|Part of a series on|
Anti-intellectualism is hostility towards and mistrust of intellect, intellectuals, and intellectual pursuits, usually expressed as the derision of education, philosophy, literature, art, and science, as impractical and contemptible. Alternatively, self-described intellectuals who are alleged to fail to adhere to rigorous standards of scholarship may be described as anti-intellectuals, although pseudo-intellectualism is a more commonly, and perhaps more accurately, used description for this phenomenon.
In public discourse, anti-intellectuals are usually perceived and publicly present themselves as champions of the common folk—populists against political elitism and academic elitism—proposing that the educated are a social class detached from the everyday concerns of the majority, and that they dominate political discourse and higher education.
Because "anti-intellectual" can be pejorative, defining specific cases of anti-intellectualism can be troublesome; one can object to specific facets of intellectualism or the application thereof without being dismissive of intellectual pursuits in general. Moreover, allegations of anti-intellectualism can constitute an appeal to authority or an appeal to ridicule that attempts to discredit an opponent rather than specifically addressing his or her arguments.
Anti-intellectualism has been used by totalitarian dictatorships to oppress political dissent. Perhaps its most extreme political form was during the 1970s in Cambodia under the rule of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, when people were killed for being academics or even for merely wearing eyeglasses (as it suggested literacy) in the Killing Fields.
During the Spanish Civil War and the following dictatorship, General Francisco Franco's civilian repression, the White Terror campaign, killed an estimated 200,000 civilians, heavily targeting writers, artists, teachers and professors.
- 1 Distrust of intellectuals
- 2 Authoritarianism
- 3 Educational anti-intellectualism
- 4 In the United States
- 4.1 17th century
- 4.2 19th century
- 4.3 21st Century
- 5 In Europe
- 6 In Asia
- 7 See also
- 8 Footnotes
- 9 Further reading
- 10 External links
Distrust of intellectuals
Economist Thomas Sowell argues for distinctions between unreasonable and reasonable wariness of intellectuals. Defining intellectuals as "people whose occupations deal primarily with ideas" as distinct from those who apply ideas practically, Sowell argues that there can be good cause for distrust of intellectuals. When working in their fields of expertise, intellectuals have increased knowledge. However, when compared to other careers, Sowell suggests intellectuals have few disincentives for speaking outside their expertise, and are less likely to face the consequences of their errors. For example, a physician is judged by effective treatment, yet might face malpractice lawsuits if he harms a patient. In contrast, a university professor with tenure is less likely to be judged by the effectiveness of his ideas and less likely to face repercussions for his errors:
By encouraging, or even requiring, students to take stands where they have neither the knowledge nor the intellectual training to seriously examine complex issues, teachers promote the expression of unsubstantiated opinions, the venting of uninformed emotions, and the habit of acting on those opinions and emotions, while ignoring or dismissing opposing views, without having either the intellectual equipment or the personal experience to weigh one view against another in any serious way.
Sowell discusses intellectual influence, labeling schoolteachers as what he calls "intelligentsia" who recruit children, beginning in elementary school, to advocate for or against issues as part of "community service" projects, which will later assist them in the college application process. In this manner, intellectuals participate in other areas where they may possess no prior knowledge at all in order to influence public policy issues. The author argues that as a result, they encourage their students to formulate opinions "without any intellectual training or prior knowledge of those issues, making constraints against falsity few or non-existent."
Similar arguments have been made by others. Historian Paul Johnson argued that a close examination of 20th-century history reveals that intellectuals have championed innumerable disastrous public policies, writing, "beware intellectuals. Not merely should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice." Journalist Tom Wolfe described an intellectual as "a person knowledgeable in one field who speaks out only in others."
Such views form the basis of an episode of the American animation series The Simpsons, "They Saved Lisa's Brain", in which one of the protagonists joins the local branch of Mensa that through a bizarre series of events, subsequently finds itself in complete charge of the local town of Springfield. Considering themselves to be intellectually superior to the rest of the townsfolk, they high-handedly implement a series of ostensibly logical but socially disruptive public policies that antagonize the rest of the town, with disastrous consequences, and are eventually rebuked by Stephen Hawking who appeared as himself.
In the 20th century, intellectuals were systematically demoted or expelled from the power structures, and, occasionally, assassinated, such as with Václav Havel, who was ostracized and made to appear untrustworthy in the Czech Republic. In Argentina in 1966, the military dictatorship of Juan Carlos Onganía intervened and dislodged many faculties, leading to a massive brain drain in an event which was called The Night of the Long Police Batons. The biochemist César Milstein reports that when the military usurped Argentine government, they declared: "our country would be put in order, as soon as all the intellectuals who were meddling in the region were expelled". In Brazil, the educator Paulo Freire was banished for being ignorant, according to the organizers of the coup d’ État of the moment.
Extreme ideological dictatorships, such as the Khmer Rouge regime in Kampuchea (1975–79), killed potential opponents with more than elementary education. In achieving their Year Zero social engineering of Cambodia, they assassinated anyone suspected of "involvement in free-market activities". The suspected Cambodian populace included professionals and almost every educated man and woman, city-dwellers, and people with connections to foreign governments. Doctrinally, the Khmer Rouge designated the farmers as the true proletariat, as the true representatives of the working class, hence the anti-intellectual purge.
Governmental anti-intellectualism ranges from closing public libraries and public schools, to segregating intellectuals in an Ivory Tower ghetto, to official declarations that intellectuals tend to mental illness, thus facilitating psychiatric imprisonment, then scapegoating to divert popular discontent from the dictatorship (see the Fascist Italy, cf. Antonio Gramsci).
Moreover, anti-intellectualism is neither always violent, nor oppressive, because most any social group can exercise contempt for intellect, intellectualism, and education. To wit, the Uruguayan writer Jorge Majfud said that "this contempt, that arises from a power installed in the social institutions and from the inferiority complex of its actors, is not a property of "underdeveloped" countries. In fact, it is always the critical intellectuals, writers, or artists who head the top-ten lists of 'The Most Stupid of the Stupid' in the country."
In the English-speaking world, especially in the US, critics like David Horowitz (viz. the David Horowitz Freedom Center), William Bennett, an ex-US secretary of education, and paleoconservative activist Patrick Buchanan, criticize schools and universities as 'intellectualist'.
- the two most salient traits of the radical movement are its anti-intellectualism and its hostility to the university as an institution. [...] Intellectuals by definition are people who take ideas seriously for their own sake. Whether or not a theory is true or false is important to them independently of any practical applications it may have. [Intellectuals] have, as Richard Hofstadter has pointed out, an attitude to ideas that is at once playful and pious. But in the radical movement, the intellectual ideal of knowledge for its own sake is rejected. Knowledge is seen as valuable only as a basis for action, and it is not even very valuable there. Far more important than what one knows is how one feels.
In 1972, sociologist Stanislav Andreski warned readers of academic works to be wary of appeals to authority when academics make questionable claims, writing, "do not be impressed by the imprint of a famous publishing house or the volume of an author's publications. [...] Remember that the publishers want to keep the printing presses busy and do not object to nonsense if it can be sold."
Critics have alleged that much of the prevailing philosophy in American academia (i.e., postmodernism and poststructuralism) are anti-intellectual: "The displacement of the idea that facts and evidence matter by the idea that everything boils down to subjective interests and perspectives is—second only to American political campaigns—the most prominent and pernicious manifestation of anti-intellectualism in our time."
In the notorious Sokal Hoax of the 1990s, physicist Alan Sokal submitted a deliberately preposterous paper to Duke University's Social Text journal to test if, as he later wrote, a leading "culture studies" periodical would "publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions." Social Text published the paper, seemingly without noting any of the paper's abundant mathematical and scientific errors, leading Sokal to declare that "my little experiment demonstrate[s], at the very least, that some fashionable sectors of the American academic Left have been getting intellectually lazy."
