Accident-proneness, also known as clumsiness, is the conception that some people might have predisposition, or that they might be more likely to suffer accidents, such as car crashes and industrial injuries, than other people. It may be used as a reason to deny any insurance on such individuals.
The early work on this subject dates back to 1919, in a study by Greenwood and Woods, who studied workers at a British munitions factory and found that accidents were unevenly distributed among workers, with a relatively small proportion of workers accounting for most of the accidents. Further work on accident-proneness was carried out in the 1930s and 1940s.
The subject is still being studied actively. Research into accident-proneness is of great interest in safety engineering, where human factors such as pilot error, or errors by nuclear plant operators, can have massive effects on the reliability and safety of a system. One of the areas of most interest and more profound research is the Aeronautical area, where accidents have been reviewed from psychological and human factors, to mechanical and technical failures. There has been many conclusive studies, that present that human factor has great influence on the results of those occurrences.
Statistical evidence clearly demonstrates that different individuals can have different rates of accidents from one another; for example, young male drivers are the group at highest risk for being involved in car accidents. There also seems to be substantial variation in personal accident rates between individuals.
However, a number of studies have cast doubt on whether accident-proneness actually exists as a distinct, persistent and independently verifiable physiological or psychological syndrome. Although substantial research has been devoted to this subject, there still seems to be no conclusive evidence either for or against the existence of accident proneness in this sense.
Nature and causes
The exact nature and causes of accident-proneness, assuming that it exists as a distinct entity, are unknown. Factors which have been considered as associated with accident-proneness have included absent-mindedness, clumsiness, carelessness, impulsivity, predisposition to risk-taking, and unconscious desires to create accidents as a way of achieving secondary gains. Broad studies on the speed and accuracy using a specially designed test sheet of finding a specific figure on various people as Japanese, Brazil born Japanese, Chinese, Russian, Spanish, Filipinos, Thai and Central Americans with different educational backgrounds. The studies have revealed that educational background or study experience is the key factor of concentration capability. Screening new employees using this test gave drastic decrease of work accidents in several companies.
- Accident analysis
- Counterphobic attitude
- Diathesis–stress model
- Human factors
- Passive–aggressive behavior
- Developmental coordination disorder § Associated disorders
- Greenwood, M. and Woods, H.M. (1919) The incidence of industrial accidents upon individuals with special reference to multiple accidents. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, Report No. 4. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
- "創造性ﾃｽﾄ、薬不要の風邪治療(妊婦､ｱｽﾘｰﾄ､NSAID)、適性ﾃｽﾄ". F6.dion.ne.jp. Retrieved 2015-08-15.
Note: this article is partly based on public domain text from the U.S. government public domain document "Accident Proneness: A Research Review"
- Rodgers, Mark D.; Blanchard, Robert E. (March 2003). "Accident Proneness: A Research Review". Federal Civil Aeromedical Institute Report DOT/FAA/AM-93-9.
- Rawson, Arnold J. (1944). "Accident Proneness". Psychosomatic Medicine 6 (1): 88–94.
- Cresswell, W.L.; Frogatt, P. (1961–1962). "Accident Proneness, or Variable Accident Tendency?" (PDF). Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland XX (V): 152–171.
- Arbous, A.G.; Kerrich, J.E. (December 1951). "Accident Statistics and the Concept of Accident-Proneness". Biometrics 7 (4): 340–432. doi:10.2307/3001656. JSTOR 3001656.
- Benner Jr., Ludwig (January 1979). "Crash Theories and the Implications for Research". American Association of Automotive Medicine Quarterly Journal 1 (1).