Anomalocaris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Anomalocaris
Temporal range: Early to mid Cambrian: 520–499 Ma[1]
ROM-BurgessShale-CompleteAnomalocarisFossil.png
Image of the first complete Anomalocaris fossil found, residing in the Royal Ontario Museum
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Dinocaridida
Order: Radiodonta
Family: Anomalocarididae
Genus: Anomalocaris
Whiteaves, 1892
Species
  • A. canadensis Whiteaves, 1892
    • =A. whiteavesi Walcott, 1908
    • =A. gigantea Walcott, 1912
    • =A. cranbrookensis Resser, 1929

(10 more unnamed species[2])

Anomalocaris ("unlike other shrimp", or "abnormal shrimp") is an extinct genus of radiodont (anomalocaridid), an order of animals thought to be closely related to ancestral arthropods. The first fossils of Anomalocaris were discovered in the Ogygopsis Shale by Joseph Frederick Whiteaves, with more examples found by Charles Doolittle Walcott in the Burgess Shale.[3] Originally several fossilized parts discovered separately (the mouth, frontal appendages, and trunk) were thought to be three separate creatures, a misapprehension corrected by Harry B. Whittington and Derek Briggs in a 1985 journal article.[3][4] Anomalocaris is thought to be one of the earliest examples of an apex predator, though others have been found in older Cambrian lagerstätten deposits.

Discovery[edit]

Frontal appendage of Anomalocaris canadensis (top) and mouthpiece of Peytoia nathorsti (bottom) from British Columbia. The latter was originally assigned to the former species.

Anomalocaris has been misidentified several times, in part due to its makeup of a mixture of mineralized and unmineralized body parts; the mouth and frontal appendage was considerably harder and more easily fossilized than the delicate body.[5] Anomalocaris fossils were first collected in 1886[6] or 1888[7] by Richard G. McConnell of the Geological Survey of Canada. The specimens were described and named in 1892 by GSC paleontologist Joseph Frederick Whiteaves.[7] The specimens are now known to represent isolated frontal appendages, but Whiteaves interpreted them as the abdomens of phyllocarid crustaceans. Noting its unusual anatomy for the abdomen of a crustacean, Whiteaves gave it the name Anomalocaris, meaning "unlike other shrimps". In 1928, Danish paleontologist Kai Henriksen proposed that Tuzoia, a Burgess Shale arthropod which was known only from the carapace, represented the missing front half of Anomalocaris.[6] The artists Elie Cheverlange and Charles R. Knight followed this interpretation in their depictions of Anomalocaris.[6]

Unbeknownst to scientists at the time, the body parts of relatives of Anomalocaris had already been described but not recognized as such. The first fossilized anomalocaridid mouth was discovered by Charles Doolittle Walcott, who mistook it for a jellyfish and placed it in the genus Peytoia. Walcott also discovered a frontal appendage but failed to realize the similarities to Whiteaves' discovery and instead identified it as feeding appendage or tail of the extinct Sidneyia.[5] In the same publication in which he named Peytoia, Walcott named Laggania, a taxon that he interpreted as a holothurian.

In 1966, the Geological Survey of Canada began a comprehensive revision of the Burgess Shale fossil record, led by Cambridge University paleontologist Harry B. Whittington.[6] In the process of this revision, Whittington and his students Simon Conway Morris and Derek Briggs would discover the true nature of Anomalocaris and its relatives, but not without contributing to the history of misinterpretations first.[5] In 1978, Conway Morris recognized that the mouthparts of Laggania were identical to Peytoia, but concluded that Laggania was a composite fossil made up of Peytoia and the sponge Corralio undulata.[8] In 1979, Briggs recognized that the fossils of Anomalocaris were appendages, not abdomens, and proposed that they were the walking legs of a giant arthropod, and that the feeding appendage Walcott had assigned to Sidneyia was the feeding appendage of Anomalocaris.[9] Later, while clearing what he thought was an unrelated specimen, Harry B. Whittington removed a layer of covering stone to discover the unequivocally connected frontal appendage thought to be a shrimp tail and mouth thought to be a jellyfish.[5][3] Whittington linked the two species, but it took several more years for researchers to realize that the continuously juxtaposed Peytoia, Laggania and frontal appendage actually represented a single, enormous creature. The two genera are now placed into the order Radiodonta, which commonly known as radiodont or anomalocaridid. Because Peytoia was named first, it became the correct name for the entire animal. The original frontal appendage, however, came from a larger species distinct from Peytoia and "Laggania", which retains the name Anomalocaris.[10]

