From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Structure of an RNA aptamer specific for biotin. The aptamer surface and backbone are shown in yellow. Biotin (spheres) fits snugly into a cavity of the RNA surface

Aptamers (from the Latin aptus – fit, and Greek meros – part) are oligonucleotide or peptide molecules that bind to a specific target molecule. Aptamers are usually created by selecting them from a large random sequence pool, but natural aptamers also exist in riboswitches. Aptamers can be used for both basic research and clinical purposes as macromolecular drugs. Aptamers can be combined with ribozymes to self-cleave in the presence of their target molecule. These compound molecules have additional research, industrial and clinical applications.

More specifically, aptamers can be classified as

  • DNA or RNA or XNA aptamers. They consist of (usually short) strands of oligonucleotides.
  • Peptide aptamers. They consist of one (or more) short variable peptide domains, attached at both ends to a protein scaffold.


Nucleic acid[edit]

Nucleic acid aptamers are nucleic acid species that have been engineered through repeated rounds of in vitro selection or equivalently, SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) to bind to various molecular targets such as small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids, and even cells, tissues and organisms. In the molecular level, aptamers bind to its target site through non-covalent interactions. Aptamers bind to these specific targets because of electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and their complementary shapes.[1] Aptamers are useful in biotechnological and therapeutic applications as they offer molecular recognition properties that rival that of the commonly used biomolecule, antibodies. In addition to their discriminate recognition, aptamers offer advantages over antibodies as they can be engineered completely in a test tube, are readily produced by chemical synthesis, possess desirable storage properties, and elicit little or no immunogenicity in therapeutic applications.

In 1990, two labs independently developed the technique of selection: the Gold lab, using the term SELEX for their process of selecting RNA ligands against T4 DNA polymerase; and the Szostak lab, coining the term in vitro selection, selecting RNA ligands against various organic dyes. The Szostak lab also coined the term aptamer (from the Latin, apto, meaning 'to fit') for these nucleic acid-based ligands. Two years later, the Szostak lab and Gilead Sciences, independent of one another, used in vitro selection schemes to evolve single stranded DNA ligands for organic dyes and human coagulant, thrombin (see anti-thrombin aptamers), respectively. There does not appear to be any systematic differences between RNA and DNA aptamers, save the greater intrinsic chemical stability of DNA.

The notion of selection in vitro was preceded twenty-plus years prior when Sol Spiegelman used a Qbeta replication system as a way to evolve a self-replicating molecule.[2] In addition, a year before the publishing of in vitro selection and SELEX, Gerald Joyce used a system that he termed 'directed evolution' to alter the cleavage activity of a ribozyme.

Since the discovery of aptamers, many researchers have used aptamer selection as a means for application and discovery. In 2001, the process of in vitro selection was automated[3][4][5] by J. Colin Cox in the Ellington lab at the University of Texas at Austin, reducing the duration of a selection experiment from six weeks to three days.

While the process of artificial engineering of nucleic acid ligands is highly interesting to biology and biotechnology, the notion of aptamers in the natural world had yet to be uncovered until 2002 when two groups led by Ronald Breaker and Evgeny Nudler discovered a nucleic acid-based genetic regulatory element (which was named riboswitch) that possesses similar molecular recognition properties to the artificially made aptamers. In addition to the discovery of a new mode of genetic regulation, this adds further credence to the notion of an 'RNA World', a postulated stage in time in the origins of life on Earth.

Both DNA and RNA aptamers show robust binding affinities for various targets.[6][7][8] DNA and RNA aptamers have been selected for the same target. These targets include lysozyme,[9] thrombin,[10] human immunodeficiency virus trans-acting responsive element (HIV TAR),[11] hemin,[12] interferon γ,[13] vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),[14] prostate specific antigen (PSA),[15][16] dopamine,[17] and the non-classical oncogene, heat shock factor 1 (HSF1).[18] In the case of lysozyme, HIV TAR, VEGF and dopamine the DNA aptamer is the analog of the RNA aptamer, with thymine replacing uracil. The hemin, thrombin, and interferon γ, DNA and RNA aptamers were selected through independent selections and have unique sequences. Considering that not all DNA analogs of RNA aptamers show functionality, the correlation between DNA and RNA sequence and their structure and function requires further investigation.