In a 1995 interview, social critic Camille Paglia described the "cultural elite" (including herself) as "a parasitic class," arguing that during widespread social disruption "the only thing holding this culture together will be masculine men of the working class. The cultural elite—women and men—will be pleading for the plumbers and the construction workers."
In the United States
In The Powring Out of the Seven Vials (1642), the Puritan John Cotton wrote that 'the more learned and witty you bee, the more fit to act for Satan will you bee. ... Take off the fond doting ... upon the learning of the Jesuits, and the glorie of the Episcopacy, and the brave estates of the Prelates. I say bee not deceived by these pompes, empty shewes, and faire representations of goodly condition before the eyes of flesh and blood, bee not taken with the applause of these persons.' Not every Puritan concurred with Cotton's contempt for secular education; some founded universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Dartmouth.
Economist Thomas Sowell argues that American anti-intellectualism can be traced to the early Colonial era, and that wariness of the educated upper-classes is understandable given that America was built, in large part, by people fleeing persecution and brutality at the hands of the educated upper classes. Additionally, rather few intellectuals possessed the practical hands-on skills required to survive in the New World, leading to a deeply rooted suspicion of those who may appear to specialize in "verbal virtuosity" rather than tangible, measurable products or services:
From its colonial beginnings, American society was a "decapitated" society—largely lacking the topmost social layers of European society. The highest elites and the titled aristocracies had little reason to risk their lives crossing the Atlantic and then face the perils of pioneering. Most of the white population of colonial America arrived as indentured servants and the black population as slaves. Later waves of immigrants were disproportionately peasants and proletarians, even when they came from Western Europe [...] The rise of American society to pre-eminence as an economic, political and military power was thus the triumph of the common man and a slap across the face to the presumptions of the arrogant, whether an elite of blood or books.
The source, Thomas Sowell, describes the effect the American Revolution had on the development of American government, as established by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. In his opinion, the tendency to "disregard" the impartiality of the law depending upon "who you are" rather than what the author describes as the impartiality of the "supremacy of the law" conflicts with the American creed of the common man. According to Sowell, this fundamental right uniquely distinguishes the American character, forged by "the beaten men of beaten races," from that of the arrogant and privileged elites of the European aristocracy.
In the history of American anti-intellectualism, modern scholars suggest that 19th-century popular culture is important, because, when most of the populace lived a rural life of manual labour and agricultural work, a 'bookish' education, concerned with the Græco-Roman classics, was perceived as of impractical value, ergo unprofitable—yet Americans, generally, were literate and read Shakespeare for pleasure—thus, the ideal "American" man was technically skilled and successful in his trade, ergo a productive member of society. Culturally, the ideal American was a self-made man whose knowledge derived from life-experience, not an intellectual man, whose knowledge derived from books, formal education, and academic study; thus, in The New Purchase, or Seven and a Half Years in the Far West (1843), the Reverend Bayard R. Hall, A.M., said about frontier Indiana:
"We always preferred an ignorant bad man to a talented one, and, hence, attempts were usually made to ruin the moral character of a smart candidate; since, unhappily, smartness and wickedness were supposed to be generally coupled, and [like-wise] incompetence and goodness."
Yet, the egghead's worldly redemption was possible if he embraced mainstream mores; thus, in the fiction of O. Henry, a character noted that once an East Coast university graduate 'gets over' his intellectual vanity—no longer thinks himself better than others—he makes just as good a cowboy as any other young man, despite his counterpart being the slow-witted naïf of good heart, a pop culture stereotype from stage shows.
Anti-intellectualism has continued to remain relevant in the 21st century. Political polarization is the most dramatic it has been in recent history, with each party – Republican and Democrat – holding the highest unfavorable view of the opposing party in the last 20 years. Anti-intellectualism, as a result, has become an effective political tool used to undermine the opposing party’s representation of the middle class.
Richard Hofstadter, in his 1963 book, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, describes anti-intellectualism as the response to the political elite by the “mob,” or growing middle class. As the middle class expanded, so did the belief that the ideal political candidate was the “self-made man,” not someone born into wealth and was well educated. It was the self-made man who could be trusted to act in the best interest of their fellow citizens.