In 2011[11] and 2020,[12] compound eyes of Anomalocaris were recovered from a paleontological dig at Emu Bay on Kangaroo Island, Australia, proving that Anomalocaris was indeed an arthropod as had been suspected. The find also indicated that advanced arthropod eyes had evolved very early, before the evolution of jointed legs or hardened exoskeletons.[11]

In 2021, "A." saron[13] and "A." magnabasis[14] were reassigned to the new genus Houcaris, in the family Tamisiocarididae.[15] In the same year, "A." pennsylvanica was reassigned to the genus Lenisicaris.[2] Multiple phylogenetic analysis also suggest "A". briggsi (tamisiocaridid) and "A". kunmingensis (amplectobeluid) are not species of Anomalocaris as well,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and wait to be renamed as the formal species had been done.[12]

Stephen Jay Gould cites Anomalocaris as one of the fossilized extinct species he believed to be evidence of a much more diverse set of phyla that existed in the Cambrian Period,[5] discussed in his book Wonderful Life, a conclusion disputed by other paleontologists.[3]

Anatomy[edit]

Size estimation of Anomalocaris

For the time in which it lived, Anomalocaris was gigantic, up to 38 centimetres (1.25 feet) long excluding the tail fan and frontal appendages.[19] Previous estimation up to 1 metre (3.3 feet)[23] is unlikely based on the ratio of body parts (body length measured only about 2 and 2.8 times the length of frontal appendage in A. canadensis and A. sp. ELRC 20001, respectively[19]) and the size of largest frontal appendage (up to 18 centimetres (7.1 inches) in length when extended).[5][19] It propelled itself through the water by undulating the flexible flaps on the sides of its body.[24] Each flap sloped below the one more posterior to it,[25] and this overlapping allowed the lobes on each side of the body to act as a single "fin", maximizing the swimming efficiency.[24] The construction of a remote-controlled model showed this mode of swimming to be intrinsically stable,[26] implying that Anomalocaris would not have needed a complex brain to manage balance while swimming. The body was widest between the third and fifth lobe and narrowed towards the tail, with additional 3 pairs of small flaps on the constricted neck region.[6][27] It is difficult to distinguish lobes near the tail, making an accurate count difficult.[25] For the main trunk flaps, the type species A. canadensis had 13 pairs,[27] while an unnamed species from Chengjiang (Anomalocaris sp. ELRC 20001) had at least 11 pairs of them.[26]

Reconstruction of Anomalocaris canadensis, showing multiple head sclerites and setal blades run across the dorsal trunk region.
Oral cones of Anomalocaris (A), Peytoia (B) and Hurdia (C). The former showing unique triradial, tuberculated and wrinkled structures.

Anomalocaris had an unusual disk-like mouth known as oral cone. The oral cone was composed of several plates organized triradially. Three of the plates were quite large. Three to four medium sized plates could be found between each of the large plates, and several small, wrinkled plates between them.[10] Such an oral cone is very different from those of a typical hurdiid radiodont like Peytoia and Hurdia, which is smooth and tetraradial.[10] The mouth resembled a pineapple ring with the center replaced by a series of serrated prongs.[3] The mouth could constrict to crush prey, but never completely close; there was always an opening about 5 millimeters in diameter when the mouth was shut; a centimeter in exceptionally large individuals. Two large frontal appendage were positioned in front of the mouth, at the front of the head. As a shared character across radiodonts,[21] Anomalocaris also possessed three sclerites on the top and side of its head. The top one, known as a head shield, dorsal carapace or H-element, was shaped like an oval, with a distinct rim on the outer edge.[27] The remaining two lateral sclerites, known as P-elements, were also ovoid, but connected by a bar-like outgrowth.[21] The P-elements were previously misinterpreted as two huge compound eyes.[27][21]

Frontal appendages of Anomalocaris, with examples from four different species.

Anomalocaris usually possessed 14 podomeres (segmental units, at least 1 for shaft and 13 for distal articulated region) on each laterally-flattened[27] frontal appendage, almost each one tipped with a pair of endites (ventral spines).[27] The endites themselves were both equipped with multiple auxiliary spines, which branches off from the anterior and posterior margin of the endites.[13][28][29][27][1] The tail was a large tail fan, composed of two[21] or three[6][27] pairs of large, lateral fin-shaped lobes and one terminal lobe-like tailpiece (A. canadensis)[27] or a pair of elongated furcae (A. sp. ELRC 20001).[30] Previous studies suggest the tail fan was used to propel it through Cambrian waters,[3][24] while further hydrodynamic study rather suggest it was more adapted to provide steering function.[31] The gills of the animal, in the form of long, thin, hair-like structures known as lanceolate blades, were arranged in rows forming setal blades. The setal blades were attached by their margin to the top side of the animal, two setal blades per body segment. A divide ran down the middle, separating the gills.[27]

