Academic boycott of Israel
The current campaign for an academic boycott of Israel was launched in April 2004 by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) as part of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign. The campaign calls for BDS activities against Israel to put international pressure on Israel, in this case against Israeli academic institutions, all of which are said by PACBI to be implicated in the perpetuation of Israeli occupation, in order to achieve BDS goals. Since then, proposals for academic boycotts of particular Israeli universities and academics have been made by academics and organisations in Palestine, the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries. The goal of the proposed academic boycotts is to isolate Israel in order to force a change in Israel's policies towards the Palestinians, which proponents argue are discriminatory and oppressive, including oppressing the academic freedom of Palestinians.
The campaigns for academic boycott of Israel have led to fierce debate. Proponents have argued that the situation, particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories, constitutes an example of apartheid in Israel.[failed verification][page needed] Opponents argue that boycott advocates apply different standards to Israel than other countries, that the boycott is counterproductive, a collective punishment of Israeli academia, a tactic to threaten the existence of the State of Israel, and also that the campaign is antisemitic. Despite this debate, academic boycott measures have been undertaken around the world, with some support among academic associations and unions, but with little institutional success.
The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) was launched in Ramallah in April 2004 by a group of Palestinian academics and intellectuals. According to PACBI, "all Israeli academic institutions, unless proven otherwise, are complicit in maintaining the Israeli occupation and denial of basic Palestinian rights."
In reaction to the National Executive Council of the National Union of Students' BDS resolution on 2 June 2015, Prof. Leslie Wagner argued, "In reality, co-operation between Israeli and British universities and their academics has grown in recent years under the energetic leadership of outgoing UK ambassador to Israel, Matthew Gould."
The Guardian open letter, 2002
The idea of an academic boycott against Israel first emerged publicly in England on 6 April 2002 in an open letter to The Guardian initiated by Steven and Hilary Rose, professors in biology at the Open University and social policy at the University of Bradford respectively, who called for a moratorium on all cultural and research links with Israel. It read:
Despite widespread international condemnation for its policy of violent repression against the Palestinian people in the Occupied Territories, the Israeli government appears impervious to moral appeals from world leaders. ... Odd though it may appear, many national and European cultural and research institutions, including especially those funded from the EU and the European Science Foundation, regard Israel as a European state for the purposes of awarding grants and contracts. ... Would it not therefore be timely if at both national and European level a moratorium was called upon any further such support unless and until Israel abide by UN resolutions and open serious peace negotiations with the Palestinians, along the lines proposed in many peace plans including most recently that sponsored by the Saudis and the Arab League.
By July 2002, the open letter had gained over 700 signatories, including those of ten Israeli academics.
In response to the open letter, Leonid Ryzhik, a senior professor in mathematics at the University of Chicago, led a rival web-based petition that condemned the original's "unjustly righteous tone" and warned that the boycott has a "broader risk of very disruptive repercussions for a wide range of international scientific and cultural contacts." The counter petition had gathered almost 1,000 signatories.
Mona Baker, Miriam Shlesinger and Gideon Toury
In early June 2002, Mona Baker, a professor of translation studies at the University of Manchester in England and a signatory of the 2002 open letter, removed two Israeli academics – Dr. Miriam Shlesinger of Bar-Ilan University which at the time had a regional branch in the Ariel settlement, a former chair of Amnesty International, Israel; and Professor Gideon Toury of Tel Aviv University – from the editorial boards of the journals Translator and Translation Studies Abstracts. Subsequently, Baker said that Translator will no longer publish any research by Israeli scholars and will refuse to sell books and journals to Israeli libraries.
Association of University Teachers
On 22 April 2005, the Council of Association of University Teachers (AUT) voted to boycott two Israeli universities: University of Haifa and Bar-Ilan University. The motions to AUT Council were prompted by the call for a boycott from nearly 60 Palestinian academics and others. The AUT Council voted to boycott Bar-Ilan because it runs courses at colleges in the West Bank (referring to Ariel College) and "is thus directly involved with the occupation of Palestinian territories contrary to United Nations resolutions". It boycotted Haifa because it was alleged that the university had wrongly disciplined Ilan Pappé for supporting a student who wrote about attacks on Palestinians during the founding of the state of Israel. The University denied having disciplined the lecturer. Union members claimed that staff and students [of Israeli universities] who seek to research Israel's history in full are often "victimised".
Condemnation and backlash
The AUT's decision was immediately condemned by Jewish groups and many members of the AUT. Critics of the boycott within and outside the AUT noted that at the meeting at which the boycott motion was passed the leadership cut short the debate citing a lack of time. Specifically, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Union of Jewish Students accused the AUT of purposely holding the vote during Passover, when many Jewish members could not be present.
The presidents of Jerusalem-based al-Quds University and Hebrew University of Jerusalem issued a joint statement condemning the boycott effort as unproductive towards ending the "shared tragedy" but rather could prolong it:
Bridging political gulfs – rather than widening them further apart – between nations and individuals thus becomes an educational duty as well as a functional necessity, requiring exchange and dialogue rather than confrontation and antagonism. Our disaffection with, and condemnation of acts of academic boycotts and discrimination against scholars and institutions, is predicated on the principles of academic freedom, human rights, and equality between nations and among individuals.
One of the university presidents, Sari Nusseibeh of al-Quds University, continued: "If we are to look at Israeli society, it is within the academic community that we've had the most progressive pro-peace views and views that have come out in favor of seeing us as equals [...] If you want to punish any sector, this is the last one to approach." He acknowledges, however, that his view is a minority one among Palestinian academics.
The British National Postgraduate Committee also voted to oppose the boycott. Project officer Andre Oboler said that the boycott "runs contrary to our objective, which is to advance in the public interest the education of postgraduate students within the UK".
Cancellation of boycott
After the backlash and condemnation – both internal and external – members of the AUT, headed by Open University lecturer and Engage founder Jon Pike – gathered enough signatures to call a special meeting on the subject. Pro-boycott demonstrators called for the AUT to maintain its course against what they described as "unbelievable pressure", while anti-boycott demonstrators suggested that the decision had been influenced by antisemitism, and argued that the AUT's integrity was being threatened by a group of "leftwing extremists". At the meeting on 26 May 2005, the AUT membership decided to cancel the boycott of both Israeli universities. Reasons cited for the decision were: the damage to academic freedom, the hampering of dialogue and peace effort between Israelis and Palestinians, and that boycotting Israel alone could not be justified.