Francis Hsu observed that American egalitarianism is considerably stronger than in Europe, e.g. in England,
“English individualism developed hand in hand with legal equality. American self-reliance, on the other hand, has been inseparable from an insistence upon economic and social as well as political equality. The result is that a qualified individualism, with a qualified equality, has prevailed in England, but what has been considered the unalienable right of every American is unrestricted self-reliance and, at least ideally, unrestricted equality. The English, therefore, tend to respect class-based distinctions in birth, wealth, status, manners, and speech, while Americans resent them.”
The resentment described above can now also be seen in current discussions regarding the media and science. Topics that are largely accepted by the general public elsewhere around the world are being used politically in the United States, e.g. climate science. Anti-intellectualism continues to be used to frame modern politics as a battle between “us and “them,” or the general public versus the elite. Woodrow Wilson, speaking as governor of New Jersey in 1912, described this battle as follows,
"What I fear is a government of experts. God forbid that in a democratic country we should resign the task and give the government over to experts. What are we for if we are to be scientifically taken care of by a small number of gentlemen who are the only men who understand the job?"
Ultimately, as sources and access of news and information have changed, so has the general's public understanding of the world. Anti-intellectualism in the 21st century can be analyzed from a variety of viewpoints and topics as individuals attempt to understand its pervasiveness in modern American society.
21st Century Adaptations
When discussing the meaning of the word anti-intellectualism in the 21st century, the word has evolved over a century’s old definition. Anti-Intellectualism was seen in a negative light due to the mistrust of wealth and upper class individuals trying to inform the general public. However, today, the word has taken on a more modern context with terms that are commonly used such as “alternative facts” “fake news” and “post-truth politics”. These definitions have also played part in the modern understanding and distrust of factual information, which plays into the greater term of anti-intellectualism in its most modern form.
21st Century Statistics
Some alarming statistics show the devastating results that the trend of anti-intellectualism has generated in the 21st century. People deny climate change on a consistent basis as a means of being at odds with the scientific community. One in four Americans think that the sun revolves around the earth and 35 percent of Americans in 2014 could not name a single branch of American government.
In Education, the ranking of the United States is 52nd out of 139 nations pertaining to the quality of instruction. Additionally, the United States no longer leads the world with the number of young adults with college degrees, as it is now in 12th place. Anti-intellectualism refers to the general disregard for intellectualism and unfavorable opinion on the importance of academic and intellectual thinking and pursuits. Some academics have stated that the rise of anti-intellectualism has resulted in a rise of college cheating as students do not want to partake in academic work and are not critically thinking about the ethical repercussions of cheating.
21st Century Mass Media
The mass-media of the 21st century played into anti-intellectualism in the US by reporting on higher education and intellectualism. Dane Claussen wrote about how many news sources focused on all of the things students were doing while in college except for the intellectual pursuits. They consistently reported on college being for fun, dating, and social development, while neglecting the academic aspects. During protests and social movements, the students were cast in a bad light by much of print media during the 20th century, which minimized their views, making it harder for the public to take them seriously.
Dane Claussen uses the following quote from Daniel Rigney, an American sociologist, to demonstrate how the media is able to influence the public's perception:
The effects of mass media on attitudes toward intellect are certainly multiple and ambiguous. On the one hand, mass communication greatly expand the sheer volume of information available for public consumption. On the other hand, much of this information comes preinterpreted for easy digestion and laden with hidden assumption, saving consumers the work of having to interpret it for themselves. Commodified information naturally tends to reflect the assumptions and interests of those who produce it, and its producers are not driven entirely by a passion to promote critical reflection.
The 21st century media researched by Claussen was also reporting on intellectualism in a way that distanced the public from intellectuals. Many of the stories that Claussen found detailed students that performed exceptionally well. These stories often objectified students like this, making them something to be looked at as an oddity, but not a status attainable by the average person. By reporting on these students in this way, they have played a part in contributing to the view that intellectualism is a form of deviancy that should be avoided so as not to attract ridicule.
