Jump to content

Active reviews for intermediate designs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eno Lirpa (talk | contribs) at 12:16, 15 September 2016 (no longer an orphan - de tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In software engineering, Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs (ARID) is a method to evaluate software architectures that combines aspects from architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) and software architecture analysis method (SAAM) in a more tactical level.

ARID Process

This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (January 2011)

References

Clements, Kazman, and Klein. Evaluating Software Architecture: Methods and Case Studies. Addison Wesley, 2002. ISBN 0-201-70482-X

External links

Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs

This software-engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Active_reviews_for_intermediate_designs&oldid=739561568"

Hidden categories: