Alexander Fraser Tytler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Tytler.
Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee, May 10, 1813.

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee FRSE (15 October 1747 – 5 January 1813) was a Scottish advocate, judge, writer and historian who served as Professor of Universal History, and Greek and Roman Antiquities, in the University of Edinburgh.[1]

Tytler's other positions included Senator of the College of Justice and George Commissioner of Justiciary in Scotland.[2] Tytler was a friend of Robert Burns, and prevailed upon him to remove lines from his poem "Tam o' Shanter" which were insulting to the legal and clerical professions.[3] His son was Patrick Fraser Tytler, traveller and historian.

Translation[edit]

Tytler wrote a treatise that is important in the history of translation theory, the Essay on the Principles of Translation (London, 1791).[4] It has been argued in a 1975 book by Gan Kechao that Yan Fu's famous translator's dictum of fidelity, clarity and elegance came from Tytler.

Tytler said that translation should fully represent the 1) ideas and 2) style of the original and should 3) possess the ease of original composition.

Quotations on democracy[edit]

In his Lectures, Tytler displayed a cynical view of democracy in general and representative democracies such as republics in particular. He believed that "a pure democracy is a chimera," and that "All government is essentially of the nature of a monarchy."[5]

In discussing the Athenian democracy, after noting that a great number of the population were actually enslaved, he went on to say, "Nor were the superior classes in the actual enjoyment of a rational liberty and independence. They were perpetually divided into factions, which servilely ranked themselves under the banners of the contending demagogues; and these maintained their influence over their partisans by the most shameful corruption and bribery, of which the means were supplied alone by the plunder of the public money."[5]

Speaking about the measure of freedom enjoyed by the people in a republic or democracy, Tytler wrote, "The people flatter themselves that they have the sovereign power. These are, in fact, words without meaning. It is true they elected governors; but how are these elections brought about? In every instance of election by the mass of a people—through the influence of those governors themselves, and by means the most opposite to a free and disinterested choice, by the basest corruption and bribery. But those governors once selected, where is the boasted freedom of the people? They must submit to their rule and control, with the same abandonment of their natural liberty, the freedom of their will, and the command of their actions, as if they were under the rule of a monarch."[6]

Tytler dismisses the more optimistic vision of democracy by commentators such as Montesquieu as "nothing better than an Utopian theory, a splendid chimera, descriptive of a state of society that never did, and never could exist; a republic not of men, but of angels," for "While man is being instigated by the love of power—a passion visible in an infant, and common to us even with the inferior animals—he will seek personal superiority in preference to every matter of a general concern".[7]

"Or at best, he will employ himself in advancing the public good, as the means of individual distinction and elevation: he will promote the interest of the state from the selfish but most useful passion of making himself considerable in that establishment which he labors to aggrandize. Such is the true picture of man as a political agent."[7]

That said however, Tytler does admit that there are individual exceptions to the rule, and that he is ready to allow "that this form of government is the best adapted to produce, though not the most frequent, yet the most striking, examples of virtue in individuals," paradoxically because a "democratic government opposes more impediments to disinterested patriotism than any other form. To surmount these, a pitch of virtue is necessary which, in other situations, where the obstacles are less great and numerous, is not called in to exertion. The nature of a republican government gives to every member of the state an equal right to cherish views of ambition, and to aspire to the highest offices of the commonwealth; it gives to every individual of the same title with his fellows to aspire at the government of the whole."[8]

Tytler believed that democratic forms of government such as those of Greece and Rome have a natural evolution from initial virtue toward eventual corruption and decline. In Greece, for example, Tytler argues that "the patriotic spirit and love of ingenious freedom ... became gradually corrupted as the nation advanced in power and splendor."[9]

Tytler goes on to generalize: "Patriotism always exists in the greatest degree in rude nations, and in an early period of society. Like all other affections and passions, it operates with the greatest force where it meets with the greatest difficulties ... but in a state of ease and safety, as if wanting its appropriate nourishment, it languishes and decays." ... "It is a law of nature to which no experience has ever furnished an exception, that the rising grander and opulence of a nation must be balanced by the decline of its heroic virtues."[9]

Misquotation[edit]

The following quotation has been attributed to Tytler, although it has also been occasionally attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville:[citation needed]

A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.
The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to complacency; From complacency to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.