Another possible producer of anti-intellectualism is the way in which certain medias, such as the news, portray intellectuals. Studies have found that highly intellectual individuals are often vilified or portrayed as irregular in the news, leading some to reject intellectualism. Pejorative terms like egghead continue to be used in modern-day criticisms of the intellectual body, further vilifying these individuals as out-of-touch and lacking of common sense.
With Americans having increasing access in the digital age in the 21st century, an increasing amount of individuals are getting their news from social media, in which it becomes very easy to confuse fact from fiction. Because individuals now have social media, there has been a greater propensity to consider oneself an expert which leads to a rejection of classical and traditional thought and study.
Confirmation Bias and Anti-Intellectualism
Confirmation bias is the phenomenon that reaffirms our self accepted ideas and creates hostility and mistrust to those other ideas that we do not expose ourselves to, thus showing a symptom of anti-intellectualism. The rejection of outside knowledge, facts and points of view is likewise a trait of an anti-intellectualist. There is less willingness to learn about the world. With the increase of social media, it is easy to find an article that affirms one's own beliefs.
21st Century Anti-intellectualism and Science
Another trend that can demonstrate the growing trend of anti-intellectualism in the 21st Century is the distrust of scientists as experts. In recent polls, a gap is shown between the acknowledgement of scientists making advancement in human lives and the actual facts that scientists put forward that people are willing to believe.
Anti-intellectualism vs. Climate Science
In America, the anti-intellectualism movement plays into the denial of climate science or climate change. The anti-intellectual movement makes moves to target scientists in an attempt to "politicize their work." The "democratization of information" of scientific research and studies puts scientist in the public view aligned with either liberal or traditionalist views. Only a third of American citizens believe that climate scientists truly have knowledge about climate change; and less feel that scientists know the correct way to end global climate change. Only 39% of Americans trust the information given by climate scientists. Over 53% of Republicans in the House of Representatives and 74% in the United States Senate deny the existence of climate change.
The rise of anti-intellectualism, especially in rural America, can be linked to the popularity of fundamentalist religion. Popular factions of Christianity such as the main Protestant denominations and the Roman Catholic Church have issued direct support of actions for climate change, while, Southern Baptist preachers and Evangelicals, have denounced the belief of climate change and have attacked its scientists, describing them as attempting to create "neo-nature paganism." There is also a reported direct link between a rate of denial or ambivalence to climate change in religiously dominated communities. People with a high belief in religion to the fundamentalist extreme also report seeing no real evidence for global warming.
Critique From Notable Figures
In the 21st century there have been other notable figures that have addressed the growing trend of anti-intellectualism. Bill Maher, a popular comedian, had a segment on his show Real Time with Bill Maher Real Time with Bill Maher, pleading to “Make America Learn Again.” Isaac Asimov, a notable writer and professor of Biochemistry, was quoted, “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
In the first decade after the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks suspected the Tsarist intelligentsia as potentially traitorous of the proletariat, thus, the initial Soviet government comprised men and women without much formal education. Vladimir Lenin derided the old intelligentsia with the expression: 'We never graduated from any academies' (мы академиев не кончали). Moreover, the deposed propertied classes were termed Lishentsy ("the disenfranchised"), whose children were excluded from education; eventually, some 200 Tsarist intellectuals such as writers, philosophers, scientists, and engineers were deported to Germany on Philosophers' ships in 1922; others were deported to Latvia and to Turkey in 1923.
During the revolutionary period, the pragmatic Bolsheviks employed "bourgeois experts" to manage the economy, industry, and agriculture, and so learn from them. After the Russian Civil War (1917–22), to achieve socialism, the USSR (1922–91) emphasised literacy and education in service to modernising the country via an educated working class intelligentsia, rather than an Ivory Tower intelligentsia. During the 1930s and the 1950s, Joseph Stalin replaced Lenin's intelligentsia with a "communist" intelligentsia, loyal to him and with a specifically Soviet world view, thereby for a while producing the worst examples of Soviet anti-intellectualism — the pseudoscientific theories of Lysenkoism and Japhetic theory, most damaging to biology and linguistics in that country.