National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education
In May 2006, on the last day of its final conference, National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education (NATFHE) passed motion 198C, a call to boycott Israeli academics who did not vocally speak out against their government: "The conference invites members to consider their own responsibility for ensuring equity and non-discrimination in contacts with Israeli educational institutions or individuals, and to consider the appropriateness of a boycott of those that do not publicly dissociate themselves from such policies." The resolution was dismissed by the AUT, the union into which the NATFHE was merging. Overall, four attempts were made to pass pro-boycott motions at the annual conferences of the AUT, especially following its reorganization as the University and College Union in 2008. Threatened by legal action on the one hand, and opposed by all University heads on the other, these never went beyond the declarative stage.
Criticism of the NATFHE
Brian Klug made this criticism of the NATFHE motion:
[E]ven if the policy and rationale were clear and unambiguous, there is a deeper problem with motions of this sort that prevents them from attracting a broad base of support: they rely on the false (or limited) analogy implied by the word "apartheid". This is not to say that there are no points of comparison, for there are – just as there are in a host of other countries where minority ethnic and national groups are oppressed. Nor is it even to say that the suffering experienced by Palestinians is less than that endured by "non-whites" in South Africa: it may or may not be (although I am not sure how to do the sums). But as I have argued elsewhere: "The validity of the analogy does not depend on a catalogue of atrocities, however appalling."
The Association of Jewish Sixthformers (AJ6) issued a press release expressing dismay and concern "about the affects [sic] of any boycott on Jewish and Israeli Sixthformers". Specifically, AJ6 pointed to "partnerships and exchange visits with Israeli schools and colleges may be under threat", and "Jewish students who study in Israel during their Gap Years are worried that teachers may refuse to provide them with references for these programmes."
The Anti-Defamation League issued a statement which condemned the motion explaining:
It is profoundly unjust for academics in the only democratic country in the Middle East – the only country where scholarship and debate are permitted to freely flourish – to be held to an ideological test and the threat of being blacklisted because of their views. No one would expect a British or American professor to have to withstand such scrutiny of their political views. Yet, when it comes to Israel a different standard applies.
The British government, through Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister Lord Triesman, issued a statement that the motion was "counterproductive and retrograde" although the British Government recognized "the independence of the NATFHE".
Response to criticism
Paul Mackney, the general secretary of NATFHE and who opposed the motion as passed, is quoted after the fact by The Guardian:
The ironic thing, is if we had put this to delegates a couple of weeks ago, before the international pro-Israeli lobby started this massive campaign emailing delegates and trying to deny us our democratic right to discuss whatever we like, it probably wouldn't have passed. People feel bullied, and what we have seen is a hardening of attitudes. All they achieved was making the delegates determined to debate and pass the motion.
Tamara Traubmann and Benjamin Joffe-Walt, reporting for The Guardian, conducted an analysis of "whether the campaigns against such boycotts are actually motivated by concerns for academic freedom, or whether they are using the universalist ideal to stifle critical discussion of Israel". They describe their findings this way:
Through discussions with anti-boycott campaigners and a trace of the most common emails (not necessarily abusive) sent to the union and handed over by Natfhe, we found the vast majority of the tens of thousands of emails originated not with groups fighting for academic freedom, but with lobby groups and thinktanks that regularly work to delegitimise criticisms of Israel.
University and College Union
Since 2007, the UCU has been controversially involved in the academic boycotts of Israel and for rejecting the previously accepted definition of "anti-Semitism". Some Jewish members resigned following claims of an underlying institutional anti-Semitism. In 2010, the UCU passed a boycott motion that invoked a "call from the Palestinian Boycott National Committee" for "an isolation of Israel while it continues to act in breach of international law" and calls to "campaign actively" against Israel's trade agreement with the European Union. Dr John Chalcraft, of the London School of Economics, said: "A boycott will be effective because Israel considers itself part of the West: when Western civil society finally says 'enough is enough', Israelis, not to mention Western governments, will take notice. A non-violent international boycott, like that of South Africa, may well play a historic role in bringing down the Israeli system of apartheid."
Susan Fuhrman, President of Teachers College, Columbia University said:
"As the president of an academic institution dedicated in large part to the preparation of teachers, I believe that universities and all centers of learning must be allowed to function as safe havens for freedom of discussion, debate and intellectual inquiry, standing apart from national and international politics and partisan strife. Only thus can they continue to produce scholarship that informs the policies and laws of democratic societies and stand as islands of hope in a frequently polarized world.... Teachers College welcomes dialogue with Israeli scholars and universities and stands with Columbia University President Lee Bollinger in expressing solidarity with them by inviting UCU to boycott us, as well."
In 2011, Ronnie Fraser unsuccessfully sued the UCU for violation of the Equality Act 2010, alleging repeated antisemitic harassment by fellow UCU members. Under cross-examination, UCU general secretary Sally Hunt admitted that Fraser "would be entitled to infer ... that the union was not taking antisemitism seriously." The UCU later ceased to promote anti-Israel boycotts.
During the Second Intifada
In April 2002, during the Al-Aqsa Intifada, around the time of the publication of the open letter in The Guardian, the Coordination des Scientifiques pour une Paix Juste au Proche-Orient, a group of French academics, published a call for a boycott of Israeli scientific institutions on the web. The statement was published in French and English and stressed that only "official Israeli institutions, including universities" were targeted, and that signatories "will continue to collaborate with, and host, Israeli scientific colleagues on an individual basis." The pledge was signed by several hundred academics from 30 countries. During the subsequent months it was the subject of discussion in the French press and in scientific journals.
In December of the same year, a motion put forward at the Administrative Council of the Université Paris 6 called for the suspension of the EU-Israel association agreement, referring to discrimination against Palestinian colleagues and to Article of this agreement, which states that "[r]elations between the Parties, as well as all the provisions of the Agreement itself, shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this Agreement." Far from calling for a boycott, the motion called on the President of the university to establish contact with Israeli and Palestinian university authorities in order to work for peace. The motion was adopted on December 16, 2002 by 22 in favor, 4 opposed, and 6 abstentions.
