|Part of a series on|
|Look up Ageism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
|Part of the Politics series on|
Ageism (also spelled "agism") is stereotyping and discriminating against individuals or groups on the basis of their age. This may be casual or systematic. The term was coined in 1969 by Robert Neil Butler to describe discrimination against seniors, and patterned on sexism and racism. Butler defined "ageism" as a combination of three connected elements. Among them were prejudicial attitudes towards older people, old age, and the aging process; discriminatory practices against older people; and institutional practices and policies that perpetuate stereotypes about elderly people.
Whilst the term has also been used to describe prejudice and discrimination against adolescents and children, including ignoring their ideas because they are too young, or assuming that they should behave in certain ways because of their age, the term is predominantly used in relation to the treatment of older people. Moreover, it has been pointed out that stigmatization does not only occur outside of the cohesively imagined group of the elderly but likewise takes place within the stigmatized group itself.
- 1 Distinction from other age-related bias
- 2 Implicit ageism
- 3 Ageist stereotyping
- 4 Ageist prejudice
- 5 Benevolent prejudice
- 6 Hostile prejudice
- 7 Digital Ageism
- 8 Discrimination
- 9 Effects of ageism
- 10 Advocacy campaigns
- 11 See also
- 12 References
- 13 External links
- 14 Further reading
Ageism in common parlance and age studies usually refers to negative discriminatory practices against old people, people in their middle years, teenagers and children. There are several forms of age-related bias. Adultism is a predisposition towards adults, which is seen as biased against children, youth, and all young people who are not addressed or viewed as adults. Jeunism is the discrimination against older people in favor of younger ones. This includes political candidacies, jobs, and cultural settings where the supposed greater vitality and/or physical beauty of youth is more appreciated than the supposed greater moral and/or intellectual rigor of adulthood. Adultcentricism is the "exaggerated egocentrism of adults." Adultocracy is the social convention which defines "maturity" and "immaturity," placing adults in a dominant position over young people, both theoretically and practically. Gerontocracy is a form of oligarchical rule in which an entity is ruled by leaders who are significantly older than most of the adult population. Chronocentrism is primarily the belief that a certain state of humanity is superior to all previous and/or future times.
Based on a conceptual analysis of ageism, a new definition of ageism was introduced by Iversen, Larsen, & Solem in 2009. This definition constitutes the foundation for higher reliability and validity in future research about ageism and its complexity offers a new way of systemizing theories on ageism: "Ageism is defined as negative or positive stereotypes, prejudice and/or discrimination against (or to the advantage of) elderly people on the basis of their chronological age or on the basis of a perception of them as being 'old' or 'elderly'. Ageism can be implicit or explicit and can be expressed on a micro-, meso- or macro-level" (Iversen, Larsen & Solem, 2009).
Other conditions of fear or aversion associated with age groups have their own names, particularly: paedophobia, the fear of infants and children; ephebiphobia, the fear of youth, sometimes also referred to as an irrational fear of adolescents or a prejudice against teenagers; and gerontophobia, the fear of elderly people.
Implicit ageism is the term used to refer to the implicit or subconscious thoughts, feelings, and behaviors one has about older or younger people. These may be a mixture of positive and negative thoughts and feelings, but gerontologist Becca Levy reports that they "tend to be mostly negative."
Ageist stereotyping is a tool of cognition which involves categorizing into groups and attributing characteristics to these groups. Stereotypes are necessary for processing huge volumes of information which would otherwise overload a person, and they are often based on a "grain of truth" (for example, the association between aging and ill health). However, they cause harm when the content of the stereotype is incorrect with respect to most of the group or where a stereotype is so strongly held that it overrides evidence which shows that an individual does not conform to it. For example, age-based stereotypes prime one to draw very different conclusions when one sees an older and a younger adult with, say, back pain or a limp. One might well assume that the younger person's condition is temporary and treatable, following an accident, while the older person's condition is chronic and less susceptible to intervention. On average, this might be true, but plenty of older people have accidents and recover quickly and very young people (such as infants, toddlers and small children) can become permanently disabled in the same situation. This assumption may have no consequence if one makes it in the blink of an eye as one is passing someone in the street, but if it is held by a health professional offering treatment or managers thinking about occupational health, it could inappropriately influence their actions and lead to age-related discrimination. Managers have been accused, by Erdman Palmore, as stereotyping older workers as being resistant to change, not creative, cautious, slow to make judgments, lower in physical capacity, uninterested in technological change, and difficult to train. Another example is when people are rude to children because of their high pitched voice, even if they are kind and courteous. A review of the research literature related to age stereotypes in the workplace was recently published in the Journal of Management.
Contrary to common and more obvious forms of stereotyping, such as racism and sexism, ageism is more resistant to change. For instance, if a child believes in an ageist idea against the elderly, fewer people correct them, and, as a result, individuals grow up believing in ageist ideas, even as elders themselves. In other words, ageism can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Ageist beliefs against the elderly is common place in today's society. For example, when an older person forgets something, he or she could be quick to call it a "senior moment," failing to realize the ageism of that statement. People also often say ageist phrases, such as "dirty old man" or "second childhood" of which elders miss the ageist undertones.
In a classic study, researchers analyzed the effects of ageism among the elderly. They performed memory tests on the three selected groups: (1) residents of China, (2) deaf North Americans, and (3) North American with normal hearing. In these three groups, the Chinese residents were presumably the least exposed to ageism with lifelong experience in a culture than traditionally venerates older generations. The North Americans who had been deaf lifelong also faced less exposure to ageism in contrast to those with typical hearing who presumably had heard ageist comments their whole life. The results of the memory tests showed that ageism has significant effects on memory. The gap in the scores between the young and old participants of North Americans with normal hearing were double those of the deaf North Americans and five times wider than those of the Chinese participants. These results prove that ageism undermines ability through its self-fulfilling nature.
