An acutely inflamed and enlarged appendix, sliced lengthwise.
|Classification and external resources|
|ICD-10||K35 - K37|
|eMedicine||med/3430 emerg/41 ped/127 ped/2925|
Appendicitis (also called epityphlitis) is inflammation of the appendix. Appendicitis commonly presents with right iliac fossa abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite. However, one third to a half of persons do not have these typical signs and symptoms. Severe complications of a ruptured appendix include widespread, painful inflammation of the inner lining of the abdominal wall and sepsis.
Appendicitis is caused by a blockage of the hollow portion of the appendix, most commonly by a calcified "stone" made of feces. However, inflamed lymphoid tissue from a viral infection, parasites, gallstone, or tumors may also cause the blockage. This blockage leads to increased pressures within the appendix, decreased blood flow to the tissues of the appendix, and bacterial growth inside the appendix causing inflammation. The combination of inflammation, reduced blood flow to the appendix and distention of the appendix causes tissue injury and tissue death. If this process is left untreated, the appendix may burst, releasing bacteria into the abdominal cavity, leading to severe abdominal pain and increased complications.
The diagnosis of appendicitis is largely based on the person's signs and symptoms. In cases where the diagnosis cannot be made based on the person's history and physical exam, close observation, radiographic imaging and laboratory tests can often be helpful. The two most common imaging tests used are ultrasound and computed tomography (CT scan). CT scan has been shown to be more accurate than ultrasound in detecting acute appendicitis. However, ultrasound may be preferred as the first imaging test in children and pregnant women because of the risks associated with radiation exposure from CT scans.
The standard treatment for acute appendicitis is surgical removal of the appendix. This may be done by an open incision in the abdomen (laparotomy) or through a few smaller incisions with the help of cameras (laparoscopy). Surgery decreases the risk of side effects or death associated with rupture of the appendix. Antibiotics may be equally effective in certain cases of non-ruptured appendicitis. It is one of the most common and significant causes of severe abdominal pain that comes on quickly worldwide. In 2013 it resulted in 72,000 deaths globally. In the United States, appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgery. Each year in the United States, more than 300,000 persons with appendicitis have their appendix surgically removed. Reginald Fitz is credited with being the first person to describe the condition in a paper published in 1886.
- 1 Signs and symptoms
- 2 Causes
- 3 Diagnosis
- 4 Management
- 5 Prognosis
- 6 Epidemiology
- 7 References
- 8 External links
Signs and symptoms
The presentation of acute appendicitis includes abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever. As the appendix becomes more swollen and inflamed, it begins to irritate the adjoining abdominal wall. This leads to the localization of the pain to the right lower quadrant. This classic migration of pain may not be seen in children under three years. This pain can be elicited through various signs and can be severe. Signs include localized findings in the right iliac fossa. The abdominal wall becomes very sensitive to gentle pressure (palpation). Also, there is severe pain on sudden release of deep pressure in the lower abdomen (rebound tenderness). If the appendix is retrocecal (localized behind the cecum), even deep pressure in the right lower quadrant may fail to elicit tenderness (silent appendix). This is because the cecum, distended with gas, protects the inflamed appendix from pressure. Similarly, if the appendix lies entirely within the pelvis, there is usually complete absence of abdominal rigidity. In such cases, a digital rectal examination elicits tenderness in the rectovesical pouch. Coughing causes point tenderness in this area (McBurney's point).
Based on experimental evidence, acute appendicitis seems to be the end result of a primary obstruction of the appendiceal lumen. Once this obstruction occurs, the appendix becomes filled with mucus and swells. This continued production of intra-lumenal mucus leads to increased pressures within the lumen and the walls of the appendix. This increased pressure results in thrombosis and occlusion of the small vessels, and stasis of lymphatic flow. At this point spontaneous recovery rarely occurs. As the occlusion of blood vessels progresses, the appendix becomes ischemic and then necrotic. As bacteria begin to leak out through the dying walls, pus forms within and around the appendix (suppuration). The end result of this cascade is appendiceal rupture (a 'burst appendix') causing peritonitis, which may lead to sepsis and eventually death. This cascade of events is responsible for the slowly evolving abdominal pain and other commonly associated symptoms.
