|Giant honey bee|
|On Mimosa pudica|
|Range of A. dorsata|
Apis dorsata, the giant honey bee, is a honey bee of South and Southeast Asia, found mainly in forested areas such as the Terai of Nepal and sometimes even in Malaysia and Singapore. They are typically around 17–20 mm (0.7–0.8 in) long. Nests are mainly built in exposed places far off the ground, like on tree limbs, under cliff overhangs, and sometimes on buildings. These social bees are known for their aggressive defense strategies and vicious behavior when disturbed. Indigenous peoples have traditionally used this species as a source of honey and beeswax, a practice known as honey hunting.
- 1 Taxonomy and Phylogeny
- 2 Description
- 3 Distribution and Habitat
- 4 Colony Cycle
- 5 Behavior
- 6 Kin Selection
- 7 Interactions With Other Species
- 8 References
Taxonomy and Phylogeny
Apis dorsata belongs to the family Apidae, which is in the class Insecta. This honeybee is most closely related to Apis mellifera, (the Western honey bee) Apis cerana, and Apis florea. Apis dorsata belongs to the subgenus Megapis. There are a few hypotheses as to when Apis dorsata diverged from both Apis florea and Apis cerana, as it is unclear which divergence occurred first. Currently, the consensus hypothesis provides a family tree that claims that Apis dorsata diverged from both Apis cerana and Apis florea at the same time.
- A. d. dorsata; primarily from India
- A. d. binghami Cockerell; from Malaysia and Indonesia
- A. d. breviligula Maa; from the Philippines
- A. d. laboriosa Fabricius; (Himalayan cliff honey bee), also in Myanmar, Laos, and southern China
A. d. laboriosa is not distinct morphologically from the nominate subspecies but has different housekeeping and swarming behavior, allowing it to survive at high altitudes. In addition, little gene flow has occurred between A. dorsata and A. d. laboriosa for millions of years; accordingly, some argue it should be classified as a distinct species. Likewise, the southeastern taxon A. d. binghami seems also to be distinct. The limits of their ranges in Indochina and the possible distinctness of the geographically distant Philippines population require more study. However, the use of the taxonomic rank of "subspecies" is typical for geographically discrete populations, so the difference in opinion here is whether or not to recognize the rank of subspecies or not (i.e., no one is disputing they are distinct lineages, the dispute is over whether to call them "species").
Apis dorsata differs from the other bees in its genus in terms of nest design. Each colony consists of a single vertical comb made of workers’ wax suspended from above, and the comb is typically covered by a dense mass of bees in several layers. The nests are mostly conical in shape and vary in size, reaching up to 1 meter in width. Each cell within the comb is hexagonal in shape. Apis dorsata store their honey on the top right-hand corner of the comb and rear the worker and drone brood in the same location of the nest. Nests are constructed in the open and in elevated locations, such as on urban buildings or tall trees. These bees rarely build nests on old or weak buildings for safety concerns. Apis dorsata can form dense aggregations at one nesting site, sometimes with up to 200 colonies in one tree.
Each colony can have up to 100,000 bees and is separated by only a few centimeters from the other colonies in an aggregation. Some colonies also exhibit patterns of nest recognition, in which they return to the same nesting sites post migration.
Distribution and Habitat
Apis dorsata is found from the Indian subcontinent to Southeast Asia and the Philippines. The greatest populations of Apis dorsata are found include China, Indonesia, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. They mostly reside in tall trees in dense forests, but also build nests on urban buildings. These bees are tropical and in most places, they migrate seasonally. Individual colonies migrate between nesting sites during the transition from the rainy to dry seasons and occupy each nesting site for about 3–4 months at a time. Some recent evidence indicates these bees return to the same nest site, though most, if not all, of the original workers might be replaced in the process because workers usually live for less than two months. Furthermore, these bees build small combs that serve as temporary nests during their long migrations.
In Bornean rainforests, Apis koschevnikovi and Apis dorsata are the only honeybees that appear frequently at flowering canopy trees or baits. Even though they share most of the same rain forest habitat, they are still able to coexist. Their difference in size and tongue length help separate their resource use.
