Acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation is a process that uses bacterial fermentation to produce acetone, n-Butanol, and ethanol from carbohydrates such as starch and glucose. It was developed by chemist Chaim Weizmann and was the primary process used to produce acetone, which was needed to make cordite, a substance essential for the British war industry during World War I.
The process may be likened to how yeast ferments sugars to produce ethanol for wine, beer, or fuel, but the organisms that carry out the ABE fermentation are strictly anaerobic (obligate anaerobes). The ABE fermentation produces solvents in a ratio of 3 parts acetone, 6 parts butanol to 1 part ethanol. It usually uses a strain of bacteria from the Class Clostridia (Family Clostridiaceae). Clostridium acetobutylicum is the most well-studied and widely used. Although less effective, Clostridium beijerinckii and Clostridium saccharobutylicum bacterial strains have shown good results as well.
The production of butanol by biological means was first performed by Louis Pasteur in 1861. In 1905, Austrian biochemist Franz Schardinger found that acetone could similarly be produced. In 1910 Auguste Fernbach (1860–1939) developed a bacterial fermentation process using potato starch as a feedstock in the production of butanol.
The Weizmann process was operated by Commercial Solvents Corporation from about 1920 to 1964 with plants in the US (Terre Haute, IN, and Peoria, IL), and Liverpool, England. The Peoria plant was the largest of the three. It used molasses as feedstock and had 96 fermenters with a volume of 96,000 gallons each.
After World War II, ABE fermentation became generally non-profitable, compared to the production of the same three solvents (acetone, butanol, ethanol) from petroleum. During the 1950s and 1960s, ABE fermentation was replaced by petroleum chemical plants. Due to different raw material costs, ABE fermentation was viable in South Africa until the early 1980s, with the last plant closing in 1983.  The last operational plant was operated by Green Biologics Ltd. in Minnesota until it shut down in June 2019.
In order to be competitive with the petrochemical industry and to replace part of it as soon as possible, the bio-processes need to be able soon to cover a substantial part of the market demand and to be flexible with respect to the market needs and the raw material properties.
The most critical aspect in biomass fermentation processes is related to its productivity. The ABE fermentation via Clostridium beijerinckii or Clostridium acetobutylicum for instance is characterized by product inhibition. This means that there is a product concentration threshold that cannot be overcome, resulting in a product stream highly diluted in water.
For this reason, in order to have a comparable productivity and profitability with respect to the petrochemical processes, cost and energy effective solutions for the product purification sections are required to provide a significant product recovery at the desired purity. The main solutions adopted during the last decades have been as follows:
- The employment of less expensive raw materials, and in particular lignocellulosic waste or algae;
- The microorganisms modifications or the research of new strains less sensitive to the butanol concentration poisoning to increase productivity and selectivity towards the butanol species;
- The fermentation reactor optimization aimed at increasing the productivity;
- The reduction of the energy costs of the separation and purification downstream processing and, in particular, to carry out the separation in-situ in the reactor;
- The use of side products such as hydrogen and carbon dioxide, solid wastes and discharged microorganisms and carry out less expensive process wastewater treatments.
In the second half of the 20th century, these technologies allowed an increasement in the final product concentration in the broth from 15 to 30 g/L, an increasement in the final productivity from 0.46 to 4.6 g/(L*h) and an increasement in the yield from 15 to 42%.
From a compound purification perspective, the main criticalities in the ABE/W product recovery are due to the water–alcohol mixture's non-ideal interactions leading to homogeneous and heterogeneous azeotropic species, as shown by the ternary equilibrium diagram. This causes the separation by standard distillation to be particularly impractical but, on the other hand, allows the exploitation of the liquid–liquid demixing region both for analogous and alternative separation processes.
Therefore, in order to enhance the ABE fermentation yield, mainly in situ product recovery systems have been developed. These include gas stripping, pervaporation, liquid–liquid extraction, distillation via Dividing Wall Column, membrane distillation, membrane separation, adsorption, and reverse osmosis. Green Biologics Ltd. has implemented this at an industrial scale.
Moreover, differently from crude oil feedstocks, biomasses nature fluctuates over the year's seasons and according to the geographical location. For this reasons, biorefinery operations need not only to be effective but also to be flexible and to be able to switch between two operating conditions rather quickly.
Sustainability is by far the topic of major concern over the last years. The energy challenge is the key point of the environmental friendly policies adopted by all the most developed and industrialized countries worldwide. For this purpose Horizon 2020, the biggest EU Research and Innovation programme, was funded by the European Union over the 2014-2020 period.
The International Energy Agency defines renewables as the centre of the transition to a less carbon-intensive and more sustainable energy system. Biofuels are believed to represent around 30% of energy consumption in transport by 2060. Their role is particularly important in sectors which are difficult to decarbonise, such as aviation, shipping and other long-haul transport. That is why several bioprocesses have seen a renewed interest in recent years, both from a research and an industrial perspective.
For this reason, the ABE fermentation process has been reconsidered from a different perspective. Although it was originally conceived to produce acetone, it is considered as a suitable production pathway for biobutanol that has become the product of major interest. Biogenic butanol is a possible substitute of bioethanol or even better and it is already employed both as fuel additive and as pure fuel instead of standard gasoline because, differently from ethanol, it can be directly and efficiently used in gasoline engines. Moreover, it has the advantage that it can be shipped and distributed through existing pipelines and filling stations.