This text was popularized as part of a longer piece commenting on the 2000 U.S. presidential election, which began circulating on the Internet during or shortly after the election's controversial conclusion.[10]

There is no reliable record of Alexander Tytler's having written any part of the text.[10] In fact, it actually comprises two parts which didn't begin to appear together until the 1970s. The first paragraph's earliest known appearance[11] is in an op-ed piece by Elmer T. Peterson in the December 9, 1951 The Daily Oklahoman, which attributed it to Tytler:

Two centuries ago, a somewhat obscure Scotsman named Tytler made this profound observation: "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy."[12]

The list beginning "From bondage to spiritual faith" is commonly known as the "Tytler Cycle" or the "Fatal Sequence". Its first known appearance is in a 1943 speech "Industrial Management in a Republic"[13] by H. W. Prentis, president of the Armstrong Cork Company and former president of the National Association of Manufacturers, and appears to be original to him. It is also published in the text of an address by Prentis (entitled "The Cult of Competency") delivered at the February 1943 convocation of the General Alumni Society of the University of Pennsylvania.[14]

Works[edit]

  • (1771). Piscatory Eclogues, with other Poetical Miscellanies of Phinehas Fletcher.
  • (1778). The Decisions of the Court of Sessions, from its First Institution to the Present Time, supplementary volume to Lord Kames's Dictionary of Decisions.
  • (1782). Plan and Outline of a Course of Lectures on Universal History.
  • (1784). Essay on the Life and Character of Petrarch, with Translation of Seven Sonnets.
  • (1791). Essay on the Principles of Translation.
  • (1792). The Robbers: A Tragedy, translation of Schiller's Die Räuber.[15]
  • (1798). A Critical Examination of Mr. Whitaker's Course of Hannibal over the Alps.
  • (1799). Ireland Profiting by Example.
  • (1800). Essay on the Military Law and the Practice of Courts-Martial.
  • (1801). Elements of General History, Ancient and Modern.
  • (1807). Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Honourable Henry Home of Kames.
  • (1815). Consideration of the Present Political State of India.

See also[edit]

General:

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Universal History – From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the 18th Century. Boston: Fetridge and Company (1850) [1834]. p. Title Page. 
  2. ^ Tytler, Alexander Fraser. Universal History – From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the 18th Century. Boston: Fetridge and Company (1850) [1834]. p. Title Page. 
  3. ^ Letter from Robert Burns to Alexander Fraser Tytler, Esq., April 1791, The Complete Works of Robert Burns (Self-Interpreting), Volume IV, Gebbie & Co., Philadelphia (1886), pp. 250–251.
  4. ^ Maymi, Protasio (1956). "General Concepts or Laws in Translation," The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 13-21.
  5. ^ a b Tytler, op. cit., Book 1, Chapter VI -- Political reflections arising from the history of Greece, p. 216.
  6. ^ Tytler, op. cit., p. 217.
  7. ^ a b Tytler, op. cit., p. 219.
  8. ^ Tytler, op. cit., p. 220.
  9. ^ a b Tytler, op. cit., p. 221.
  10. ^ a b The Snopes.com Urban Legends Reference Pages, The Fall of the Athenian Republic, accessed March 21, 2010.
  11. ^ Loren Collins. "The Truth About Tytler". 
  12. ^ Elmer T. Peterson (9 December 1951). "This is the Hard Core of Freedom". Daily Oklahoman. p. 12A. 
  13. ^ Prentis, Jr., Henning Webb (1943). Industrial Management in a Republic. Newcomen Society in North America. p. 22. 
  14. ^ Henning W. Prentis, "The Cult of Competency" (The General Magazine and Historical Chronicle, University of Pennsylvania the General Alumni Society, Vol. XLV, Numb. III, April 1943).
  15. ^ Milburn Jr., Douglas (1967). "The First English Translation of 'Die Räuber': French Bards and Scottish Translators," Monatshefte, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 41-53.

External links[edit]