From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Image of Alchimia, the embodiment of alchemy. Woodcut published by Leonhard Thurneysser in 1574. Thurneysser was a student of Paracelsus.

Alkahest is a theorized "universal solvent", which was believed to be capable of dissolving any other substance, including gold, without altering or destroying its base components.[1] The alchemist Philippus Paracelsus first made mention of the alkahest as a chemical that could fortify the liver, and in instances where the liver failed, could act as a substitute (see De Viribrus Membrorum). Because of its perceived invaluable medicinal qualities, alchemists of the time were concerned with its plausibility and existence. As the shift of alchemy went from transmuting metals to creating remedies, the alkahest (also known as the ignis gehennae[2]) became valued for its ability to break down substances to their base virtues/properties, which included healing properties. Thus it was sought after for its potential to cure incurable diseases at the time, for example, the breaking down of Ludus could provide a cure for urinary calculi.[2]


It became very popular in the 17th and 18th centuries through J.B. van Helmont, after which it was taken less seriously over time. Its prevalence in the 17th and 18th centuries, despite its otherwise absurd and extreme qualities, was likely due to the popularity of alchemy at the time and no adequate alternative theory of chemistry.[3] Those who followed and trained under Paracelsus did not think of the alkahest as van Helmont did, but slowly built upon the ideas posed by their teacher.[3] Tobias Ludwig Kohlhans (1624-1705) suggested in his dissertation of the spleen, that alkahest could be found in the lymphatic vessels of animals.[2] This was then contested and doubted by Helmont, Oldenburg (later in 1661), and Goddard, who raised questions about its "sweetly acidic" quality, the necessity of a hypothetical universal solvent to explain the acidity in empty animal lymphatic vessels, its ability to be generated within the body, and how it differed from that of the other fluids or humours in the body.[2] German Alchemist Kohann Kunckel (1630-1703) and others over time began to see the alkahest as just fantasy and wishful thinking.[4]


The origin and etymology of the word alkahest is under no consensus, as Paracelsus left no trace or history of the word. George Starkey argued it came from the german word al-gehest (all spirit).[4] Johann Rudolph Glauber posed that it could have come from the words alhali est, the german word al gar heis, or Al zu hees, meaning "very hot".[4] Cleidophorus Mystagogus in england argued for its root being of Belgian or high-dutch.[4] Paracelcus believed that alkahest was, in fact, the philosopher's stone. Whereas, a Mr. Oldenburg in 1661 made experimental connections between the legendary alkahest, and the liquid discovered in the lymphatic vessels of animals introduced by Kohlhans.[2] Some, such as Boerhaave in his textbook elementa Chymiae (1732), did not think Alkahest was the philosopher's stone but that it was in fact of greater importance and value than the stone.[2]

Other Names[edit]

Helmont considered the alkahest to have never-ending reusability calling it an "immortal".[2] He also used the term "maccabean fire" because of its similarities to the "thick water" in the apocryphal book of Maccabees in the Old Testament.[2] Another name for the Alkahest termed by Helmont was ignis gehennae.[2] Other names include Latex (or "clear water reduced to its minutest atoms"), and primum Ens Salum (or "salt exalted to its highest degree").[2] Ladislae Reti, a historian of science investigated alchemical recipes involving alkahest, and found that no chemical was sufficient in breaking down the wide variety of materials Helmont supposed. Reti points out that in such recipes, an alcohol solution of potassium hydroxide could have been used instead.[4]


The recipe for the theorized alkahest, as many alchemical recipes were, was often kept secret.[4] There were many alchemists attempting to obtain the universal solvent, and thus many recipes, some later rejected by their creators, have been found.[5]


Paracelsus's own recipe for alkahest was made of caustic lime, alcohol, and carbonate of potash; however, his recipe was not intended to be a "universal solvent".[6][7]

Jan Baptist van Helmont[edit]