On the other hand, when elders show larger independence and control in their lives, defying ageist assumptions, they are more likely to be healthier, mentally and physically, than other people their age.
Ageist prejudice is a type of emotion which is often linked to the cognitive process of stereotyping. It can involve the expression of derogatory attitudes, which may then lead to the use of discriminatory behavior. Where older or younger contestants were rejected in the belief that they were poor performers, this could well be the result of stereotyping. But older people were also voted for at the stage in the game where it made sense to target the best performers. This can only be explained by a subconscious emotional reaction to older people; in this case, the prejudice took the form of distaste and a desire to exclude oneself from the company of older people.
Stereotyping and prejudice against different groups in society does not take the same form. Age-based prejudice and stereotyping usually involves older or younger people being pitied, marginalized, or patronized. This is described as "benevolent prejudice" because the tendency to pity is linked to seeing older or younger people as "friendly" but "incompetent." This is similar to the prejudice most often directed against women and disabled people. Age Concern's survey revealed strong evidence of "benevolent prejudice." 48% said that over-70s are viewed as friendly (compared to 27% who said the same about under-30s). Meanwhile, only 26% believe over-70s are viewed as capable (with 41% saying the same about under-30s).
The figure for friendliness of under-30s is, conversely, an example of Hostile Prejudice.
"Hostile prejudice" based on hatred, fear, aversion, or threat often characterizes attitudes linked to race, religion, disability, and sex. An example of hostile prejudice toward youth is the presumption without any evidence that a given crime was committed by a young person. Rhetoric regarding intergenerational competition can be motivated by politics. Violence against vulnerable older people can be motivated by subconscious hostility or fear; within families, this involves impatience and lack of understanding. Equality campaigners are often wary of drawing comparisons between different forms of inequality. But it is unquestionably true that abuse and neglect experienced by vulnerable older people (which is closely linked to hostile prejudice) kills more people each year than the shocking but relatively isolated cases of public violence motivated by race, religion, or sexual orientation.
The impact of "benevolent" and "hostile" prejudice tends to be different. The warmth felt towards older or younger people and the knowledge that many have no access to paid employment means there is often public acceptance that they are deserving of preferential treatment—for example, less expensive movie and bus fares. But the perception of incompetence means older and younger people can be seen as "not up to the job" or "a menace on the roads," when there is little or exaggerated evidence to support this. Prejudice also leads to assumptions that it is "natural" for older or younger people to have lower expectations, reduced choice and control, and less account taken of their views.
Digital ageism refers to the prejudices faced by older adults in the digital world. A few examples of the subtle ways in which digital ageism operates in cultural representations, research, and everyday life: Generational segregation naturalizes youth as digitally adept and the old as digital dunces. Many cultural representations have long histories reproducing images of the life cycle as a mountain, where we peak in middle age then decline. Older adults’ experiences are often excluded from research agendas on digital media, and ageism is ensconced within disciplines such as mass communication studies. For example, in a media diffusionist perspective, the practices of seniors are depicted as either negligible or as lagging, and the equation of diffusion with individual ownership can hide practical ‘work-arounds’ such as cell phone sharing or missed calls used by older couples on fixed incomes. Ageism is also inadvertently embedded in the ways that we generate statistics, for example through data collected based on large age categories (e.g. '60+') foisting anyone over 60 into ‘the grey zone’ which obscures differences.
Age discrimination refers to the actions taken to deny or limit opportunities to people on the basis of age. These are usually actions taken as a result of one's ageist beliefs and attitudes. Age discrimination occurs on both a personal and institutional level.
On a personal level, an older person may be told that he or she is too old to engage in certain physical activities, like an informal game of basketball between friends and family. A younger person may be told they are too young to get a job or help move the dining room table. On an institutional level, there are policies and regulations in place that limit opportunities to people of certain ages and deny them to all others. The law, for instance, requires that all young persons must be at least 16 years old in order to obtain a driver's license in the United States. There are also government regulations that determine when a worker may retire. Currently, in the US, a worker must be between 65 and 67 years old (depending upon his or her birth year) before becoming eligible for Social Security retirement benefits, but some company pension plans begin benefits at earlier ages.
A 2006/2007 survey done by the Children's Rights Alliance for England and the National Children's Bureau asked 4,060 children and young people whether they have ever been treated unfairly based on various criteria (race, age, sex, sexual orientation, etc.). A total of 43% of British youth surveyed reported experiencing discrimination based on their age, far eclipsing other categories of discrimination like sex (27%), race (11%), or sexual orientation (6%). Consistently, a study based on the European Social Survey found that whereas 35% of Europeans reported exposure ageism, only 25% reported exposure to sexism and as few as 17% reported exposure to racism.
Ageism has significant effects in two particular sectors: employment and health care.
The concept of ageism was originally developed to refer to prejudice and discrimination against older people and middle age, but has expanded to include children and teenagers.
Like racial and gender discrimination, age discrimination, at least when it affects younger workers, can result in unequal pay for equal work. Unlike racial and gender discrimination, however, age discrimination in wages is often enshrined in law. For example, in both the United States and the United Kingdom minimum wage laws allow for employers to pay lower wages to young workers. Many state and local minimum wage laws mirror such an age-based, tiered minimum wage. Midlife workers, on average, make more than younger workers do, which reflects educational achievement and experience of various kinds (job-specific, industry-specific, etc.). The age-wage peak in the United States, according to Census data, is between 45 and 54 years of age. Seniority in general accords with respect as people age, lessening ageism.