Based on fossilized eyes from the Emu Bay Shale, which belonged to an unnamed Anomalocaris (A. cf. canadensis) from the same stratus[12] (previously thought to be those of "A". briggsi,[11] a species which is unlikely an Anomalocaris[21]), the eyes of Anomalocaris were 30 times more powerful than those of trilobites, long thought to have had the most advanced eyes of any contemporary species. With 16,000 lenses, the resolution of the 3-centimetre-wide (1.2 in) eyes would have been rivalled only by that of the modern dragonfly, which has 28,000 lenses in each eye.[11] Additionally, Anomalocaris had dichromatic Color vision.[32]

Paleobiology[edit]

Diet[edit]

Restoration model of Anomalocaris hunt on Canadaspis.

A long-standing view holds that Anomalocaris fed on hard-bodied animals, making it one of the first predators—and its raptorial frontal appendages mid-gut glands strongly suggest a predatory lifestyle.[33] However, its ability to penetrate mineralized shells, especially those of trilobites has been questioned.[34][10] Some Cambrian trilobites have been found with round or W-shaped "bite" marks, which were identified as being the same shape as the mouthparts of Peytoia (previously misidentified as those of Anomalocaris[35]). Stronger evidence that Anomalocaris ate trilobites comes from coprolite, which contain trilobite parts and are so large that the anomalocarids are the only known organism from that period large enough to have produced them.[35] However, since Anomalocaris lacks any mineralized tissue, it seemed unlikely that it would be able to penetrate the hard, calcified shell of trilobites.[35] Rather, the coprolites may have been produced by a different organisms, such as the trilobites of the genus Redlichia.[28]

The lack of wear on anomalocaridid mouthparts suggests they did not come into regular contact with mineralized trilobite shells, and were possibly better suited to feeding on smaller, soft-bodied organisms by suction, since they would have experienced structural failure if they were used against the armour of trilobites.[34][28] A. canadensis may have been capable of feeding on organisms with hard exoskeletons due to the short, robust spines on its appendages.[28] However, as opposed to Peytoia whose mouthpiece is more rectangular with short protruding spines, the mouthpiece of A. canadensis has a smaller and more irregular opening, not permitting strong biting motions, and indicating a suction-feeding behavior to suck in softer organisms.[10]

One suggested possibility is that anomalocaridids fed by grabbing one end of their prey in their jaws while using their appendages to quickly rock the other end of the animal back and forth. This produced stresses that exploited the weaknesses of arthropod cuticles, causing the prey's exoskeleton to rupture and allowing the predator to access its innards.[35] This behaviour was originally thought to have provided an evolutionary pressure for trilobites to roll up, to avoid being flexed until they snapped.[35]

Anomalocaris magnabasis, a large species of Anomalocaris discovered south of the Burgess Shale, had spinules projecting from the spine base. These small, thin spines would have allowed Anomalocaris magnabasis to be a more effective hunter of soft bodied prey, able to pick up and quickly ensnare priapulids and other animals that lacked a hard shell.[14]

Paleoecology[edit]

Anomalocaris canadensis lived in the Burgess Shale in relatively great numbers, though comparable fossils have been found elsewhere, suggesting a more expansive range over the Laurentian continent.[1] In the Burgess Shale, Anomalocaris is more common in the older sections, notably the Mount Stephen trilobite beds. However, in the younger sections, such as the Phyllopod bed, Anomalocaris could reach much greater sizes; roughly twice the size of its older, trilobite bed relatives. These rare giant specimens have previously been referred to a separate species, Anomalocaris gigantea; however, the validity of this species has been called into question, and is currently dubious.[23]

Other species attributed to Anomalocaris live in vastly different environments. Anomalocaris saron and Anomalocaris kunmingensis lived in the Maotianshan Shales, a shallow tropical sea in what is now modern China. Anomalocaris briggsi lived in a comparable environment; the shallow, tropical waters of Cambrian Australia. The Maotianshan Shale and the Emu Bay Shale are very close in proximity, being separated by a small landmass, far from the Burgess Shale.[36]

