Abortion in the United Kingdom
This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Abortion is legal on a wide number of grounds in England and Wales and Scotland based on the Abortion Act 1967, then one of the most liberal abortion laws in Europe when it was enacted. In Northern Ireland however, abortion is prohibited under most circumstances.
- 1 Great Britain
- 2 Northern Ireland
- 3 Crown dependencies
- 4 History
- 5 Statistics
- 6 Approved methods
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Section 1(1) of the Abortion Act 1967
Subject to the provisions of this section, a person shall not be guilty of an offence under the law relating to abortion when a pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner if two registered medical practitioners are of the opinion, formed in good faith -
- (a) that the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman or any existing children of her family; or
- (b) that the termination of the pregnancy is necessary to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; or
- (c) that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant woman, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated
- (d) that there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.
"The law relating to abortion"
In Scotland, this means any rule of law relating to the procurement of abortion.
"Terminated by a registered medical practitioner"
Place where termination must be carried out
See sections 1(3) to (4).
The opinion of two registered medical practitioners
See section 1(4).
Determining the risk of injury in ss. (a) & (b)
See section 1(2)
"Risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman", s. 1(1)(a)
In R v British Broadcasting Corporation, ex parte ProLife Alliance, Lord Justice Laws said:
There is some evidence that many doctors maintain that the continuance of a pregnancy is always more dangerous to the physical welfare of a woman than having an abortion, a state of affairs which is said to allow a situation of de facto abortion on demand to prevail.
England and Wales
Sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861
Section 58 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 provides:
- 58. Every woman, being with child, who, with intent to procure her own miscarriage, shall unlawfully administer to herself any poison or other noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent, and whosoever, with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman whether she be or be not with child, shall unlawfully administer to her or cause to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing, or unlawfully use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable . . . to be kept in penal servitude for life . . .
Section 59 of that Act provides:
- 59. Whosoever shall unlawfully supply or procure any poison or other noxious thing, or any instrument or thing whatsoever, knowing that the same is intended to be unlawfully used or employed with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether she be or be not with child, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable . . . to be kept in penal servitude . . .
For the purposes of sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, and any rule of law relating to the procurement of abortion, anything done with intent to procure a woman's miscarriage (or in the case of a woman carrying more than one foetus, her miscarriage of any foetus) is unlawfully done unless authorised by section 1 of the Abortion Act 1967 and, in the case of a woman carrying more than one foetus, anything done with intent to procure her miscarriage of any foetus is authorised by the said section 1 if the ground for termination of the pregnancy specified in subsection (1)(d) of the said section 1 applies in relation to any foetus and the thing is done for the purpose of procuring the miscarriage of that foetus, or any of the other ground for termination of the pregnancy specified in the said section 1 applies.
"Felony" and "misdemeanor"
See the Criminal Law Act 1967.
Mode of trial
The offences under section 58 and 59 are indictable-only offences.
An offence under section 58 is punishable with imprisonment for life or for any shorter term.
An offence under section 59 is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
The Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929
As to the effect of section 6(1)(a) of the Broadcasting Act 1990 in relation to broadcasting pictures of an abortion, see R v British Broadcasting Corporation, ex parte ProLife Alliance  UKHL 23,  1 AC 185,  2 WLR 1403,  2 All ER 977,  UKHRR 758,  HRLR 26,  ACD 65,  EMLR 23, reversing R v British Broadcasting Corporation, ex parte ProLife Alliance  EWCA Civ 297,  3 WLR 1080,  2 All ER 756, CA. That section was repealed by the Communications Act 2003.
Health policy is part of the devolved powers transferred to the Northern Ireland Assembly (NIA) by the Northern Ireland Act of 1998 in the frame of the devolution in the United Kingdom. Abortion law in Northern Ireland falls within the scope of the criminal law in Northern Ireland. Criminal justice and policing powers were devolved to Northern Ireland in 2010.
Law concerning abortion
The Abortion Act 1967 does not extend to Northern Ireland. The pieces of legislation governing abortion in Northern Ireland are sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 and sections 25 and 26 of the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945 (which are derived from the corresponding provisions of the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929).
An offence under section 58 is punishable with imprisonment for life or for any shorter term.