The causative agents include bezoars, foreign bodies, trauma, intestinal worms, lymphadenitis, and, most commonly, calcified fecal deposits that are known as appendicoliths or fecaliths. The occurrence of obstructing fecaliths has attracted attention since their presence in persons with appendicitis is higher in developed than in developing countries. In addition an appendiceal fecalith is commonly associated with complicated appendicitis. Also, fecal stasis and arrest may play a role, as demonstrated by persons with acute appendicitis having fewer bowel movements per week compared with healthy controls.
The occurrence of a fecalith in the appendix was thought to be attributed to a right-sided fecal retention reservoir in the colon and a prolonged transit time. However, a prolonged transit time was not observed in subsequent studies. From epidemiological data, it has been stated that diverticular disease and adenomatous polyps were unknown and colon cancer exceedingly rare in communities exempt from appendicitis. Also, acute appendicitis has been shown to occur antecedent to cancer in the colon and rectum. Several studies offer evidence that a low fiber intake is involved in the pathogenesis of appendicitis. This low intake of dietary fiber is in accordance with the occurrence of a right-sided fecal reservoir and the fact that dietary fiber reduces transit time.
Diagnosis is based on a medical history (symptoms) and physical examination which can be supported by an elevation of neutrophilic white blood cells and imaging studies if needed. (Neutrophils are the primary white blood cells that respond to a bacterial infection.) Histories fall into two categories, typical and atypical. Typical appendicitis includes several hours of generalized abdominal pain which begins in the region of the umbilicus with associated anorexia, nausea, or vomiting. The pain then "localizes" into the right lower quadrant where the tenderness increases in intensity. However, it is possible the pain could localize to the left lower quadrant in persons with situs inversus totalis. The combination of pain, anorexia, leukocytosis, and fever is classic. Atypical histories lack this typical progression and may include pain in the right lower quadrant as an initial symptom. Irritation of the peritoneum (inside lining of the abdominal wall) can lead to increased pain on movement, or jolting, for example going over speedbumps. Atypical histories often require imaging with ultrasound and/or CT scanning.
- Aure-Rozanova sign: Increased pain on palpation with finger in right Petit triangle (can be a positive Shchetkin-Bloomberg's)
- Bartomier-Michelson's sign: Increased pain on palpation at the right iliac region as the person being examined lies on his/her left side compared to when he/she lies on his/her back.
- Dunphy's sign: Increased pain in the right lower quadrant with coughing.
- Kocher's (Kosher's) sign: From the person's medical history, the start of pain in the umbilical region with a subsequent shift to the right iliac region.
- Massouh sign: Developed in and popular in southwest England, the examiner performs a firm swish with his/her index and middle finger across the abdomen from the Xiphoid process to the left and the right iliac fossa. A positive Massouh sign is a grimace of the person being examined upon a right sided (and not left) sweep.
- Obturator sign: The person being evaluated lies on her/his back with the hip and knee both flexed at ninety degrees. The examiner holds the person's ankle with one hand and knee with the other hand. The examiner rotates the hip by moving the person's ankle away from the his/her body while allowing the knee to move only inward. A positive test is pain with internal rotation of the hip.
- Psoas sign: Also known as the "Obraztsova's sign" is right lower-quadrant pain that is produced with either the passive extension of the right hip or by the active flexion of the person's right hip while supine. The pain that is elicited is due to inflammation of the peritoneum overlying the iliopsoas muscles and inflammation of the psoas muscles themselves. Straightening out the leg causes pain because it stretches these muscles, while flexing the hip activates the iliopsoas and therefore also causes pain.
- Rovsing's sign: Pain in the lower right abdominal quadrant with continuous deep palpation starting from the left iliac fossa upwards (counterclockwise along the colon). The thought is there will be increased pressure around the appendix by pushing bowel contents and air towards the ileocaecal valve provoking right sided abdominal pain.
- Sitkovskiy (Rosenstein)'s sign: Increased pain in the right iliac region as the person is being examined lies on his/her left side.
Blood and urine test
While there is no laboratory test specific for appendicitis, a complete blood count (CBC) is done to check for signs of infection. Although 70-90 percent of people with appendicitis may have an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, there are many other abdominal and pelvic conditions that can cause the WBC count to be elevated.
A urinalysis generally does not show infection but it is important for determining pregnancy status, especially the possibility of an ectopic pregnancy in woman of childbearing age. The urinalysis is also important for ruling out a urinary tract infection as the cause of abdominal pain. The presence of more than 20 WBC per high-power field in the urine is more suggestive of a urinary tract disorder.
In children the clinical examination is important for determination of which children with abdominal pain should receive immediate surgical consultation and which should receive diagnostic imaging. Because of the health risks of exposing children to radiation, ultrasound is the preferred first choice with CT-scan being a legitimate follow-up if the ultrasound is inconclusive. CT scan is more accurate than ultrasound for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adults and adolescents. CT scan has a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 95%. Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 81%.
Ultrasonography and Doppler sonography provide useful means to detect appendicitis, especially in children. Ultrasound can also show free fluid collection in the right iliac fossa, along with a visible appendix without blood flow when using color Doppler, and noncompressibility of the appendix, as it is essentially a walled off abscess. In some cases (15% approximately), however, ultrasonography of the iliac fossa does not reveal any abnormalities despite the presence of appendicitis. This false negative finding is especially true of early appendicitis before the appendix has become significantly distended. In addition false negative findings are more common in adults where larger amounts of fat and bowel gas make visualizing the appendix technically difficult. Despite these limitations, sonographic imaging in experienced hands can often distinguish between appendicitis and other diseases with similar symptoms. Some of these conditions include inflammation of lymph nodes near the appendix or pain originating from other pelvic organs such as the ovaries or fallopian tubes.
Where it is readily available, computed tomography (CT) has become frequently used, especially in people whose diagnosis is not obvious on history and physical examination. Concerns about radiation, however, tend to limit use of CT in pregnant women and children, especially with the increasingly widespread usage of MRI.
The accurate diagnosis of appendicitis is multi-tiered, with the size of the appendix having the strongest positive predictive value, while indirect features can either increase or decrease sensitivity and specificity. A size of over 6 mm is both 95% sensitive and specific for appendicitis.
However, because the appendix can be filled with fecal material, causing intraluminal distention, this criterion has shown limited utility in more recent meta analyses. This is as opposed to ultrasound, in which the wall of the appendix can be more easily distinguished from intraluminal feces. In such scenarios, ancillary features such as increased wall enhancement as compared to adjacent bowel, and inflammation of the surrounding fat, or fat stranding, can be supportive of the diagnosis, although their absence does not preclude it. In severe cases with perforation, an adjacent phlegmon or abscess can be seen. Dense fluid layering in the pelvis can also result, related to either pus or enteric spillage. When patients are thin or younger, the relative absence of fat can make both the appendix and surrounding fat stranding difficult to see.
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI usage has become increasingly common for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and pregnant patients due to the radiation dosage that, while of nearly negligible risk in healthy adults, can be harmful to children or the developing fetus. In pregnancy, it has been found to be more useful during the second and third trimester, particularly as the enlargening uterus displaces the appendix, making it difficult to find by ultrasound. The periappendiceal stranding that is reflected on CT by fat stranding on MRI appears as increased fluid signal on T2 weighted sequences. First trimester pregnancies are usually not candidates for MRI, as the fetus is still undergoing organogenesis, and there are no long term studies to date regarding its potential risks or side effects.
In general, plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is not useful in making the diagnosis of appendicitis and should not be routinely obtained in a person being evaluated for appendicitis. Plain abdominal films may be useful for the detection of ureteral calculi, small bowel obstruction, or perforated ulcer, but these conditions are rarely confused with appendicitis. An opaque fecalith can be identified in the right lower quadrant in less than 5% of persons being evaluated for appendicitis. A barium enema has proven to be a poor diagnostic tool for appendicitis. While failure of the appendix to fill during a barium enema has been associated with appendicitis, up to 20% of normal appendices also do not fill.
|Migratory right iliac fossa pain||1 point|
|Nausea and vomiting||1 point|
|Right iliac fossa tenderness||2 points|
|Rebound abdominal tenderness||1 point|
|High white blood cell count (leukocytosis)||2 points|
|Shift to left (segmented neutrophils)||1 point|
|Total score||10 points|
The Alvarado score is the most widely used scoring system. A score below 5 suggests against a diagnosis of appendicitis, whereas a score of 7 or more is predictive of acute appendicitis. In a person with an equivocal score of 5 or 6, a CT scan or ultrasound exam may be used to reduce the rate of negative appendectomy.