Statistical discrimination refers to limiting the employment opportunities of an individual based on stereotypes of a group to which the person belongs. Limited employment opportunities could come in the form of lower pay for equal work or jobs with little social mobility. Younger female workers were historically discriminated against, in comparison with younger men, because it was expected that, as young women of childbearing years, they would need to leave the work force permanently or periodically to have children.
Labor regulations also limit the age at which people are allowed to work and how many hours and under what conditions they may work. In the United States, a person must generally be at least 14 years old to seek a job, and workers face additional restrictions on their work activities until they reach age 16. Many companies refuse to hire workers younger than 18.
While older workers benefit more often from higher wages than do younger workers, they face barriers in promotions and hiring. Employers also encourage early retirement or layoffs disproportionately more for older or more experienced workers.
Age discrimination in hiring has been shown to exist in the United States. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's first complainants were female flight attendants complaining of (among other things) age discrimination. In 1968, the EEOC declared age restrictions on flight attendants’ employment to be illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, Joanna Lahey, professor at The Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M, found recently that firms are more than 40% more likely to interview a young adult job applicant than an older job applicant.
In a survey for the University of Kent, England, 29% of respondents stated that they had suffered from age discrimination. This is a higher proportion than for gender or racial discrimination. Dominic Abrams, social psychology professor at the university, concluded that Ageism is the most pervasive form of prejudice experienced in the UK population.
According to Dr. Robert M. McCann, an associate professor of management communication at the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business, denigrating older workers, even if only subtly, can have an outsized negative impact on employee productivity and corporate profits. For American corporations, age discrimination can lead to significant expenses. In Fiscal Year 2006, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received nearly 17,000 charges of age discrimination, resolving more than 14,000 and recovering $51.5 million in monetary benefits. Costs from lawsuit settlements and judgments can run into the millions, most notably with the $250 million paid by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) under a settlement agreement in 2003.
In the UK, age discrimination against older people has been prohibited in employment since 2006. Since then, the number of age discrimination cases rose dramatically. The laws protect the anyone over the age of 16 who is young as well as old. There were over 6,800 claims submitted to the Employment Tribunal in 2010/11 compared with just 900 in 2006/2007 (immediately after the Regulations came in force). However, the figures for 2011/2012 show a 47% fall in the number of claims, and commentators have suggested that the repeal of the Default Retirement Age may be the reason behind this.
Some political offices have qualifications that discriminate on the basis of age as a proxy for experience, education, or accumulated wisdom. For example, the President of the United States must be at least 35 years old; a United States Senator must be at least 30; and a United States Congressman must be at least 25.
There is considerable evidence of discrimination against the elderly in health care. This is particularly true for aspects of the physician-patient interaction, such as screening procedures, information exchanges, and treatment decisions. In the patient-physician interaction, physicians and other health care providers may hold attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that are associated with ageism against older patients. Studies have found that some physicians do not seem to show any care or concern toward treating the medical problems of older people. Then, when actually interacting with these older patients on the job, the doctors sometimes view them with disgust and describe them in negative ways, such as "depressing" or "crazy." For screening procedures, elderly people are less likely than younger people to be screened for cancers and, due to the lack of this preventative measure, less likely to be diagnosed at early stages of their conditions.
After being diagnosed with a disease that may be potentially curable, older people are further discriminated against. Though there may be surgeries or operations with high survival rates that might cure their condition, older patients are less likely than younger patients to receive all the necessary treatments. For example, health professionals pursue less aggressive treatment options in older patients, and fewer adults are enrolled in tests of new prescription drugs. It has been posited that this is because doctors fear their older patients are not physically strong enough to tolerate the curative treatments and are more likely to have complications during surgery that may end in death.
Other research studies have been done with patients with heart disease, and, in these cases, the older patients were still less likely to receive further tests or treatments, independent of the severity of their health problems. Thus, the approach to the treatment of older people is concentrated on managing the disease rather than preventing or curing it. This is based on the stereotype that it is the natural process of aging for the quality of health to decrease, and, therefore, there is no point in attempting to prevent the inevitable decline of old age.
Furthermore, caregivers further undermine the treatment of older patients by helping them too much, which decreases independence, and by making a generalized assumption and treating all elderly as feeble.
Differential medical treatment of elderly people can have significant effects on their health outcomes, a differential outcome which somehow escapes established protections against ageism.
Effects of ageism
Ageism has significant effects on the elderly and young people. The stereotypes and infantilization of older and younger people by patronizing language affects older and younger people's self-esteem and behaviors. After repeatedly hearing a stereotype that older or younger people are useless, older and younger people may begin to feel like dependent, non-contributing members of society. They may start to perceive themselves in terms of the looking-glass self—that is, in the same ways that others in society see them. Studies have also specifically shown that when older and younger people hear these stereotypes about their supposed incompetence and uselessness, they perform worse on measures of competence and memory. These stereotypes then become self-fulfilling prophecies. According to Becca Levy's Stereotype Embodiment Theory, older and younger people might also engage in self-stereotypes, taking their culture's age stereotypes—to which they have been exposed over the life course—and directing them inward toward themselves. Then this behavior reinforces the present stereotypes and treatment of the elderly.