An opposing motion was proposed and adopted on January 27, 2003 by members of the Council. It stated that it "recognized the emotions stirred up by the motion adopted on December 16, 2002, and by the way it was interpreted" and affirmed "its opposition to any moratorium or boycott in the relations between universities and university faculty; asked that, in the context of the preparation of the EU's Sixth Framework Program, the association agreement between the EU and Israel be renegotiated to include the Palestinians … and called on the EU to ensure compliance by all parties with all clauses of the agreement (…)".
Following Operation Cast Lead
In March 2009, shortly after the Gaza War, a call for an academic boycott in France was published on the web with over 50 signatures, including Daniel Bensaïd, Gérard Toulouse of the Académie des sciences, coauthor in 2003 of Les scientifiques et les droits de l'homme with Lydie Koch-Miramond who had also signed and defended the boycott of Israel in 2002, Mireille Fanon-Mendès-France, and Roland Lombard, President of the Collectif Interuniversitaire pour la Coopération avec les Universités Palestiniennes. They called "in the first place to impose a program of boycott, divestment, and sanctions," following the creation of the French organization BDS France.
In the spring of 2009, the Association of Academics for the Respect of International Law in Palestine (AURDIP) was created by the group of academics who had initiated the 2002 call, in alliance with the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel PACBI and with the British organization BRICUP . AURDIP was created with two primary missions: (1) To promote the application of international law in Israel and Palestine ; specifically to oppose Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories and Israel’s settlement policy, which fly in the face of international conventions on human rights, United Nations resolutions, and decisions of the International Court of Justice; (2) To defend Palestinians’ right to education and to support students and staff of Palestinian universities in the defense of this right.
Haaretz reported in 2009 that a group of American professors had joined the boycott call in the wake of the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict:
While Israeli academics have grown used to such news from Great Britain, where anti-Israel groups several times attempted to establish academic boycotts, the formation of the United States movement marks the first time that a national academic boycott movement has come out of America.
The group's name is "U.S. Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel". (USACBI)
Support and successes
In April 2013, the Association for Asian American Studies (AAAS) voted to boycott Israeli universities and academic institutions. It was joined in December by the American Studies Association (ASA). In a vote in which 1,252 of its 5,000 members participated, 66% voted in favour of a boycott. The reasons given were "Israel's violation of international law and UN resolutions; the documented impact of the Israeli occupation on Palestinian scholars and students; [and] the extent to which Israeli institutions of higher education are a party to state policies that violate human rights," and thus "negatively impact the working conditions of Palestinian scholars and students". Many proponents of the ASA's boycott, including Yale professor and past president of the ASA Matthew Frye Jacobson, argue that the action can be seen as "symbolic", as it is such defined by the ASA council statement. In response to the resolution, a number of organizations and politicians accused the ASA of applying a double standard towards Israel. Opponents of the boycott called the resolution antisemitic and anti-Israel.
Israel is the only nation ever boycotted by the ASA in the 52 years of the organization's existence. The New York Times reported that ASA's president Curtis Marez argued that America has "a particular responsibility to answer the call for boycott because it is the largest supplier of military aid to the state of Israel". Marez acknowledged that the United States has previously, and is currently, the largest supplier of military aid to many governments, including some with poor human rights records, but explained that Israel is the only country in which "civil society groups" had specifically asked the ASA to launch a boycott. Further responding to accusations that the ASA was singling out Israel while ignoring many other nations that have comparable or even worse human rights records that Israel (including many of Israel's neighbors), Marez replied: "One has to start somewhere."
Over 700 new members joined the organisation between the December vote to boycott Israeli academic institutions and April 2014. The ASA subsequently released a statement that said it had "collected more membership revenue in the past three months than in any other three-month period over the past quarter-century" and that their organization is "thriving".
In December 2013, the council of the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association voted unanimously in favor of the academic boycott of Israel, becoming the third American academic association to participate in PACBI's Call to action. NAISA made an official declaration of its support for the academic boycott of Israel, choosing to create an original document of declaration in order to protest, "the infringement of the academic freedom of Indigenous Palestinian academics and intellectuals in the Occupied Territories and Israel who are denied fundamental freedoms of movement, expression, and assembly, which [it] uphold[s]." The declaration "encourages NAISA members to boycott Israeli academic institutions because they are imbricated with the Israeli state".
In November 2015, the annual business meeting of the American Anthropological Association voted to join the academic boycott campaign, by a margin of 1,040 to 136. In 2016 the resolution was put up for vote by all the members of the Association and was rejected.
In a speech given at Brooklyn College in 2013 with BDS founding member Omar Barghouti, prominent American academic Judith Butler commented on the reasons behind her support of the academic boycott campaign of the BDS movement stating:
Others may interpret the boycott differently, but I have no problem collaborating with Israeli scholars and artists as long as we do not participate in any Israeli institution or have Israeli state monies support our collaborative work. The reason, of course, is that the academic and cultural boycott seeks to put pressure on all those cultural institutions that have failed to oppose the occupation and struggle for equal rights and the rights of the dispossessed, all those cultural institutions that think it is not their place to criticize their government for these practices, all of them that understand themselves to be above or beyond this intractable political condition.
Hamid Dabashi, a professor of Iranian studies at Columbia University, is on the advisory board of the U.S. Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel. Dabashi supports boycott efforts targeting both Israeli individuals and institutions:
The divestment campaign that has been far more successful in Western Europe needs to be reinvigorated in North America – as must the boycotting of the Israeli cultural and academic institutions ... Naming names and denouncing individually every prominent Israeli intellectual who has publicly endorsed their elected officials' wide-eyed barbarism, and then categorically boycotting their universities and colleges, film festivals and cultural institutions, is the single most important act of solidarity that their counterparts can do around the world.
The Columbia Palestine Forum (CPF), which was formed at Columbia University in March 2009, maintains that Israel is an apartheid state and advocates boycott and divestment efforts against Israel. The group has called for increased disclosure of university finances to establish that Columbia funds are not being used towards "maintenance of the Israeli occupation and human rights abuses in Gaza and the West Bank", and advocates divestment of university funds from any companies that profit from what it describes as the "continued occupation of Palestinian lands, the maintenance of illegal Israeli settlements and the walls being built around Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem".
