||It has been suggested that this article be merged into Administrative receivership. (Discuss) Proposed since April 2016.|
||It has been suggested that Examinership be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since April 2016.|
As a legal concept, administrative receivership is a procedure under the insolvency laws of a number of common law jurisdictions. It functions as a rescue mechanism for insolvent entities and allows them to carry on running their business. The process – in the United Kingdom colloquially called "under administration" – is an alternative to liquidation, or may be a precursor to it. A company in administrative receivership is operated by an administrator (as interim chief executive with custodial responsibility for the company's assets and obligations) on behalf of its creditors. The administrator may recapitalise the business, sell the business to new owners, or demerge it into elements that can be sold and close the remainder.
Most countries distinguish between voluntary (board-decided) and involuntary (court-decided) receivership. In voluntary administrative receivership, the administrator is appointed by the company directors. In involuntary administrative receivership, the administrator is appointed by a judicial court. The legal terms for these processes vary from country to country, and the processes may overlap.
|This section does not cite any sources. (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Australian law establishes a system of voluntary administration, whereby administrators are appointed by a resolution of the board of the relevant company. The Board may appoint an administrator in circumstances where the company is, or will become at some future time, insolvent. In certain circumstances, a liquidator or secured creditor of an insolvent company may elect to appoint an administrator. Once appointed, the administrator must prepare a report containing recommendations as to whether the company should be returned to the control of the directors, wound up or execute a deed of company arrangement.
Administrators are required to be registered liquidators, and by virtue of their appointment have broad powers to deal with company property. The appointment of an administrator "freezes" any legal proceedings (on foot or anticipated) against the company, and control of the company is given entirely to the administrator. Directors of the company are prohibited from acting in their capacity as directors for the duration of the administration.
The Australian insolvency regime, encompassing administrations, liquidations and receiverships, is the subject of ongoing discussion in respect of law reform.
The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act provides mechanisms for consumer and general proposals in order to give time for an insolvent person to be able to reorganize his affairs. For insolvent companies (or affiliated groups) owing more than $5 million, a more flexible regime is available under the Companies' Creditors Arrangements Act ("CCAA").
In UK law, the administration regime is governed by the Insolvency Act 1986, as amended by the Enterprise Act 2002. An "administrator" can be appointed without petitioning the court by the holder of a floating charge (created since 15 September 2003), by the company or by its directors. Other creditors must petition the court to appoint an administrator. The administrator must act in the interests of all the creditors and attempt to rescue the company as a going concern. If this proves impossible he or she must work to maximise the recovery of the creditors as a whole. Only then may the administrator attempt to realise property in favour of one or more secured creditor. A firm is usually in Administration for no more than 12 months, after which an extension from the court can be produced at the courts discretion. Administration is analogous to going into "Chapter 11" in the United States, although there are certain key differences, mainly stemming from the fact that English law does not include the debtor in possession concept. During the reorganisation period, as a result, the administrator usually runs the business rather than the directors, and any additional liquidity requirements effectively have to be met by funds provided by existing creditors rather than by any super-senior 'DIP financing'.
The administrator is an officer of the court and an agent of the company, and is not personally liable for any contracts she or he makes on behalf of the company. He has the power to do anything necessary or expedient for the management of the affairs, business and property of the company.
The new administration regime introduced by the Enterprise Act 2002 replaces the previous situation where administrative receivership was available as an alternative to administration, which has traditionally been a more rescue-oriented insolvency regime. This regime allowed the holder of a floating charge to appoint an administrative receiver to realise assets in his favour, and also to block an administration order sought by a borrower. This was felt to be too favourable to the floating charge holder at the expense of other creditors. Holders of a floating charge created prior to 15 September 2003 retain their right to appoint an administrative receiver, but all purported rights to do so created after that date will be construed as rights to appoint an administrator (subject to certain specific, rare exceptions).
A court order is issued that forbids any form of legal or insolvency action without the court's permission. An application to the court for an administration order may be made by the company, the directors, a creditor or any combination of them. The Enterprise Act 2002 amended the Insolvency Act 1986 to provide an out-of-court process to appoint an administrator to the holder of a floating charge or the company or its directors. This is considerably cheaper and simpler than the previous system, which involved an application to court.
In the UK, an administration order is a process designed to protect limited companies from their creditors while a debt restructuring plan is carried out and presented to creditors and courts. This administration order process requires a licensed insolvency practitioner to act as the administrator appointed by the court.
A pre-pack is the process of selling the assets of a company immediately after it has entered administration. It is sometimes the case that the previous directors or management purchase the assets of the company from the administrator and set up a new company.
This process has advantages in that it enables the administrator to realise a greater amount for the assets due to business continuity and the goodwill of the company are preserved. The employees of the company are also usually transferred to the new company preserving jobs.
Pre-packs have attracted criticism because of the appearances it gives to unconnected parties that the company has just continued without its creditors. SIP 16 was introduced in January 2009 to assist Insolvency Practitioners in pre-pack cases. It was designed to make the process more transparent for creditors and to ensure that fair value was obtained for the assets.
In November 2009, the Office of Fair Trading announced a  study into corporate insolvencies, with particular focus on pre-pack administrations. It will report on whether the insolvency market is operating efficiently, with enough freedom of competition between insolvency practitioners and whether consumers and creditors are being treated as fairly as possible.
A recent example of a pre-pack is the sale of the assets of Cobra Beer to Coors immediately after Cobra Beer entered administration. This allowed the brand to continue, save jobs  but also leave suppliers out of pocket by an estimated £75 million.
Individual administration order in England, Wales and Northern Ireland
In this process, a debtor who has enough money left over after priority creditors and essential expenses, may be able to arrange an individual voluntary arrangement. (Debtors with less serious problems may prefer a debt management plan).
Republic of Ireland
The Republic of Ireland operates a similar process called examinership, but companies require permission from the High Court to enter and leave examinership.
- Administration (British football)
- Administrative receivership
- Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code
- Examinership a similar process in the Republic of Ireland
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 436A Company may appoint administrator if board thinks it is or will become insolvent". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 436B Liquidator may appoint administrator". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 436C Secured party may appoint administrator". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 439A Administrator to convene meeting and inform creditors". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 437A Role of administrator". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 440D Stay of proceedings". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 443A General debts". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 443B Payments for property used or occupied by, or in the possession of, the company". www.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
- "The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act". http://www.bankruptcy-canada.ca. External link in
- "Bankruptcy and Insolvency at Glance". http://www.ic.gc.ca. 2012. External link in
- "Bankruptcy Law in Canada and B.C.". http://www.slocombe-trustee.com. External link in
- "Administration". sfpgroup.com. SFP Group 2014 - All Rights Reserved. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
- Insolvency: so what is a pre-pack?, Accountancy Age, 11 June 2009
- Pre-pack administrations to be investigated by OFT, Business Sale Report, 24 November 2009
- Pre-packs overtake normal administrations, Accountancy Age, 18 June 2009
- [dead link]Money management – In England Citizens Advice Bureau.