The idealist philosopher Giovanni Gentile established the intellectual basis of Fascist ideology with the autoctisi (self-realisation) via concrete thinking that distinguished between the good (active) intellectual and the bad (passive) intellectual:
Fascism combats ... not intelligence, but intellectualism... which is... a sickness of the intellect... not a consequence of its abuse, because the intellect cannot be used too much... it derives from the false belief that one can segregate oneself from life.— Giovanni Gentile, addressing a Congress of Fascist Culture, Bologna, 30 March 1925
To counter the "passive intellectual" who used his or her intellect abstractly, and therefore was "decadent", he proposed the "concrete thinking" of the active intellectual who applied intellect as praxis—a "man of action", like Fascist Benito Mussolini, versus the decadent Communist intellectual Antonio Gramsci. The passive intellectual stagnates intellect by objectifying ideas, thus establishing them as objects. Hence the Fascist rejection of materialist logic, because it relies upon a priori principles improperly counter-changed with a posteriori ones that are irrelevant to the matter-in-hand in deciding whether or not to act.
In the praxis of Gentile's concrete thinking criteria, such consideration of the a priori toward the properly a posteriori constitutes impractical, decadent intellectualism. Moreover, this fascist philosophy occurred parallel to Actual Idealism, his philosophic system; he opposed intellectualism for its being disconnected from the active intelligence that gets things done, i.e. thought is killed when its constituent parts are labelled, and thus rendered as discrete entities.
Related to this, is the confrontation between the Spanish franquist General, Millán Astray, and the writer Miguel de Unamuno during the Dia de la Raza celebration at the University of Salamanca, in 1936, during the Spanish Civil War. The General exclaimed: ¡Muera la inteligencia! ¡Viva la Muerte! ("Death to intelligence! Long live death!"); the Falangists applauded.
Qin Shi Huang (246–210 BC), the first Emperor of unified China, consolidated political thought, and power, by suppressing freedom of speech at the suggestion of Chancellor Li Si, who justified such anti-intellectualism by accusing the intelligentsia of falsely praising the emperor, and of dissenting through libel. From 213 to 206 BC, it was generally thought that the works of the Hundred Schools of Thought were incinerated, especially the Shi Jing (Classic of Poetry, c. 1000 BC) and the Shujing (Classic of History, c. 6th century BC). The exceptions were books by Qin historians, and books of Legalism, an early type of totalitarianism—and the Chancellor's philosophic school (see the Burning of books and burying of scholars). However, upon further inspection of Chinese historical annals such as the Shi Ji and the Han Shu, this was found not to be the case. The Qin Empire privately kept one copy of each of these books in the Imperial Library but it publicly ordered that the books should be banned. Those who owned copies were ordered to surrender the books to be burned; those who refused were executed. This eventually led to the loss of most ancient works of literature and philosophy when Xiang Yu burned down the Qin palace in 208BC.
People's Republic of China
The Cultural Revolution was a politically violent decade (1966–76) of wide-ranging social engineering of the People's Republic of China by its leader Chairman Mao. After several national policy crises, Mao, to regain public prestige and control of the Communist Party of China (CPC), on 16 May 1966, announced that the Party and Chinese society were permeated with liberal bourgeois elements who meant to restore capitalism to China, and that said people could only be removed with post–revolutionary class struggle. To that effect, China's youth nationally organised into Red Guards, hunting the liberal bourgeois elements subverting the CCP and Chinese society. The Red Guards acted nationally, purging the country, the military, urban workers, and the leaders of the CCP. The Red Guards were particularly aggressive in attacking their teachers and professors, causing most schools and universities to be shut down once the Cultural Revolution began. Three years later, in 1969, Mao declared the Cultural Revolution ended; yet the political intrigues continued until 1976, concluding with the arrest of the Gang of Four, the de facto end of the Cultural Revolution.