CPF outlined its demands to a university representative during a demonstration on 5 March 2009. On the previous day, it held a panel discussion featuring multiple Columbia faculty members who have been supportive of the group. Gil Anidjar, a religion professor, advocated boycott as an appropriate "exercise of freedom", while anthropology professor Brinkley Messick indicated that Columbia President Lee Bollinger had agreed to meet with the faculty to discuss the demands for divestment. One CPF member described the group's goals in a 3 March article for Columbia's newspaper, stating, "by divesting from companies that do business with the occupation, we can put global pressure on the Israeli government to end it."
Opposition and criticism of academic boycotts within the U.S.
University of Pennsylvania President Amy Gutmann said in January 2012 that the university "has clearly stated on numerous occasions that it does not support sanctions or boycotts against Israel". She said that the school was not a sponsor of a BDS conference taking place on campus in February 2012.
In March 2009, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) reiterated its opposition to any academic boycott of Israel (or any other country) but added that discussion of the Israel-Palestinian conflict should be encouraged. AFT President Randi Weingarten stated that:
We believe academic boycotts were a bad idea in 2002 and are a bad idea now. Academic boycotts are inconsistent with the democratic values of academic freedom and free expression... We want to make clear that this position does not in any way discourage an open discussion and debate of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or of ways to resolve it. However, we expect that such a discussion would not be one-sided and would consider the behavior of all the relevant actors. An academic boycott of Israel, or of any country, for that matter, would effectively suppress free speech without helping to resolve the conflict.
The Forward published, in January 2012, an article about Jewish presidents of universities, saying, "many college presidents" see BDS as a "red line" and "presidents who were previously disinclined to speak out against anti-Israel activity on campus in the name of preserving open dialogue found themselves publicly opposing the movement."
After fierce debate, the American Anthropological Association (AAA) chose not to endorse any academic boycott of Israel in 2016. Anthropologist David M. Rosen studied the effects of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement on the association. Rosen's conclusion was:
"Had the association joined the BDS boycott, it would have established ... an ideological litmus test for participation in the academy. Endorsing a political test for speech is a step on a dangerous path for American anthropologists. As University of Chicago president Robert Zimmer put it, boycotts are an 'assault on the fundamental principles of open discourse ... and free argumentation, principles that lie at the very foundation of the academy and its missions of discovery ... and education.' ... [A]n academic boycott opens the door to the general political suppression of speech in the academy. ... [I]f academics no longer uphold the principle of free speech in the university, neither will anyone else."
Criticism of the ASA
Until April 2013, no American school had ever divested from or imposed an academic boycott on Israel despite strong boycott campaigns. Former President of Harvard University Larry Summers has called Israel-boycott efforts "anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent". In 2007, nearly 300 university presidents across the United States signed a join statement denouncing the boycott movement. In 2010, a group of 15 American university professors launched a campaign calling for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel.
Many universities and prominent scholars criticized the ASA's support of the boycott. Brandeis University, Pennsylvania State University, Indiana University and Kenyon College decided to withdraw from the ASA. The American Council on Education, an umbrella organisation of 1,800 institutions, the American Association of Universities which represents 62 schools across the US and Canada, and the American Association of University Professors all condemned the boycott.
Ninety-two university presidents including of Harvard, Brown, Yale, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, Cornell, Duke, Stanford, Boston, Columbia, Chicago, New York University, Dartmouth College, Wesleyan, Florida, University of Miami, Western Kentucky University, University of Connecticut and University of Washington, condemned the boycott and distanced themselves from the ASA.
Harvard president Drew Gilpin Faust said, "academic boycotts subvert the academic freedoms and values necessary to the free flow of ideas," and that a boycott was "a direct threat to these ideals". Former Harvard president Lawrence H. Summers stated that Israel was being unfairly singled out when other countries' human rights records were far worse. The president of Kenyon college dismissed it as a "geopolitical tool", endorsing the decision of its American Studies program to secede as an institutional member of the ASA. The president Wesleyan university deplored this "politically retrograde resolution", describing it as an irresponsible attack under the guise of phony progressivism.
Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, argued that the boycott demonstrated "the Orwellian antisemitism and moral bankruptcy of the ASA" while the ADL described the boycott as "shameful, morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest attack on academic freedom".
In January 2014, 134 members of Congress (69 Democrats, 65 Republicans) signed a letter to ASA president Curtis Marez and president-elect Lisa Duggan, which accused the ASA of engaging in a "morally dishonest double standard". The letter stated that: "Like all democracies, Israel is not perfect. But to single out Israel, while leaving relationships with universities in autocratic and repressive countries intact, suggests thinly-veiled bigotry and bias."
Official government responses and legislation
In February 2014 a bill called the "Protect Academic Freedom Act" was introduced into the U.S. Congress. The legislation "seeks to bar federal funds from going to academic institutions that back the BDS movement". Supporters of the legislation claim that its purpose to oppose "discriminatory boycotts which impede rather than advance the peace process and that seek to deny Israelis the right to free speech on American campuses". Those opposing the bill claim that it would fiercely violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and many doubt its efficacy as a response to the ASA's boycott movement.
On 30 May 2014, Representative Alan Grayson introduced H.R. 4776, a bill "to prohibit an institution of higher education that participates in a boycott of the Israeli government, economy, or academia from receiving funds from the U.S. federal government".
In January 2009, the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees brought forward a proposal to ban Israeli academics from teaching at Ontario Universities. CUPE-Ontario leader Sid Ryan stated, "we are ready to say Israeli academics should not be on our campuses unless they explicitly condemn the university bombing and the assault on Gaza in general." Ryan subsequently said, "Academic freedom goes both ways. What we are saying is if they want to remain silent and be complicit in these kinds of actions, why should they enjoy the freedom to come and teach in other countries like Canada?" CUPE's national president, Paul Moist, issued a statement declaring his opposition to the motion and saying, "I will be using my influence in any debates on such a resolution to oppose its adoption."
Shortly after its original statement, CUPE removed its call to boycott individual academics from its website and replaced it with statement that called instead for a boycott "aimed at academic institutions and the institutional connections that exist between universities here and those in Israel". Tyler Shipley, spokesperson for CUPE local 3903 at York University, told the Toronto Star that his group will begin to advocate for York to sever financial ties to Israel.
