Procedural reasoning system
In artificial intelligence, a procedural reasoning system (PRS) is a framework for constructing real-time reasoning systems that can perform complex tasks in dynamic environments. It is based on the notion of a rational agent or intelligent agent using the belief–desire–intention software model.
A user application is predominately defined, and provided to a PRS system is a set of knowledge areas. Each knowledge area is a piece of procedural knowledge that specifies how to do something, e.g., how to navigate down a corridor, or how to plan a path (in contrast with robotic architectures where the programmer just provides a model of what the states of the world are and how the agent's primitive actions affect them). Such a program, together with a PRS interpreter, is used to control the agent.
The interpreter is responsible for maintaining beliefs about the world state, choosing which goals to attempt to achieve next, and choosing which knowledge area to apply in the current situation. How exactly these operations are performed might depend on domain-specific meta-level knowledge areas. Unlike traditional AI planning systems that generate a complete plan at the beginning, and replan if unexpected things happen, PRS interleaves planning and doing actions in the world. At any point, the system might only have a partially specified plan for the future.
PRS is based on the BDI or belief–desire–intention framework for intelligent agents. Beliefs consist of what the agent believes to be true about the current state of the world, desires consist of the agent's goals, and intentions consist of the agent's current plans for achieving those goals. Furthermore, each of these three components is typically explicitly represented somewhere within the memory of the PRS agent at runtime, which is in contrast to purely reactive systems, such as the subsumption architecture.
History
The PRS concept was developed by the Artificial Intelligence Center at SRI International during the 1980s, by many workers including Michael Georgeff, Amy L. Lansky, and François Félix Ingrand. Their framework was responsible for exploiting and popularizing the BDI model in software for control of an intelligent agent. The seminal application of the framework was a fault detection system for the reaction control system of the NASA Space Shuttle Discovery. Development on this PRS continued at the Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute through to the late 1990s, which lead to the development of a C++ implementation and extension called dMARS.
Architecture
The system architecture of SRI's PRS includes the following components:
- Database for beliefs about the world, represented using first order predicate calculus.
- Goals to be realized by the system as conditions over an interval of time on internal and external state descriptions (desires).
- Knowledge areas (KAs) or plans that define sequences of low-level actions toward achieving a goal in specific situations.
- Intentions that include those KAs that have been selected for current and eventual execution.
- Interpreter or inference mechanism that manages the system.
Features
SRI's PRS was developed for embedded application in dynamic and real-time environments. As such it specifically addressed the limitations of other contemporary control and reasoning architectures like expert systems and the blackboard system. The following define the general requirements for the development of their PRS:[1]
- asynchronous event handling
- guaranteed reaction and response types
- procedural representation of knowledge
- handling of multiple problems
- reactive and goal-directed behavior
- focus of attention
- reflective reasoning capabilities
- continuous embedded operation
- handling of incomplete or inaccurate data
- handling of transients
- modeling delayed feedback
- operator control
Applications
The seminal application of SRI's PRS was a monitoring and fault detection system for the reaction control system (RCS) on the NASA space shuttle.[2] The RCS provides propulsive forces from a collection of jet thrusters and controls altitude of the space shuttle. A PRS-based fault diagnostic system was developed and tested using a simulator. It included over 100 KAs and over 25 meta level KAs. RCS specific KAs were written by space shuttle mission controllers. It was implemented on the Symbolics 3600 Series LISP machine and used multiple communicating instances of PRS. The system maintained over 1000 facts about the RCS, over 650 facts for the forward RCS alone and half of which are updated continuously during the mission. A version of the PRS was used to monitor the reaction control system on the NASA Space Shuttle Discovery.
PRS was tested on Shakey the robot including navigational and simulated jet malfunction scenarios based on the space shuttle.[3] Later applications included a network management monitor called the Interactive Real-time Telecommunications Network Management System (IRTNMS) for Telecom Australia.[4]
Extensions
The following list the major implementations and extensions of the PRS architecture.[5]
- UM-PRS [6]
- OpenPRS (formerly C-PRS and Propice) [7][8]
- AgentSpeak
- Distributed Multi-Agent Reasoning System (dMARS)
- GORITE
- JAM [9]
- JACK Intelligent Agents
- SRI Procedural Agent Realization Kit (SPARK) [10]
- PRS-CL [11]
See also
- Distributed multi-agent reasoning system
- JACK Intelligent Agents
- Belief-desire-intention software model
- Intelligent agent
References
- ^ Ingrand, F.; M. Georgeff; A Rao (1992). "An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control". IEEE Expert. 7 (6): 34–44. doi:10.1109/64.180407.
- ^
Georgeff, M. P.; F. F. Ingrand (1990). "Real-time reasoning: the monitoring and control of spacecraft systems". Proceedings of the sixth conference on Artificial intelligence applications. pp. 198–204.
{{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter|booktitle=ignored (|book-title=suggested) (help) - ^
Georgeff, M. P.; A. L. Lansky (1987). "Reactive reasoning and planning" (PDF). Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87). Artificial Intelligence Center. SRI International. pp. 198–204.
{{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter|booktitle=ignored (|book-title=suggested) (help) - ^
Rao, Anand S.; Michael P. Georgeff (1991). "Intelligent Real-Time Network Management". Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Technical Note 15. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.48.3297.
{{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter|booktitle=ignored (|book-title=suggested) (help) - ^
Wobcke, W. R. (2007). "Reasoning about BDI Agents from a Programming Languages Perspective" (PDF). Proceedings of the AAAI 2007 Spring Symposium on Intentions in Intelligent Systems.
{{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter|booktitle=ignored (|book-title=suggested) (help) - ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ [4]
- ^ [5]
- ^ [6]
Further reading
- M.P. Georgeff and A.L. Lansky. "A system for reasoning in dynamic domains: Fault diagnosis on the space shuttle" Technical Note 375, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, 1986.
- Michael P. Georgeff, Amy L. Lansky, Marcel J. Schoppers. "Reasoning and Planning in Dynamic Domains: An Experiment with a Mobile Robot" Technical Note 380, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, 1987.
- M. Georgeff, and A. L. Lansky (1987). Procedural knowledge. Proceedings of the IEEE 74(10):1383–1398, IEEE Press.
- Georgeff, Michael P.; Ingrand, Francois Felix. "Research on procedural reasoning systems" Final Report – Phase 1, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, 1988.
- Michael P. Georgeff and François Félix Ingrand "Decision-Making in an Embedded Reasoning System" Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit (Michigan), August 1989.
- K. L. Myers, User Guide for the Procedural Reasoning System Technical Report, Artificial Intelligence Center, Technical Report, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1997
- A Match Made in Space Spinoff, NASA, 2006
External links
- PRS-CL: A Procedural Reasoning System An extension to PRS maintained by SRI International