Finally biobutanol is widely used as a direct solvent for paints, coatings, varnishes, resins, dyes, camphor, vegetable oils, fats, waxes, shellac, rubbers and alkaloids due to its higher energy density, lower volatility, and lower hygroscopicity. It can be produced from different kinds of cellulosic biomass and can be used for further processing of advanced biofuels such as butyl levulinate as well.
The application of n-butanol in the production of butyl acrylate has a wide scope for its expansion, which in turn would help in increasing the consumption of n-butanol globally. Butyl acrylate was the biggest n-butanol application in 2014 and is projected to be worth US$3.9 billion by 2020.
- Mark R. Wilkins and Hasan Atiye (2012). "Fermentation". In Nurhan Turgut Dunford (ed.). Food and Industrial Bioproducts and Bioprocessing. Wiley. p. 195. ISBN 9781119946052.
- Qureshi N, Blaschek, HP. 2001. Recent advances in ABE fermentation: hyper-butanol producing Clostridium beijerinckii BA101. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27(5):287-291.
- Trifirò, Ferruccio (June 2010). "Quale la sintesi ideale del butanolo ?". Chimica & Industria: 96–101.
- Dürre, Peter; Bahl, Hubert; Gottschalk, Gerhard (June 1992). "Die Aceton-Butanol-Gärung: Grundlage für einen modernen biotechnologischen Prozeß?". Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 64 (6): 491–498. doi:10.1002/cite.330640603.
- "Auguste Fernbach (1860-1939)". Institut Pasteur. Archived from the original on 2014-12-08. Retrieved 2015-03-18.
- GB application 191504845, Charles Weizmann, "Improvements in the Bacterial Fermentation of Carbohydrates and in Bacterial Cultures for the same", published 1919-03-06, assigned to Charles Weizmann
- Fred C. Kelly (1936). One Thing Leads to Another: The Growth of an Industry, Houghton Mifflin
- D. T. Jones & D. R. Woods (December 1986). "Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited". Microbiological Reviews. 50 (4): 484–524. doi:10.1128/MMBR.50.4.484-524.1986. PMC 373084. PMID 3540574.
- García, V.; Päkkilä, J.; Ojamo, H.; Keiski, R. L.; Muurinen, E. (2011). "Challenges in biobutanol production: How to improve the efficiency?". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (2): 964–980. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.008.
- "Dortmund Data Bank".
- Luyben, W. L. (2008). "Control of the Heterogeneous Azeotropic n-Butanol/Water Distillation System". Energy Fuels. 22 (6): 4249–4258. doi:10.1021/ef8004064.
- Groot, W. J.; van der Lans, R. G. J. M.; Luyben, K. Ch. A. M. (December 1989). "Batch and continuous butanol fermentations with free cells: integration with product recovery by gas-stripping". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 32 (3): 305–308. doi:10.1007/BF00184979. S2CID 10097692.
- Ezeji, T. C.; Qureshi, N.; Blaschek, H. P. (1 February 2004). "Acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) production from concentrated substrate: reduction in substrate inhibition by fed-batch technique and product inhibition by gas stripping". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 63 (6): 653–658. doi:10.1007/s00253-003-1400-x. PMID 12910325. S2CID 5111041.
- Yue, Dajun; You, Fengqi; Snyder, Seth W. (July 2014). "Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: Overview, key issues and challenges". Computers & Chemical Engineering. 66: 36–56. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016.
- Giuliano, Aristide; Poletto, Massimo; Barletta, Diego (March 2016). "Process optimization of a multi-product biorefinery: The effect of biomass seasonality". Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 107: 236–252. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2015.12.011.
- Errico, Massimiliano; Sanchez-Ramirez, Eduardo; Quiroz-Ramìrez, Juan Josè; Rong, Ben-Guang; Segovia-Hernandez, Juan Gabriel (27 September 2017). "Multiobjective Optimal Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol Separation Systems Using Liquid–Liquid Extraction-Assisted Divided Wall Columns". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 56 (40): 11575–11583. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03078.
- Groot, W. J.; Soedjak, H. S.; Donck, P. B.; Lans, R. G. J. M.; Luyben, K. Ch. A. M.; Timmer, J. M. K. (1990). "Butanol recovery from fermentations by liquid-liquid extraction and membrane solvent extraction". Bioprocess Engineering. 5 (5): 203–216. doi:10.1007/BF00376227. S2CID 98157509.
- Williams, C.L.; Westover, T. L.; Emerson, R. M.; Tumuluru, J. S.; Li, C. (2016). "Sources of Biomass Feedstock Variability and the Potential Impact on Biofuels Production". Bioenergy Research. 9: 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9694-y.
- Kenney, K. L.; Smith, W. A.; Gresham, G. L.; Westover, T. L. (2013). "Understanding biomass feedstock variability". Biofuels. 4: 111–127. doi:10.4155/bfs.12.83.
- "Biobased market studies galore!".
- "Horizon 2020 programme" (PDF).
- "IEA Renewables Report 2019".
- Yang, S.-T.; El-Ensashy, H.; Thongchul, N. (2013). Bioprocessing Technologies in Biorefinery for Sustainable Production of Fuels, Chemicals, and Polymers. Wiley.
- Kraemer, Korbinian; Harwardt, Andreas; Bronneberg, Rob; Marquardt, Wolfgang (May 2011). "Separation of butanol from acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation by a hybrid extraction–distillation process". Computers & Chemical Engineering. 35 (5): 949–963. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.028.
- "n-Butanol Market Worth 5.58 Billion USD by 2022". www.prnewswire.com.