Some observers have questioned what practical effect any CUPE resolution will have since the 20,000 university workers represented by CUPE Ontario include campus staff but almost no full-time faculty.
The University of Western Sydney's Student Association (UWSSA) formally affiliated to the "Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel" in February 2009, following a request from PACBI. The President of the UWSSA, Jacob Carswell-Doherty, later stated, "We have no interest in hearing the Israeli viewpoint. Our agenda is to persuade the university administration to implement the terms of the boycott."
In 2013, the issue of Academic Boycotts and the BDS campaign received significant press treatment when a suit was filed against professor Jake Lynch, the director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Sydney, by Shurat HaDin, a pro-Israel legal lobby organization. The 30 page suit focusses on Lynch's denying a sabbatical appointment to professor Dan Avnon of Hebrew University because of his center's pro-BDS policy not to support Israeli academics. Andrew Hamilton of Shurat HaDin stated "Our strategic aim in this case is to address the unlawful racial discrimination of the BDS movement generally and the academic boycott in particular, rather than to narrowly focus on the discrimination against Prof. Avnon." The case has been described as a "landmark legal suit" and "a major test of the legality of the boycott, divestments and sanctions (BDS) campaign".
In July 2014, Shurat HaDin-the Israel Law Center announced that it was withdrawing its Lawsuit against Lynch. Lynch stated that this decision "gives the green light for many more Australians to take their own action in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle for rights and freedoms we are lucky enough to be able to take for granted".
In January 2016, 168 Italian academics and researchers published a call to boycott Israeli academic institutions. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, was singled out as a boycott target. "The Institute carries out research in a wide range of technologies and weapons used to oppress and attack Palestinians," said the call.
Campaign to boycott Ben-Gurion University
On 5 September 2010, a nationwide academic petition was initiated by academics supporting a termination of a partnership agreement between the University of Johannesburg (UJ) and Ben-Gurion University (BGU); a long-standing partnership dating back to apartheid era relations between the two institutions. Well-known academics such as Professors Breyten Breytenbach, John Dugard, Mahmood Mamdani, Antjie Krog and Achille Mbembe are signatories to the academic petition, which is also backed by Vice-Chancellors from four universities in South Africa.
Amid widespread public attention, both within South Africa and internationally, the campaign to boycott BGU quickly gained momentum and within a few days more than 250 academics had signed the petition, stating: "The Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories has had disastrous effects on access to education for Palestinians. While Palestinians are not able to access universities and schools, Israeli universities produce the research, technology, arguments and leaders for maintaining the occupation. BGU is no exception, by maintaining links to both the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) and the arms industry BGU structurally supports and facilitates the Israeli occupation."
On 26 September 2010 Archbishop Desmond Tutu released a letter through The Sunday Times, under the heading "Israeli ties: a chance to do the right thing", supporting the academics. The Nobel Laureate's position in favour of the boycott was accompanied by an appeal that: "The University of Johannesburg has a chance to do the right thing, at a time when it is unsexy."
Former South African cabinet minister and ANC leader Ronnie Kasrils also came out in support of the boycott call and wrote in The Guardian: "Israeli universities are not being targeted for boycott because of their ethnic or religious identity, but because of their complicity in the Israeli system of apartheid" and "The principled position of academics in South Africa to distance themselves from institutions that support the occupation is a reflection of the advances already made in exposing that the Israeli regime is guilty of an illegal and immoral colonial project."
Against the backdrop of the publicly supported campaign, UJ's highest academic body (Senate) voted on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 "not to continue a long-standing relationship with Ben-Gurion University in Israel in its present form" and conditionally terminate its Apartheid-era relationship with BGU.
A fact-finding investigation conducted by the University confirmed BGU's links with the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) and complicity in the Israeli occupation. Accepting the recommendations of the report, the University committed itself to end any research or teaching relationship with Ben-Gurion University that has direct or indirect military links; or in instances where human rights abuses are identified. The University has stated that if BGU violates any of the conditions agreed on by Senate or UJ's stated principles, which include "solidarity with any oppressed population", the relationship will be terminated completely after 6 months.
Within hours of the University of Johannesburg's decision to conditionally terminate its links with Ben-Gurion University, major South African universities began looking into their own ties with Israeli universities.
Wits University vice-chancellor Loyiso Nongxa told journalists that he was not aware of "any formal links – a memorandum of understanding [MoU] – between Wits and Israeli universities". Three hours later, Wits university's spokesperson confirmed that it "has no formal ties with any Israeli university, according to our database".
The University of Cape Town followed suit shortly afterwards, stating, "There are no institution-level partnerships with Israeli universities." The University of Pretoria, University of KwaZulu-Natal and Stellenbosch University have since confirmed that they have no formal partnerships with institutions in Israel.
Wits SRC adopts academic boycott of Israel
The Wits SRC academic boycott has not been renewed since it was passed in 2012 and is de facto no longer operable at the institution. A number of Wits SRC and former Wits SRC members have visited the country and talked about their experiences. They have said they are against boycotts and that calling Israel an apartheid state is an insult to black South Africans. Israeli writers and the Israeli director of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have also visited the campus.
A prominent Palestinian academic, president of Al-Quds University, Sari Nusseibeh, has argued against academic boycotts of Israel, telling Associated Press "If we are to look at Israeli society, it is within the academic community that we've had the most progressive pro-peace views and views that have come out in favor of seeing us as equals.... If you want to punish any sector, this is the last one to approach." He acknowledges, however, that his view is a minority one among Palestinian academics.
Comparisons to academic boycotts of South Africa
The academic boycott of South Africa is frequently invoked as a model for more recent efforts to organize academic boycotts of Israel.
Some invoke the comparison to claim that an academic boycott of Israel should not be controversial based on a misconception that the academic boycott of South Africa was uncontroversial and straightforward. The reality, at the time, was very different. The effort was the subject of significant criticism and contentious debate from diverse segments. Andy Beckett wrote in The Guardian on this frequent mistaken comparison: "In truth, boycotts are blunt weapons. Even the most apparently straightforward and justified ones, on closer inspection, have their controversies and injustices."