There are two methods of reproductive swarming in which Apis dorsata initiates new colonies, which usually occurs in October or November. The most common occurs when a queen flies away from the original nest slowly and a swarm of workers follows her. This new cluster of bees can be temporary, or they can permanently move to a new nesting site. The distance these bees travel is unknown, but some have been observed to travel about 500 meters away from the original nest. The second, more rare method is referred to as “budding.” In budding, a group of workers leave the natal nest to form a new colony at a nesting site about 1 meter away from the original.
A non-reproductive method of colony initiation is absconding. Absconding refers to when an entire colony moves to a new location. As a colony is formed, multiple curtains, essentially layers, of bees are formed around the developing nest. Colony initiation is related to the migratory patterns of these bees.
Colony Migration and Decline
As a colony is initiated, the migration depends on foraging resources and predation risks. These bees travel to different sites depending on the blooming season of flowers. There are about 100,000 members in each colony and each colony resides in one nesting site for about 3–4 months at a time. Colonies tend to decline when resources, such as food, honey, and pollen, are depleted. Colonies decline during the rainy and summer seasons because of the instability of foraging sources due to climate change.
Some drones and the queen fly away from the nest and mate on flight. The drone flights are comparatively shorter than those of other Asian honeybee species. The Apis dorsata flights occur around dusk for 13 minutes on average. Apis dorsata exhibit high degrees of polyandry, with many drones mating with the queen. In fact, Apis dorsata fabricius is known to have the highest levels of polyandry among all social insects. In general, this bee population experiences extreme multiple matings. This may be attributed to the short duration of flight times for mating. During mating, the drones fly to “drone congregation areas” (DCAs). There is sufficient evidence to conclude that each aggregation has its own DCA since there is more genetic relatedness within aggregations and because of the short duration and distance traveled during the mating flight.
Apis dorsata utilizes what is known as a dance language, also known as waggle dance, to communicate the location of food sources to other bees in the colony. The dance language indicates the distance, profitability, and direction of the food source. These social bees dance in the open and their dances produce sound signals of high intensity in the air. The orientation of the dancer’s body points in the direction of the food source; the frequency of the sound indicates the profitability of the food source. Apis dorsata produces silent dances, which usually involve visual cues during the day. They additionally produce sound with their dances in the nighttime, as they are the only bees of its genus that exhibit nocturnal foraging activity. Furthermore, there is some evidence that Apis dorsata dances for migration purposes as well. Bees that have returned from the new nesting site perform dances that alert the colony of information such as the direction of the new nesting site.
Unlike the rearing patterns of other species of the genus Apis, the worker and drone brood of Apis dorsata are dispersed across in the same area and even share cells, and are not differentiated in separate locations of the nest. It would seem that worker policing makes mistakes often in correctly removing the drone brood since the drone brood are interspersed with worker brood, but every male raised comes from a queen-laid egg (not a worker-laid egg). This shows us that worker policing does indeed work within populations of these bees. In these instances, worker policing occurs through “egg-eating” or oophagy, but in the case of these bees, worker policing is directed at workers with ovaries since oophagy is hard to achieve, as worker-laid and queen-laid eggs are nearly identical in shape and size.
Genetic Relatedness Within and Between Aggregations
Since Apis dorsata is known for its highly polyandrous activity, these bees exhibit a large number of colonies in close proximity to each other. Although the colonies within an aggregation are near each other, these colonies are not closely related. The queens of the colonies in an aggregation are not closely related, but the aggregation itself is more genetically linked than is expected by chance. Higher than expected genetic links may exist among colonies because they migrate together during their long distance migratory routes to the same nesting sites in the new location. This may also be attributed to short distance reproductive swarming methods and brief mating periods as well. Since it has been observed that rarely any queen-daughter relationships exist within aggregations, the “budding” hypothesis of colony initiation rarely occurs. Due to their long distance migratory patterns, the bees cause enough gene flow to occur between the colonies of different aggregations. There is distinct genetic differentiation between aggregations. In turn, the genetic relatedness between colonies within a single aggregation decreases.