Many overcome these stereotypes and live the way they want, but it can be difficult to avoid deeply ingrained prejudice, especially if one has been exposed to ageist views in childhood or adolescence.
Australia has had age discrimination laws for some time. Discrimination on the basis of age is illegal in each of the states and territories of Australia. At the national level, Australia is party to a number of international treaties and conventions that impose obligations to eliminate age discrimination.
The Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 established the Australian Human Rights Commission and bestows on this Commission functions in relation to a number of international treaties and conventions that cover age discrimination. During 1998-1999, 15% of complaints received by the Commission under the Act were about discrimination on the basis of age.
Age discrimination laws at the national level were strengthened by the Age Discrimination Act 2004, which helps to ensure that people are not subjected to age discrimination in various areas of public life, including employment, the provision of goods and services, education, and the administration of Australian government laws and programs. The Act, however, does provide for exemptions in some areas, as well as providing for positive discrimination, that is, actions which assist people of a particular age who experience a disadvantage because of their age.
In 2011, for the first time a position of Age Discrimination Commissioner was created within the Australian Human Rights Commission. The new Commissioner's responsibilities include raising awareness among employers about the beneficial contributions that senior Australians as well as younger employees can make in the workforce.
In November 2011, the Nigerian House of Representatives considered a bill which would outlaw age discrimination in employment.
At least two bills has been filed before the 16th Congress of the Philippines seeking to address age discrimination in employment in the country. The Blas Ople Policy Center, a non-government organization, asserts that responsibilities of making livelihood in a household has shifted to younger members of the family due to bias against hiring people older than 30 years of age. The organization also added that age discrimination contributes to the unemployment rate and acts as a hurdle to inclusive growth in the country. Overseas Filipino Workers returning from abroad seeking to find work in the country were tagged as vulnerable to age discrimination.
In the U.S., each state has its own laws regarding age discrimination, and there are also federal laws. In California, the Fair Employment and Housing Act forbids unlawful discrimination against persons age 40 and older. The FEHA is the principal California statute prohibiting employment discrimination, covering employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, apprenticeship programs and/or any person or entity who aids, abets, incites, compels, or coerces the doing of a discriminatory act. In addition to age, it prohibits employment discrimination based on race or color; religion; national origin or ancestry, physical disability; mental disability or medical condition; marital status; sex or sexual orientation; and pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Although there are many protections for age-based discrimination against older workers (as shown above) there are very few similar protections for younger workers.
The District of Columbia and twelve states define age as a specific motivation for hate crimes – California, Florida, Iowa, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York and Vermont.
The federal government governs age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). The ADEA prohibits employment discrimination based on age with respect to employees 40 years of age or older as well. The ADEA also addresses the difficulty older workers face in obtaining new employment after being displaced from their jobs, arbitrary age limits. The ADEA applies even if some of the minimum 20 employees are overseas and working for a US corporation.
The United States federal government has responded to issues of youth-bias in governance through several measures in the past. They include the creation of the 1970s-era National Commission on Resources for Youth, which was created in the late 1960s as to promote youth participation throughout communities. Recently the federal government implemented the Tom Osborne Federal Youth Coordination Act, aiming to curb redundancy among federal service providers to youth.
As it approaches its fiftieth anniversary, one author argues that America's leading law against age discrimination, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, offers little real protection to older workers. In her 2014 book, Patricia G. Barnes, an attorney and judge, argues the ADEA was riddled with loopholes to begin with and has been eviscerated over time by the U.S. Supreme Court. Moreover, her book, Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace, argues the "legalization" of age discrimination has caused a trickle down affect. Workers who are otherwise considered to be young - workers in their 30s, 40s and 50s - are increasingly experiencing age discrimination.
The European citizenship provides the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of age. According to Article 21-1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union s:Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union#CHAPTER III. EQUALITY, "any discrimination based on any ground such as (…) age, shall be prohibited".
Additional protection against age discrimination comes from the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC. It prohibits discrimination on grounds of age in the field of employment.
On 18 August 2006, the General Equal Treatment Act (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz, AGG) came into force. The aim of the AGG is to prevent and abolish discrimination on various grounds including age.
A recent study suggested that youths in Germany feel the brunt of age discrimination.
In France, Articles 225-1 through 225-4 of the Penal Code detail the penalization of Ageism, when it comes to an age discrimination related to the consumption of a good or service, to the exercise of an economic activity, to the labor market or an internship, except in the cases foreseen in Article 225-3.
In Belgium, the Law of 25 Feb 2003 "tending to fight discrimination" punishes Ageism when "a difference of treatment that lacks objective and reasonable justification is directly based on ... age". Discrimination is forbidden when it refers to providing or offering a good or service, to conditions linked to work or employment, to the appointment or promotion of an employee, and yet to the access or participation in "an economic, social, cultural or political activity accessible to the public" (Article 2nd, § 4). Incitement to discrimination, to hatred or to violence against a person or a group on the grounds of (…) age (Article 6) is punished with imprisonment and/or a fine. Nevertheless, employment opportunities are worsening for people in their middle years in many of these same countries, according to Martin Kohli et al. in Time for Retirement (1991).
In the UK, laws against Ageism are new. Age discrimination laws were brought into force in October 2006, and can now be found in the Equality Act 2010. This implements the Equal Treatment Framework Directive 2000/78/EC and protects employees against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation. There is also provision in the Equality Act 2010 to prohibit age discrimination in the provision of goods and services, though this has not yet been implemented by the current UK Coalition Government and will not be implemented before October 2012 at the earliest.[needs update]
Despite the relatively recent prohibition on age discrimination, there have already been many notable cases and official statistics show a 37% increase in claims in 2009/10 and a further 31% increase in 2010/11. Examples include the case involving Rolls Royce, the "Heyday" case brought by Age UK and the recent Miriam O'Reilly case against the BBC.
