|Humidity and hygrometry|
|Measures and Instruments|
The wet-bulb temperature (WBT) is the temperature read by a thermometer covered in water-soaked cloth (wet-bulb thermometer) over which air is passed. At 100% relative humidity, the wet-bulb temperature is equal to the air temperature (dry-bulb temperature); at lower humidity the wet-bulb temperature is lower than dry-bulb temperature because of evaporative cooling.
The wet-bulb temperature is defined as the temperature of a parcel of air cooled to saturation (100% relative humidity) by the evaporation of water into it, with the latent heat supplied by the parcel. A wet-bulb thermometer indicates a temperature close to the true (thermodynamic) wet-bulb temperature. The wet-bulb temperature is the lowest temperature that can be reached under current ambient conditions by the evaporation of water only.
Even heat-adapted people cannot carry out normal outdoor activities past a wet-bulb temperature of 32 °C (90 °F), equivalent to a heat index of 55 °C (130 °F). The theoretical limit to human survival for more than a few hours in the shade, even with unlimited water, is 35 °C (95 °F) – theoretically equivalent to a heat index of 70 °C (160 °F), though the heat index doesn't go that high.
Consider a thermometer wrapped in a water-moistened cloth. The drier and less humid the air is, the faster the water will evaporate. The faster water evaporates, the lower the thermometer's temperature will be relative to air temperature.
But water can only evaporate if the air around it can absorb more water. This is measured by comparing how much water is in the air, compared to the maximum which could be in the air—the relative humidity. 0% means the air is completely dry, and 100% means the air contains all the water it can hold in the present circumstances and it cannot absorb any more water (from any source).
This is why we feel cooler in dry air. The drier the air, the more moisture it can hold beyond what is already in it, and the easier it is for extra water to evaporate. The result is that sweat evaporates more quickly in drier air, cooling down the skin faster. But if the relative humidity is 100%, no water can evaporate, and cooling by sweating or evaporation is not possible.
When relative humidity is 100%, a wet bulb thermometer can also no longer be cooled by evaporation, so it will read the same as an unwrapped thermometer.
The wet-bulb temperature is the lowest temperature which may be achieved by evaporative cooling of a water-wetted (or even ice-covered), ventilated surface.
By contrast, the dew point is the temperature to which the ambient air must be cooled to reach 100% relative humidity assuming there is no further evaporation into the air; it is the point where condensation (dew) and clouds would form.
For a parcel of air that is less than saturated (i.e., air with less than 100 percent relative humidity), the wet-bulb temperature is lower than the dry-bulb temperature, but higher than the dew point temperature. The lower the relative humidity (the drier the air), the greater the gaps between each pair of these three temperatures. Conversely, when the relative humidity rises to 100%, the three figures coincide.
For air at a known pressure and dry-bulb temperature, the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature corresponds to unique values of the relative humidity and the dew point temperature. It therefore may be used for the practical determination of these values. The relationships between these values are illustrated in a psychrometric chart.
Cooling of the human body through perspiration is inhibited as the relative humidity of the surrounding air increases in summer. Other mechanisms may be at work in winter if there is validity to the notion of a "humid" or "damp cold."
Lower wet-bulb temperatures that correspond with drier air in summer can translate to energy savings in air-conditioned buildings due to:
Thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature
The thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature or adiabatic saturation temperature is the temperature a volume of air would have if cooled adiabatically to saturation by evaporation of water into it, all latent heat being supplied by the volume of air.
The temperature of an air sample that has passed over a large surface of the liquid water in an insulated channel is called the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature—the air has become saturated by passing through a constant-pressure, ideal, adiabatic saturation chamber.
Meteorologists and others may use the term "isobaric wet-bulb temperature" to refer to the "thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature". It is also called the "adiabatic saturation temperature", though meteorologists also use "adiabatic saturation temperature" to mean "temperature at the saturation level", i.e. the temperature the parcel would achieve if it expanded adiabatically until saturated.
Thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature is plotted on a psychrometric chart.
The thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature is a thermodynamic property of a mixture of air and water vapor. The value indicated by a simple wet-bulb thermometer often provides an adequate approximation of the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature.