Others, such as Hillary and Stephen Rose in Nature (2002), make the comparison and argue for an academic boycott of Israel based on a belief that the academic boycott of South Africa was effective in ending apartheid. George Fink responds (Nature 2002) that asserting that the boycott of South Africa by the world's academic communities 'was instrumental in ending apartheid in South Africa' is a deception and was actually terminated by two pivotal and interrelated political events: strict economic sanctions on South Africa imposed by the United States Congress in 1986 and measures by South Africa president F. W. de Klerk in 1989 and 1990.
In 2010, the Senate of the University of Johannesburg recommended cutting off all links with Ben-Gurion University in Israel because of the country's policies. The scientific agreement, which focused on cooperation in water research, had only been signed in the previous year. Prior to making a final decision, the university sent a senior delegation of its faculty on a fact finding tour to Israel in January 2011.
Accusations of antisemitism
Anthony Julius and Alan Dershowitz argue that boycotts against Israel are antisemitic, using their anti-Zionism as a cover for "Jew hatred". They compare the boycotts to the 1222 Canterbury Council, specifically the council's implementation of sharply limiting Christian contact with Jews, and Nazi boycotts of Jewish shops in the 1930s, as well as Arab League attempts to economically isolate Israel and refrain from purchasing "anything Jewish".
Harvard President Larry Summers "blasted" the boycotts as "antisemitic":
[T]here is much that should be, indeed that must be, debated regarding Israeli policy.... But the academic boycott resolution passed by the British professors union in the way that it singles out Israel is in my judgment anti-Semitic in both effect and in intent.
Summers had previously argued that a proposed boycott was antisemitic "in effect, if not intent". This position was criticized by Judith Butler, in an article titled "No, it's not anti-semitic". Butler argues the distinction of effective antisemitism, and intentional antisemitism is at best controversial.
If we think that to criticise Israeli violence, or to call for economic pressure to be put on the Israeli state to change its policies, is to be "effectively anti-semitic", we will fail to voice our opposition for fear of being named as part of an anti-semitic enterprise. No label could be worse for a Jew, who knows that, ethically and politically, the position with which it would be unbearable to identify is that of the anti-semite.
- Boycotts of Israel#Academic boycotts
- Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
- Disinvestment from Israel
- Boycotts of Israel
- New antisemitism
- Reactions to Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
- Pessin Andrew and Doron S. Ben-Atar. Introduction. Anti-Zionism on Campus: The University, Free Speech, and BDS, edited by Pessin and Ben-Atar, Indiana UP, 2018, pp. 1-40.
- Keller, Uri Yacobi (October 2009). "Academic Boycott of Israel and the Complicity of Israeli Academic Institutions in Occupation of Palestinian Territories" (PDF). Economy of the Occupation. 23. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
- "PACBI Guidelines for the International Academic Boycott of Israel". PACBI. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
- "Call for Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel". PACBI. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- USACBI. "US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel". Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- Newman, David. "The academic boycott of Israel", Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 2 (2), 45–56, 2008
- "Israel Palestine Paradoxes of Academic Freedom". Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
- Kristian Davis Bailey (25 February 2014). "Separate and Unequal: Discriminatory Policies in Israel and Palestine". The Stanford Daily.
- Bill Van Esveld (2010). Separate and Unequal: Israel's Discriminatory Treatment of Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (PDF). Human Rights Watch. ISBN 1-56432-729-9.
- Isaacs, Tracy; Vernon, Richard (2011). Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215–218. ISBN 9781139497312. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- Avnon, Dan. "BDS and Self-Righteous Moralists." Anti-Zionism on Campus, Pessin and Ben-Atar, Indiana UP, 2018, pp. 224-235.
- ADL Slams British Academic Boycott Policy Archived 25 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Anti-Defamation League, 26 May 2006. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- "Lecturers call for Israel boycott", BBC News, 30 May 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- Tamara Traubmann and Benjamin Joffe-Walt, "Israeli university boycott: how a campaign backfired", The Guardian, 20 June 2006. Retrieved 17 September 2006.
- Editorial (6 May 2005). "Facing Up to the AUT". The New York Sun.
- Anthony Julius and Alan Dershowitz in The Times Online 13 June 2007 "The Contemporary Fight Against anti-Semitism". Archived from the original on 26 August 2009. Retrieved 4 February 2016.
- "Times Higher Education, June 2, 2006". Timeshighereducation.co.uk. 2 June 2006. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
- Ward, Olivia (20 July 2015). "Israeli boycott movement scores successes". Toronto Star. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
- "About the Campaign". PACBI. Retrieved 1 January 2012.
- Leslie Wagner "Much Ado About ... the Academic Boycott of Israel in the UK", Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, 14 June 2015
- Andy Beckett and Ewen MacAskill, "British academic boycott of Israel gathers pace", The Guardian, 12 December 2002. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- Patrick Bateson; Richard Dawkins; Colin Blakemore; Steven Rose; Marina Lynch; Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond; Juliette Frey; Nora Frontali; Eva Jablonka; Per Andersen; and 115 other academics (6 April 2002). "Open Letter: More pressure for Mid East peace". The Guardian.
- Suzanne Goldenberg, Will Woodward, "Israeli boycott divides academics", The Guardian, 8 July 2002
- Mona Baker's double standard by Gideon Toury,Times Higher Education, February 7, 2003.
- "Report to members from the AUT national council". Archived from the original on 30 January 2006. Retrieved 22 May 2005.
- Lisa Taraki (7 July 2004). "Palestinian academics call for international academic boycott of Israel". Birzeit University. Archived from the original on 18 May 2005. Retrieved 22 May 2005.
- "The University of Haifa Response to the AUT Decision". University of Haifa. 15 May 2008. Archived from the original on 27 April 2008. Retrieved 15 May 2008.
- "BBC 20 April 2005". BBC News. 20 April 2005. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
- Curtis, Polly (24 May 2005). "Second Opinion". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 16 June 2008. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- Menachem Magidor; Sari Nusseibeh (19 May 2005). "Joint Hebrew University – Al-Quds University Statement on Academic Cooperation Signed in London" (Press release). Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Retrieved 15 May 2008.
- "Palestinian university president comes out against boycott of Israeli academics" (AP, Haaretz) 18 June 2006
- "Palestinian academic opposes Israel boycott" AP, Ynetnews 18 June 2006
- "Academics back Israeli boycotts". BBC News. 22 April 2005.