Recent research suggested that the number of age discrimination claims annually could reach 15,000 by 2015.
The European Social Study survey in 2011 revealed that nearly two out of five people claim to have been shown a lack of respect because of their age. The survey suggested that the UK is riven by intergenerational splits, with half of people admitting they do not have a single friend over 70; this compares with only a third of Portuguese, Swiss and Germans who say that they do not have a friend of that age or older. A Demos study in 2012 showed that three quarters of people in the UK believed there to be not enough opportunities for older and younger people to meet and work together.
The "Grey Pride" campaign has been advocating for a Minister for Older People and its campaign has had some success, with Labour Leader Ed Miliband appointing Liz Kendall as Shadow Minister for Older People.
The artist Michael Freedman, an outspoken advocate against age discrimination within the art world says that "mature students, like me, come to art late in life, so why are we penalised and demotivated? Whatever happened to lifelong learning and the notion of a flexible workforce?"
|This section may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards, as it has a completely different focus than the rest of the article, which focuses on ageism against the elderly. (August 2015)|
Many current and historical intergenerational and youth programs have been created to address the issue of Ageism. Among the advocacy organizations created in the United Kingdom to challenge age discrimination are Age UK and the British Youth Council.
In the United States there have been several historic and current efforts to challenge Ageism. The earliest example may be the Newsboys Strike of 1899, which fought ageist employment practices targeted against youth by large newspaper syndicates in the Northeast. During the Franklin D. Roosevelt Administration, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt was active in the national youth movement, including the formation of the National Youth Administration and the defense of the American Youth Congress. She made several statements on behalf of youth and against Ageism. In one report entitled, "Facing the Problems of Youth," Roosevelt said of youth,
- "We cannot simply expect them to say, 'Our older people have had experience and they have proved to themselves certain things, therefore they are right.' That isn't the way the best kind of young people think. They want to experience for themselves. I find they are perfectly willing to talk to older people, but they don't want to talk to older people who are shocked by their ideas, nor do they want to talk to older people who are not realistic."
Students for a Democratic Society formed in 1960 to promote democratic opportunities for all people regardless of age, and the Gray Panthers was formed in the early 1970s with a goal of eliminating Ageism in all forms. Three O'Clock Lobby formed in 1976 to promote youth participation throughout traditionally ageist government structures in Michigan, while Youth Liberation of Ann Arbor started in 1970 to promote youth and fight Ageism.
More recent U.S. programs include Americans for a Society Free from Age Restrictions, which formed in 1996 to advance the civil and human rights of young people through eliminating ageist laws targeted against young people, and to help youth counter Ageism in America. The National Youth Rights Association started in 1998 to promote awareness of the legal and human rights of young people in the United States, and the Freechild Project was formed in 2001 to identify, unify and promote diverse opportunities for youth engagement in social change by fighting Ageism.
- In 2002 the Writers Guild of America, West waged a legal battle within the entertainment industry to eliminate age discrimination commonly faced by elder scriptwriters.
- Director Paul Weitz reported he wrote the 2004 film, In Good Company to reveal how Ageism affects youth and adults.
- In 2002 The Freechild Project created an information and training initiative to provide resources to youth organizations and schools focused on youth rights.
- In 2006 Lydia Giménez-LLort, PhD, an assistant professor of Psychiatry and researcher at the Autonomous University of Barcelona coined the term 'Snow White Syndrome' at the 'Congrés de la Gent Gran de Cerdanyola del Vallès' (Congress of the Elderly of Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain) as a metaphor to define Ageism in an easier and more friendly way while developing a constructive spirit against it. The metaphor is based on both the auto-Ageism and adultocracy exhibited by the queen of the Snow White fairy tale as well as the social Ageism symbolized by the mirror
- Since 2008 'The Intergenerational Study' by Lydia Giménez-LLort and Paula Ramírez-Boix from the Autonomous University of Barcelona is aimed to find the basis of the link between grandparents and grandsons (positive family relationships) that are able to minimize the Ageism towards the elderly. Students of several Spanish universities have enrolled in this study which soon will be also performed in USA, Nigeria, Barbados, Argentina and Mexico. The preliminary results reveal that 'The Intergenerational study questionnaire' induces young people to do a reflexive and autocritic analysis of their intergenerational relationships in contrast to those shown towards other unrelated old people which results very positive to challenge Ageism. A cortometrage about 'The International Study' has been directed and produced by Tomás Sunyer from Los Angeles City College
- Votes at 16 intends to lower the voting age in the United Kingdom to 16, reducing Ageism and giving 16 year olds equal pay on the National Minimum Wage. The group claims that 16 year olds get less money than older people for the same work, angering many 16 year olds. They additionally postulate that 16 year olds will have their voice listened to by older people more often.
Accusations of ageism
In a recent interview, actor Pierce Brosnan cited ageism as one of the contributing factors as to why he was not asked to continue his role as James Bond in the Bond film Casino Royale, released in 2006.
Also, successful singer and actress Madonna spoke out in her 50s about ageism and her fight to defy the norms of society. In 2015, BBC Radio 1 were accused of ageism after the station didn't add her new single to their playlist. Similarly, Sex and the City star Kim Cattrall has also raised the issue of ageism.