Lately, a concept of smart aptamers, and smart ligands in general, has been introduced. It describes aptamers that are selected with pre-defined equilibrium (), rate (, ) constants and thermodynamic (ΔH, ΔS) parameters of aptamer-target interaction. Kinetic capillary electrophoresis is the technology used for the selection of smart aptamers. It obtains aptamers in a few rounds of selection.

Recent developments in aptamer-based therapeutics have been rewarded in the form of the first aptamer-based drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in treatment for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), called Macugen offered by OSI Pharmaceuticals. In addition, the company NeoVentures Biotechnology Inc.[19] has successfully commercialized the first aptamer based diagnostic platform for analysis of mycotoxins in grain. Many contract companies develop aptamers and aptabodies to replace antibodies in research, diagnostic platforms, drug discovery, and therapeutics.

Non-modified aptamers are cleared rapidly from the bloodstream, with a half-life of minutes to hours, mainly due to nuclease degradation and clearance from the body by the kidneys, a result of the aptamer's inherently low molecular weight. Unmodified aptamer applications currently focus on treating transient conditions such as blood clotting, or treating organs such as the eye where local delivery is possible. This rapid clearance can be an advantage in applications such as in vivo diagnostic imaging. An example is a tenascin-binding aptamer under development by Schering AG for cancer imaging. Several modifications, such as 2'-fluorine-substituted pyrimidines, polyethylene glycol (PEG) linkage, etc. (both of which are used in Macugen, an FDA-approved aptamer) are available to scientists with which to increase the serum half-life of aptamers easily to the day or even week time scale.

Another approach to increase the nuclease resistance of aptamers is to develop Spiegelmers, which are composed entirely of an unnatural L-ribonucleic acid backbone. A Spiegelmer of the same sequence has the same binding properties of the corresponding RNA aptamer, except it binds to the mirror image of its target molecule.

In addition to the development of aptamer-based therapeutics, many researchers such as the Ellington lab have been developing diagnostic techniques for aptamer based plasma protein profiling called aptamer plasma proteomics. This technology will enable future multi-biomarker protein measurements that can aid diagnostic distinction of disease versus healthy states.

Furthermore, the Hirao lab applied a genetic alphabet expansion using an unnatural base pair[20][21] to SELEX and achieved the generation of high affinity DNA aptamers.[22] Only few hydrophobic unnatural base as a fifth base significantly augment the aptamer affinity to target proteins.

As a resource for all in vitro selection and SELEX experiments, the Ellington lab has developed the Aptamer Database cataloging all published experiments.


Peptide aptamers [23] are artificial proteins selected or engineered to bind specific target molecules. These proteins consist of one or more peptide loops of variable sequence displayed by a protein scaffold. They are typically isolated from combinatorial libraries and often subsequently improved by directed mutation or rounds of variable region mutagenesis and selection. In vivo, peptide aptamers can bind cellular protein targets and exert biological effects, including interference with the normal protein interactions of their targeted molecules with other proteins. Libraries of peptide aptamers have been used as "mutagens", in studies in which an investigator introduces a library that expresses different peptide aptamers into a cell population, selects for a desired phenotype, and identifies those aptamers that cause the phenotype. The investigator then uses those aptamers as baits, for example in yeast two-hybrid screens to identify the cellular proteins targeted by those aptamers. Such experiments identify particular proteins bound by the aptamers, and protein interactions that the aptamers disrupt, to cause the phenotype.[24][25] In addition, peptide aptamers derivatized with appropriate functional moieties can cause specific postranslational modification of their target proteins, or change the subcellular localization of the targets.[26]

Peptide aptamers can also recognize targets in vitro. They have found use in lieu of antibodies in biosensors [27][28] and used to detect active isoforms of proteins from populations containing both inactive and active protein forms.[29] Derivatives known as tadpoles, in which peptide aptamer "heads" are covalently linked to unique sequence double-stranded DNA "tails", allow quantification of scarce target molecules in mixtures by PCR (using, for example, the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) of their DNA tails.[30]

The peptides that form the aptamer variable regions are synthesized as part of the same polypeptide chain as the scaffold and are constrained at their N and C termini by linkage to it. This double structural constraint decreases the diversity of the conformations that the variable regions can adopt,[31] and this reduction in conformational diversity lowers the entropic cost of molecular binding when interaction with the target causes the variable regions to adopt a single conformation. As a consequence, peptide aptamers can bind their targets tightly, with binding affinities comparable to those shown by antibodies (nanomolar range).