Children: Gastroenteritis, mesenteric adenitis, Meckel's diverticulitis, intussusception, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, lobar pneumonia, urinary tract infection (abdominal pain in the absence of other symptoms can occur in children with UTI), new-onset Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, pancreatitis, and abdominal trauma from child abuse; distal intestinal obstruction syndrome in children with cystic fibrosis; typhlitis in children with leukemia.
Women: A pregnancy test is important in all women of childbearing age since an ectopic pregnancy can have signs and symptoms similar to those of appendicitis. Other obstetrical/gynecological causes of similar abdominal pain in women include pelvic inflammatory disease, ovarian torsion, menarche, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, and Mittelschmerz (the passing of an egg in the ovaries approximately two weeks before an expected menstruation cycle).
Men: testicular torsion;
Acute appendicitis is typically managed by surgery. However, in uncomplicated cases antibiotics are both effective and safe. While antibiotics are effective for treating uncomplicated appendicitis, 20% of people had a recurrence within a year and required eventual appendectomy.
In people with inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who present with appendicitis, surgical intervention is contraindicated, as the normal healing response following surgery is impaired by the underlying disease process, and the patients form non healing fistulas, sinus tracts and enteric leakage. In such scenarios, the underlying disease process must be treated medically with DMARDs, as opposed to surgically.
Pain medications (such as morphine) do not appear to affect the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis and therefore should be given early in the person's care. Historically there were concerns among some general surgeons that analgesics would affect the clinical exam in children and thus some recommended that they not be given until the surgeon in question was able to examine the person for themselves.
The surgical procedure for the removal of the appendix is called an appendicectomy. Appendectomy can be performed through open or laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy has several advantages over open appendectomy as an intervention for acute appendicitis.
For over a century, Laparotomy (open appendectomy) was the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. This procedure consists of the removal of the infected appendix through a single large incision in the lower right area of the abdomen. The incision in a laparotomy is usually 2 to 3 inches (51 to 76 mm) long.
During an open appendectomy, the person with suspected appendicitis is placed under general anesthesia to keep the muscles completely relaxed and to keep the person unconscious. The incision is two to three inches (76 mm) long and it is made in the right lower abdomen, several inches above the hip bone. Once the incision opens the abdomen cavity and the appendix is identified, the surgeon removes the infected tissue and cuts the appendix from the surrounding tissue. After careful and close inspection of the infected area, and ensuring there are no signs that surrounding tissues are damaged or infected, the surgeon will start closing the incision. This means sewing the muscles and using surgical staples or stitches to close the skin up. In order to prevent infections, the incision is covered with a sterile bandage.
Laparoscopic appendectomy has become an increasingly prevalent intervention for acute appendicitis since its introduction in 1983. This surgical procedure consists of making three to four incisions in the abdomen, each 0.25 to 0.5 inches (6.4 to 12.7 mm) long. This type of appendectomy is made by inserting a special surgical tool called laparoscope into one of the incisions. The laparoscope is connected to a monitor outside the person's body and it is designed to help the surgeon to inspect the infected area in the abdomen. The other two incisions are made for the specific removal of the appendix by using surgical instruments. Laparoscopic surgery also requires general anesthesia and it can last up to two hours. Laparoscopic Appendectomy has several advantages over open appendectomy, including a shorter post-operative recovery, less post-operative pain, and lower superficial surgical site infection rate. However, the occurrence of intra-abdominal abscess is almost three times more prevalent in laparoscopic appendectomy than open appendectomy.
The treatment begins by keeping the person who will be having surgery from eating or drinking for a given period of time, usually overnight. An intravenous drip is used to hydrate the person who will be having surgery. Antibiotics given intravenously such as cefuroxime and metronidazole may be administered early to help kill bacteria and thus reduce the spread of infection in the abdomen and postoperative complications in the abdomen or wound. Equivocal cases may become more difficult to assess with antibiotic treatment and benefit from serial examinations. If the stomach is empty (no food in the past six hours) general anaesthesia is usually used. Otherwise, spinal anaesthesia may be used.
Once the decision to perform an appendectomy has been made, the preparation procedure takes approximately one to two hours. Meanwhile, the surgeon will explain the surgery procedure and will present the risks that must be considered when performing an appendectomy. With all surgeries there are certain risks that must be evaluated before performing the procedures. However, the risks are different depending on the state of the appendix. If the appendix has not ruptured, the complication rate is only about 3% but if the appendix has ruptured, the complication rate rises to almost 59%. The most usual complications that can occur are pneumonia, hernia of the incision, thrombophlebitis, bleeding or adhesions. Recent evidence indicates that a delay in obtaining surgery after admission results in no measurable difference in outcomes to the person with appendicitis.