Performing an abortion in Northern Ireland is an offence except in specific cases. An offence under section 25(1) of the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945 is, by the proviso to that section, not committed if the act which caused the death of a child was done in good faith for the purpose only of preserving the life of the mother. The word "unlawfully" in section 58 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 imports the meaning expressed by the said proviso and thus section 58 must be read as if the words making it an offence to use the instrument with intent to procure a miscarriage were qualified by a similar proviso. In other words, a person who procures an abortion in good faith for the purpose of preserving the life of the mother is not guilty of an offence. In Northern Ireland Health and Social Services Board v A and Others  NIJB 1, MacDermott LJ said, at p 5, that he was "satisfied that the statutory phrase, 'for the purpose only of preserving the life of the mother' does not relate only to some life-threatening situation. Life in this context means that physical or mental health or well-being of the mother and the doctor's act is lawful where the continuance of the pregnancy would adversely affect the mental or physical health of the mother. The adverse effect must however be a real and serious one and there will always be a question of fact and degree whether the perceived effect of non-termination is sufficiently grave to warrant terminating the unborn child." In Western Health and Social Services Board v CMB and the Official Solicitor (1995) unreported, Pringle J stated "the adverse effect must be permanent or long-term and cannot be short term ... in most cases the adverse effect would need to be a probable risk of non-termination but a possible risk might be sufficient if the imminent death of the mother was a risk in question". In Family Planning Association Of Northern Ireland v Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety (8 October 2004), Nicholson LJ stated at paragraph 73: "it is unlawful to procure a miscarriage where the foetus is abnormal but viable, unless there is a risk that the mother may die or is likely to suffer long-term harm, which is serious, to her physical or mental health." Sheil LJ stated at paragraph 9: "termination of a pregnancy based solely on abnormality of the foetus is unlawful and cannot lawfully be carried out in this jurisdiction."
Thus, Northern Irish women have two solutions to have an abortion. They can either have a legal abortion via the NHS or in a private clinic in Northern Ireland (provided they meet the criteria of a serious and long-term risk to mental or physical health that is probable and not possible), or in all other circumstances travel in England, Scotland or Wales, and pay to terminate their pregnancy in a private clinic (provided they meet the legal criteria for accessing abortion services under the Abortion Act 1967).
Human rights concerns
On 30 November 2015, Horner J in the High Court in Belfast made a declaration of incompatibility under the Human Rights Act 1998 to the effect that Northern Ireland's law on abortion, specifically its lack of provision in cases of fatal foetal abnormality or where the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, could not be interpreted in a manner consistent with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The declaration of incompatibility was quashed by the Court of Appeal on the grounds that "a broad margin of appreciation must be accorded to the state [and] a fair balance has been struck by the law as it presently stands until the legislature decides otherwise".
On 7 June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the law of Northern Ireland was incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life, guaranteed by article 8 of the Convention, insofar as they prohibited abortion in cases of rape, incest and fatal foetal abnormality. However, the court did not restore the declaration of incompatibility as it also held that the claimant did not have standing to bring the proceedings and accordingly the court had no jurisdiction to make a declaration of incompatibility reflect its view on the compatibility issues.
The judgments of the Supreme Court acknowledged that the court lacked jurisdiction to issue a declaration of incompatibility, but included a non-binding opinion that an incompatibility existed, and that a future case in which the applicant had the necessary standing would be likely to succeed. It also urged "[t]hose responsible for ensuring the compatibility of Northern Ireland law with the Convention rights" to "recognise and take account of these conclusions ... by considering whether and how to amend the law". The opinion raises the possibility that Westminster may legislate to relax abortion laws in Northern Ireland, since human rights, unlike health, are not a devolved matter.
The number of terminations of pregnancy per year in Northern Ireland since 2006–2007 inclusive is as follows:
Northern Ireland Termination of Pregnancy Statistics 2014/15: Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety[permanent dead link] (includes previous years to 2006-2007)
The above bulletin explains that, in 2014–2015, the majority of terminations were carried out in the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust area (12) and involved women who were normally resident in Northern Ireland (14). Six involved woman aged 30 years and over, seven involved women aged 25 to 29, and three involved women aged 24 and under.
In 2014, the age groups for women undergoing abortions in the above category were as follows:
|40 and over||54|
In the same year, the gestations of the pregnancies terminated by abortion in the above category were as follows:
|20 and over||15|
Abortion statistics for years previous to 2011 are available online in the National Archives.
It is not possible to ascertain the number of similar abortions in Scotland as the data refer to the board of residence of the patient. This includes a small number of women who travel to Scotland from countries where terminations are not so accessible and may be counted as Scottish residents if they provide a temporary Scottish address or postcode. See: Termination of Pregnancy Statistics 2014, NHS National Services Scotland
Political party positions
The former Democratic Unionist Party Health Minister, Jim Wells, said in The Guardian: "That is a tragic and difficult situation but should the ultimate victim of that terrible act [rape]—which is the child—should he or she be punished for what has happened by having their life terminated? No."
According to Ulster Unionist Party party leader Mike Nesbitt, "We are waiting for the consultation and the justice minister has been liaising with the minister for health. My view is that we need a consultation and that a woman's voice should be stronger by a long way in that consultation."
Following the Report to the United Nations on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women in July 2013, Jenny Willott MP, then the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Employment Relations, Consumer and Postal Affairs and Women and Equalities stated that the UK Government were obliged to submit to the Committee a report on the steps taken to implement their recommendations on abortion laws and services in Northern Ireland by November 2014.
At its 2012 conference, Sinn Féin adopted a policy of allowing abortion in both parts of Ireland under certain circumstances although deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness had already stated, "Sinn Fein is not in favour of abortion, and we resisted any attempt to bring the British 1967 Abortion Act to the North."