For an accurate wet-bulb thermometer, "the wet-bulb temperature and the adiabatic saturation temperature are approximately equal for air-water vapor mixtures at atmospheric temperature and pressure. This is not necessarily true at temperatures and pressures that deviate significantly from ordinary atmospheric conditions, or for other gas–vapor mixtures."
Temperature reading of wet-bulb thermometer
This section needs additional citations for verification. (August 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Wet-bulb temperature is measured using a thermometer that has its bulb wrapped in cloth—called a sock—that is kept wet with distilled water via wicking action. Such an instrument is called a wet-bulb thermometer. A widely used device for measuring wet and dry bulb temperature is a sling psychrometer, which consists of a pair of mercury bulb thermometers, one with a wet "sock" to measure the wet-bulb temperature and the other with the bulb exposed and dry for the dry-bulb temperature. The thermometers are attached to a swivelling handle which allows them to be whirled around so that water evaporates from the sock and cools the wet bulb until it reaches thermal equilibrium.
An actual wet-bulb thermometer reads a temperature that is slightly different from the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature, but they are very close in value. This is due to a coincidence: for a water-air system the psychrometric ratio (see below) happens to be close to 1, although for systems other than air and water they might not be close.
To understand why this is so, first consider the calculation of the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature.
In this case, a stream of unsaturated air is cooled. The heat from cooling that air is used to evaporate some water which increases the humidity of the air. At some point the air becomes saturated with water vapor (and has cooled to the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature). In this case we can write the following balance of energy per mass of dry air:
- saturated water content of the air (kgH2O/kgdry air)
- initial water content of the air (same unit as above)
- latent heat of water (J/kgH2O)
- initial air temperature (K)
- saturated air temperature (K)
- specific heat of air (J/kg·K)
For the case of the wet-bulb thermometer, imagine a drop of water with unsaturated air blowing over it. As long as the vapor pressure of water in the drop (function of its temperature) is greater than the partial pressure of water vapor in the air stream, evaporation will take place. Initially, the heat required for the evaporation will come from the drop itself since the fastest moving water molecules are most likely to escape the surface of the drop, so the remaining water molecules will have a lower average speed and therefore a lower temperature. If this were the only thing that happened and the air started bone dry, if the air blew sufficiently fast then its partial pressure of water vapor would remain constantly zero and the drop would get infinitely cold.
Clearly this doesn't happen. It turns out that, as the drop starts cooling, it's now colder than the air, so convective heat transfer begins to occur from the air to the drop. Also, understand that the evaporation rate depends on the difference of concentration of water vapor between the drop-stream interface and the distant stream (i.e. the "original" stream, unaffected by the drop) and on a convective mass transfer coefficient, which is a function of the components of the mixture (i.e. water and air).
After a certain period, an equilibrium is reached: the drop has cooled to a point where the rate of heat carried away in evaporation is equal to the heat gain through convection. At this point, the following balance of energy per interface area is true:
- water content of interface at equilibrium (kgH2O/kgdry air) (note that the air in this region is and has always been saturated)
- water content of the distant air (same unit as above)
- mass transfer coefficient (kg/m2⋅s)
- air temperature at distance (K)
- water drop temperature at equilibrium (K)
- convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2·K)
- is the driving force for mass transfer (constantly equal to throughout the entire experiment)
- is the driving force for heat transfer (when reaches , the equilibrium is reached)
Let us rearrange that equation into:
Now let's go back to our original "thermodynamic wet-bulb" experiment, Experiment 1. If the air stream is the same in both experiments (i.e. and are the same), then we can equate the right-hand sides of both equations:
Rearranging a little bit:
It is clear now that if then the temperature of the drop in Experiment 2 is the same as the wet-bulb temperature in Experiment 1. Due to a coincidence, for the mixture of air and water vapor this is the case, the ratio (called psychrometric ratio) being close to 1.
Experiment 2 is what happens in a common wet-bulb thermometer. That's why its reading is fairly close to the thermodynamic ("real") wet-bulb temperature.