Peptide aptamer scaffolds are typically small, ordered, soluble proteins. The first scaffold,[23] which is still widely used,[32] is Escherichia coli thioredoxin, the trxA gene product (TrxA). In these molecules, a single peptide of variable sequence is displayed instead of the Gly-Pro motif in the TrxA -Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys- active site loop. Improvements to TrxA include substitution of serines for the flanking cysteines, which prevents possible formation of a disulfide bond at the base of the loop, introduction of a D26A substitution to reduce oligomerization, and optimization of codons for expression in human cells,.[32][33] Reviews in 2015 have reported studies using 12 [32] and 20 [34] other scaffolds.

Peptide aptamer selection can be made using different systems, but the most used is currently the yeast two-hybrid system. Peptide aptamers can also be selected from combinatorial peptide libraries constructed by phage display and other surface display technologies such as mRNA display, ribosome display, bacterial display and yeast display. These experimental procedures are also known as biopannings. Among peptides obtained from biopannings, mimotopes can be considered as a kind of peptide aptamers. All the peptides panned from combinatorial peptide libraries have been stored in a special database with the name MimoDB.[35][36]

Selection of Ligand Regulated Peptide Aptamers (LiRPAs) has been demonstrated. By displaying 7 amino acid peptides from a novel scaffold protein based on the trimeric FKBP-rapamycin-FRB structure, interaction between the randomized peptide and target molecule can be controlled by the small molecule Rapamycin or non-immunosuppressive analogs.


The Affimer protein, an evolution of peptide aptamers, is a small, highly stable protein engineered to display peptide loops which provides a high affinity binding surface for a specific target protein. It is a protein of low molecular weight, 12–14 kDa,[37] derived from the cysteine protease inhibitor family of cystatins.[38][39][40][41]

The Affimer scaffold is a stable protein based on the cystatin protein fold. It displays two peptide loops and an N-terminal sequence that can be randomised to bind different target proteins with high affinity and specificity similar to antibodies. Stabilisation of the peptide upon the protein scaffold constrains the possible conformations which the peptide may take, thus increasing the binding affinity and specificity compared to libraries of free peptides.

The Affimer protein scaffold was developed initially at the MRC Cancer Cell Unit in Cambridge then across two laboratories at the University of Leeds.[38][39][40][41] Affimer technology has been commercialised and developed by Avacta Life Sciences, who are developing it as reagents for research and therapeutic applications.



AptaBiD or Aptamer-Facilitated Biomarker Discovery is a technology for biomarker discovery.[42] AptaBiD is based on multi-round generation of an aptamer or a pool of aptamers for differential molecular targets on the cells which facilitates exponential detection of biomarkers. It involves three major stages: (i) differential multi-round selection of aptamers for biomarker of target cells; (ii) aptamer-based isolation of biomarkers from target cells; and (iii) mass spectrometry identification of biomarkers. The important feature of the AptaBiD technology is that it produces synthetic affinity probes (aptamers) simultaneously with biomarker discovery. In AptaBiD, aptamers are developed for cell surface biomarkers in their native state and conformation. In addition to facilitating biomarker identification, such aptamers can be directly used for cell isolation, cell visualization, and tracking cells in vivo. They can also be used to modulate activities of cell receptors and deliver different agents (e.g., siRNA and drugs) into the cells.


Aptamers can be used in:

  • Affinity reagents
  • Bioimaging probes
  • Biosensing[43][44][45]
  • Therapeutics, e.g. Pegaptanib.
  • Controlled release of therapeutics

Aptamers have also been against several viruses including influenza A and B viruses[46], Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)[46] and SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV)[46] in various experimental settings.