- Rick Kelly (2 May 2005). "Britain: lecturers' union boycotts two Israeli universities". World Socialist Website.
- Judy Siegel, "Leading UK group comes out against proposed academic boycott of Israel", The Jerusalem Post, 15 April 2005, 05.
- Matthew Taylor, "Storm blows union off course: Can lecturers unite now the vote to isolate Israeli universities has been overturned?", The Guardian, 31 March 2005, 22.
- "Academics vote against Israeli boycott". The Guardian. London. 26 May 2005. Retrieved 22 May 2005.
- Klug, Brian (30 May 2006). "Spare us the analogies". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 14 September 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- "NATFHE motion on proposed boycott of Israeli academics – an AUT statement", Association of University Teachers, 30 May 2006. Retrieved 9 July 2006.
- Steve Farrar, "Laureates denounce action against Israel" Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine, The Times, 26 May 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- The Association of Jewish Sixthformers "dismayed" by NATFHE boycott, AJ6 Press Release
- "Lecturer tells UCU: change or I'll sue". 7 July 2011. Retrieved 14 August 2011.
- "British Academic Union passes Motion to consider Boycotting Israel". Insight-Info.com. Archived from the original on 13 July 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2017.
- Jonny Paul (2 June 2010). "Britain's largest academic union cuts ties with Histadrut". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
- Garner, Richard (31 May 2007). "Lecturers vote to boycott Israeli academics". The Independent. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
- "President Fuhrman Responds to Proposed Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions". Teachers College, Columbia University. 19 June 2007.
- Fraser, Ronnie. "Fraser versus the University College Union: A Personal Reflection." Anti-Zionism on Campus: The University, Free Speech, and BDS, edited by Andrew Pessin and Doron S. Ben-Atar, Indiana University Press, 2018, pp. 105-121.
- Coordination des Scientifiques pour une Paix Juste au Proche-Orient
- "Verbatim : "Les échanges scientifiques ne sont pas exempts de politique"". Le Monde.fr (in French). 6 January 2003. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- "Le boycottage des cerveaux et produits israéliens". Le Monde.fr (in French). 1 October 2002. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- "Don't boycott Israel's scientists". Nature. 417 (6884): 1–1. May 2002. doi:10.1038/417001a. ISSN 1476-4687.
- Abbes, Ahmed; Balabane, Mikhael; Farjoun, Emmanuel; Harris, Michael; Rouquier, Raphael; Schapira, Pierre (May 2002). "Palestinian scientists are already restricted". Nature. 417 (6886): 221–222. doi:10.1038/417221c. ISSN 1476-4687.
- Universities under Curfew , in the Notices of the AMS, December 2002.
- "Communiqué de la paix maintenant".
- Béréziat, Gilbert (2008). Quand l'université se réveille, tout devient possible (in French). Harmattan. ISBN 978-2-296-06499-7.
- "Il faut mettre fin à l'impunité d'Israël". L'Humanité (in French). 3 March 2009. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- BDS France
- "Mission - AURDIP". www.aurdip.org. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- Ahren, Raphael. "For first time, U.S. professors call for academic and cultural boycott of Israel". Haaretz. Israel. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
- Erin Sheley (19 March 2009). "War of Silence; The intellectual boycott of Israel hits the United States". The Weekly Standard.
- US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
- Maya Shwayder (16 December 2013). "US scholars' group votes in favor of academic boycott of Israel". The Jerusalem Post. JTA. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
- Valerie Strauss (16 December 2013). "U.S. academic group votes to boycott Israeli universities". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 December 2013.
- Schoof, Renee (17 March 2014). "Questions roil debate on academic boycott of Israel". The Bellingham Herald. McClatchy Washington Bureau. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
- Goldberg, Michelle (6 December 2013). "What Does the American Studies Association's Israel Boycott Mean for Academic Freedom?". The Nation blog. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
- "Council Statement on the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions". The American Studies Association. Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
- Maya Shwayder, "134 members of US Congress denounce ASA's Israel boycott" The Jerusalem Post, 19 January 2014.
- Lori Lowenthal Marcus, "Congressional Letter: Academic Boycott of Israel is 'Thinly Veiled Bigotry'" The Jewish Press 10 January 2014 (updated: 14 January 2014.)
- Marcella Bombardieri, "US academia split over boycott targeting Israel" The Boston Globe, 25 December 2013.
- Michael S. Roth, "Boycott of Israeli universities: A repugnant attack on academic freedom" Los Angeles Times, 19 December 2013.
- Valerie Strauss, "Dozens of universities reject academic boycott of Israel" (update) The Washington Post, 23 December 2013.
- Alan Dershowitz, "Some hard questions about the Western European double standard against Israel" The Jerusalem Post 12 March 2014.
- Greenberg, David. "The ASA's Boycott of Israel Is Not as Troubling As It Seems". The New Republic. 19 December 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2014.
- Richard Pérez-Peña, "Scholars' Group to Disclose Result of Vote on an Academic Boycott of Israel" The New York Times (online edition), 15 December 2013.
- "World in brief – 24 April 2014: United States: ASA's Israel boycott boosts membership", Times Higher Education, 24 April 2014.
- Pérez-Peña, Richard (15 December 2013). "Scholars' Group to Disclose Result of Vote on an Academic Boycott of Israel". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- DeSantis, Nick. "Native American-Studies Group's Leadership Supports Israel Boycott". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
- "Declaration of Support for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions". naisa.org. Archived from the original on 27 March 2014. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
- Redden, Elizabeth (23 November 2015). "Big Night for Boycott Movement". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
- Redden, Elizabeth (7 June 2016). "Anthropology Group Won't Boycott Israel". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
- Butler, Judith. "Judith Butler's Remarks to Brooklyn College on BDS". The Nation. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
- "Boycott & Divestment Efforts Proliferate on Campus" Archived 13 February 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), 8 April 2009.
- "Penn distances itself from BDS conference", Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 5 January 2012.
- "U.S. teachers reject academic boycott of Israel" Archived 5 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), 12 March 2009.
- Naomi Zeveloff (17 January 2012). "College Leaders Balance Israel and Speech". The Forward.