The surgeon will also explain how long the recovery process should take. Abdomen hair is usually removed in order to avoid complications that may appear regarding the incision. In most of the cases persons going in for surgery experience nausea or vomiting which requires specific medication before surgery. Antibiotics along with pain medication may also be administrated prior to appendectomies.
Hospital lengths of stay typically range from a few hours to a few days, but can be a few weeks if complications occur. The recovery process may vary depending on the severity of the condition, if the appendix had ruptured or not before surgery. Appendix surgery recovery is generally a lot faster if the appendix did not rupture. It is important that persons undergoing surgery respect their doctor's advice and limit their physical activity so the tissues can heal faster. Recovery after an appendectomy may not require diet changes or a lifestyle change.
Length of hospital stays for appendicitis varies on the severity of the condition. A study from the United States found that in 2010, the average appendicitis hospital stay was 1.8 days. For stays where the person's appendix had ruptured, the average length of stay was 5.2 days.
After surgery occurs, the patient will be transferred to a postanesthesia care unit so his or her vital signs can be closely monitored to detect anesthesia- and/or surgery-related complications. Pain medication may also be administered if necessary. After patients are completely awake, they are moved into a hospital room to recover. Most individuals will be offered clear liquids the day after the surgery, then progress to a regular diet when the intestines start to function properly. Patients are recommended to sit up on the edge of the bed and walk short distances for several times a day. Moving is mandatory and pain medication may be given if necessary. Full recovery from appendectomies takes about four to six weeks, but can be prolonged to up to eight weeks if the appendix had ruptured.
Most persons with appendicitis recover easily after surgical treatment, but complications can occur if treatment is delayed or if peritonitis occurs. Recovery time depends on age, condition, complications, and other circumstances, including the amount of alcohol consumption, but usually is between 10 and 28 days. For young children (around 10 years old), the recovery takes three weeks.
The real possibility of life-threatening peritonitis is the reason why acute appendicitis warrants speedy evaluation and treatment. Persons with suspected appendicitis may have to undergo a medical evacuation. Appendectomies have occasionally been performed in emergency conditions (i.e., not in a proper hospital), when a timely medical evacuation was impossible.
Typical acute appendicitis responds quickly to appendectomy and occasionally will resolve spontaneously. If appendicitis resolves spontaneously, it remains controversial whether an elective interval appendectomy should be performed to prevent a recurrent episode of appendicitis. Atypical appendicitis (associated with suppurative appendicitis) is more difficult to diagnose and is more apt to be complicated even when operated early. In either condition, prompt diagnosis and appendectomy yield the best results with full recovery in two to four weeks usually. Mortality and severe complications are unusual but do occur, especially if peritonitis persists and is untreated. Another entity known as appendicular lump is talked about quite often. It happens when the appendix is not removed early during infection and omentum and intestine adhere to it, forming a palpable lump. During this period, surgery is risky unless there is pus formation evident by fever and toxicity or by USG. Medical management treats the condition.
An unusual complication of an appendectomy is "stump appendicitis": inflammation occurs in the remnant appendiceal stump left after a prior incomplete appendectomy.
Appendicitis is most common between the ages of 5 and 40; the median age is 28. It tends to affect males, those in lower income groups, and, for unknown reasons, people living in rural areas. In 2013 it resulted in 72,000 deaths globally down from 88,000 in 1990.
In the United States, there were nearly 293,000 hospitalizations involving appendicitis in 2010. Appendicitis is one of the most frequent diagnoses for emergency department visits resulting in hospitalization among children aged 5–17 years in the United States.
- MerriamWebster definition
- Graffeo, CS; Counselman, FL (1996). "Appendicitis.". Emergency medicine clinics of North America 14 (4): 653–71. doi:10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70273-x. PMID 8921763.
- Graffeo, CS; Counselman, FL (November 1996). "Appendicitis.". Emergency medicine clinics of North America 14 (4): 653–71. doi:10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70273-x. PMID 8921763.
- Hobler, K. (Spring 1998). "Acute and Suppurative Appendicitis: Disease Duration and its Implications for Quality Improvement". Permanente Medical Journal 2.