Antibody replacement[edit]

Aptamers have an innate ability to bind to any molecule they're targeted at, including cancer cells and bacteria. Bound to a target, aptamers inhibit its activity. Aptamers suffer from two issues that limit their effectiveness. Firstly, the bonds they form with target molecules are usually too weak to be effective,[citation needed] and second, they're easily digested by enzymes.

Adding an unnatural base to a standard aptamer can increase its ability bind to target molecules. A second addition in the form of a "mini hairpin DNA" gives the aptamer a stable and compact structure that is resistant to digestion, extending its life from hours to days.[citation needed]

Aptamers are less likely to provoke undesirable immune responses than antibodies.[citation needed]

Controlled Release of Therapeutics[edit]

The ability of aptamers to reversibly bind molecules such as proteins has generated increasing interest in using them to facilitate controlled release of therapeutic biomolecules, such as growth factors. This can be accomplished by tuning the affinity strength to passively release the growth factors[47], along with active release via mechanisms such as hybridization of the aptamer with complimentary oligonucleotides[48] or unfolding of the aptamer due to cellular traction forces[49].

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Mallikaratchy, Prabodhika (January 30, 2017). "Evolution of Complex Target SELEX to Identify Aptamers Against Mammalian Cell-Surface Antigens". Molecules. 22 (2): 215. doi:10.3390/molecules22020215. PMC 5572134. PMID 28146093 – via CUNY Academic Works.
  2. ^ Mills, DR; Peterson, RL; Spiegelman, S (July 1967). "An extracellular Darwinian experiment with a self-duplicating nucleic acid molecule". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 58 (1): 217–24. Bibcode:1967PNAS...58..217M. doi:10.1073/pnas.58.1.217. PMC 335620. PMID 5231602.
  3. ^ Cox, J. C.; Ellington, A. D. (2001). "Automated selection of anti-protein aptamers". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 9 (10): 2525–2531. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(01)00028-1. PMID 11557339.
  4. ^ Cox, J. C.; Rajendran, M.; Riedel, T.; Davidson, E. A.; Sooter, L. J.; Bayer, T. S.; Schmitz-Brown, M.; Ellington, A. D. (2002). "Automated acquisition of aptamer sequences". Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 5 (4): 289–29. doi:10.2174/1386207023330291. PMID 12052180.
  5. ^ Cox, J. C.; Hayhurst, A.; Hesselberth, J.; Bayer, T. S.; Georgiou, G.; Ellington, A. D. (2002). "Automated selection of aptamers against protein targets translated in vitro: From gene to aptamer". Nucleic Acids Research. 30 (20): e108. doi:10.1093/nar/gnf107. PMC 137152. PMID 12384610.
  6. ^ Neves, M.A.D.; O. Reinstein; M.Saad; P.E. Johnson (2010). "Defining the secondary structural requirements of a cocaine-binding aptamer by a thermodynamic and mutation study". Biophys. Chem. 153 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2010.09.009. PMID 21035241.
  7. ^ Baugh, C.; D. Grate; C. Wilson (2000). "2.8 angstrom crystal structure of the malachite green aptamer". J. Mol. Biol. 301 (1): 117–128. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3951. PMID 10926496.
  8. ^ Dieckmann, T.; E. Fujikawa; X. Xhao; J. Szostak; J. Feigon (1995). "Structural Investigations of RNA and DNA aptamers in Solution". Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 59: 13–81. doi:10.1002/jcb.240590703.
  9. ^ Potty, A.; K. Kourentzi; H. Fang; G. Jackson; X. Zhang; G. Legge; R. Willson (2009). "Biophysical Characterization of DNA Aptamer Interactions with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor". Biopolymers. 91 (2): 145–156. doi:10.1002/bip.21097. PMID 19025993.