Whilst the Alliance Party treats abortion as a matter of conscience, their former leader, David Ford, introduced the Abortion (Fatal Foetal Abnormalities) Bill in December 2016. This would have allowed women the right to a termination up to 24 weeks in cases of FFA. The Bill fell with the collapse of the Northern Ireland Executive in January 2017 although Mr Ford has indicated his desire to re-introduce the Bill if the Assembly is restored.
Religious group positions
The Catholic Church position on abortion is based upon the Sixth Commandment: "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13). The Church holds the view that every human from conception has an inalienable right to life and thus considers abortion a mortal sin, the procuring of which automatically incurs, for any Catholic, the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae ("by the very commission of the offence"). The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992) states: "Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law."  It has been claimed that Catholic opposition to abortion follows from the "doctrine of the double-effect" which originated with St Thomas Aquinas.
The Presbyterian Church in Ireland is strongly pro-life and maintains that abortion should only be permitted in exceptional circumstances (e.g. where there is a real and substantial risk to the life of the mother) subject to the most stringent safeguards. The church has affirmed the sanctity of human life, that human life begins at conception, and that complex medical and social issues such as abortion need to be handled with sensitivity and compassion.
The Church of Ireland affirms the right to life as a fundamental ethical value from which all other values derive and therefore places value on the right to life of an unborn child and the life of his/her mother. However, the church also recognises that in circumstances of "strict and undeniable medical necessity", the care that medical professionals need to give to the mother may result in the termination of her pregnancy. In cases of what the church describes as "lethal foetal abnormality", the church objects to feticide as a form of termination but accepts an option of expediting birth and providing perinatal palliative care and support, i.e. when the child is viable outside the womb. In keeping with its position on the value of life, the church believes that the circumstances of the conception do not alter the value of the child's life. Alongside this, it contends that it is self-evident that ongoing support for victims of sexual crime must be "readily available and of the highest standards".
The Methodist Church in Ireland believes that a foetus should progressively be accorded rights, as it develops through its stages of gestation, culminating with full respect as an individual at birth. It maintains that abortion is a permissible choice in a small number of very specific cases, namely where the mother's life is at risk, where there is risk of "grave injury" to the physical or mental health of the mother, in cases of rape or incest, or where the foetus is "incapable of survival" whether due to the "gross abnormality" of the foetus (e.g. anencephaly) or otherwise. However, the church is opposed to "abortion on demand" and contends that a foetus cannot be regarded as "just an appendage of the mother's body".
The smaller Protestant churches are generally conservative on the issue of abortion and include the Free Presbyterian Church, formerly led by Ian Paisley (Lord Bannside), also founder of the Democratic Unionist Party, who opposed abortion except where the life of the mother was in danger. In the House of Commons in 1993, Paisley stated: "My views on abortion are well known. In the historic Protestant tradition, I totally oppose it, except where the life of the mother is in danger."
The Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland explains its pro-life position through a biblical narrative of the human status of the unborn child. It also acknowledges that women facing a crisis pregnancy often are confronted with the most difficult decision of their lives and encourages support which helps women to choose an alternative to abortion. The church has expressed a particular concern about abortions for minor abnormalities such as club foot, cleft lip or cleft palate.
Churches and their members support women in crisis pregnancies and/or who have experienced a miscarriage or abortion through practical support and advice and counselling services, either through personal initiative, the ministries of individual churches, or through non-denominational charities such as Life NI.
An Amnesty International poll in October 2014 indicated that a majority within Northern Ireland's population appeared to agree to change abortion law in three particular cases: rape, incest and fatal foetal abnormality.
For British left-wing journalist Polly Toynbee, the current situation is discriminatory against women: "We have to end the discrimination against women in Northern Ireland which as citizens of the UK, forbids them from having an abortion in their own home country."
According to Bernadette Smyth, the leader of the Belfast-based group Precious Life which is opposed to abortion, "Women's health is not in danger. Women are not dying because they cannot get abortion."
Situation in 2013
In March 2013, Northern Ireland Health Minister Jim Wells proposed an amendment "to restrict lawful abortions to NHS premises, except in cases of urgency when access to NHS premises is not possible and where no fee is paid".
In response, Amnesty International asked the NI Assembly's Justice Committee to reject the full amendment, declaring that "the restrictive abortion laws and practices and barriers to access safe abortion are gender-discriminatory, denying women and girls treatment only they need".
Finally, Northern Ireland Justice Minister David Ford issued a call for public consultation on amending the criminal law on abortion. The call for consultation took into consideration cases where "there is a diagnosis in pregnancy that the foetus has a lethal abnormality". and cases where "women have become pregnant as a result of sexual crime".
Ford also wrote that "it is not a debate on the wider issues of abortion law – issues often labelled as 'pro-choice' and 'pro-life'". The consultation was closed on 17 January 2015.