A 2007 Pew Research Center study found that a majority of American voters would be less likely to vote for a President past a given age, with only 45% saying that age would not matter.
- Age of consent
- Age stratification
- Aging brain
- Aging in the American workforce
- Memory and aging
- Minor (law)
- The Poppy Fields
- Sudbury schools - Schools Pre-K through high school with no age-based restrictions or groupings
- You kids get off my lawn!
- Youth rights
- Nelson, T.D. (Ed.) (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-64057-2.
- Quadagno, J. (2008). The field of social gerontology. In E. Barrosse (Ed.), Aging & the life course: An introduction to social gerontology (pp. 2–23). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Butler, R. N. (1969). "Age-ism: Another form of bigotry". The Gerontologist 9 (4): 243–246.
- Wilkinson J and Ferraro K, Thirty Years of Ageism Research. In Nelson T (ed). Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002
- "Young and Oppressed". youthrights.org. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- "Youthful Indiscretions". kingsreview.co.uk. Retrieved on 11 September 2015.
- Lauter And Howe (1971) Conspiracy of the Young. Meridian Press.
- De Martelaer, K.; De Knop, P.; Theeboom, M.; Van Heddegem, L. (2000). "The UN Convention as a Basis for Elaborating Rights of Children In Sport". Journal of Leisurability 27 (2): 3–10.
- (n.d.) Youth Liberation Z magazine.
- Maddox, G. L. (1987). The Encyclopedia of aging (p. 284). New York: Springer Pub. Co..
- Lyon, P.; Pollard, D. (1997). "Perceptions of the older employee: is anything really changing?". Personnel Review 26 (4): 245–257 . doi:10.1108/00483489710172051.
- Iversen, T.N.; Larsen, L.; Solem, P.E. (2009). "A conceptual analysis of ageism". Nordic Psychology 61: 4–22. doi:10.1027/1901-22184.108.40.206.
- Fletcher, A. (2006) Washington Youth Voice Handbook. CommonAction.
- "Stop Discrimination's Glossary (European Union)". stop-discrimination.info. Archived from the original on 2006-05-18. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
- Branch, L., Harris, D. & Palmore, E.B. (2005) Encyclopedia of Ageism. Haworth Press. ISBN 0-7890-1890-X
- Levy, B. R. (2001). "Eradication of Ageism requires addressing the enemy within". The Gerontologist 41 (5): 578–579. doi:10.1093/geront/41.5.578.
- Palmore, E. B. (1999). Ageism: negative and positive (2nd ed., p. 108). New York: Springer Pub.
- Posthuma, R. A.; Campion, M. A. (2009). "Age stereotyping in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions". Journal of Management 35: 158–188.
- Berger, Kathleen Stassen (2014). Invitation to the Life Span, Second Edition. New York: Worth Publishers.
- Levy, Becca; Langer, Ellen (1994). "Aging free from stereotypes: Successful memory in Chin among the deaf". Journal of Personality & Social Psychology.
- cf., Posthuma, Wagstaff, & Campion, (2012). Age Stereotypes and Workplace Age Discrimination: A Framework for Future Research. In J. W. Hedge, W. C. Borman (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook on Work and Aging. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 313-340.
- Loretto, W.; Duncan, C.; White, P.J. (2000). "Ageism and employment: Controversies, ambiguities, and younger people's perceptions". Ageing & Society 20 (3): 279–302. doi:10.1017/s0144686x00007741.
- Gee, E. & G. Gutman, (eds.). (2000). The Overselling of Population Aging: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges, and Social Policy. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
- Gullette, M. M. (1997). Declining to Decline: Cultural combat: the politics of the midlife. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
- Loos, E. F., L. Haddon & E. Mante-Meijer (2012), Generational use of new media. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. California: Stanford University Press.
- Sawchuk, K. & Crow, B. (2012). Seniors, Cell Phones, and Tactical Restriction, in Phillip Vannini et al (eds.), echnologies of Mobility in the Americas, (157-174). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
- Fernández-Ardèvol, M.; Ivan, L. (2013). "Older people and mobile communication, in two European contexts". Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations 15: 3.
- Sawchuk, K., & Crow, B. (2010). Into the grey zone: Seniors, cell phones and milieus that matter. In B. Poppinga (ed.), Observing the mobile user experience: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop held in conjunction with NordiCHI (pp. 17–20). Oldenburg, Germany: HaptiMap.
- Willow, C., Franklin, A. and Shaw, C. (2007). Meeting the obligations of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in England. Children and young people's messages to Government. DCSF.
- Ayalon, Liat (2014). "Perceived Age, Gender, and Racial/Ethnic Discrimination in Europe: Results from the European Social Survey". Educational Gerontology 40 (7): 499–517. doi:10.1080/03601277.2013.845490.
- Questions and Answers About the Minimum Wage, US Department of Labor
- Age Positive, Department for Work and Pensions in Sheffield and London
- Phelps, E. S. (1972). "The statistical theory of racism and sexism". American Economic Review 62: 659–661.
- Youth & Labor – Age Requirements, US Department of Labor
- Gail Collins (14 October 2009). When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present. Little, Brown. pp. 59–. ISBN 978-0-316-07166-6.
- K Barry. "Timeline of Discrimination". Femininity in Flight. Retrieved 2015-08-06.
- Lahey, J. (2005) Do Older Workers Face Discrimination? Boston College.
- (2006) How Ageist is Britain? London: Age Concern.
- When Words Get Old: Ageist Language Newswise, Retrieved on 9 September 2008.