  10. ^ Long, S.; M. Long; R. White; B. Sullenger (2008). "Crystal structure of an RNA aptamer bound to thrombin". RNA. 14 (2): 2504–2512. doi:10.1261/rna.1239308. PMC 2590953. PMID 18971322.
  11. ^ Darfeuille, F.; S. Reigadas; J. Hansen; H. Orum; C. Di Primo; J. Toulme (2006). "Aptamers targeted to an RNA hairpin show improved specificity compared to that of complementary oligonucleotides". Biochemistry. 45 (39): 12076–12082. doi:10.1021/bi0606344. PMID 17002307.
  12. ^ Liu, M.; T. Kagahara; H. Abe; Y. Ito (2009). "Direct In Vitro Selection of Hemin-Binding DNA Aptamer with Peroxidase Activity". Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 82: 99–104. doi:10.1246/bcsj.82.99.
  13. ^ Min, K.; M. Cho; S. Han; Y. Shim; J. Ku; C. Ban (2008). "A simple and direct electrochemical detection of interferon-gamma using its RNA and DNA aptamers". Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 23 (12): 1819–1824. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2008.02.021. PMID 18406597.
  14. ^ Ng, E.W.M; D.T. Shima; P. Calias; E.T. Cunningham; D.R. Guyer; A.P. Adamis (2006). "Pegaptanib, a targeted anti-VEGF aptamer for ocular vascular disease". Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 5 (2): 123–132. doi:10.1038/nrd1955. PMID 16518379.
  15. ^ Savory, N.; K. Abe; K. Sode; K. Ikebukuro (2010). "Selection of DNA aptamer against prostate specific antigen using a genetic algorithm and application to sensing". Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 26 (4): 1386–91. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.057. PMID 20692149.
  16. ^ Jeong, S.; S.R. Han; Y.J. Lee; S.W. Lee (2010). "Selection of RNA aptamers specific to active prostate-specific antigen". Biotechnology Letters. 32 (3): 379–85. doi:10.1007/s10529-009-0168-1. PMID 19943183.
  17. ^ Walsh, R.; M. DeRosa (2009). "Retention of function in the DNA homolog of the RNA dopamine aptamer". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 388 (4): 732–735. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.084. PMID 19699181.
  18. ^ Salamanca, HH; Antonyak MA; Cerione RA; Shi H; Lis JT (2014). "Inhibiting heat shock factor 1 in human cancer cells with a potent RNA aptamer". PLoS ONE. 9 (5): e96330. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...996330S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096330. PMC 4011729. PMID 24800749.
  19. ^ "Aptamers NeoVentures Biotechnology". www.neoventures.ca. Retrieved 2016-02-03.
  20. ^ Kimoto, M.; et al. (2009). "An unnatural base pair system for efficient PCR amplification and functionalization of DNA molecules". Nucleic Acids Research. 37 (2): e14. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn956. PMC 2632903. PMID 19073696.
  21. ^ Yamashige, R.; et al. (2012). "Highly specific unnatural base pair systems as a third base pair for PCR amplification". Nucleic Acids Research. 40 (6): 2793–2806. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1068. PMC 3315302. PMID 22121213.
  22. ^ Kimoto, M.; et al. (2013). "Generation of high-affinity DNA aptamers using an expanded genetic alphabet". Nat. Biotechnol. 31 (5): 453–457. doi:10.1038/nbt.2556. PMID 23563318.
  23. ^ a b Colas P.; Cohen B.; Jessen T.; Grishina I.; McCoy, J.; Brent, R. (1996). "Genetic selection of peptide aptamers that recognize and inhibit cyclin-dependent kinase 2". Nature. 380 (6574): 548–550. Bibcode:1996Natur.380..548C. doi:10.1038/380548a0. PMID 8606778.