- Wangensteen OH, Bowers WF (1937). "Significance of the obstructive factor in the genesis of acute appendicitis". Arch Surg 34 (3): 496–526. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1937.01190090121006.
- Pieper R, Kager L, Tidefeldt U (1982). "Obstruction of appendix vermiformis causing acute appendicitis. One of the most common causes of this is an acute viral infection which causes lymphoid hyperplasia and therefore obstruction. An experimental study in the rabbit". Acta Chir Scand 148 (1): 63–72. PMID 7136413.
- al.], ed. Dan L. Longo ... [et (2012). Harrison's principles of internal medicine. (18th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. Chapter 300. ISBN 978-0-07174889-6. Retrieved 6 November 2014.
- Tintinalli, editor-in-chief Judith E. (2011). Emergency medicine : a comprehensive study guide (7. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. Chapter 84. ISBN 978-0-07-174467-6. Retrieved 6 November 2014.
- Schwartz's principles of surgery (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division. 2010. p. Chapter 30. ISBN 978-0-07-1547703.
- Barrett, ML; Hines, AL; Andrews, RM (February 2006). "Trends in Rates of Perforated Appendix, 2001–2010: Statistical Brief #159". PMID 24199256.
- Paulson, EK; Kalady, MF; Pappas, TN (16 January 2003). "Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis.". The New England Journal of Medicine 348 (3): 236–42. doi:10.1056/nejmcp013351. PMID 12529465.
- Shogilev, DJ; Duus, N; Odom, SR; Shapiro, NI (November 2014). "Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014.". The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (Review) 15 (7): 859-71. doi:10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568. PMC 4251237. PMID 25493136.
- Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012). "Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials". BMJ 344: e2156. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2156. PMC 3320713. PMID 22491789.
- GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death, Collaborators (17 December 2014). "Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.". Lancet 385 (9963): 117–71. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. PMC 4340604. PMID 25530442.
- Mason, RJ (August 2008). "Surgery for appendicitis: is it necessary?". Surgical infections 9 (4): 481–8. doi:10.1089/sur.2007.079. PMID 18687030.
- Fitz RH (1886). "Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment". Am J Med Sci (92): 321–46.
- Hollerman J.; et al. (1988). "Acute recurrent appendicitis with appendicolith". Am J Emerg Med 6 (6): 614–7. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(88)90105-2.
- Dehghan A, Moaddab AH, Mozafarpour S (June 2011). "An unusual localization of trichobezoar in the appendix". The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 22 (3): 357–8. PMID 21805435.
- Jones BA, Demetriades D, Segal I, Burkitt DP (1985). "The prevalence of appendiceal fecaliths in patients with and without appendicitis. A comparative study from Canada and South Africa". Ann. Surg. 202 (1): 80–2. doi:10.1097/00000658-198507000-00013. PMC 1250841. PMID 2990360.
- Nitecki S, Karmeli R, Sarr MG (1990). "Appendiceal calculi and fecaliths as indications for appendectomy". Surg Gynecol Obstet 171 (3): 185–8. PMID 2385810.
- Arnbjörnsson E (1985). "Acute appendicitis related to faecal stasis". Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae 74 (2): 90–3. PMID 2992354.
- Raahave D, Christensen E, Moeller H, Kirkeby LT, Loud FB, Knudsen LL (2007). "Origin of acute appendicitis: fecal retention in colonic reservoirs: a case control study". Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1089/sur.2005.04250. PMID 17381397.
- Burkitt DP (1971). "The aetiology of appendicitis". Br J Surg 58 (9): 695–9. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800580916. PMID 4937032.
- Segal I, Walker AR (1982). "Diverticular disease in urban Africans in South Africa". Digestion 24 (1): 42–6. doi:10.1159/000198773. PMID 6813167.
- Arnbjörnsson E (1982). "Acute appendicitis as a sign of a colorectal carcinoma". J Surg Oncol 20 (1): 17–20. doi:10.1002/jso.2930200105. PMID 7078180.
- Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS (1972). "Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease". Lancet 2 (7792): 1408–12. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(72)92974-1. PMID 4118696.
- Adamis D, Roma-Giannikou E, Karamolegou K (2000). "Fiber intake and childhood appendicitis". Int J Food Sci Nutr 51 (3): 153–7. doi:10.1080/09637480050029647. PMID 10945110.