Experimentally, the wet-bulb thermometer reads closest to the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature if:
- The sock is shielded from radiant heat exchange with its surroundings
- Air flows past the sock quickly enough to prevent evaporated moisture from affecting evaporation from the sock
- The water supplied to the sock is at the same temperature as the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature of the air
In practice the value reported by a wet-bulb thermometer differs slightly from the thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature because:
- The sock is not perfectly shielded from radiant heat exchange
- Air flow rate past the sock may be less than optimum
- The temperature of the water supplied to the sock is not controlled
At relative humidities below 100 percent, water evaporates from the bulb which cools the bulb below ambient temperature. To determine relative humidity, ambient temperature is measured using an ordinary thermometer, better known in this context as a dry-bulb thermometer. At any given ambient temperature, less relative humidity results in a greater difference between the dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures; the wet-bulb is colder. The precise relative humidity is determined by reading from a psychrometric chart of wet-bulb versus dry-bulb temperatures, or by calculation.
Psychrometers are instruments with both a wet-bulb and a dry-bulb thermometer.
A wet-bulb thermometer can also be used outdoors in sunlight in combination with a globe thermometer (which measures the incident radiant temperature) to calculate the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT).
Adiabatic wet-bulb temperature
The adiabatic wet-bulb temperature is the temperature a volume of air would have if cooled adiabatically to saturation and then compressed adiabatically to the original pressure in a moist-adiabatic process[clarification needed] (AMS Glossary[clarification needed]). Such cooling may occur as air pressure reduces with altitude[clarification needed], as noted in the article on lifted condensation level.
This term, as defined in this article, may be[vague] most prevalent in meteorology.
As the value referred to as "thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature" is also achieved via an adiabatic process, some engineers and others may use[vague] the term "adiabatic wet-bulb temperature" to refer to the "thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature". As mentioned above, meteorologists and others may use[vague] the term "isobaric wet-bulb temperature" to refer to the "thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature".
"The relationship between the isobaric and adiabatic processes is quite obscure. Comparisons indicate, however, that the two temperatures are rarely different by more than a few tenths of a degree Celsius, and the adiabatic version is always the smaller of the two for unsaturated air. Since the difference is so small, it is usually neglected in practice."
The wet-bulb depression is the difference between the dry-bulb temperature and the wet-bulb temperature. If there is 100% humidity, dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures are identical, making the wet-bulb depression equal to zero in such conditions.
Wet-bulb temperature and health
Living organisms can survive only within a certain temperature range. When the ambient temperature is excessive, humans and many animals cool themselves below ambient by evaporative cooling (sweat in humans and horses, saliva and water in dogs and other mammals); this helps to prevent potentially fatal hyperthermia due to heat stress. The effectiveness of evaporative cooling depends upon humidity; wet-bulb temperature, or more complex calculated quantities such as Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) which also takes account of solar radiation, give a useful indication of the degree of heat stress, and are used by several agencies as the basis for heat stress prevention guidelines.
A sustained wet-bulb temperature exceeding 35 °C (95 °F) is likely to be fatal even to fit and healthy people, unclothed in the shade next to a fan; at this temperature our bodies switch from shedding heat to the environment, to gaining heat from it. In practice, such ideal conditions for humans to cool themselves will not always exist - hence the high fatality levels in the 2003 European and 2010 Russian heat waves, which saw wet-bulb temperatures no greater than 28°C. 
A 2015 study concluded that depending on the extent of future global warming, parts of the world could become uninhabitable due to deadly wet bulb temperatures. A 2020 study reported cases where a 35 °C (95 °F) wet-bulb temperature had already occurred, albeit too briefly and in too small a locality to cause fatalities. 
In 2018, South Carolina implemented new regulations to protect high school students from heat-related emergencies during outdoor activities. Specific guidelines and restrictions are in place for wet-bulb temperatures between 82.0 °F (27.8 °C) and 92.0 °F (33.3 °C); wet-bulb temperatures of 92.1 °F (33.4 °C) or greater require all outdoor activities to be canceled.
Heat waves with high humidity
- On 8 July 2003, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, saw the highest heat index ever recorded at 81 °C (178 °F) with a temperature of 42 °C (108 °F) and a 35 °C (95 °F) dew point.