- Harris, D. (2003 July–August) Simple justice. The story behind a record-setting age discrimination settlement and what it could mean in your workplace. AARP The Magazine. Retrieved on 25 October 2008.
- Complaints soar as 'age discrimination within NHS' leaves elderly neglected. Agediscrimination.info (2011-11-09). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Poor treatment of older people in the NHS is an attitude problem. Agediscrimination.info (2011-02-15). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- The Department of Health says there is no place for age discrimination in the NHS, but a new report shows the middle aged 'miss out' on life saving cancer surgery. Agediscrimination.info (2011-03-18). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Nelson, T. D. (2005). "Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self". Journal of Social Issues 61 (2): 207–221. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x.
- Robb, C.; Hongbin, C.; Haley, W. E. (2002). "Ageism in mental health and health care: A critical review" (PDF). Journal of Clinical Geropsychology 8 (1): 1–12.
- Cruikshank, Margaret (2009). Learning to be old: Gender, culture, and aging (2nd edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Herrera, Angelica P. (2010). "Disparate inclusion of older adults in clinical trials: Priorities and opportunities for policy and practice change". American Journal of Public Health 100: S105–S112. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.162982.
- Peron, Emily P.; Ruby, Christine M. (2011–2012). "A primer on medication use in older adults for the non-clinician". Generations.
- Levy, B (1996). "Improving memory in old age by implicit self-stereotyping". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 1092–1107. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.112.
- Australia. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Bittman, Michael; Flick, Mardi; Rice, James (2001). The Recruitment of Older Australian Workers: A Survey of Employers in a High Growth Industry (PDF). Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales. pp. 14–15. ISBN 978-0-7334-1908-9.
- "Legislation | Australian Human Rights Commission". Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
- In Australia, new age discrimination laws have been passed by the Federal Parliament; a position of Age Discrimination Commissioner has been created in the Australian Human Rights Commission for the first time. Agediscrimination.info (2011-05-26). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Canadian Criminal Code[dead link]
- Canada. Agediscrimination.info (2006-12-12). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- "Tories in Canada end forced retirement, decades of 'age discrimination'". Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Canadians believe employers discriminate against older applicants. Agediscrimination.info (2012-07-23). Retrieved on 24 July 2012.
- Mateo, Janvic (11 June 2014). "Law vs age discrimination in employment sought". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 15 April 2015.
- Lopez, Ron (8 May 2014). "End age discrimination, Congress urged". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved 15 April 2015.
- USA. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- California Fair Employment and Housing Act FindLaw.
- PDF (23.8 KB) (See page 1, section "Other", note 2) Retrieved on May-21-2009
- PDF (1.96 MB) McClintock, Michael (See pages 84 and 122, Appendix 10, "Others", note 2) Retrieved on May-21-2009
- Federal Protections for Older Workers 2008 KMB Legal
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 FindLaw website.
- Morelli v. Cedel (2nd Cir. 1998) 141 F3d 39, 45 FindLaw website.
- Barnes, Patricia G. (22 August 2014). Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace (ebook and paperback) (1 ed.). http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00MYREMRY. ISBN 978-0-9898708-1-8. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
- PDF (80.6 KB)
- EC Legislation. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Germany. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Young in Germany feel brunt of age discrimination. Agediscrimination.info (2012-01-23). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- (English) French Penal Code (Legifrance)
- (French) Legifrance's Code pénal – original text
- France. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- (French) PDF (76.5 KB)
- Belgium. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- In the UK. Agediscrimination.info. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- 37% rise in age discrimination claims. Agediscrimination.info (2010-07-08). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Age discrimination claims increase by 79%, Tribunal Service statistics show. Agediscrimination.info (2011-03-31). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- ItemPage. Agediscrimination.info (2009-05-14). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- ItemPage. Agediscrimination.info (2009-09-25). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- ItemPage. Agediscrimination.info (2011-01-10). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Age discrimination claims will continue to rise and peak at nearly 15,000 a year by 2015. Agediscrimination.info (2011-07-07). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- UK among Europe's worst countries for Ageism and age discrimination. Agediscrimination.info (2011-10-30). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Older people in Britain are more concerned about age discrimination than their European neighbours. Agediscrimination.info (2012-05-25). Retrieved on 30 May 2012.
- Shadow minister for older people is a 'thorn in the side' of the coalition. Agediscrimination.info (2011-10-25). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Blog. Michael Freedman. Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
- Roosevelt, A.E. (1935) "Facing the Problems of Youth," National Parent-Teacher Magazine 29(30). Retrieved 7/30/07.
- Kuhn, M., Long, C. and Quinn, L. (1991) No Stone Unturned: the Life and Times of Maggie Kuhn. Ballantine Books.
- ASFAR (2006).  Americans for a Society Free from Age Restrictions Articles of Incorporation.
- National Youth Rights Association (2001). National Youth Rights Association Articles of Incorporation (Partial)
- Hellerman, A. (2005) Working Solo in Good Company Writers Guild of America, East website.
- (n.d.) Survey of North American Youth Rights The Freechild Project website.
-  (Spanish) Envellir bé · Successful Ageing · Saber Envejecer website – Know-how.
-  (Spanish) Envellir bé : Successful Ageing · Saber envejecer website – Research.
- Cox, J. (2006) Brosnan Bares All For Playboy
- "Madonna not giving in to Ageism". Cafe Fair.
- Kim Cattrall's red carpet rant: "down with Ageism and age discrimination". Agediscrimination.info (2011-04-05). Retrieved on 11 April 2012.
|Look up Ageism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
- 2005 issue of the Journal of Social Issues Thematic journal issue devoted to empirical and theoretical research on Ageism.