Although Jersey, Guernsey, and the Isle of Man are not part of the United Kingdom, as they are part of the Common Travel Area, people resident on these islands who choose to have an abortion have travelled to the UK since the Abortion Act 1967.
It is lawful in Jersey to have an abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy so long as specific criteria are met; it is still lawful but with more stringent criteria between 12 and 24 weeks. The criteria were established in the Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law 1997.
It is lawful in Guernsey to have an abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy so long as specific criteria are met; it is still lawful but with more stringent criteria between 12 and 24 weeks. The criteria were established in the Abortion (Guernsey) Law 1997. Other Channel Islands which are part of the Bailwick of Guernsey (including Alderney, Sark and Herm) also come under the articles of this Law.
Isle of Man
It is lawful in the Isle of Man to have an abortion in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy so long as specific criteria are met. The criteria were established in the Termination of Pregnancy Act 1995.
Abortion was dealt with by the Ecclesiastical Courts in England, Scotland and Wales. Until the Reformation it was dealt with under the laws of the Catholic Church. The Ecclesiastical Courts dealt mainly with the issue due to problems of evidence in such cases. The Ecclesiastical Courts had wider evidential rules and more discretion regarding sentencing. Although the Ecclesiastical Courts heard most cases of abortion, some cases such as the Twinslayers Case were heard in the Secular Courts. The old Ecclesiastical Courts were made defunct after the Reformation.
Later, under Scottish common law, abortion was defined as a criminal offence unless performed for "reputable medical reasons", a definition sufficiently broad as to essentially preclude prosecution.[when?]
The law on abortion started to be codified in legislation and dealt with in government courts under sections 1 and 2 of Lord Ellenborough's Act (1803). The offences created by this statute were replaced by section 13 of the Offences against the Person Act 1828. Under section 1 of the 1803 Act and the first offence created by section 13 of the 1828 Act, the crime of abortion was subject, in cases where the woman was proved to have been quick with child, to the death penalty or transportation for life. Under section 2 of the 1803 Act and the second offence created by section 13 of the 1828 Act (all other cases), the penalty was transportation for 14 years.
Section 13 of the 1828 Act was replaced by section 6 of the Offences against the Person Act 1837. This section made no distinction between women who were quick with child and those who were not. It eliminated the death penalty as a possible punishment.
Section 6 of the 1837 Act was replaced by section 58 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Section 59 of that created a new preparatory offence of procuring poison or instruments with intent to procure abortion.
From 1870 there was a steady decline in fertility, linked not to a rise in the use of artificial contraception but to more traditional methods such as withdrawal and abstinence. This was linked to changes in the perception of the relative costs of childrearing. Of course, women did find themselves with unwanted pregnancies. Abortifacients were discreetly advertised and there was a considerable body of folklore about methods of inducing miscarriages. Amongst working class women violent purgatives were popular: pennyroyal, aloes and turpentine were all used. Other methods to induce miscarriage were very hot baths and gin, extreme exertion, a controlled fall down a flight of stairs, or veterinary medicines. So-called "backstreet" abortionists were fairly common, although their bloody efforts could be fatal. Estimates of the number of illegal abortions varied widely: by one estimate, 100,000 women made efforts to procure an abortion in 1914, usually by drugs.
The criminality of abortion was redoubled in 1929, when the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 was passed. The Act criminalised the deliberate destruction of a child "capable of being born alive". This was to close a lacuna in the law, identified by Lord Darling, which allowed for infants to be killed during birth, which would mean that the perpetrator could neither be prosecuted for abortion or murder. There was included in the Act the presumption that all children in utero over 28 weeks gestation were capable of being born alive. Children in utero below this gestation were dealt with by way of evidence presented to determine whether or not they were capable of being born alive. In 1987, the Court of Appeal refused to grant an injunction to stop an abortion, ruling that a fetus between 18 and 21 weeks was not capable of being born alive. In May 2007, a woman from Levenshulme, Manchester who had an illegal late-term abortion at 7 1⁄2 months in early 2006 was convicted of child destruction under the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929. The case is believed to be the first of its kind in Britain.
In 1938, the decision in R v. Bourne allowed for further considerations to be taken into account. This case related to an abortion performed on a girl who had been raped. It extended the defence to abortion to include "mental and physical wreck" (McNaghtan LJ). The gynaecologist concerned, Aleck Bourne, later became a founder member of the "pro-life" group SPUC (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) in 1966. The pro-choice group the Abortion Law Reform Association was formed in 1936.
In 1939 the Birkett Committee recommended a change to abortion laws, but the intervention of World War II meant that all plans were shelved. Post-war, after decades of stasis, certain high-profile tragedies, including thalidomide, and social changes brought the issue of abortion back into the political arena.
The 1967 Act
The Abortion Act 1967 sought to clarify the law. Introduced by David Steel and subject to heated debate, it allowed for legal abortion on a number of grounds, with the added protection of free provision through the National Health Service. The Act was passed on 27 October 1967 and came into effect on 27 April 1968.