- The 2015 Indian heat wave saw wet-bulb temperatures in Andhra Pradesh reach 30 °C (86 °F). A similar wet-bulb temperature was reached during the 1995 Chicago heat wave.
- A heat wave in August 2015 saw temperatures of 48.6 °C (119.5 °F) and a dew point of 29.5 °C (85.1 °F) at Samawah, Iraq, and 114.8 °F (46.0 °C) with a dew point of 89.6 °F (32.0 °C) in Bandar-e Mahshahr, Iran. This implied wet-bulb temperatures of about 33.5 °C (92.3 °F) and 34.7 °C (94.5 °F) respectively. The government urged residents to stay out of the sun and drink plenty of water.
Highest recorded wet-bulb temperatures
The following locations have recorded wet-bulb temperatures of 34 °C (93 °F) or higher. Note that weather stations are typically at airports, not necessarily the greatest heat sinks, so other locations in the city may have experienced higher values.
|WT (°C)||City and state||Country|
|36.3||Ras Al Khaimah City||UAE|
|36.2||[unnamed location], Sindh||Pakistan|
|35.6||Yannarie, Western Australia||Australia|
|35.1||[unnamed location], Khyber Pakhtunkhwa||Pakistan|
|35||Matlapa, San Luis Potosi||Mexico|
|34.8||La Paz, Baja California Sur||Mexico|
|34.8||Soto la Marina, Tamaulipas||Mexico|
|34.6||Machilipatnam mandal, Andhra Pradesh||India|
|34.5||Sahadevkhunta, Balasore, Odisha||India|
|34||Port Hedland, Western Australia||Australia|
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (April 2021)
- Guy W. Gupton (2002). HVAC Controls: Operation & Maintenance. The Fairmont Press, Inc. pp. 288–. ISBN 978-0-88173-394-5.
- A Dictionary of Weather. Oxford Reference. ISBN 978-0-19-954144-7.
- "Adiabatic saturation temperature".
- VanWylen, Gordon J; Sonntag, Richard E. (1973). Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics (2nd ed.). Wiley. p. 448. ISBN 978-0471902270.
- accessed 20080408
- NWSTC Remote Training Module; SKEW T LOG P DIAGRAM AND SOUNDING ANALYSIS; RTM - 230; National Weather Service Training Center; Kansas City, MO 64153; July 31, 2000
- "Dry Bulb, Wet Bulb and Dew Point Temperature".
- Sherwood, S.C.; Huber, M. (25 May 2010). "An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (21): 9552–5. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.9552S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913352107. PMC 2906879. PMID 20439769.
- Colin Raymond1, Tom Matthews, Radley M. Horton (2020). "The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance". 6 (19). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1838. Cite journal requires
|journal=(help)CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
- Jeremy S. Pal & Elfatih A. B. Eltahir (2015). "Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability". Nature. 6 (2): 197–200. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..197P. doi:10.1038/nclimate2833.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
- Shelton, David. "New rules go into effect to protect SC high school athletes in extreme heat". Post and Courier. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
- "Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Monitoring (WBGT)" (PDF). South Carolina High School League. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
- Jason Samenow (31 July 2015). "Iran city hits suffocating heat index of 165 degrees, near world record". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 April 2016. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
- Henson, Bob (9 May 2020). "Heat and Humidity Near the Survivability Threshold: It's Already Happening". Weather Underground. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
- "The Deadly Combination of Heat and Humidity". The New York Times. 6 June 2015. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
- "Feels-Like Temp Reaches 164 Degrees in Iran, 159 in Iraq; Days Off Ordered as Mideast Broils in Extreme Heat Wave". Weather.com. 5 August 2015. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
- "Relative Humidity and Wet-bulb from Dewpoint". US National Weather Service. Retrieved 4 February 2019. Calculation assumed air pressure of 760 mmHg (101 kPa).
- "Global heating pushes tropical regions towards limits of human livability". The Guardian. 8 March 2021. Retrieved 19 April 2021.
- Zhang, Yi; Held, Isaac; Fueglistaler, Stephan (March 2021). "Projections of tropical heat stress constrained by atmospheric dynamics". Nature Geoscience. 14 (3): 133–137. doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00695-3. ISSN 1752-0908. Retrieved 19 April 2021.