When the Communist Party of Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge (1951–81), established their regime as Democratic Kampuchea (1975–1979) in Cambodia, their anti-intellectualism which idealised the country and demonised the cities was immediately imposed on the country in order to establish agrarian socialism, thus, they emptied cities in order to purge the Khmer nation of every traitor, enemy of the state, and intellectual, often symbolised by eyeglasses (see the Killing Fields).
In the early stages of the Armenian Genocide of 1915, around 2,300 Armenian intellectuals were deported from Constantinople (Istanbul) and subsequently mostly murdered by the Ottoman government. The event has been described by historians as a decapitation strike, which intended to deprive the Armenian population of an intellectual leadership and a chance of resistance.
- "It is all too easy for people with more formal schooling to believe they know better than those directly involved [in a particular problem]," Sowell, 2001.[full citation needed]
- Courtois, Stephanie. The Black Book of Communism. p. 601.
- "Trial of the Khmer Rogue". Archived from the original on 2012-04-22.
- Sowell, Thomas (2009). Intellectuals and Society. Basic Books. ISBN 9780465019489. Retrieved 16 November 2013.[pages needed]
- Sowell (2009), p. 296.
- Johnson, Paul (2009-10-13). Intellectuals. HarperCollins. ISBN 9780061871474. Retrieved 16 November 2013.
- Wolfe, Tom. (2000). "In the Land of the Rococo Marxists," Harper's Monthly, June 2000.
- "Václav Havel".
- Police repression at the Universidad de Buenos Aires - University of Toronto
- (Spanish) La noche de los bastones largos Archived May 14, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.
- Political Affairs Magazine - Power and the Intellectuals Archived September 27, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Horowitz Rocks Leftist Academia at Stanford".
- Searle, John R. (1971). The Campus Wars, Chapter 2: The Students, URL retrieved 14 June 2010.
- Stanislav Andreski, The Social Sciences as Sorcery. 1972, The University of California Press
- Larry Laudan, Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science (1990), University of Chicago Press
- Sokal, Alan D. (May 1996). "A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies". Lingua Franca. Archived from the original on 26 March 2007. Retrieved April 3, 2007.
- Hofstadter, Richard Anti-intellectualism in American Life (1962), p. 46.
- Sowell, Thomas. (2001) The Quest for Cosmic Justice. Simon and Schuster, 2001, ISBN 978-0-7432-1507-7, p. 187.
- Sowell (2001), p. 187
- Vinovskis, Maris. "Schooling and Poor Children in 19th-Century America". American Behavioral Scientist.
- "7 things to know about polarization in America". Pew Research Center. 2014-06-12. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Hofstadter, Richard (1963). Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. United States of America: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0394415353.
- Wood, Gordon (2011). Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199832463.
- Hsu, Francis (1980). Americans and Chinese: Passages to Differences. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 082480757X.
- Stokes, Bruce; Wike, Richard; Carle, Jill (2015-11-05). "Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Dreger, Jonas (2014). Introduction: The Tension between Science and Politics. Palgrave Macmillian UK. ISBN 978-1-349-47918-4.
- Sowell, Thomas (2001). The Quest for Cosmic Justice. Free Press. ISBN 9780743215077.
- Sample, Ian; editor, science (2015-01-29). "Many Americans reject evolution, deny climate change and find GM food unsafe, survey finds". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "1 In 4 Americans Thinks The Sun Goes Around The Earth, Survey Says". NPR.org. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "A Shocking Number Of Americans Don't Know Basic Facts About The US Government". Business Insider. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America The rise of "alternative facts," and opinions replacing science and real facts".
- Rafik, Elias. "The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students' Perceptions of Cheating". Journal of Business Ethics.
- Dane, Claussen (2004). Anti-Intellectualism in American Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. pp. 197–198. ISBN 0-8204-5721-3.
- Dane, Claussen (2004). Anti-Intellectualism in American Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. p. 43. ISBN 0-8204-5721-3.