See also[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Lerosey-Aubril R, Hegna TA, Babcock LE, Bonino E, Kier C (2014-05-19). "Arthropod appendages from the Weeks Formation Konservat-Lagerstätte: new occurrences of anomalocaridids in the Cambrian of Utah, USA". Bulletin of Geosciences: 269–282. doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1442.
  2. ^ a b Wu, Y.; Ma, J.; Lin, W.; Sun, A.; Zhang, X.; Fu, D. (2021). "New anomalocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta) from the lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte: Biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 569: Article 110333. Bibcode:2021PPP...569k0333W. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110333.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Conway Morris S (1998). The crucible of creation: the Burgess Shale and the rise of animals. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. pp. 56–9. ISBN 978-0-19-850256-2.
  4. ^ Whittington HB, Briggs DE (1985). "The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 309 (1141): 569–609. Bibcode:1985RSPTB.309..569W. doi:10.1098/rstb.1985.0096.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Gould SJ (1989). Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W.W. Norton. pp. 194–206. ISBN 978-0-393-02705-1.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Collins, Desmond (1996). "The "Evolution" of Anomalocaris and Its Classification in the Arthropod Class Dinocarida (nov.) and Order Radiodonta (nov.)". Journal of Paleontology. 70 (2): 280–293. doi:10.1017/S0022336000023362. JSTOR 1306391.
  7. ^ a b Whiteaves, J. F. (1892). "Description of a new genus and species of phyllocarid Crustacea from the Middle Cambrian of Mount Stephen, B. C.". The Canadian Record of Science. 5 (4).
  8. ^ Conway Morris, S. (1978). "Laggania cambria Walcott: A Composite Fossil". Journal of Paleontology. 52 (1): 126–131. JSTOR 1303799.
  9. ^ Briggs, D. E. G. (1979). "Anomalocaris, the largest known Cambrian arthropod". Palaeontology. 22 (3): 631–664.
  10. ^ a b c d e Daley AC, Bergström J (June 2012). "The oral cone of Anomalocaris is not a classic peytoia". Die Naturwissenschaften. 99 (6): 501–4. Bibcode:2012NW.....99..501D. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0910-8. PMID 22476406. S2CID 2042726.
  11. ^ a b c d Paterson JR, García-Bellido DC, Lee MS, Brock GA, Jago JB, Edgecombe GD (December 2011). "Acute vision in the giant Cambrian predator Anomalocaris and the origin of compound eyes". Nature. 480 (7376): 237–40. Bibcode:2011Natur.480..237P. doi:10.1038/nature10689. PMID 22158247. S2CID 2568029.
  12. ^ a b c Paterson, John R.; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; García-Bellido, Diego C. (2020-12-01). "Disparate compound eyes of Cambrian radiodonts reveal their developmental growth mode and diverse visual ecology". Science Advances. 6 (49): eabc6721. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6721P. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc6721. hdl:10141/622906. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 7821881. PMID 33268353.
  13. ^ a b Xian‐Guang, Hou; Bergström, Jan; Ahlberg, Per (1995-09-01). "Anomalocaris and other large animals in the lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of southwest China". GFF. 117 (3): 163–183. doi:10.1080/11035899509546213. ISSN 1103-5897.
  14. ^ a b Pates S, Daley AC, Edgecombe GD, Cong P, Lieberman BS (2019). "Systematics, preservation and biogeography of radiodonts from the southern Great Basin, USA, during the upper Dyeran (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4)". Papers in Palaeontology. 7: 235–262. doi:10.1002/spp2.1277.
  15. ^ Wu, Yu; Fu, Dongjing; Ma, Jiaxin; Lin, Weiliang; Sun, Ao; Zhang, Xingliang (2021). "Houcaris gen. nov. from the early Cambrian (Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte expanded the palaeogeographical distribution of tamisiocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta)". PalZ. 95 (2): 209–221. doi:10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4. ISSN 1867-6812. S2CID 235221043.
  16. ^ Vinther J, Stein M, Longrich NR, Harper DA (March 2014). "A suspension-feeding anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian" (PDF). Nature. 507 (7493): 496–9. Bibcode:2014Natur.507..496V. doi:10.1038/nature13010. PMID 24670770. S2CID 205237459.
  17. ^ Cong, Peiyun; Ma, Xiaoya; Hou, Xianguang; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Strausfeld, Nicholas J. (2014). "Brain structure resolves the segmental affinity of anomalocaridid appendages". Nature. 513 (7519): 538–542. Bibcode:2014Natur.513..538C. doi:10.1038/nature13486. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 25043032. S2CID 4451239.
  18. ^ Van Roy P, Daley AC, Briggs DE (June 2015). "Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps". Nature. 522 (7554): 77–80. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...77V. doi:10.1038/nature14256. PMID 25762145. S2CID 205242881.
