das Phänomen des Seriellen in der Kunst: Aspekte einer künstlerischen Methode von Monet bis zur amerikanischen Pop Art. Würzburg: Könighausen + Neumann.
- Tick, Judith. 2001. "Crawford (Seeger), Ruth (Porter)". The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell. London: Macmillan.
- Waelti-Walters, Jennifer R. 1992. Michel Butor. Collection monographique Rodopi en littérature française contemporaine 15. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi. ISBN 9789051833867.
- Walker, Alan. 1986. Franz Liszt, volume two: The Weimar Years 1848–1861. New York: Knopf. ISBN 9780394525402.
- Whittall, Arnold. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Serialism. Cambridge Introductions to Music. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86341-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-0-521-68200-8 (pbk).
- Wörner, Karl H. 1973. Stockhausen: Life and Work, introduced, translated, and edited by Bill Hopkins. London: Faber and Faber; Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-02143-6.
Further reading
- Delaere, Marc. 2016. "The Stockhausen–Goeyvaerts Correspondence and the Aesthetic Foundations of Serialism in the Early 1950s". In The Musical Legacy of Karlheinz Stockhausen: Looking Back and Forward, edited by M. J. Grant and Imke Misch, 20–34. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag. ISBN 978-3-95593-068-4.
- Eco, Umberto. 2005. "Innovation & Repetition: Between Modern & Postmodern Aesthetics". Daedalus 134, no. 4, 50 Years (Fall): 191–207. doi:10.1162/001152605774431527. JSTOR 20028022.
- Essl, Karlheinz. 1989. "Aspekte des Seriellen bei Stockhausen". In Almanach Wien Modern 89, edited by L. Knessl, 90-97. Vienna: Konzerthaus.
- Forte, Allen. 1964. "A Theory of Set-Complexes for Music". Journal of Music Theory 8, no. 2 (Winter): 136–184.
- Forte, Allen. 1973. The Structure of Atonal Music. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
- Forte, Allen. 1998. The Atonal Music of Anton Webern. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Fürstenberger, Barbara. 1989. Michel Butors literarische Träume: Untersuchungen zu Matière de rêves I bis V. Studia Romanica 72. Heidelberg: C. Winter. ISBN 9783533040705, 9783533040699.
- Gollin, Edward. 2007. "Multi-Aggregate Cycles and Multi-Aggregate Serial Techniques in the Music of Béla Bartók." Music Theory Spectrum 29, no. 2 (Fall): 143–176. doi:10.1525/mts.2007.29.2.143.
- Gredinger, Paul. 1955. "Das Serielle". Die Reihe 1 ("Elektronische Musik"): 34–41. English as "Serial Technique", translated by Alexander Goehr. Die Reihe 1 ("Electronic Music"), (English edition 1958): 38–44.
- Knee, Robin. 1985. "Michel Butor's Passage de Milan: The Numbers Game". Review of Contemporary Fiction 5, no. 3:146–149.
- Kohl, Jerome. 2017. Karlheinz Stockhausen: Zeitmaße. Landmarks in Music Since 1950, edited by Wyndham Thomas. Abingdon, Oxon; London; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7546-5334-9.
- Krenek, Ernst. 1953. "Is the Twelve-Tone Technique on the Decline?" The Musical Quarterly 39, no 4 (October): 513–527.
- Lerdahl, Fred, and Ray Jackendoff. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Meyer, Leonard B. 1967. Music, the Arts, and Ideas: Patterns and Predictions in Twentieth-Century Culture. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Second edition 1994.)
- Miller, Elinor S. 1983. "Critical Commentary II: Butor's Quadruple fond as Serial Music". Romance Notes 24, no. 2 (Winter): 196–204.
- Misch, Imke. 2016. "Karlheinz Stockhausen: The Challenge of Legacy: An Introduction". In The Musical Legacy of Karlheinz Stockhausen: Looking Back and Forward, edited by M. J. Grant and Imke Misch, 11–19. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag. ISBN 978-3-95593-068-4.
- Perle, George. 1962. Serial Composition and Atonality: An Introduction to the Music of Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Rahn, John. 1980. Basic Atonal Theory. New York: Schirmer Books.
- Ross, Alex. 2007. The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, ISBN 978-0-374-24939-7.
- Roudiez, Leon S. 1984. "Un texte perturbe: Matière de rêves de Michel Butor". Romanic Review 75, no. 2:242–255.
- Savage, Roger W. H. 1989. Structure and Sorcery: The Aesthetetics of Post-War Serial Composition and Indeterminancy. Outstanding Dissertations in Music from British Universities. New York: Garland Publications. ISBN 0-8240-2041-3.
- Schwartz, Steve. 2001. "Richard Yardumian: Orchestral Works". Classical Net. Retrieved 10 May 2011.
- Scruton, Roger. 1997. Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-816638-9. Quoted in Arved Ashbey, The Pleasure of Modernist Music (University of Rochester Press, 2004) p. 122. ISBN 1-58046-143-3.
- Smith Brindle, Reginald. 1966. Serial Composition. London, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Spencer, Michael Clifford. 1974. Michel Butor. Twayne's World Author Series TWS275. New York: Twayne Publishers. ISBN 9780805721867.
- Straus, Joseph N. 1999. "The Myth of Serial 'Tyranny' in the 1950s and 1960s" (Subscription access). The Musical Quarterly 83:301–343.
- Wangermée, Robert. 1995. André Souris et le complexe d'Orphée: entre surréalisme et musique sérielle. Collection Musique, Musicologie. Liège: P. Mardaga. ISBN 9782870096055.
- White, Eric Walter, and Jeremy Noble. 1984. "Stravinsky". In The New Grove Modern Masters. London: Macmillan.
External links
- Serial and twelve-note works by American composers (26 July 2012). Retrieved 23 February 2016.