- Hugh TB, Hugh TJ (2001). "Appendicectomy--becoming a rare event?". Med. J. Aust. 175 (1): 7–8. PMID 11476215.
- Gear JS, Brodribb AJ, Ware A, Mann JI (January 1981). "Fibre and bowel transit times". The British Journal of Nutrition 45 (1): 77–82. doi:10.1079/BJN19810078. PMID 6258626.
- Ashdown, H. F.; D'Souza, N.; Karim, D.; Stevens, R. J.; Huang, A.; Harnden, A. (17 December 2012). "Pain over speed bumps in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study". BMJ 345 (dec14 14): e8012–e8012. doi:10.1136/bmj.e8012. PMC 3524367. PMID 23247977.
- Hobler, K. (Spring 1998). "Acute and Suppurative Appendicitis: Disease Duration and its Implications for Quality Improvement" (PDF). Permanente Medical Journal 2 (2).
- Small V (2008) Surgical emergencies. In Dolan B and Holt L (eds) Accident and Emergency: Theory into Practice, 2nd edition. Elsevier.[page needed]
- Rovsing, N. T. (1907) "Indirektes Hervorrufen des typischen Schmerzes an McBurney's Punkt. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostik der Appendicitis und Typhlitis". Zentralblatt für Chirurgie, Leipzig, 34: 1257-1259 (German)
- CDEM Curriculum
- Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE (2007). "Does this child have appendicitis?". JAMA 298 (4): 438–51. doi:10.1001/jama.298.4.438. PMC 2703737. PMID 17652298.
- American College of Radiology, "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question" (PDF), Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation (American College of Radiology), retrieved August 17, 2012
- Krishnamoorthi, R.; Ramarajan, N.; Wang, N. E.; Newman, B.; Rubesova, E.; Mueller, C. M.; Barth, R. A. (2011). "Effectiveness of a Staged US and CT Protocol for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis: Reducing Radiation Exposure in the Age of ALARA". Radiology 259 (1): 231–239. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100984. PMID 21324843.
- Wan, M. J.; Krahn, M.; Ungar, W. J.; Caku, E.; Sung, L.; Medina, L. S.; Doria, A. S. (2009). "Acute Appendicitis in Young Children: Cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in Diagnosis--A Markov Decision Analytic Model". Radiology 250 (2): 378–386. doi:10.1148/radiol.2502080100. PMID 19098225.
- Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ (October 2004). "Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents". Annals of Internal Medicine 141 (7): 537–46. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011. PMID 15466771.
- Kim, Y; Kang, G; Moon, SB (November 2014). "Increasing utilization of abdominal CT in the Emergency Department of a secondary care center: does it produce better outcomes in caring for pediatric surgical patients?". Annals of surgical treatment and research 87 (5): 239–44. doi:10.4174/astr.2014.87.5.239. PMID 25368849.
- Liu, B; Ramalho, M; AlObaidy, M; Busireddy, KK; Altun, E; Kalubowila, J; Semelka, RC (28 August 2014). "Gastrointestinal imaging-practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.". World journal of radiology 6 (8): 544–66. doi:10.4329/wjr.v6.i8.544. PMID 25170393.
- Garcia, K.; Hernanz-Schulman, M.; Bennett, D. L.; Morrow, S. E.; Yu, C.; Kan, J. H. (2009). "Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Diagnostic Importance of Normal Abdominopelvic CT Findings with Nonvisualized Appendix". Radiology 250 (2): 531–537. doi:10.1148/radiol.2502080624. PMID 19188320.
- Doria, A. S.; Moineddin, R.; Kellenberger, C. J.; Epelman, M.; Beyene, J.; Schuh, S.; Babyn, P. S.; Dick, P. T. (2006). "US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis". Radiology 241 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1148/radiol.2411050913. PMID 16928974.
- Burke, LM; Bashir, MR; Miller, FH; Siegelman, ES; Brown, M; Alobaidy, M; Jaffe, TA; Hussain, SM; Palmer, SL; Garon, BT; Oto, A; Reinhold, C; Ascher, SM; Demulder, DK; Thomas, S; Best, S; Borer, J; Zhao, K; Pinel-Giroux, F; De Oliveira, I; Resende, D; Semelka, RC (24 July 2015). "Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: a 5-Year Multi-institutional Study.". American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 213: 693.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.026. PMID 26215327.
- Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rao JA, Conn AK (July 1999). "Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT". The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 17 (4): 325–8. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90077-3. PMID 10452424.