The Act provided a defence for doctors performing an abortion on any of the following grounds:
- To save the woman's life
- To prevent grave permanent injury to the woman's physical or mental health
- Under 24 weeks to avoid injury to the physical or mental health of the woman
- Under 24 weeks to avoid injury to the physical or mental health of the existing child(ren)
- If the child was likely to be severely physically or mentally handicapped
Before the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 mended the Act, the Infant Life Preservation Act 1929 acted as a buffer to the Abortion Act 1967. This meant that abortions could not be carried out if the child was "capable of being born alive". There was therefore no statutory limit put into the Abortion Act 1967, the limit being that which the courts decided as the time at which a child could be born alive. The C v S case in 1987 reconfirmed that at 19–22 weeks a foetus was not capable of being born alive. The 1967 Act required that the procedure must be certified by two doctors before being performed.
Since 1967, members of Parliament have introduced a number of private member's bills to change the abortion law. Four resulted in substantive debate (1975, 1976, 1979, 1988, and 1990) but all failed. The Lane Committee investigated the workings of the Act in 1974 and declared its support.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Changes to the Abortion Act 1967 were introduced in Parliament through the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. The time limits were lowered from 28 to 24 weeks for most cases on the grounds that medical technology had advanced sufficiently to justify the change. Restrictions were removed for late abortions in cases of risk to life, fetal abnormality, or grave physical and mental injury to the woman. Some Members of Parliament claimed not to have been aware of the vast change the decoupling of the Infant Life Preservation Act 1929 would have on the Abortion Act 1967, particularly in relation to the unborn disabled child.
Politicians from the unionist and nationalist parties in Northern Ireland joined forces on 20 June 2000 to block any extension of the Abortion Act 1967 to Northern Ireland where terminations are only allowed on a restricted basis.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008
There was widespread action across the country to oppose any attempts to restrict abortion via the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (now Act) in Parliament (Report Stage and Third Reading, 22 October 2008). MPs voted to retain the current legal limit of 24 weeks. Amendments proposing reductions to 22 weeks and 20 weeks were defeated by 304 to 233 votes and 332 to 190 votes respectively.
A number of pro-choice amendments were proposed by the Labour MPs Diane Abbot, Katy Clark and John McDonnell, including NC30 Amendment of the Abortion Act 1967: Application to Northern Ireland. However, it was reported that the Labour government at the time asked MPs not to table these pro-choice amendments (and at least until Third Reading) and then allegedly used parliamentary mechanisms in order to prevent a vote. In particular Harriet Harman, Minister for Women and Equality, was reported to have blocked the series votes to liberalise Britain's abortion laws.
50th anniversary of the Abortion Act 1967 (UK)
In May 2017, the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership made a commitment to extend the Abortion Act 1967 to Northern Ireland. In June 2017, the UK Government revealed plans to provide some type of free abortion services in England for women from Northern Ireland in an attempt to head off a Tory rebellion in a vote on the Queen's Speech.
Number of abortions
Post 1967 there was a rapid increase in the annual number of legal abortions, and a decline in sepsis and death due to illegal abortions. In 1978 121,754 abortions were performed on women resident in the UK, and 28,015 on non-resident women. The rate of increase fell from the early 1970s and actually dipped from 1991-95 before rising again. The age group with the highest number of abortions per 1000 is amongst those aged 20–24. 2006 statistics for England and Wales revealed that 48% of abortions occurred to women over the age of 25, 29% were aged 20–24; 21% aged under 20 and 2% under 16.
In 2004, there were 185,415 abortions in England and Wales. 87% of abortions were performed at 12 weeks or less and 1.6% (or 2,914 abortions) occurred after 20 weeks. Abortion is free to residents, 82% of abortions were carried out by the public tax-paid National Health Service.
By 2009 the number of abortions had risen to 189,100. Of this number, 2,085 are as a result of doctors deciding that there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.
In a written answer to Jim Allister, the Northern Ireland health minister Edwin Poots disclosed that 394 abortions were carried out in Northern hospitals for the period 2005/06 to 2009/10 with the footnote that reasons for abortions were not gathered centrally.
190,800 abortions were notified as taking place in England and Wales in 2013. 0.2% fewer than in 2012; 185,331 were to residents of England and Wales. The age-standardised rate was 15.9 abortions per 1,000 resident women aged 15–44 years; this rate increased from 11.0 in 1973, peaked at 17.9 in 2007, and fell to 15.9 in 2013.
Since approval of abortion in the UK in 1967 to 2014, 8,745,508 abortions have been performed.
Attitudes to abortion
2004 Times/Populus poll
- 75% of Britons believe abortion should be legal
- 38% of Britons believe abortion should "always" be legal
- 36% of Britons believe abortion should "mostly" be legal
- 23% of Britons believe abortion should be illegal
- 20% of Britons believe abortion should "mostly" be illegal
- 4% of Britons believe abortion should "always" be illegal
NB: The survey compares the results to respondents' voting habits for mainland parties, indicating the possibility that Northern Ireland was not included in this survey.