  24. ^ Geyer, C. R.; Colman-Lerner, A.; Brent, R. (1999). ""Mutagenesis" by peptide aptamers identifies genetic network members and pathway connections". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96 (15): 8567–8572. Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.8567G. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.15.8567. PMC 17557. PMID 10411916.
  25. ^ Dibenedetto, S.; Cluet, D.; Stebe, P. N.; Baumle, V.; Léault, J.; Terreux, R.; Bickle, M.; Chassey, B. D.; Mikaelian, I.; Colas, P.; Spichty, M.; Zoli, M.; and Rudkin, B.B. (2013). "Calcineurin A versus NS5A-TP2/HD domain containing 2: a case study of site-directed low-frequency random mutagenesis for dissecting target specificity of peptide aptamers". Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 12 (7): 1939–1952. doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.024612. PMC 3708177. PMID 23579184.
  26. ^ Colas P.; Cohen B.; Ko Ferrigno, P.; Silver P. A.; Brent, R. (2000). "Targeted modification and transportation of cellular proteins". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97 (25): 13720–550. Bibcode:2000PNAS...9713720C. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.25.13720. PMC 17642. PMID 11106396.
  27. ^ Shu, W.; Laurenson, S.; Knowles, T. P.; Ko Ferrigno, P.; and Seshia, A. A. (2008). "Highly specific label-free protein detection from lysed cells using internally referenced microcantilever sensors". Biosens. Bioelectron. 24 (2): 233–237. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.036. PMID 18495468.
  28. ^ Ko Ferrigno, P. (2016). "Non-antibody protein-based biosensors". Essays Biochem. 60 (1): 19–25. doi:10.1042/EBC20150003. PMC 4986471. PMID 27365032.
  29. ^ Davis, J. J.; Tkac, J.; Humphries, R.; Buxton, A. T.; Lee, T. A.; Ko Ferrigno, P. (2009). "Peptide aptamers in label-free protein detection: 2. Chemical optimization and detection of distinct protein isoforms". Anal. Chem. 81 (9): 3314–3320. doi:10.1021/ac802513n. PMID 19320493.
  30. ^ Nolan G. P. (2005). "Tadpoles by the tail". Nat. Methods. 2 (1): 11–12. doi:10.1038/nmeth0105-11. PMID 15782163.
  31. ^ Spolar R. S.; Record M. T. Jr. (1994). "Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA". Science. 263 (5148): 777–784. Bibcode:1994Sci...263..777S. doi:10.1126/science.8303294. PMID 8303294.
  32. ^ a b c Reverdatto, S.; Burz, D. S.; and Shekthtman, A. (2015). "Peptide aptamers: development and applications". Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 15 (12): 1082–1101. doi:10.2174/1568026615666150413153143. PMC 4428161. PMID 25866267.
  33. ^ Bickel, M. B.; Dussere, E.; Moncorgé, O.; Bottin, H.; and Colas, P. (2006). "Selection and characterization of large collections of peptide aptamers through optimized yeast two-hybrid procedures". Nat. Protoc. 1 (3): 1066–1091. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.32. PMID 17406388.
  34. ^ Škrlec, K.; Štrukelj, B.; and Berlec, A. (2015). "Non-immunoglobulin scaffolds: a focus on their targets". Trends Biotechnol. 33 (7): 408–418. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.012. PMID 25931178.
  35. ^ Huang, J; Ru, B; Zhu, P; Nie, F; Yang, J; Wang, X; Dai, P; Lin, H; Guo, FB; Rao, N (2011-11-03). "MimoDB 2.0: a mimotope database and beyond". Nucleic Acids Research. 40 (1): D271–7. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr922. PMC 3245166. PMID 22053087.
  36. ^ "MimoDB: a mimotope database and beyond". immunet.cn. Retrieved 2016-02-03.
  37. ^ Roberts, Josh P. (2013). "Biomarkers Take Center Stage". GEN. 33.
  38. ^ a b Woodman R.; Yeh J.T.-H.; Laurenson S.; Ko Ferrigno P. (2005). "Design and Validation of a Neutral Protein Scaffold for the Presentation of Peptide Aptamers". J. Mol. Biol. 352 (5): 1118–1133. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.001. PMID 16139842.