Nest Recognition and Fidelity
Apis dorsata is better than many of its relatives at avoiding drifting, an event when bees return to the wrong colonies after foraging. Apis dorsata tends to form dense aggregations, contributing to the high nest fidelity and recognition amongst these bees. These bees usually return to their natal nests because this behavior results in higher fitness. If drifting were common, robbing bees and parasites could spread quickly through colonies. The high fidelity to the natal nests also leads to the aggressive behavior of Apis dorsata bees. They aggressively attack workers from colonies that aren’t their own. If workers and queens do not return to the same colony, they have a high chance of getting killed because the other colony views them as potential robbers or carriers of disease. Some colonies even return to exactly the same nesting sites after their seasonal migrations.
Interactions With Other Species
Similar to other honeybees, Apis dorsata is regularly attacked by parasitic mites. The parasitic mite known to attack Apis dorsata is Tropilaelaps clareae. Tropilaelaps clareae needs brood in order to reproduce and are found in adult brood males of the colony. Apis dorsata is thought to be the original host of this parasite. If Apis dorsata engages in brood-less migration, then the entire colony can reduce infestation by this parasitic mite. Although quite rare, some experimental evidence has shown that Apis dorsata exhibits a specialized grooming behavior as a defense mechanism to remove parasites. The grooming behavior involves intense shaking of the body and auto-grooming with the legs.
Defense Against Predators
Since the nests of Apis dorsata are fairly exposed and accessible to predators, these giant honeybees exhibit strong and aggressive defense strategies. Their predators include wasps, hornets, birds, and human bee-hunters. Their defense strategies typically include physical contact, especially when they face attacks from wasps. These giant honeybees utilize a method called “heat balling,” in which they heat their thoraces to a temperature of 45 degrees Celsius (which is lethal to wasps.)
Another method that Apis dorsata utilizes against wasps is referred to as “shimmering” behavior or defense waving. Bees in the outer layer thrust their abdomens 90° in an upward direction and shake them in a synchronous way. This may be accompanied by stroking of the wings. The signal is transmitted to nearby workers that also adopt the posture, thus creating a visible — and audible — "ripple" effect across the face of the comb, in an almost identical manner to an audience wave at a crowded stadium. These wave-like patterns repel wasps that get too close to the nests of these bees and serve to confuse the wasp. In turn, the wasp cannot fixate on capturing one bee or getting food from the bees’ nest, so the wasp will seek to find easier prey and leave this nest alone. Shimmering appears to be an evolutionary successful behavior for group living amongst social bees.
Studies have also provided evidence that these bee colonies aggregate in defense. If one part of the nest is directly threatened by a bird, a signal (still unknown as to how) gets relayed to the rest of the colony so that all of them help in the defense, even if they are not directly threatened.
This genus has a long history with mankind. Cave paintings of these bees have been found in Valencia, Spain that date back to the Paleolithic era. In modern times, since large amounts of honey (up to 45 kilograms) can be stored in the nests of Apis dorsata, many people frequently harvest their nests. Honey represents a livelihood for some of these people as it can provide them with an important source of income. However, deforestation, urbanization, pesticides, and honey hunting have threatened local populations of bees and their honey. These bees are known to be aggressive, and they have the potential to viciously sting humans. In fact, they are known as “Hejjenu” in Karnataka, India due to their aggressive behavior, large colonies, and painful stings. At least one fatal defensive attack on a human has been reported.
According to Vietnamese sociologists, in the early 19th century, honey hunting or raftering was the most important occupation of the people who lived in the Melaleuca forest swamp. At that time, people paid taxes to the government in exchange for living in the forest. Beeswax was used to pay the tax and for making candles, and was sold to visiting ships from Hainan, China.
Between 1945 and 1975, the forests were devastated first by wars, and then by forest clearing for wood and agricultural purposes. As a consequence, rafter beekeeping dramatically decreased in the area. The technique is still used today at the state farm of Song Trem in U Minh District. According to a survey, about 96 beekeepers are in the area. In 1991, they harvested 16,608 l of honey and 747 kg of wax.
- Starr, Christoper (1987). "Nest-site Preferences of the Giant Honey Bee, Apis dorsata (Hymeoptera:Apidae), in Borneo". Pan-Pacific Entomologist (63): 37–42.
- Garnery, L. (1991). "Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Apis inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data". Apidologie. 22: 87–92. doi:10.1051/apido:19910111.
- Michael S. Engel (1999). "The taxonomy of recent and fossil honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apis)". Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 8: 165–196.
- Maria C. Arias & Walter S. Sheppard (2005). "Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera:Apinae:Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 37 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.02.017. PMID 16182149.
Maria C. Arias & Walter S. Sheppard (2005). "Corrigendum to "Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera:Apinae:Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data" [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37 (2005) 25–35]". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 40 (1): 315. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.002.
- Neupane, K.R. (2005). "Nesting behavior of Giant honey bee (Apis dorsata)". Retrieved 19 September 2015.
- Paar, Jurgen (2006). "Genetic Structure of an Apis dorsata Population: The Significance of Migration and Colony Aggregation". Journal of Heredity. A12: 119–126. doi:10.1093/jhered/esh026.
- Roubik, David W. (2005-01-01). Roubik, David W.; Sakai, Shoko; Karim, Abang A. Hamid, eds. Honeybees in Borneo. Ecological Studies. Springer New York. pp. 89–103. doi:10.1007/0-387-27161-9_8. ISBN 978-0-387-21309-5.
- Oldroyd, B.P. (1998). "Colony relatedness in aggregations of Apis dorsata Fabricius (Hymenoptera, Apidae)". Insectes Sociaux. 47: 94–95. doi:10.1007/s000400050015.
- Reddy, Chandrasekhara (1989). "Rates of swarming and absconding in the giant honey bee, Apis dorsata F.". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India. 8: 425–430. doi:10.1007/bf03179655.
- Paar, Jurgen (2002). "Drifting of workers in nest aggregations of the giant honeybee Apis dorsata". Apidologie. 33: 553–561. doi:10.1051/apido:2002040.
- Dyer, F.C. (1994). "Colony Migration in the tropical honey bee Apis dorsata F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)". Insectes Sociaux. 41: 129–140. doi:10.1007/bf01240473.
- Raghunandan, K.S. (2013). "Colony status of Asian giant honeybee, Apis dorsata Fabricius in Southern Karnataka, India". African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8: 680–689.
- Moritz, Robin (1995). "High degree of polyandry in Apis dorsata queens detected by DNA micro satellite variability". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 37: 357–363. doi:10.1007/bf00174141.
- Oldroyd, Benjamin (2003). "A scientific note on the mating frequency of Apis dorsata". Apidologie. 34: 85–86. doi:10.1051/apido:2002044.
- Kirchner, Wolfgang (1993). "Acoustic signals in the dance language of the giant honeybee, Apis dorsata". Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology. 33: 67–72. doi:10.1007/bf00171657.
- Wattanachaiyingcharoen, W. (2002). "Lack of worker reproduction in the giant honey bee "Apis dorsata" Fabricius". Insectes Sociaux. 49: 82–85. doi:10.1007/s00040-002-8283-1.
- Buchler, Ralph (1992). "Grooming Behaviour of Apis cerana, Apis mellifera and Apis dorsata and its effect on the parasitic mites Varroa jacobsoni and Tropilaelaps clareae". Experimental and Applied Acarology. 16: 313–319. doi:10.1007/bf01218573.
- Kastberger, Gerald (2008). "Social Waves in Giant Honeybees Repel Hornets". PLoS ONE. 9: e3141. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003141. PMC . PMID 18781205.
- Sharma, LK (2000). "The predator-prey interaction between blue-bearded bee eaters (Nyctornis athertoni Jardine and Selby 1830) and giant honeybees (Apis dorsata Fabricius 1798)". Apidologie. 31: 727–736. doi:10.1051/apido:2000157.
- Chong, Elena (April 29, 2014). "Death of man stung by bees ruled accidental". The Straits Times. Retrieved April 30, 2014.
- Fougères, M. (1902). Rapport sur l’apiculture coloniale. III Congrès Internationale l’apiculture pp. 53–58.
- Dau, Nguyen Dinh. 1992. Personal communication.[unreliable source?]
- Son Nam. 1993. (reprint) Dat Gia dinh xua (The ancient Southern part). Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
- Phung Huu Chinh, Nguyen Hung Minh, Pham Hong Thai and Nguyen Quang Tan (1995). Rafter Beekeeping in Melaleuca Forests in Vietnam. Bees for Development Journal 36 pp. 8–9.