  19. ^ a b c d Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Pates, Stephen (2018-09-14). "New suspension-feeding radiodont suggests evolution of microplanktivory in Cambrian macronekton". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 3774. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3774L. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06229-7. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6138677. PMID 30218075.
  20. ^ Liu, Jianni; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Steiner, Michael; Dunlop, Jason A; Shu, Degan; Paterson, John R (2018-11-01). "Origin of raptorial feeding in juvenile euarthropods revealed by a Cambrian radiodontan". National Science Review. 5 (6): 863–869. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwy057. ISSN 2095-5138.
  21. ^ a b c d e f Moysiuk J, Caron JB (August 2019). "A new hurdiid radiodont from the Burgess Shale evinces the exploitation of Cambrian infaunal food sources". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 286 (1908): 20191079. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1079. PMC 6710600. PMID 31362637.
  22. ^ Moysiuk, Joseph; Caron, Jean-Bernard (2021). "Exceptional multifunctionality in the feeding apparatus of a mid-Cambrian radiodont". Paleobiology: 1–21. doi:10.1017/pab.2021.19. ISSN 0094-8373.
  23. ^ a b BRIGGS, D. E. G. 1979. Anomalocaris, the largest known Cambrian arthropod. Palaeontology, 22, 3, 631–664.
  24. ^ a b c Usami Y (January 2006). "Theoretical study on the body form and swimming pattern of Anomalocaris based on hydrodynamic simulation". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 238 (1): 11–7. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.008. PMID 16002096.
  25. ^ a b Whittington HB, Briggs DE (1985). "The Largest Cambrian Animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (free full text). 309 (1141): 569–609. Bibcode:1985RSPTB.309..569W. doi:10.1098/rstb.1985.0096.
  26. ^ a b Briggs DE (May 1994). "Giant predators from the cambrian of china". Science. 264 (5163): 1283–4. Bibcode:1994Sci...264.1283B. doi:10.1126/science.264.5163.1283. PMID 17780843.
  27. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Daley AC, Edgecombe GD (January 2014). "Morphology of Anomalocaris canadensis from the Burgess Shale". Journal of Paleontology. 88 (1): 68–91. doi:10.1666/13-067. S2CID 86683798.
  28. ^ a b c d Daley AC, Paterson JR, Edgecombe GD, García-Bellido DC, Jago JB (2013). Donoghue P (ed.). "New anatomical information on Anomalocaris from the Cambrian Emu Bay Shale of South Australia and a reassessment of its inferred predatory habits". Palaeontology: n/a. doi:10.1111/pala.12029.
  29. ^ Liu, Qing (2013-09-01). "The first discovery of anomalocaridid appendages from the Balang Formation (Cambrian Series 2) in Hunan, China". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 37 (3): 338–343. doi:10.1080/03115518.2013.753767. ISSN 0311-5518. S2CID 129212098.
  30. ^ Chen, J.-y.; Ramskold, L.; Zhou, G.-q. (1994-05-27). "Evidence for Monophyly and Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators". Science. 264 (5163): 1304–1308. Bibcode:1994Sci...264.1304C. doi:10.1126/science.264.5163.1304. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17780848. S2CID 1913482.
  31. ^ Sheppard, K A; Rival, D E; Caron, J -B (2018-10-01). "On the Hydrodynamics of Anomalocaris Tail Fins". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 58 (4): 703–711. doi:10.1093/icb/icy014. hdl:1974/22737. ISSN 1540-7063. PMID 29697774.
  32. ^ Fleming JF, Kristensen RM, Sørensen MV, Park TS, Arakawa K, Blaxter M, et al. (December 2018). "Molecular palaeontology illuminates the evolution of ecdysozoan vision". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 285 (1892): 20182180. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2180. PMC 6283943. PMID 30518575.
  33. ^ Vannier J, Liu J, Lerosey-Aubril R, Vinther J, Daley AC (May 2014). "Sophisticated digestive systems in early arthropods". Nature Communications. 5 (1): 3641. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.3641V. doi:10.1038/ncomms4641. PMID 24785191.
  34. ^ a b Hagadorn JW (August 2009). "Taking a Bite out of Anomalocaris" (PDF). In Smith MR, O'Brien LJ, Caron J (eds.). Abstract Volume. International Conference on the Cambrian Explosion (Walcott 2009). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Burgess Shale Consortium (published 31 July 2009). ISBN 978-0-9812885-1-2.
  35. ^ a b c d e Nedin C (1999). "Anomalocaris predation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites". Geology. 27 (11): 987–990. Bibcode:1999Geo....27..987N. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0987:APONAM>2.3.CO;2.
  36. ^ Jeanes J. "Mapping the world's Burgess Shale-type deposits". www.virtualmuseum.ca. Retrieved 2019-09-16.

External links[edit]