- Rigney, Daniel (1991). "Three kinds of anti-intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter". Sociological Inquiry. 61: 431–451.
- Dane, Claussen (2004). Anti-Intellectualism in American Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. p. 198. ISBN 0-8204-5721-3.
- Claussen, Danes. "A Brief History of Anti-Intellectualism in American Media". Academe. 97.
- Lecklider, Aaron (2013). Inventing the Egghead: The Battle over Brainpower in American Culture.
- Mitchell, Amy; Gottfried, Jeffrey; Barthel, Michael; Shearer, Elisa (2016-07-07). "1. Pathways to news". Pew Research Center's Journalism Project. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "What Is Confirmation Bias?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "Americans' increasing distrust of science — and not just on climate change". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "Anti-Intellectualism Is Biggest Threat to Modern Society | American Council on Science and Health". acsh.org. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Funk, Cary; Kennedy, Brian (2016-10-04). "1. Public views on climate change and climate scientists". Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "Anti-intellectualism Is Killing America". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Zaleha, Bernard Daley; Szasz, Andrew (2015-01-01). "Why conservative Christians don't believe in climate change". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (5): 19–30. doi:10.1177/0096340215599789. ISSN 0096-3402.
- "cultural cognition project - Cultural Cognition Blog - MAPKIA! "answer" episode 1: The interaction effect of religion & science comprehension on perceptions of climate change risk". www.culturalcognition.net. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Moran, Lee (2017-02-11). "Bill Maher Wants To 'Make America Learn Again' This Valentine's Day". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- "The cult of ignorance in the U.S.: Anti intellectualism and the 'dumbing down' of America - Progreso Weekly". Progreso Weekly. 2016-05-29. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- Intelligentsia / Lenin to Gorky
- Gentile, Giovanni, Origins and Doctrine of Fascism (with selections from other works), A. James Gregor, ed., pp. 22–23, 33, 65–66
- The Oxford Guide to Philosophy (2005), Ted Honderich, ed., p. 332.
- Dadrian, Vahakn N. (2004). The history of the Armenian genocide: ethnic conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus (6th rev. ed.). New York: Berghahn Books. p. 221. ISBN 1-57181-666-6.
- Blinka, David S. (2008). Re-creating Armenia: America and the memory of the Armenian genocide. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 31.
In what scholars commonly refer to as the decapitation strike on April 24, 1915...
- Bloxham, Donald (2005). The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians. Oxford University Press. p. 70.
...the decapitation of the Armenian nation with the series of mass arrests that began on 24 April...
- Sahаkian, T. A. (2002). "Արևմտահայ մտավորականության սպանդի արտացոլումը հայ մամուլում 1915-1916 թթ. [The interpretation of the fact of extermination of the Armenian intelligentsia in the Armenian press in 1915-1916]". Lraber Hasarakakan Gitutyunneri (in Armenian) (1): 89.
Դրանով թուրքական կառավարությունը ձգտում էր արևմտահայությանը գլխատել, նրան զրկել ղեկավար ուժից, բողոքի հնարավորությունից:
- Dane S. Claussen (2004). Anti-Intellectualism in American Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 978-0820457215.
- Liza Featherstone, Doug Henwood, and Christian Parenti, "'Action Will be Taken': Left Anti-Intellectualism and its Discontents," Left Business Observer.
- William Hinton, Hundred Day War: The Cultural Revolution at Tsinghua University. New York: New York University Press, 1972.
- Richard Hofstadter, Anti-intellectualism in American Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963. online
- Aaron Lecklider (2013). Inventing the Egghead: The Battle over Brainpower in American Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-4486-1.
- Elvin T. Lim (2008). The Anti-Intellectual Presidency: The Decline of Presidential Rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199898091.
- "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America". psychology today. 2014.
There is a growing and disturbing trend of anti-intellectual elitism in American culture. It’s the dismissal of science, the arts, and humanities and their replacement by entertainment, self-righteousness, ignorance, and deliberate gullibility.
|Look up anti-intellectualism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|