2005 YouGov/Daily Telegraph poll
- 2% said it should be permitted throughout pregnancy
- 25% support maintaining the current limit of 24 weeks
- 30% would back a measure to reduce the legal limit for abortion to 20 weeks
- 19% support a limit of 12 weeks
- 9% support a limit of fewer than 12 weeks
- 6% responded that abortion should never be allowed
2011 MORI poll
Asked if a woman wants an abortion, she should not have to continue with her pregnancy:
- 53% Agreed
- 15% Agreed very strongly
- 12% Agreed strongly
- 27% Agreed
- 22% Neither agreed nor disagreed
- 17% Disagreed
- 8% Disagreed
- 3% Disagreed strongly
- 5% Disagreed very strongly
- 5% Did not know
- 3% Preferred not to answer
Asked if too many women do not think hard enough before having an abortion
- 37% Agreed
- 8% Agreed very strongly
- 8% Agreed strongly
- 21% Agreed
- 26% Neither agreed nor disagreed
- 28% Disagreed
- 16% Disagreed
- 7% Disagreed strongly
- 5% Disagreed very strongly
- 6% Did not know
- 3% Preferred not to answer
Asked if it should be made more difficult for women to obtain abortions
- 23% Agreed
- 7% Agreed very strongly
- 4% Agreed strongly
- 12% Agreed
- 23% Neither agreed nor disagreed
- 46% Disagreed
- 25% Disagreed
- 9% Disagreed strongly
- 12% Disagreed very strongly
- 6% Did not know
- 2% Preferred not to answer
Methodology is time-related. Up to the ninth week medical abortion can be used (mifepristone was approved for use in Britain in 1991); from the seventh up to the fifteenth week suction or vacuum aspiration is most common (largely replacing the more damaging dilation and curettage technique); for the fifteenth to the eighteenth weeks surgical dilation and evacuation is most common. Approximately 30% of abortions are performed medically.
In 2011, BPAS lost a High Court bid to force the Health Secretary to allow women undertaking early medical abortions in England, Scotland and Wales to administer the second dose of drug treatment at home.
- Halsbury's Laws of England
- Halsbury's Statutes
- Ormerod, David; Hooper, Anthony (2011), "Homicide and related offences: abortion", in Ormerod, David; Hooper, Anthony (eds.). Blackstone's criminal practice, 2012. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 226–230. ISBN 9780199694389.
- Richardson, P.J., ed. (1999). Archbold: criminal pleading, evidence and practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN 9780421637207. Chapter 19. Section III. Paras 19-149 to 19-165.
- Ormerod, David C. (2011), "Section 16.5 Further homicide and related offences: Child destruction and abortion", in Ormerod, David C., Smith and Hogan's criminal law (13th ed.), Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 602–615, ISBN 9780199586493.
- Card, Richard (1992), "Abortion law", in Card, Richard; Cross, Rupert; Jones, Philip, Criminal law (12th ed.), London: Butterworths, pp. 230–235, ISBN 9780406000866.
- "Q&A: Abortion in NI". BBC News. 13 June 2001.
- "Written Answers: Abortion". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 19 July 2010. col. WA153.
- Revised text of s 1 of the Abortion Act 1967. Legislation.gov.uk.
- The Abortion Act 1967, section 6
- R v British Broadcasting Corporation, ex parte ProLife Alliance  EWCA Civ 297 at ,  2 All ER 756 at 761, CA
- Revised text of section 58 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Legislation.gov.uk.
- Revised text of section 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Legislation.gov.uk.
- The Abortion Act 1967, section 5(2); as read with section 6
- The Offences against the Person Act 1861 (24 & 25 Vict c 100), section 58; the Criminal Justice Act 1948 (11 & 12 Geo 6 c 58), section 1(1)
- The Offences against the Person Act 1861 (24 & 25 Vict c 100), section 59; the Penal Servitude Act 1891 (54 & 55 Vict c 69), section 1(1); the Criminal Justice Act 1948 (11 & 12 Geo 6 c 58), section 1(1)
- R v Buck and Buck, 44 Cr App R 213, Assizes, per Edmund Davies J.; R v Creamer  1 QB 72, 49 Cr App R 368,  3 WLR 583,  3 All ER 257, CCA
- See also Attorney General's Reference (No 3 of 1994)  AC 245,  3 WLR 421, HL,  1 Cr App R 351, CA.
- "Devolution settlement: Northern Ireland". gov.uk. Gov.uk. 20 February 2013.
- Grosios, K; Gahan, PB; Burbidge, J. "Overview of healthcare in the UK". The EPMA Journal. 1: 529–34. doi:10.1007/s13167-010-0050-1. PMC . PMID 23199107.
- The Abortion Act 1967, section 7(3)
- The Offences against the Person Act 1861 (24 & 25 Vict c 100), section 58; the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1953, section 1(1)
- Birchard, Karen (2000). "Northern Ireland resists extending abortion Act". The Lancet. 356 (9223): 52. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73390-0.