Following Paracelsus, it was the chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont who expanded on the alkahest, believing it was a universal solvent.[7] Helmont claimed that knowledge of the recipe was granted by God and was therefore known by few, and he had many dreams during which he believed he had been gifted the recipe, only to find them inadequate.[4][7] Given the difficulty of obtaining alkahest, Helmont suggested the use of other, inferior substances that they believed were capable of similar tasks.[5] Volatile salt of tartar, also known as pyrotartaric acid or glutaric acid, was considered both a substitute for alkahest and a component of alkahest.[5][1] Helmont's writings also referred to a fourteenth century alchemical manuscript which discussed sal alkali, which may have been caustic potash or lye, that was capable of dissolving many substances and may have been an ingredient for Helmont's alkahest.[6][7][8]

Seventeenth century alchemists[edit]

In the seventeenth century, many alchemists were working on obtaining the alkahest, some being Johann Rudolf Glauber, George Starkey, Frederick Clod, Thomas Vaughan, Thomas Henshaw, Johann Brun, Robert Hamilton, Hugh Piatt, and Robert Child.[7] Glauber believed that the alkahest was a class of substances, rather than one, particular substance.[7] Glauber believed he had discovered alkahest after discovering that volatile niter (nitric acid) and fixed niter (potassium carbonate) were able to dissolve many substances.[5] Starkey described alkahest as a circulated salt that is neither acid nor alkali.[9] Moreover, Starkey believed that, because acid saline liquors are destroyed by alkalies and urinous spirits, they cannot be ingredients of the immortal alkahest.[5] He believed instead that non-acidic substances could be ingredients of the alkahest, some of these suspected substances being urinous spirits, spirit of alkalies, and sulphureous vegetable spirits.[5] In particular, Starkey believed that alkahest's secret ingredient laid within urine.[5][7] Clodius believed that mercury could convert salts into "ponderous liquor", which he believed was needed to make the alkahest.[5]

Issues with the concept[edit]

A potential problem involving alkahest is that, if it dissolves everything, then it cannot be placed into a container because it would dissolve the container. This problem was first posed by German alchemist Kohann Kunckel.[4] However, the alchemist Philalethes specified that alkahest dissolved only composed materials into their constituent, elemental parts;[9] hence, a hypothetical container made of a pure element (say, lead) would not be dissolved by alkahest. The old remark "spit is the universal solvent" satirizes the idea, suggesting that instead of a solvent that would easily dissolve anything, the only "real" solvent to anything is a great deal of hard work. In modern times, water is sometimes called the universal solvent, because it can dissolve a large variety of substances, due to its chemical polarity and amphoterism.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Panzarasa, Guido (2015). "Rediscovering pyrotartaric acid: a chemical interpretation of the volatile salt of tartar" (PDF). Bulletin for the History of Chemistry. 40: 1–8 – via IsisCB.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana Maria; Ferraz, Márcia Helena Mendes; Rattansi, Piyo M. (2010). "LOST ROYAL SOCIETY DOCUMENTS ON 'ALKAHEST' (UNIVERSAL SOLVENT) REDISCOVERED". Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 64 (4): 435–456. ISSN 0035-9149.
  3. ^ a b Porto, Paulo A. (2002). "" Summus atque felicissimus salium" : The Medical Relevance of the Liquor Alkahest". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 76 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1353/bhm.2002.0038. ISSN 1086-3176.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana Maria; Ferraz, Marcia Helena Mendes; Rattansi, Piyo M. (2014). "Seventeenth-century 'treasure' found in royal society archives: The ludus helmontii and the stone disease". Notes & Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science. 68: 227–243 – via doi:10.1098/rsnr.2014.0010.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Newman, William R.; Principe, Lawrence M. (2002). Alchemy Tried in the Fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the Fate of Helmontian Chymistry. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 138, 242–243, 249, 282, 286. ISBN 0-226-57711-2.
  6. ^ a b Stratford, Jordan; Kupperman, Jeffrey S. (2014). A Dictionary of Western Alchemy. Wheaton, Illinois: Quest Books. pp. 7, 79. ISBN 0835608972.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Porto, Paulo A. (2002). "Summus atque felicissimus salium: The Medical Relevance of the Liquor alkahest". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 76: 3, 9, 20, 23, 24, 27, 29 – via JSTOR.
  8. ^ Leinhard, John. "No.1569 Alkahest". University of Houston. Retrieved 14 May 2014.
  9. ^ a b Philalethes, Eirenaeus. "The Secret of the Immortal Liquor Called Alkahest or Ignis-Aqua". Retrieved 14 May 2014.