- Ageism – Discrimination Against Age A Knol examining Ageism and social attitudes against different age groups.
- Age Discrimination at Work: Wellpoint/Blue Cross
- Age discrimination laws by the BBC
- Age discrimination statistics for the UK, Europe and the world
- Ageing at work EU-OSHA
- Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons Edited scholarly volume of the latest research and theory on Ageism.
- Everyone deserves to be given a chance An essay against Ageism towards teenagers, written by a Canadian adolescent.
- An in-depth look at Ageism by Linda M. Woolfe, PhD, of Webster University
- Article on Older Drivers.
- Article on singer Madonna and her views on Ageism
- Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace, by Patricia G. Barnes. The author, an attorney and judge, writes that a confluence of failures by American institutions have eviscerated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, leaving American workers with virtually no protection against age discrimination.
- Ageism In America Detailed report on Ageism from the International Longevity Center.
- Ayalon, Liat. "Feelings towards Older vs. Younger Adults: Results from the European Social Survey". Educational Gerontology 39 (12): 888–901. doi:10.1080/03601277.2013.767620.
- Interview with social psychologists Susan Fiske and Mike North about common stereotypes of older people. (Ayalon, Liat (2013). "Feelings towards Older vs. Younger Adults: Results from the European Social Survey". Educational Gerontology 39 (12): 888–901. doi:10.1080/03601277.2013.767620.)
- Issues and resources on aging in Alabama
- Ayalon, Liat; Doron, I; Bodner, E; Inbar, N (2014). "Macro- and micro-level predictors of age categorization: results from the European Social Survey". European Journal of Ageing 11 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1007/s10433-013-0282-8.
- Old Lesbians Organizing for Change
- Yechezkel, Rachel; Ayalon, Liat (2013). "Social Workers' Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Abuse in Younger vs. Older Women". Journal of Family Violence 28 (4): 381–391. doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9506-0.
- USA Today article examining old and young CEOs about the ages of John McCain and Barack Obama
- Barnes, Patricia G. (2014). Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. ISBN 978-0-9898708-1-8. External link in
- Bergling, Tim (2004). Reeling in the Years: Gay Men's Perspectives on Age and Ageism. New York, NY: Southern Tier Editions, Harrington Park Press. ISBN 1-56023-370-2. OCLC 52166116.
- Bytheway, Bill (1995). Ageism. Buckingham; Bristol, PA: Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-19176-2. OCLC 30733778.
- Calasanti, Toni M. and Kathleen F. Slevin (2006). Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-95223-9. OCLC 65400440.
- Copper, Barbara (1987). Ageism in the Lesbian Community. Freedom, California: Crossing Press. ISBN 978-0895942364. OCLC 16331354.
- Cruikshank, Margaret (2003). Learning to be Old: Gender, Culture, and Aging. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 0-8476-9848-3. OCLC 49566317.
- Eglit,, Howard C. (2004). Elders on Trial: Age and Ageism in the American Legal System. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. ISBN 0-8130-2765-9. OCLC 56482087.
- Gaster, Lucy (2002). Past it at 40?: A Grassroots View of Ageism and Discrimination in Employment: A Report. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press. ISBN 1-86134-484-8. OCLC 51802692.
- Glover, Ian and Mohamed Branine (2001). Ageism in Work and Employment. Aldershot, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate. ISBN 1-84014-149-2. OCLC 45487982.
- Gravagne, Pamela H. (2013). The Becoming of Age: Cinematic Visions of Mind, Body and Identity in Later Life. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-7260-4.
- Gullette, Margaret Morganroth (2004). Aged by Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-31062-0. OCLC 52514302.
- Gullette, Margaret Morganroth (2011). Agewise: Fighting the New Ageism in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-31073-2.
- Gullette, Margaret Morganroth (1997). Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of the Midlife. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia. ISBN 0-8139-1721-2. OCLC 35986171.
- Kimmel, D.C. (1988). "Ageism, psychology, and public policy". American Psychologist 43 (3): 175–178. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.3.175.
- Kite, M.E.; Johnson, B.T. (1988). "Attitudes towards older and younger adults: A meta-analysis". Psychology and Aging 3 (3): 232–244.
- Lagacé, Martine, & al. (2010). L'Âgisme: Comprendre et changer le regard social sur le vieillissement. Quebec city, Quebec, Canada: Presses de l'Université Laval (PUL). ISBN 2-7637-8781-9. OCLC 632095367.
- MacDonald, Barbara and Cynthia Rich (2001). Look Me in the Eye: Old Women, Aging and Ageism. Tallahassee, FL: Spinsters Ink Books. ISBN 978-1883523404. OCLC 198557801.
- Macnicol, John (2006). Age Discrimination: An Historical and Contemporary Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University. ISBN 0-521-84777-X. OCLC 61176543.
- Nelson, Todd D. (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-14077-2. OCLC 47863229.
- Nelson, T. D. (2005). "Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self". Journal of Social Issues 61 (2): 207–221. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x.
- Nelson, T. D. (2015). Ageism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (2nd Ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
- Palmore, Erdman, Laurence Branch, and Diana Harris (editors) (2005). Encyclopedia of Ageism. Binhamton, NY: Haworth Pastoral Press: Haworth Reference Press. ISBN 0-7890-1889-6. OCLC 55801014.
- Thompson, Neil (2006). Anti-Discriminatory Practice (4th ed.). Basingstoke, England; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1-4039-2160-1. OCLC 62302620.