  39. ^ a b Hoffmann T.; Stadler L.K.J.; Busby M.; Song Q.; Buxton A.T.; Wagner S.D.; Davis J.J.; Ko Ferrigno P. (2010). "Structure-function studies of an engineered scaffold protein derived from Stefin A. I: Development of the SQM variant". PEDS. 23 (5): 403–413. doi:10.1093/protein/gzq012. PMC 2851446. PMID 20179045.
  40. ^ a b Stadler L.K.J.; Hoffmann T.; Tomlinson D.C.; Song Q.; Lee T.; Busby M.; Nyathi Y.; Gendra E.; Tiede C.; Flanagan K.; Cockel S.J.; Wipat A.; Harwood C.; Wagner S.D.; Knowles M.A.; Davis J.J.; Keegan N.; Ko Ferrigno P. (2011). "Structure-function studies of an engineered scaffold protein derived from Stefin A. II: Development and Applications of the SQT variant". PEDS. 24 (9): 751–763. doi:10.1093/protein/gzr019. PMID 21616931.
  41. ^ a b Tiede C.; Tang A.A.; Deacon S.E.; Mandal U.; Nettleship J.E.; Owen R.L.; George S.E.; Harrison D.J.; Owens R.J.; Tomlinson D.C.; McPherson M.J. (2014). "Adhiron: A stable and versatile peptide display scaffold for molecular recognition applications". PEDS. 27 (5): 145–155. doi:10.1093/protein/gzu007. PMC 4000234. PMID 24668773.
  42. ^ Berezovski MV, Lechmann M, Musheev MU, Mak TW, Krylov SN (Jul 2008). "Aptamer-facilitated biomarker discovery (AptaBiD)". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (28): 9137–43. doi:10.1021/ja801951p. PMID 18558676.
  43. ^ Wei, Hui; Li, Bingling; Li, Jing; Wang, Erkang; Dong, Shaojun (2007-09-12). "Simple and sensitive aptamer-based colorimetric sensing of protein using unmodified gold nanoparticle probes". Chemical Communications. 0 (36): 3735–3737. doi:10.1039/B707642H. ISSN 1364-548X. PMID 17851611.
  44. ^ Cheng, Hanjun; Qiu, Xuefeng; Zhao, Xiaozhi; Meng, Wei; Huo, Da; Wei, Hui (2016-03-01). "Functional Nucleic Acid Probe for Parallel Monitoring K+ and Protoporphyrin IX in Living Organisms". Analytical Chemistry. 88 (5): 2937–2943. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04936. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 26866998.
  45. ^ Xiang, Yu; Lu, Yi (2011). "Using personal glucose meters and functional DNA sensors to quantify a variety of analytical targets". Nature Chemistry. 3 (9): 697–703. Bibcode:2011NatCh...3..697X. doi:10.1038/nchem.1092. PMC 3299819. PMID 21860458.
  46. ^ a b c Kumar, Binod; Khanna, Madhu; Meseko, Clement A.; Sanicas, Melvin; Kumar, Prashant; Asha, Kumari; Asha, Kumari; Kumar, Prashant; Sanicas, Melvin (January 2019). "Advancements in Nucleic Acid Based Therapeutics against Respiratory Viral Infections". Journal of Clinical Medicine. 8 (1): 6. doi:10.3390/jcm8010006. PMID 30577479.
  47. ^ Wang, Yong; Fan, Tai-Hsi; Shaw, Montgomery T.; Zhou, Jing; Soontornworajit, Boonchoy (2010-03-01). "Hydrogel functionalization with DNA aptamers for sustained PDGF-BB release". Chemical Communications. 46 (11): 1857–1859. doi:10.1039/B924909E. ISSN 1364-548X. PMID 20198232.
  48. ^ Battig, Mark R.; Soontornworajit, Boonchoy; Wang, Yong (2012-08-01). "Programmable Release of Multiple Protein Drugs from Aptamer-Functionalized Hydrogels via Nucleic Acid Hybridization". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 134 (30): 12410–12413. doi:10.1021/ja305238a. ISSN 0002-7863.
  49. ^ Stejskalová, Anna; Oliva, Nuria; England, Frances J.; Almquist, Benjamin D. (2019). "Biologically Inspired, Cell-Selective Release of Aptamer-Trapped Growth Factors by Traction Forces". Advanced Materials. 0: 1806380. doi:10.1002/adma.201806380. ISSN 1521-4095.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]