- William A. Jacobson (22 December 2013). "University statements rejecting academic boycott of Israel". Legal Insurrection. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
- "List of Universities rejecting academic boycott of Israel". Legal Insurrection. 22 December 2013. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
- Rosen, David M. "The Magic of Myth: Fashioning the BDS Narrative in the New Anthropology." Anti-Zionism on Campus: The University, Free Speech, and BDS, edited by Andrew Pessin and Doron S. Ben-Atar, Indiana University Press, 2018, pp. 280-297.
- "Harvard insists Israeli shares sale not driven by boycott", Ewen MacAskill, 16 August 2010, The Guardian.
- Schworm, Peter. "Hampshire College cuts ties with fund invested in Israel", Peter Schworm, The Boston Globe, 12 February 2009.
- Paras D. Bhayani (2 June 2006). "Summers Says British Boycott of Israeli Academics Is Intentionally 'Anti-Semitic'; President's words are strongest condemnation of Israel critics to date; remarks divide Harvard professors". The Harvard Crimson.
- "ACE President Molly Corbett Broad's Statement on Boycotts of Israeli Academic Institutions". American Council on Education.
- "Top US schools reject boycott of Israel". The Jerusalem Post.
- "92 universities reject academic boycott of Israel". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
- "Dozens of universities reject academic boycott of Israel (update)". The Washington Post.
- "FIU becomes latest college to oppose boycott of Israel". Miami Herald. Retrieved 28 December 2013.
- Miller, Jonathan. "Western Kentucky University President Gary Ransdell Denounces Anti-Israel Boycott". The Recovering politician. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
- "University Officials and Academic Institutions Respond to ASA Boycott". ADL.
- Harriet Sherwood, "Major US academic body backs boycott of Israeli educational institutions", The Guardian, 17 December 2013.
- Yarden Skop, "U.S. academic group votes to boycott Israel", Haaretz, 16 December 2013.
- Lori Lowenthal Marcus, "House Bill to Slap Financial Penalties on anti-Israel Boycotts", The Jewish Press, 6 February 2014.
- David Francis, "US mulls bill punishing Israel boycotters", Al Jazeera, 19 February 2014.
- Rebecca Shimoni Stoil, "Illinois congressmen submit anti-boycott bill", The Times of Israel, 7 February 2014.
- "H.R.4776 - To prohibit an institution of higher education that participates in a boycott of the Israeli government, economy, or academia from receiving funds from the U.S. Federal Government". Congress.gov.
- Vanessa Kortekaas, "Ontario union calls for ban on Israeli professors"[dead link], National Post, 5 January 2009.
- "CUPE Ontario to recommend support for ban on Israeli academics in response to Gaza bombings" Archived 6 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Press Release from CUPE Ontario, 5 January 2009.
- Emily Mathieu, "CUPE offices picketed over Ryan boycott call" Archived 13 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Toronto Star, 9 January 2009.
- "Steve Janke: CUPE pulls Ryan proposal from union web site"[permanent dead link], National Post, 14 January 2009. The National Post noted that while the original resolution mentioned Ryan three times and listed him a point of contact, the new resolution did not mention Ryan's name.
- Sheri Shefa, "CUPE Ontario calls for Israel boycott", Canadian Jewish News (CJN), 26 February 2009.
- Katie Daubs and Lee Greenberg, "Ontario union's proposed Israeli ban not anti-Semitic: academics"[dead link], Canwest News Service, National Post, 6 January 2009.
- "Australian University students support BDS campaign" Archived 18 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine, 7 February 2009 (Posted on the website of the Australian Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions Campaign for Palestine).
- "Sydney students call for Israel boycott" Archived 23 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine, Jwire, 8 March 2009.
- "Court told Dan Avnon not hurt by Jake Lynch's BDS campaign", The Australian, 14 March 2014
- "Anti-Israeli BDS campaign facing court test", The Australian, 31 October 2013
- "Israel race case: judge questions class action against Sydney academic" The Guardian, 12 February 2014
- Israeli"NGO quits BDS case against Sydney academic", Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), 10 July 2014.
- "Italian scholars boycott Israeli academic institutions", Al Jazeera, January 30, 2016
"Italian academics call for boycott of Israeli universities", Ynetnews January 29, 2016
- "Academic Boycott of Israel Called by Irish Teachers Union" (Rabble, April 4, 2013)
- "Irish student union endorses Israel boycott", Haaretz, 7 March 2014 .
- "South African Academics Support the Call for UJ to Terminate Relationship with Israeli Institution". University of Johannesburg Petition. Archived from the original on 27 September 2010.
- "Israeli ties: a chance to do the right thing", The Times (South Africa) Archived 2 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- Ronnie Kasrils, "South Africa's Israel boycott", The Guardian, 29 September 2010.
- UJ press statement released on 30 September 2010 headed "UJ sets conditions for link with Israeli university"
- David Macfarlane (1 October 2010). "More varsities check Israel links". Mail & Guardian.
- "Wits students boycott Israel", News24.
- Roxanne Joseph (4 September 2014). "Wits gives PYA edge in SRC elections, EFF shut out". Wits Vuvuzela.
- Leon Jamaine Mithi (10 May 2016). "Calling Israel an apartheid state is an insult to black South African". The Oregonian.
- Lesiba Bapela (21 February 2016). "Stop using apartheid for your own agenda". The Jerusalem Post.
- Andy Ngo (7 April 2016). "South African activists tour to reclaim narrative on apartheid". Daily Vanguard.
- "Leading Israeli author Eshkol Nevo speaking to students at Wits University as part of his tour of South Africa". Embassy of Israel SA.
- Raphael Ahren (14 March 2016). "Dore Gold: South Africa 'ready to hear' Israel's arguments". The Times of Israel.
- "Palestinian university president comes out against boycott of Israeli academics". Associated Press. 18 June 2006.
- Andy Beckett (12 December 2002). "It's water on stone – in the end the stone wears out". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- Paras D. Bhayani (5 June 2006). "Summers Attacks British Boycott; President links boycott of Israeli academics with trend of anti-semitism". The Harvard Crimson.
- Judith Butler, "No, it's not anti-semitic", London Review of Books, 21 August 2003. Retrieved 23 June 2003.