- R v Bourne  1 KB 687
- Family Planning Association Of Northern Ireland v Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety  NICA 39 at paragraph , per Nicholson LJ
- Quoted by Nicholson LJ at paragraph 56 of Family Planning Association Of Northern Ireland v Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety 2004 NICA 39
- "Family Planning Association of Norther Ireland v. The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety (ref: 2004 NICA 39)". Northern Ireland Court of Appeal (NICA). 8 October 2004.
- "Family Planning Association of Norther Ireland v. The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety (ref: 2004 NICA 37)". Northern Ireland Court of Appeal (NICA). 8 October 2004.
- "Abortion Law in the Republic of Ireland". mariestopes.org.uk. Marie Stopes UK. Archived from the original on 2014-11-03. Retrieved 2014-11-03.
- "Do you provide travel advice for overseas clients?". mariestopes.org.uk. Marie Stopes UK. Archived from the original on 2014-11-03. Retrieved 2014-11-03.
- The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission's Application  NIHC 96 (QB),  NIQB 96 (30 November 2015), High Court (Northern Ireland)
- Attorney General for Northern Ireland & The Department for Justice v The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission  NICA 42 (29 June 2017), Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland)
- Henry McDonald (29 June 2017). "Northern Irish appeal court refuses limited lifting of abortion ban". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- "In the matter of an application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)" (PDF). www.supremecourt.uk. The Supreme Court. Retrieved 2018-06-10.
- "Supreme Court rules Northern Ireland's abortion law breaches human rights but rejects challenge on technical grounds". The Independent. Retrieved 2018-06-10.
- "'All eyes are now on Government' after Supreme Court rule Northern Ireland abortion laws 'incompatible' with human rights laws". Belfast Telegraph. 7 June 2018. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland: Abortion)  UKSC 27 (7 June 2018), Supreme Court (United Kingdom)
- "Northern Ireland should have its own laws and conventions, but it's wrong to deprive citizens of their human rights". The Independent. 7 June 2018. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
The situation of some pregnant women in Northern Ireland who wish for a termination ... is incompatible with two sections of the Human Rights Act 1998. That would 'trump' the convenient political argument ... that such matters are devolved and reserved to the Northern Ireland assembly and executive (which is of course in abeyance and there is no sign of it resuming work soon).
- "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2011". Department of Health. 2012.
- "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2012". Department of Health. 2013.
- "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2013". Department of Health. 2014.
- "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2014". Department of Health. 2015.
- McDonald, Henry (23 September 2014). "Northern Ireland gets health minister who opposes abortion for raped women". The Guardian.
- Rainey, Mark (22 October 2014). "Seven out of 10 people in NI back a relaxation of abortion law – survey". News Letter. Belfast, Northern Ireland.
- "UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women: Women and Equalities written question - answered on 31st March 2014". theyworkforyou.com. They Work For You. 31 March 2014.
- Harkin, Shaun (5 December 2012). "The struggle for abortion rights in Ireland". Socialist Worker.
- McDonald, Henry (7 March 2015). "Sinn Féin drops opposition to abortion at Derry congress". The Guardian.
- Staff writer (14 March 2017). "Ford resubmits private member's bill on abortion reform". allianceparty.org. Alliance Party of Northern Ireland.
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, page 489 paragraph 2271
- McKeown, Maeve (19 June 2013). "Ireland's Abortion Problem: The moral arguments". New Left Project.
- Presbyterian Church in Ireland (2013). "Presbyterians call for Pro Life Abortion Policy with stringent safeguards for exceptional cases". www.presbyterianireland.org. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
- Church and Society Commission, Church of Ireland (2015). "Response to NI Abortion Legislation Consultation" (PDF). www.ireland.anglican.org. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
- Methodist Church in Ireland (2012). "Statement on the proposed Abortion legislation" (PDF). www.irishmethodist.org. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
- Ian Paisley, Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (27 May 1993). "Early-day Motions". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. col. 1023–1024.
- Public Morals Committee, Reformed Presbyterian Church (2008). "Abortion". www.rpc.org. Archived from the original on 2015-10-23. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
- "Pregnancy Matters (support website)". Life Northern Ireland. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
- Millward Brown (October 2014). Attitudes to abortion (pdf). Amnesty International.
- "Time for change in Northern Ireland". fpa.org.uk. Family Planning Association.
- AP (18 October 2012). "Protests as Ireland's 1st abortion clinic opens". USA Today.
- Jim Wells, Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly for South Down (5 March 2013). "Amendment, new clause "Ending the life of an unborn child" (Criminal Justice Bill Marshalled List of Amendments Further Consideration Stage)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Northern Ireland: Northern Ireland Executive. Archived 3 November 2014.
- Justice Act - Jim Wells' amendment: Submission to the Northern Ireland Assembly Justice Committee (PDF). Amnesty International. September 2014.
- The Criminal Law on Abortion - Lethal Foetal Abnormality and Sexual Crime: A Consultation on Amending the Law by the Department of Justice (PDF). Department of Justice, Northern Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2014.