- Boleslawski E, Panis Y, Benoist S, Denet C, Mariani P, Valleur P (March 1999). "Plain abdominal radiography as a routine procedure for acute abdominal pain of the right lower quadrant: prospective evaluation". World Journal of Surgery 23 (3): 262–4. doi:10.1007/pl00013181. PMID 9933697.
- APPENDICITIS from Townsend: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery on MD Consult
- Kulik, DM; Uleryk, EM; Maguire, JL (January 2013). "Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain.". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (1): 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.004. PMID 23177898.
- Fink AS, Kosakowski CA, Hiatt JR, Cochran AJ (June 1990). "Periappendicitis is a significant clinical finding". American Journal of Surgery 159 (6): 564–8. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80067-X. PMID 2349982.
- "Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) Symptoms; Diseases and Conditions". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- Cunha BA, Pherez FM, Durie N (July 2010). "Swine influenza (H1N1) and acute appendicitis". Heart Lung 39 (6): 544–6. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.04.004. PMID 20633930.
- Zheng H, Sun Y, Lin S, Mao Z, Jiang B (August 2008). "Yersinia enterocolitica infection in diarrheal patients". Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27 (8): 741–52. doi:10.1007/s10096-008-0562-y. ISBN 0-9600805-6-2. PMID 18575909.
- Agha, FP; Ghahremani, GG; Panella, JS; Kaufman, MW (September 1987). "Appendicitis as the initial manifestation of Crohn's disease: radiologic features and prognosis.". AJR. American journal of roentgenology 149 (3): 515–8. doi:10.2214/ajr.149.3.515. PMID 3497535.
- Anderson, M; Collins, E (November 2008). "Analgesia for children with acute abdominal pain and diagnostic accuracy.". Archives of Disease in Childhood 93 (11): 995–7. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.137174. PMID 18305071.
- Sauerland, S; Jaschinski, T; Neugebauer, EA (Oct 6, 2010). "Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10): CD001546. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3. PMID 20927725.
- Appendicitis near its centenary.
- Appendicitis procedures explained National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse. Retrieved on 2010-02-01
- Laparotomy abdominal surgery About surgeries online portal. Retrieved on 2010-02-01
- Endoscopic appendectomy.
- CT predictors of failed laparoscopic appendectomy.
- Appendicitis surgery procedures Encyclopedia of surgery Portal. Retrieved on 2010-02-01
- "'Emergency' appendix surgery can wait: MDs". CBC News. 2010-09-21.
- Appendicitis surgery, removal and recovery Retrieved on 2010-02-01
- Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006). "Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature". The American surgeon 72 (2): 162–6. PMID 16536249.
- "WHO Disease and injury country estimates". World Health Organization. 2009. Archived from the original on 11 November 2009. Retrieved Nov 11, 2009.
- Ellis, H (March 2012). "Acute appendicitis.". British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005) 73 (3): C46–8. PMID 22411604.
- Appendicitis epidemiological data VoxHealth medical information based on CDC medical records. Retrieved on 12-24-2012.
- Wier LM, Hao Y, Owens P, Washington R. Overview of Children in the Emergency Department, 2010. HCUP Statistical Brief #157. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. May 2013.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Appendicitis.|
- CT of the abdomen showing acute appendicitis
- Podcast on the management of appendicitis
- Appendicitis and Appendectomy author Dennis Lee, M.D. editor Jay Marks, M.D. - MedicineNet.com, Doctor Produced information plus Patient Discussions provided by MedicineNet.com
- Appendicitis - MayoClinic.com, from the Web site of the Mayo Clinic
- Appendicitis, history, diagnosis and treatment by Surgeons Net Education
- Appendicitis Research Latest research from the literature on appendicitis
- Acute and Suppurative Appendicitis from the Spring 1998 issue of The Permanente Medical Journal
- Appendicitis Update Complete information including laparoscopic appendectomy
- History of Appendicitis Vermiformis: Its diseases and treatment. By Arthur C. McCarty, M.D.
- How to Recognize the Symptoms of Appendicitis, a how-to article from wikiHow
- Appendicitis: Acute Abdomen and Surgical Gastroenterology from the Merck Manual Professional (Content last modified September 2007)
- Abdominal Emergencies, 'Surgical Abdomen'.By DR David Bednarczyk; Pediatric Surgery