- Stephen Dorrell, Under-Secretary for Health (26 July 1990). "Written Answers: HEALTH - Abortion". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. col. 428–429.
- Peters, Claire (21 May 2008). "Abortion law in Jersey". BBC News.
- Lakeman, Christopher (June 1997). "The concept of "distress" in the Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law, 1997". Jersey and Guernsey Law Review. 1 (2). Archived from the original on 3 October 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2011.
- "1996: Guernsey votes to legalise abortion". BBC News. 13 June 1996.
- "Abortion (Guernsey) Law, 1997". guernseylegalresources.gg. Guernsey Legal Resources. Archived from the original on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2011.
- Vannin, Ellan (20 August 2008). "Abortion: The IOM Law". BBC News.
- Keown, John (2002). Abortion, doctors and the law : some aspects of the legal regulation of abortion in England from 1803 to 1982. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521894135.
- Szreter; Fisher
- "Child Destruction Bill". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Lords. 12 July 1928. col. 998–1000.
- C v S  QB 135,  2 WLR 1108,  1 All ER 1230,  2 FLR 505, (1987) 17 Fam Law 269, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
- "C. v. S., 25 February 1987". Annual Review of Population Law. 14: 41. 1987. PMID 12346721.
- "Baby destruction woman sentenced". BBC News. 24 May 2007. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
- R v Bourne  1 KB 687,  3 All ER 615, Court of Criminal Appeal
- "Our work". spuc.org.uk. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.
- House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee. "Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967 Volume 1 Twelfth Report of Session 2006-07". Pdf.
- "Abortion (Amendment) Bill (Select Committee)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 26 February 1975. col. 503–542.
- "Abortion (Amendment) Bill (Select Committee)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 9 February 1976. col. 100–170.
- "Abortion (Amendment) Bill". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 13 July 1979. col. 891–983.
- "Abortion (Amendment) Bill". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 22 January 1988. col. 1228–1296.
- "Clause 34: Amendment of law relating to termination of pregnancy". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. 21 June 1990. col. 1178–1209.
- "Last chance – Abortion Rights protest tonight". The F-Word. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Abortion Rights". Abortion Rights. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Laurie Penny. "Stand up for the Pro-Choice Majority!". Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] (Programme) (No. 2)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "MPs reject cut in abortion limit". BBC News. 21 May 2008.
- Abbott, Diane (2008-07-23). "Diane Abbott: A right to choose? Not in Northern Ireland". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "MPs pushing abortion rights in NI". 2008-07-23. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Commons, Table Office, House of. "House of Commons Amendments". publications.parliament.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Harriet Harman shouldn't be blogging on International Women's Day – she's suppressed women's rights for 12 years". LabourList. 2009-03-09. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Watt, Nicholas (2008-10-20). "Harman to block Commons votes on liberalising abortion laws". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Editorial (2008-10-21). "Editorial: Abortion law have fallen victim to political expediency". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Editor, Patrick Hennessy, Political (2008-07-12). "Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman in abortion bust-up". ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Elliott, Cath (2008-10-17). "Cath Elliott: Gordon Brown seems determined to stifle even progressive amendments to the HFE bill". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Manifesto - The Labour Party". The Labour Party. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Labour would change the law to stop women in Northern Ireland being sent to prison for abortions". The Independent. 2017-05-11. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Elgot, Jessica (2017-10-23). "Northern Irish women offered free abortion services in England". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- Rowlands S (October 2007). "Contraception and abortion". J R Soc Med. 100 (10): 465–8. doi:10.1258/jrsm.100.10.465. PMC . PMID 17911129.
- Royal Commission on the National Health Service (Chapter 18: The NHS and Private Practice). HMSO. 17 July 1979. ISBN 9780101761505. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
- Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2006. Government Statistical Service for the Department of Health. 19 June 2007. Retrieved 1 November 2007.
- Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2004 (PDF). Government Statistical Service for the Department of Health. 27 July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 July 2008.
- Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2009. Government Statistical Service for the Department of Health. 25 May 2010. Retrieved 19 January 2012.
- Edwin Poots, Minister of Health, Social Services and Public Safety) (6 June 2011). "AQW 203/11-15". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Northern Ireland: Northern Ireland Executive. Pdf pp. WA 351.
- Nakatudde, Nambassa (6 October 2014). Statistics on Abortion (Commons Briefing papers SN04418). House of Commons Library. Pdf.
- "Q&A: Abortion law". BBC News. 21 June 2006. Retrieved 1 November 2007.
- "YouGov/Daily Telegraph Survey Results" (PDF). yougov.com. YouGov. 30 July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 October 2008. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
- "Public Attitudes towards Abortion". ipsos.com. Ipsos MORI. 5 September 2011. Pdf of data.
- Dyer, C. (2011). "Ruling prevents women taking second abortion pill at home". BMJ. 342: d1045. doi:10.1136/bmj.d1045. PMID 21321014.